The collection

Every essay — page 10

Page 10 of 19, continuing through the fields in the same order.

What cloth is Weaves Setting and geometry Knits and other structures Mechanics and drape Pattern and colour Compound and figured cloths After the loom Cloth doing a job

Fields Series Threads Weave index Refutations Concepts Search

Mechanics and drape

Cloth as a mechanism rather than a material. The bias, the angle at which threads jam, and why a flat sheet cannot cover a sphere.

Cotton and viscose in every column this site carries. The two cellulosic fibres compared across every constant on this site. Both are cellulose at 1.52 g/cm³, both are given a modulus of 8 GPa and a fineness of 1.7 dtex, so a 20 tex yarn of either has the same diameter to the last figure — and therefore the same crimp, the same cover, the same jamming sett and the same bending bracket. Every geometric result on this site is the same number for the two fibres. Water separates them twice: viscose swells 1.75 times as far across and loses half its strength where cotton gains a tenth. What the table cannot show is why, which is a question about how cellulose is arranged inside a fibre and is not in this collection.

Water tells two fibres apart

Cotton and viscose are the same material by every constant this collection carries. Same density, same modulus, same fineness, so the same diameter at every count and the same crimp, cover, jamming sett and bending bracket. A wash separates them by a factor of two, and it is the only thing here that can.

7 figures · Yarn stiffness

The poplin's two budgets as it is held stretched. What is left of a poplin's interchange in each direction as it is held at more and more warp strain. The warp's budget falls to nothing at 3.93%, which is the point of the curve; the weft's rises, because the crimp the warp gives up is crimp the weft takes on. There is one locus and one position on it, so the two are not two quantities that happen to be related — they are the two distances from one point to the two ends of one curve. The consequence is that a pre-tensioned cloth has almost no warp recovery left and more weft recovery than it started with. What the plot cannot show is that the exchange rate between them is not constant: the curve is not a straight line, and its slope is the Poisson ratio this site computes elsewhere.

A cloth has one budget for two directions

A woven cloth looks as though it carries two independent reserves of free extension, one along the warp and one across the weft. It carries one. There is a single curve of states and a single position on it, so every hundredth spent one way is refunded the other — which means a pre-tensioned cloth has not used its recovery up, it has moved it.

6 figures · Tensile

Elastic recovery against strain, for seven fibres. The elastic recovery of seven fibres at the strains it is reported at: extend to a stated strain, unload, read the strain returned immediately. Each fibre's points are joined and the line stops where the measurements stop, which is the point of the figure — a fibre strained past the last point on its own line is a fibre this collection declines to answer for. Nothing here is measured below one per cent of strain, and a woven cloth just past its own interchange budget is at a thread strain of a few hundredths, so the region that matters most for a fabric is the region nobody has reported. Recovery falls monotonically for every fibre, which is what lets the unmeasured region be bracketed between the lowest measured value and one rather than extrapolated. What the plot cannot show is the delayed recovery, which is excluded by the convention and is largest for the fibre with the best reputation for recovering.

Recovery is measured and nothing predicts it

A fibre's stiffness is a bracket this collection can compute the ends of. What fraction of a strain it gives back is not: it has to be looked up, the tables are thin, they stop exactly where a fabric needs them, and the most attractive explanation for the ordering they show turns out to have no signal in it at all.

7 figures · Yarn stiffness $What a tensioned sheeting has left of its load. A sheeting pulled to a strain, clamped at that length and left. Its length does not change, and its load does: crossings rearrange locally until the load has fallen to what friction alone can hold, which is 0.0756 N per end and is the same number whatever the cloth was pulled to. So the fraction retained is that floor over the load applied, and it falls — a cloth tensioned to 4.94 per cent keeps 29 per cent of what it was given. Below the resting band's own edge nothing is lost at all, because the cloth was never outside what friction could hold. What the plot cannot show is time: nothing here says how long the rearrangement takes, only where it stops.$

A tensioned cloth loses its load

Clamp a fabric at a fixed length and its tension falls overnight. Nothing crept and nothing flowed: the crossings rearranged locally until the load had dropped to what friction alone can hold, and that level is the same number whatever the cloth was pulled to — so the harder it was tensioned, the smaller the share it keeps.

6 figures · Set $Eight fibres through one cloth, and the bracket that hides them. A muslin is 19 per cent fibre and the rest air, so its thermal conductivity is a two-phase mixture, and how the fibre and the air are arranged is not something any amount of knowing the fractions settles. What is settled is Wiener's pair of bounds: heat across a series arrangement sees the harmonic mean and along a parallel one sees the volume average, and every real arrangement lies between. Each bar here is one fibre's whole band, from the series bound at its lowest published conductivity to the parallel bound at its highest. Not one of the eight clears any other, so this model cannot tell wool from nylon in a fabric — and the same cloth at twice the thickness has twice the resistance, exactly. Air's own conductivity is marked, and every band sits within a fifth of it.$

Warmth is a thickness of air

A fabric is a tenth fibre and the rest air, so its thermal conductivity is a mixture of the two — and the pair of bounds that any mixture must lie between comes out narrower than the difference between wool and nylon. The model cannot tell one fibre from another in a cloth. What it can tell, exactly and with no bracket at all, is that twice the thickness is twice the warmth.

6 figures · Insulation

The crossings under a 25 mm² presser foot. A 25 mm² foot on a muslin covers 12 ends and 11 picks, which is 132 crossings — and a first guess treats those as 132 chances of finding a thick place. They are not independent chances. Every crossing along one end shares that end's diameter, so the largest crossing is the largest end plus the largest pick, and the number of tries is 23: the threads. Each cell here is shaded by its own two diameters, and the darkest is at the meeting of the darkest row and the darkest column, which is what that identity looks like. The gauge rests on it and reads 0.431 mm, against 0.342 for the cloth's mean crossing — 26% over.

A thickness is a maximum, not a mean

A presser foot rests on whatever is highest beneath it, so the thickness of a fabric is an extreme value — and an extreme grows with how much cloth is asked. The standard specifies the foot's area because the foot's area is in the answer.

7 figures · Compression $A bundle is weaker than the threads it is made of. Threads pulled in parallel do not break together. The weakest goes first and hands its load to the rest, which are now carrying more than they were, so the bundle's peak load is reached before every thread is at its own strength. With a load per surviving thread of x carried by the fraction that has not yet broken, the bundle's strength per thread is the largest value of x(1 − F(x)) — Daniels' maximum, which for a lognormal at CV 15% is 0.7380 of the mean thread, reached with 93% of the threads still unbroken. A simulated bundle that knows none of that arithmetic sits above the limit at every finite size — its strength is a maximum over the sample it happens to have drawn — and closes on it as the bundle grows: 0.753, 0.744, 0.741 at the last three sizes. The scatter falls the other way, from 14.5% at one thread to 0.7% at 1600.$

A bundle is weaker than its threads

Threads pulled together do not break together. The weakest goes first and hands its load to the rest, so a bundle carries its maximum well before every thread is at its own limit — and the shortfall is a quarter, decided by the spread and by nothing else.

7 figures · Tensile $Where a 20 tex yarn breaks, against how much was clamped. A tensile test clamps a length of yarn and pulls until the thinnest section between the clamps gives. So a yarn's strength is a minimum, and a minimum depends on how many independent tries the sample contains. The tries are not sections — a plane can be taken anywhere — but staple lengths, because two planes closer together than one fibre share most of their fibres. At 28 mm staple a 100 mm specimen holds 3.6 independent tries and a 500 mm one holds 17.9, and the longer test reads 11% lower. The spread is not fitted either: it is the evenness floor at 118 fibres times an index of 1.35, which is 13.4%.$

A yarn breaks at its thinnest place

A tensile test does not measure a yarn. It measures the worst section between the clamps — so evenness and strength are one measurement taken twice, and the number of independent tries in a specimen is set by the length of a fibre.

6 figures · Assembly

Where the strain goes, at a 25° twist. Extend a twisted yarn and the fibres in it are not all strained alike. If each stays at its own radius — the affine model — a fibre at helix angle θ takes cos²θ of the yarn's strain, so the fibre on the axis takes all of it and the fibre at the surface takes 82.1% of it. The core reaches its breaking extension first and the yarn cannot realise its own fibres. If instead every fibre migrates between the core and the surface, every fibre has the same mean strain and they all break together. The two are exactly computable — 0.8214 against 0.9509 of what the fibres could give — and the ratio between them, 2/(cos α(1 + cos α)) = 1.158, is what migration is worth. The shading is that arithmetic and the two panels use the same scale.

A straight fibre cannot share the load

Extend a twisted yarn and its fibres are not all strained alike: the one on the axis takes the whole of it and the one at the surface takes cos²α. So they do not break together, and what a wandering fibre is worth comes out as one expression with nothing fitted in it.

6 figures · Migration

The pressure a 23° twist puts on its own fibres. A twisted yarn squeezes itself. Every fibre under tension at a radius pulls inward with sin²θ of its tension per unit length, and integrating outward to the surface — where the pressure is zero by definition, because there is nothing outside to push against — gives p(r) = ½σ(cos²θ(r) − cos²α) in closed form. At a surface angle of 23° the pressure on the axis is 7.6 per cent of the core fibre's own axial stress and the mean over the section is 3.61 per cent of it. The shading is that closed form and the curve is the same function plotted; the shape is what matters, and its one uncompromising feature is the zero at the edge. The outermost fibres are held by nothing, which is why a yarn is hairy, why a surface fibre is the one that comes away on a finger, and why singeing changes a yarn's behaviour out of all proportion to the mass it removes.

What grips the end of a fibre

A twisted yarn squeezes itself, and the squeeze holds the fibre ends in. Write the slip and the break out side by side and the fibre's own strength cancels — and so does the load on the yarn — leaving a gripped length that depends on fineness, friction and the twist and on nothing else.

6 figures · Migration

The singles inside a ply are not the singles

Folding leaves each single with a fraction of its own twist, which should ruin its grip on its own fibres. It does not, because the ply's helix presses on the singles exactly as a single's helix presses on its fibres — and across the whole practical range the two very nearly cancel.

6 figures · Ply

Which end of the bracket a thread in cloth is at. A yarn bends as a solid rod while its fibres cannot slide and as a loose bundle once they can, and the crossover is a curvature: the coherent state demands an axial force in the outer fibre that has to be built up by friction under the twist's own radial pressure. The curves are the crossover radius against twist at four contact efficiencies, the top one being 1.0 — the claim that fibres touch along their whole length, which nobody makes. The rule at the bottom is the radius a thread is bent to by its own crimp in a cloth, about 0.25 mm. Every curve is above the rule by at least 19-fold, so a thread in cloth is at the free end of its bracket at every twist and every efficiency, and the collection's habit of using the lower bound is a result rather than a convention.

Twist decides where in the bracket

A yarn's bending rigidity can only be bracketed, and the bracket is three hundred wide. What decides where a yarn sits in it is whether its fibres can slide — and for a thread bent by its own crimp in a cloth, the answer is not close.

6 figures · Yarn stiffness $Two exponents in a compression curve. How far a flat plate sinks into plain, 2/2 twill, satin 8 in sheeting, against the pressure it is applying, on logarithmic axes where a power law is a straight line. The measured slopes over the light end of the range are 0.50 for the plain, 0.67 for the 2/2 twill, 0.67 for the satin 8 — against two thirds predicted for any weave carrying a float and one half for a weave carrying none. The prediction is one line of algebra: pressure is a stiffness times a strain times a bearing fraction, the bearing fraction is a square root of depth for a plateau and linear in it for a point, so the pressure is the three-halves power in the first case and the square in the second. Nothing is fitted to produce it; the slopes are measured afterwards and compared. At the heavy end every curve bends, because the crowns have merged and the cloth has stopped being a surface and started being a solid — which is a different regime with a different law, and it belongs to the compaction of a fibre mass rather than to the geometry of an interlacement.$

A cloth compresses along its own bearing curve

A fabric's pressure–thickness curve is always fitted with an empirical power law and the exponent is reported without explanation. It is not empirical. At light loads it is two thirds for any weave carrying a float and one half for a weave carrying none, and the two numbers come out of one line of algebra with nothing fitted in it.

6 figures · Compression

A thickness is a property of the pressure it was measured at. What a gauge reports for sheeting against the pressure it presses with. At 1 kPa it reads 0.382 mm, which is the cloth; at 0.02 kPa it reads 0.555 mm, which is the cloth plus 87 µm of hair on each face. The difference is 31% of the reading and it is not a compressibility: nothing in the fabric has been squashed, the foot has simply stopped in a different place. That is why every thickness standard specifies its pressure to two figures, and why comparing a thickness from one standard with a thickness from another is comparing two different measurements of two different objects. The dashed line is the cloth's own geometric thickness, which no reading below the crossover ever reaches.

A compression curve is two laws in series

A published fabric compression exponent is a fitted number with no derivation attached, and this site has already said why: the range it is fitted over straddles two regimes. One of them turns out not to be in the cloth at all.

7 figures · Compression

Warmth is a canopy, and a canopy grows as a logarithm. Thermal resistance of sheeting against how much its hair population has been multiplied by raising, both faces counted. The unraised cloth is given no still air at all, because its hairs cannot reach one another — n_A λ² is under one and there is no canopy to hold air still. Past the threshold the canopy's depth is λ·ln(n_A λ²), so every doubling of the hair population adds the same depth of nap and no more: the steps here are 434 µm apiece, all the way up. At 256× the nap is 3.07 mm deep and worth 39 times the cloth it grows on, which is the whole reason a flannel is warm and a poplin of the same yarn is not — a canopy is two parts in ten thousand fibre, so its conductivity is air's, while the cloth itself is a quarter fibre. What is claimed is a conduction resistance across a depth of nearly still air; whether the air is still is a question about flow and is not asked here.

Warmth is mostly the hairs

This collection established that a fabric's thermal resistance is its thickness and not its fibre, and that twice the thickness is twice the warmth. It never asked what the thickness was made of. On a raised cloth almost none of it is cloth.

6 figures · Insulation

Where a loop's bending actually is. Half a stitch — from the crown of a needle loop's head to the bottom of the next sinker loop — with the curvature at every station drawn as a spine standing off the curve, in units of one over the yarn diameter. The centre line is drawn as a line rather than at the yarn's own width here, because the subject of this figure is the curvature and a yarn drawn at true width covers its own spines. The peak is 1.00, at 28% of the way along, and the curvature varies smoothly from one end to the other with no jump anywhere. That smoothness is the whole point: Peirce's construction joins an arc of constant curvature to a straight line of none, so its bending moment steps at the join, and a step in moment is a point force no thread can carry. An elastica has no steps in it, which is why its forces exist at all and his do not.

A thread between two crossings is an elastica

Every crossing force Peirce's thread path can give comes from a tension, and a cloth on a table has none. What presses its threads together there is their own unwillingness to be bent — and recovering that needs a shape nobody had, because a path assembled from an arc and a straight line has a bending moment that jumps.

6 figures · Elastica

A force is what an energy does when a crossing moves

The force a thread presses its neighbour with is the rate its bending energy changes as the crossing is displaced. Solved as a constrained minimisation, that number arrives with the shape rather than after it — and the same force, recovered a second time from the curve's own equilibrium, agrees to a tenth of a per cent.

6 figures · Elastica

How hard a relaxed fabric presses on itself. The normal force at one crossing of a relaxed cloth, against the force at one interlacing of a relaxed jersey. The woven figures were recovered by inverting a thickness measurement through a compression energy; the knitted one comes from a solved shape and no measurement at all, so the two are genuinely independent rather than two readings of one number. Every cloth in the table presses harder than the knit — by between 5 and 22 times — and the knitted figure is an upper bound besides. One ratio is behind a list of differences usually explained separately: which fabric gives up a fibre end, which pills, which frays, which lets a seam slip.

What a loop presses with

A knitted loop hangs on the loop below it and presses on it with a force nobody has been able to state. Solved from the loop's own bending it comes to about forty millinewtons a stitch — an order of magnitude under a woven crossing's, by two independent routes that have nothing in common.

6 figures · Elastica

What a loop model still cannot say

A planar rod with a natural curvature and point contacts gets a knit's forces, its modulus and its extension. It does not get torsion, it does not get the third dimension the interlacing actually needs, and it does not stop adjacent courses passing through one another — which is why its extension ceiling sits three times beyond any jersey.

6 figures · Elastica

What a knit gives when it is pulled. Force against course-wise extension for a 20 tex cotton jersey at a 3.5 mm loop, computed from the loop's own bending with the relaxed shape as the yarn's natural one. The loop length is the same at every point on the curve: nothing here is the yarn stretching. It reaches 92% extension at 2.96 N per metre and then stiffens by a factor of 85 over the rest of the range, as the straight line between two interlacings runs up against the yarn between them. This is the number the collection's second phase recorded as a lower bound it could not compute, and it is still a lower bound in one respect: friction at the contacts is not in it, so a real fabric is stiffer than this and does not come back along the same curve.

The modulus a knit has instead of one

A fabric's stiffness in extension is usually its yarn's modulus with the geometry taken out. A knit's is not: dimensionally it can only be a bending rigidity over a length cubed, and the same yarn laid straight and parallel is thirty thousand times stiffer than the fabric made of it.

6 figures · Knit

How hard a fabric is to bend, per unit width. Bending rigidity in micronewton metres per unit width, computed the same way for eight woven cloths and for a jersey in each of its two directions: the yarn's own rigidity, times the length of yarn per unit area, times the fourth power of the cosine of the angle each element makes with the bending direction. The knit lands inside the band of the woven cloths rather than below it, which is worth knowing because a knit is usually called the softer fabric. It is not softer to bend; it is softer to stretch, by three decades. What it does have is direction: 2.17 to one between its two axes, where a balanced plain weave is near one, and the soft axis is the one a jersey rolls about at its top and bottom edges.

A knit bends more easily along its courses

A jersey is not a soft fabric to bend. Computed the same way as this collection's woven cloths it lands inside their band, at the limp end — and the useful number is not the magnitude but the direction: two point two to one between its two axes, with the soft one being the axis it rolls about.

6 figures · Knit

What friction has to hold in a relaxed knit

A knit's bending energy slopes away from the fabric everybody measures, so something is holding it there. Along its courses friction holds comfortably. Along its wales the driving force is exactly the contact force, so the whole balance collapses to one condition — the friction coefficient must exceed a half — and no yarn in this collection reaches it.

6 figures · Friction

A knitted loop is a plane curve in a plane that is not the fabric's. A relaxed 20 tex jersey at a 3.5 mm loop, seen from the end of a course. Each course is a straight line because it is one: a half period leaves and arrives along the course direction, so the plane it bends in contains that direction, and a plane curve seen along a line in its own plane projects to a segment. The upper panel expands the thickness 3× so the arrangement can be seen and no angle may be measured off it; the lower panel is the same fabric at one scale, where the tilt is what it really is. The angle is 11.75°: a climb of one yarn diameter, 0.167 mm, against a drop of a course spacing and a diameter, 0.803 mm. Successive courses overlap by exactly one diameter, which is the interlacing, and the fabric is therefore 0.334 mm thick — two yarn diameters, with nothing fitted.

A loop is a plane curve in another plane

A knitted loop was solved as a flat curve because two curves in one plane cannot pass through one another and a loop must. Letting it out of the plane turns out to change nothing about its shape: the loop is still planar, and its plane is the fabric's turned through twelve degrees.

6 figures · Elastica

What leaving the plane costs

Every number the flat loop model produced, beside the same number with the climb in it. Four of the five fall, none moves by four per cent, and the estimate that priced the third dimension beforehand had the sign the wrong way round for a reason worth naming.

6 figures · Elastica