Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
The collection

Every essay — page 11

Page 11 of 23, continuing through the fields in the same order.

What cloth is Weaves Setting and geometry Knits and other structures Mechanics and drape Pattern and colour Compound and figured cloths After the loom Cloth doing a job

FieldsSeriesThreadsWeave indexRefutationsConceptsSearch

Mechanics and drape

Cloth as a mechanism rather than a material. The bias, the angle at which threads jam, and why a flat sheet cannot cover a sphere.

A cloth laid over a sphere. Every thread segment is exactly one pitch and none has stretched. What has changed is the angle at each crossing, and the amount is decided by the surface — a developable one costs nothing and a curved one costs more the further the cloth goes.

Shear locking in a composite preform

Laying a woven reinforcement over a mould is the bias mechanism doing useful work, and it stops dead at the angle where the threads jam. Where the cloth wrinkles is a geometric prediction with a radius attached.

6 figures · Bias What the drape coefficient answers to. The drape coefficient against the number of folds, and against how far the hem has come in. Over the range a real specimen shows, the fold count barely moves it; the hem radius moves it across almost its whole range.

A drape coefficient is one number for a directional thing

A fabric bends more easily one way than the other — a factor of two is ordinary. The drape test reports a single percentage, and the quantity that carries the directionality is the fold count, which the coefficient is almost blind to.

6 figures · Drape Wrinkles 127 mm apart. A 300 mm width of a 120 g/m² cloth whose bending length is 20 mm, held under 5 newtons per metre across it and compressed. It cannot carry the compression in the plane, so it leaves the plane, at a wavelength the bending rigidity and the tension settle between them: 127 mm, which is 2.4 wrinkles across the width. The amplitude is drawn and is not computed — this arithmetic sets the spacing and says nothing about the depth.

A cloth cannot carry a push

The net model that runs this site's mechanics has no bending stiffness at all, so it buckles under any compression whatever, into wrinkles of any wavelength whatever. What picks the wavelength is the competition the net leaves out — and the answer is a quarter power, which is why a wrinkle is so hard to change.

8 figures · Buckling The number the drape test does not record. A 150 mm specimen over a 90 mm pedestal, for fabrics from limp to stiff. The curve is the fold count the buckling argument predicts — three quarters of a power of the specimen's radius over its own bending length — and it runs from 2 folds to 11. The number beside each mark is the drape coefficient the same specimen would report, which moves by a few points across the whole range.

The nodes a drape test throws away

A drape test lays a circular specimen over a pedestal, photographs the shadow and reports one number. The specimen also falls into a definite number of folds, which is a buckling mode set by the fabric's own bending length — and the standard method observes it, does not record it, and reports the number it is least sensitive to.

7 figures · Buckling Everywhere a sheeting can go. Every state a sheeting of 28 × 26 threads per centimetre in 25 and 25 tex can reach without a yarn changing length, solved from Peirce's plain-weave geometry. The set is a curve and not a region: 4.03 per cent of extension is available along the warp, and reaching it costs 6.98 per cent of the width.

A cloth extends by moving its crimp

Everybody says the extension available along the warp is the warp's own crimp. On six of eight ordinary cloths it is not — a close sheeting has 14.61 per cent of warp crimp and reaches 4.03 per cent, because the limit lives in the weft.

6 figures · Tensile Everywhere a muslin can go. Every state a muslin of 24 × 22 threads per centimetre in 20 and 20 tex can reach without a yarn changing length, solved from Peirce's plain-weave geometry. The set is a curve and not a region: 6.59 per cent of extension is available along the warp, and reaching it costs 21.82 per cent of the width.

Pulled both ways, only one can give

A cloth at constant thread length has one degree of freedom, so its reachable states are a curve rather than a region. Equal extension in both directions meets that curve at exactly one point — the state the cloth is already in — so the amount available is nought.

7 figures · Tensile A ratio that will not hold still. The exchange rate between the two directions for 4 cloths, against how far each has been extended along the warp. Every curve is above one half everywhere it is drawn, and every curve rises — so a single number for a cloth's ratio has to name the state it was read at, which a material's ratio does not.

A cloth's Poisson ratio is not a material's

The ratio of a cloth's contraction to its extension has a name everywhere else in mechanics, and it breaks every rule the name comes with — above one half on all eight cloths measured, doubling across a four per cent span, and not reciprocal between the two directions.

8 figures · Tensile The shed in section. A warp line 1200 mm from the fell of the cloth at the left to the back rest at the right, with 8 shafts at 300 mm and every 16 mm behind it. Each shaft lifts its ends in proportion to its own distance from the fell, which is what gives the same 30 mm clear opening at the reed from every shaft. The resulting extension is 0.460 per cent at the front shaft and 0.722 per cent at the back, a ratio of 1.57. Vertical scale exaggerated 4 times.

The shed is an extension

Every model of a finished cloth treats a thread as inextensible, and every one of them is about a fabric that has left the loom. On the loom the warp is stretched thousands of times a minute by the shed itself, and the amount is exact trigonometry with nothing fitted in it: the square of the shed's tangent, times the shaft's own distance from the fell, over twice what is left behind it.

6 figures · Shed The strain across a harness. The warp strain each shaft of a 24-shaft harness puts into its own ends, from 0.460 per cent at the front to 1.728 per cent at the back. Shafts within a budget of 1.0 per cent are drawn in one colour and those outside it in another; the budget is reached at shaft 13.

The back shaft works hardest

How hard the loom is on a warp end is the product of two numbers from different worlds — how often its column changes sides, which is a property of a binary matrix with no millimetre in it, and the strain of the shaft it happens to be on, which is a property of a machine with no weave in it. Neither knows about the other, and the threading that joins them is a decision nobody makes on structural grounds.

6 figures · Shed Flexes per end in the same check, ground a pick along. One bar per warp end above the draft of the same check, ground a pick along, each the number of times that end changes sides in one repeat — which is the number of times the shed drags it through its heddle eye. The counts run from 6 to 10, and they are the same numbers that give the cloth its interlacing rate of 0.500 per intersection.

A figure is harder on its warp

Every basic weave flexes all its ends exactly as often as each other — plain, twill, satin and sateen alike, and it is a one-line theorem. Figure one of them on another and that evenness goes, or does not, depending on where the ground weave was started relative to the figure. The same invisible offset that decides whether a fine figure holds together decides, at a coarse one, how unevenly the loom works the warp.

7 figures · Shed The two calculations a yarn's stiffness admits. A bundle of 9 fibres bent with the fibres free to slide and with them locked together. Free, the rigidity is the sum of the fibres': 0.00141 N·mm² for a 30 tex cotton yarn. Locked, it is the fourth power of the yarn's own diameter: 0.689. The ratio is the fibre count over the square of the packing factor, 490, and nine fibres are drawn where the yarn has 176. What the drawing cannot show is where a real yarn sits between them, which is a question about friction rather than about fibre.

A yarn's stiffness is a bracket, not a number

Two calculations are available for how stiff a thread is in bending, and both are exact. One treats the fibres as free to slide and gives the sum of their stiffnesses; the other treats them as locked and gives a solid rod. They differ by the fibre count, which for an ordinary cotton yarn is a factor of five hundred — and no measurement of the fibre narrows it by anything at all.

6 figures · Yarn stiffness What a shed costs, in newtons. The tension the shed puts into one end at each shaft of a 24-shaft harness, for a 25 tex cotton yarn. The strain is set by the loom's geometry alone; the tension is that strain times the yarn's modulus. The front shaft holds 0.52 N and the back 1.95 N, which is 14 and 52 per cent of the yarn's breaking load. What the chart cannot show is the rest of the warp tension, which the let-off adds on top of all of these and which no geometry decides.

What the shed costs, in newtons

The shed's strain has been computed here and could not be priced: a strain is a length over a length and says nothing about how hard a thread is being pulled. A modulus turns it into a tension — and the back shaft of a twenty-four-shaft harness turns out to hold its ends at half their breaking load, all day, from the geometry alone.

6 figures · Yarn stiffness The load–extension curve, computed from a stiffness. The tension in one end of a sheeting against how far the cloth has been extended, computed as the slope of its bending energy along its own constant-thread-length locus. The curve passes through zero at the state of least energy, which is where an unloaded cloth sits, and rises either side of it. What the curve cannot show is what happens after the crimp runs out: past the end of the locus the load is carried by stretching yarn rather than by straightening it, and that is a modulus three orders of magnitude higher and a different figure.

The locus gets a force

This site has drawn the set of states a cloth can reach without stretching any yarn, and has never been able to say which of them it is in or what it would cost to move. Both questions are one derivative of a bending energy — and the answer explains the flat start every fabric's load–extension curve has, which is not slack yarn but a symmetry.

6 figures · Tensile A crossing before and after it is pressed. One warp end of a sheeting riding over three picks, drawn twice to the same scale. Unpressed, both sections are circles and the cloth is 0.388 mm thick. At 0.40 N per crossing the sections flatten to aspect ratios of 1.75 and 1.84, the cloth thins to 0.263 mm, and the warp runs flat for 0.109 mm over each pick before it begins to curve. What the drawing cannot show is why the cloth does not do this by itself: flattening shrinks the arc radius as well as the crimp height, so it costs bending energy, and a relaxed cloth keeps its threads round.

A flattened thread is a record of a force

A yarn in cloth is not round, and this site has modelled the flattening for as long as this collection has run with the amount of it left as a number somebody chose. Give the section a stiffness and ask what the cloth prefers, and the answer is a circle — at every stiffness, for every balanced cloth in the table. Flattening does not happen by itself; it happens because something pressed.

7 figures · Compression The bracket that closes and the bracket that does not. A 25 tex cotton yarn at a packing factor of 0.6. Its bending rigidity lies between 0.00117 N·mm² — the sum of its fibres', with them free to slide — and 0.478, a solid rod of its own diameter: a factor of 408, and both ends are derivations. Its resistance to being squashed out of round has an upper bound of the same kind, 369 N/mm² for a solid section, and no lower bound at all, because fibres free to slide resist a change of shape with nothing. That is why the aspect ratio of a flattened yarn has been a free parameter here since the setting field was built: a quantity bounded below by zero cannot be estimated from its bounds, and has to be measured.

The stiffness with no lower bound

A yarn's bending rigidity lies between two derivable ends and the ratio is the fibre count — wide, but closed. Its resistance to being squashed out of round has an upper bound of the same kind and a lower bound of exactly nothing, because fibres free to slide resist a change of shape with nothing at all. That is why nobody could ever compute the aspect ratio of a flattened thread.

7 figures · Compression How much too thick a round section is, and what reconciles it. For each cloth in the standard cloth table: the thickness a circular Peirce section predicts, the thickness a cloth of that construction measures, and the force per crossing that makes the flattened model reproduce the measurement. The over-prediction runs from 36% to 81%. The reconciling forces span a factor of 4.6 across a table whose counts span a factor of six, and every one of them is of the order of the contact force the cloth's own warp tension supplies — which is what makes this a model rather than eight fitted parameters. What the rows cannot show is that the thicknesses are trade figures for cloths of these constructions rather than measurements of these particular fabrics, so what is being read is an ordering.

The relaxed cloth's contact force

How hard two threads press on each other in a cloth that is not being pulled is the number this site's own integrity criterion has needed since its first essays, and the route to it was an elastica nobody had. A thickness gauge supplies it instead — because a cloth's thickness is a record of how flat its threads are, and how flat they are is a record of how hard they are pressed.

6 figures · Compression A sheeting's crossing, dry and wetted. One crossing of a sheeting in section at three swellings: dry, at the swelling where its geometry has its last state, and fully wetted at 20%. The closure condition is that the two systems' crimp heights add to the cloth's thickness, and each can supply at most the height it reaches when its straight portion has just vanished. Swelling raises the demand in proportion and the supply more slowly, so the margin closes and then goes negative — at 9.29% for this cloth against cotton's 20%. The bottom panel is drawn as far as the threads reach and no further, because there is no state to draw. What the drawing cannot show is what happens instead, which is that the yarn is compacted.

The swelling a cloth cannot take

Three of the eight cloths in this collection's table have no wet state at all. A thread of fixed length cannot wrap a partner that has grown by a fifth, so the closure condition fails and the geometry has nothing to offer. What happens instead costs megapascals, and the alternative route is not merely dearer but unavailable — the thread would break first.

6 figures · Compression Cotton and viscose in every column this site carries. The two cellulosic fibres compared across every constant on this site. Both are cellulose at 1.52 g/cm³, both are given a modulus of 8 GPa and a fineness of 1.7 dtex, so a 20 tex yarn of either has the same diameter to the last figure — and therefore the same crimp, the same cover, the same jamming sett and the same bending bracket. Every geometric result on this site is the same number for the two fibres. Water separates them twice: viscose swells 1.75 times as far across and loses half its strength where cotton gains a tenth. What the table cannot show is why, which is a question about how cellulose is arranged inside a fibre and is not in this collection.

Water tells two fibres apart

Cotton and viscose are the same material by every constant this collection carries. Same density, same modulus, same fineness, so the same diameter at every count and the same crimp, cover, jamming sett and bending bracket. A wash separates them by a factor of two, and it is the only thing here that can.

7 figures · Yarn stiffness The poplin's two budgets as it is held stretched. What is left of a poplin's interchange in each direction as it is held at more and more warp strain. The warp's budget falls to nothing at 3.93%, which is the point of the curve; the weft's rises, because the crimp the warp gives up is crimp the weft takes on. There is one locus and one position on it, so the two are not two quantities that happen to be related — they are the two distances from one point to the two ends of one curve. The consequence is that a pre-tensioned cloth has almost no warp recovery left and more weft recovery than it started with. What the plot cannot show is that the exchange rate between them is not constant: the curve is not a straight line, and its slope is the Poisson ratio this site computes elsewhere.

A cloth has one budget for two directions

A woven cloth looks as though it carries two independent reserves of free extension, one along the warp and one across the weft. It carries one. There is a single curve of states and a single position on it, so every hundredth spent one way is refunded the other — which means a pre-tensioned cloth has not used its recovery up, it has moved it.

6 figures · Tensile Elastic recovery against strain, for seven fibres. The elastic recovery of seven fibres at the strains it is reported at: extend to a stated strain, unload, read the strain returned immediately. Each fibre's points are joined and the line stops where the measurements stop, which is the point of the figure — a fibre strained past the last point on its own line is a fibre this collection declines to answer for. Nothing here is measured below one per cent of strain, and a woven cloth just past its own interchange budget is at a thread strain of a few hundredths, so the region that matters most for a fabric is the region nobody has reported. Recovery falls monotonically for every fibre, which is what lets the unmeasured region be bracketed between the lowest measured value and one rather than extrapolated. What the plot cannot show is the delayed recovery, which is excluded by the convention and is largest for the fibre with the best reputation for recovering.

Recovery is measured and nothing predicts it

A fibre's stiffness is a bracket whose ends can be computed. What fraction of a strain it gives back is not: it has to be looked up, the tables are thin, they stop exactly where a fabric needs them, and the most attractive explanation for the ordering they show turns out to have no signal in it at all.

7 figures · Yarn stiffness What a tensioned sheeting has left of its load. A sheeting pulled to a strain, clamped at that length and left. Its length does not change, and its load does: crossings rearrange locally until the load has fallen to what friction alone can hold, which is 0.0756 N per end and is the same number whatever the cloth was pulled to. So the fraction retained is that floor over the load applied, and it falls — a cloth tensioned to 4.94 per cent keeps 29 per cent of what it was given. Below the resting band's own edge nothing is lost at all, because the cloth was never outside what friction could hold. What the plot cannot show is time: nothing here says how long the rearrangement takes, only where it stops.

A tensioned cloth loses its load

Clamp a fabric at a fixed length and its tension falls overnight. Nothing crept and nothing flowed: the crossings rearranged locally until the load had dropped to what friction alone can hold, and that level is the same number whatever the cloth was pulled to — so the harder it was tensioned, the smaller the share it keeps.

6 figures · Set Eight fibres through one cloth, and the bracket that hides them. A muslin is 19 per cent fibre and the rest air, so its thermal conductivity is a two-phase mixture, and how the fibre and the air are arranged is not something any amount of knowing the fractions settles. What is settled is Wiener's pair of bounds: heat across a series arrangement sees the harmonic mean and along a parallel one sees the volume average, and every real arrangement lies between. Each bar here is one fibre's whole band, from the series bound at its lowest published conductivity to the parallel bound at its highest. Not one of the eight clears any other, so this model cannot tell wool from nylon in a fabric — and the same cloth at twice the thickness has twice the resistance, exactly. Air's own conductivity is marked, and every band sits within a fifth of it.

Warmth is a thickness of air

A fabric is a tenth fibre and the rest air, so its thermal conductivity is a mixture of the two — and the pair of bounds that any mixture must lie between comes out narrower than the difference between wool and nylon. The model cannot tell one fibre from another in a cloth. What it can tell, exactly and with no bracket at all, is that twice the thickness is twice the warmth.

6 figures · Insulation The crossings under a 25 mm² presser foot. A 25 mm² foot on a muslin covers 12 ends and 11 picks, which is 132 crossings — and a first guess treats those as 132 chances of finding a thick place. They are not independent chances. Every crossing along one end shares that end's diameter, so the largest crossing is the largest end plus the largest pick, and the number of tries is 23: the threads. Each cell here is shaded by its own two diameters, and the darkest is at the meeting of the darkest row and the darkest column, which is what that identity looks like. The gauge rests on it and reads 0.431 mm, against 0.342 for the cloth's mean crossing — 26% over.

A thickness is a maximum, not a mean

A presser foot rests on whatever is highest beneath it, so the thickness of a fabric is an extreme value — and an extreme grows with how much cloth is asked. The standard specifies the foot's area because the foot's area is in the answer.

7 figures · Compression A bundle is weaker than the threads it is made of. Threads pulled in parallel do not break together. The weakest goes first and hands its load to the rest, which are now carrying more than they were, so the bundle's peak load is reached before every thread is at its own strength. With a load per surviving thread of x carried by the fraction that has not yet broken, the bundle's strength per thread is the largest value of x(1 − F(x)) — Daniels' maximum, which for a lognormal at CV 15% is 0.7380 of the mean thread, reached with 93% of the threads still unbroken. A simulated bundle that knows none of that arithmetic sits above the limit at every finite size — its strength is a maximum over the sample it happens to have drawn — and closes on it as the bundle grows: 0.753, 0.744, 0.741 at the last three sizes. The scatter falls the other way, from 14.5% at one thread to 0.7% at 1600.

A bundle is weaker than its threads

Threads pulled together do not break together. The weakest goes first and hands its load to the rest, so a bundle carries its maximum well before every thread is at its own limit — and the shortfall is a quarter, decided by the spread and by nothing else.

7 figures · Tensile