Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
The collection

Every essay — page 12

Page 12 of 19, continuing through the fields in the same order.

What cloth is Weaves Setting and geometry Knits and other structures Mechanics and drape Pattern and colour Compound and figured cloths After the loom Cloth doing a job

FieldsSeriesThreadsWeave indexRefutationsConceptsSearch

Pattern and colour

A draft is a periodic plane pattern with two states, so the symmetry is two-coloured. Colour order, and the things the eye reliably gets wrong.

What a figure costs in shafts. Two families of block designs in 8-end satin on 8-end sateen at blocks of 8. One repeats three block-columns however wide it gets and costs 24 shafts at every width from 24 to 120 ends. The other gives every block-column a different pattern and costs 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 shafts as it grows — exactly 8 more per new column. Shafts are counted as distinct columns of the composite matrix.

What a figure costs the loom

A block design's shaft count does not depend on how wide the figure is, or how deep, or how many blocks it has. It depends on how many *different* block-columns it has, and each new one costs exactly one repeat of the ground weave — 8 shafts, then 16, then 24, in a straight line with no slope to fit.

7 figures · Blocks The staircase a woven outline is. Four straight edges on a block grid, stepping 1 across in 1, 1 across in 2, 2 across in 1, 1 across in 4. Each tread is one repeat of 8-end satin, which at 24 by 22 threads per centimetre is 3.33 mm across and 3.64 mm up. A jacquard hook at 140 cm width is 1.17 mm, so the machine resolves 2.9 times finer than the cloth can use.

A woven outline is a staircase

A jacquard's resolution is quoted as its hook count, and on a 1,200-hook machine 140 cm wide that is a step of 1.17 mm. The cloth cannot use it. A figure's smallest feature is one repeat of the ground weave, which on an eight-end satin is 3.33 mm — so the machine resolves nearly three times finer than the fabric can hold, and a finer machine buys nothing at all.

7 figures · Blocks The block condition, one half at a time. Every block shape from 8×8 down, for 8-end satin figured on 8-end sateen, each an exhaustive census of all 65,536 four-by-four profiles. The bar is split: the dark part is figures that separate with a thread left loose on the face, and the light part is figures that separate with nothing visible wrong. Shapes satisfying the block condition in one direction only are marked, and none of them has a light part at all. What the chart cannot show is why: the census is exhaustive and the theorem behind it is not proved here.

A rectangular block is not half a rule

The block rule was proved for square blocks and the rectangular case was recorded as not run, on the grounds that a block a repeat wide and half a repeat deep satisfies only half the condition. Running it turns up two things: half the condition rules out the failure nobody can see, and a block turned through a right angle is a different design — which a square census cannot notice, because a square block is its own transpose.

6 figures · Blocks Everything the relative origin decides. Each of six quantities computed from a weave matrix, swept over all 64 relative origins of 8-end satin figured on 8-end sateen. A quantity that takes one value across the sweep is a gauge freedom of the pair; one that takes several is something a designer chooses without knowing it. longest float takes 2 values; interlacing rate takes 2 values; weft-face fraction takes 3 values. The origins fall into 3 different partitions, so the moving quantities are not all decided by the same number. What the table cannot show is the census over all 65,536 profiles, which is a seventh column, and the one that showed the origin decides whether the cloth holds together.

What else the relative origin decides

Where two weaves start relative to each other decides whether the cloth holds together, and it has a second consequence beside that. Two is what a search finds when it looks twice. Sweeping every origin against every measure of the cloth turns up a third — the longest float, which is the one property a weaver actually looks at — and turns up an earlier figure caption that says the opposite.

7 figures · Blocks The step between a figure and its ground. Three figures on a plain ground, all in one sheeting's threads at its own setts. A thread presses on the thread it crosses only where it turns, and it turns at its interlacings — so the pressing a region receives per unit area is the contact force at one turn times the turns per unit area, and the second factor is a property of the matrix exactly. A five-end satin turns two fifths as often as a plain weave, is pressed two fifths as hard, flattens less, and stands 55 µm proud of it. What the rows cannot show is that both regions are given a plain weave's weave angle: a satin's crimp is genuinely smaller and its turns genuinely gentler, so the real step is larger than this, by an amount not computed here.

A figured cloth has a step in its surface

A damask is one cloth in one set of threads at one sett, and it is not flat. A thread presses on the thread it crosses only where it turns, so a region that turns less often is pressed less often, flattens less and stands thicker — and the step is a ratio of interlacing rates, read off the matrix with no yarn property in it.

6 figures · Blocks A spread shading on 8 ends. The 7 tone steps of a spread shading on an 8-end repeat, each built by adding one more coset of the 8-end satin with move 3. Every coset has exactly one mark in every end and every pick, so the fraction of warp on the face is k over 8 exactly at every step, with no averaging in it. The numbers beneath are the longest float, and they run 7, 3, 3, 1, 3, 3, 7 — so the lustre scale is not the tone scale. The midtone is a plain weave and the extremes are satins, which is why a spread shading is at its most matt exactly in the middle. What the drafts cannot show is the surface: a long float stands proud of a short one, so an evenly toned shading is not an even surface either.

A shading changes two things at once

The tone steps of a shaded damask are exactly even — each adds one satin coset, so the fraction of warp on the face is k over n with no averaging in it. The lustre steps are not even at all: on eight ends the longest float runs 7, 3, 3, 1, 3, 3, 7, so a series that grades smoothly in tone is at its most matt exactly in the middle.

8 figures · Shading A 40-by-40 motif on a poplin, drawn and finished. A motif 40 ends wide and 40 picks tall, at the setts the reed and the take-up were set to, and the same motif measured on the finished cloth. Point paper has one cell per end and per pick, so a motif's proportions are the ratio of the two setts — and both setts move in the finishing, in opposite directions. On the poplin the aspect changes by a factor of 0.8429, so a circle drawn as a circle at the loom's numbers comes back 15.7% out of round and a designer who wants a circle must draw an ellipse of 1.1863. What the drawing cannot show is that the correction is not a property of the design: it belongs to the cloth, so the same card woven on a different construction is a different shape.

A motif is drawn at the wrong shape on purpose

Point paper has one cell per end and per pick, so a design's proportions on the cloth are the ratio of the two setts. Both setts move in the finishing and they move in opposite directions, so a circle drawn as a circle comes back out of round — by three per cent on a balanced cloth and by sixteen on a warp-dense one.

7 figures · Pattern Two layers of one cloth, against how they happen to lie. Two identical muslins laid over one another and slid across each other by one thread spacing. In register the pair passes 37.9 per cent — as much as one cloth, because every hole is over a hole — and it falls linearly to 12.5 per cent before rising again at the next thread. The rule everybody uses is that two layers pass the product of their open areas, which is 14.3 per cent. That number is the average of this curve over all offsets, exactly — an identity, not a fit — and it is the answer at two points on it and nowhere else. Nothing about a real pair of layers is at its average, and the openness varying from place to place across a folded cloth is what a moiré is.

Two layers are the product on average and nowhere

Everybody knows what two layers of a cloth pass: the product of their open areas. That figure is exactly right — it is the mean of the true answer over every way the two layers can lie — and it is the answer at two registrations out of a continuum. In register a doubled cloth is as open as a single one; half a thread out it can be shut completely. The variation across a folded curtain is what a moiré is.

6 figures · Opacity How open a batiste is, against where the light is. One minus the cover is a cloth's openness to a light directly behind it, and for this batiste it is 40.1 per cent. Move off the normal and a line of sight has to clear the hole at the top of the cloth and the same hole one thickness below, so what it can use falls as t·tan α is taken off each side — reaching nothing at 39.0° across the ends. Averaged over the whole sky with Lambert's cosine weighting, the cloth is 6.42 per cent open — 6.3 times less than the covering rule says, and the whole of the difference is the thickness. One minus the cover is the openness of a cloth with no thickness, and no cloth has none.

Opacity is not cover

The covering rule counts a thread as a bar that stops everything, and a single fine cotton thread held to a window plainly does not. What a cloth transmits is the open area plus whatever comes through the threads, so the covered fraction is a lever rather than a barrier — and the lever is longest exactly where the rule says the cloth is most closed. Nothing here computes a thread's transmittance, and saying why is the useful half.

6 figures · Opacity The same error twice: scattered, and in a period. Two bands of 96 ends, drawn at spacings that differ from the reed's by the same root-mean-square amount — 6% of a dent, which is 25 µm. The upper band's errors are independent; the lower band's repeat every 8 ends, which is what one shaft set forward or one dent of the reed too wide produces. The displacement is drawn 8 times over scale, because at true scale it is half a pixel and both bands are picket fences; the arithmetic below it is at the true amplitude. The upper band reads as an even cloth with a little texture in it and the lower one has stripes, and nothing about the eye is needed to say why: at 96 ends the periodic arrangement is 7.7 times stronger at its own frequency than the scattered one is at any frequency, and over the 256 ends a buyer takes in at once it is 12.8. The ratio grows as the square root of how much cloth is looked at, which is why a fault-finding sweep is done at a distance rather than close up.

A random error hides and a periodic one shows

A warp whose threads vary by fifteen per cent looks perfectly even. One dent of the reed a tenth of a millimetre wide makes a streak that gets the piece rejected. The same amount of error, arranged two ways — and the ratio between them is √(2n/π), with nothing fitted in it.

7 figures · Variation One weft fault at three periods, a fraction of a millimetre apart. A 260 mm slice of a 1500 mm cloth at 22 picks per centimetre, 220 picks deep, with a thick place recurring along the weft. Each pick takes a whole width of yarn, so the marks land 35 to a pick across the full width and step sideways by the remainder of the width divided by the fault's period. On the left that remainder is zero and every thick place in the piece falls in the same columns — a warp-way stripe made entirely by a weft fault. In the middle the period is five hundredths of a millimetre longer and the same fault draws steep diagonals. On the right it is a third of a millimetre longer again, the marks land nowhere near each other, and the fault reads as texture. Nothing about the yarn distinguishes the three; the cloth's width does. The slice is drawn rather than the whole width because thirty-five marks a pick fill a panel solid at any step but zero, which is a true picture of a dense pattern and a useless one of its structure.

A slub finds the width of the cloth

A thick place recurring along a weft yarn does not make a bar. It makes diagonals — and when the cloth's width happens to be a whole number of fault periods, it makes stripes down the piece instead, from a fault that is entirely in the weft.

6 figures · Moire How much of a 20 tex yarn's unevenness survives being woven. Weaving averages, and the averaging is a square root. A patch of cloth 3 mm across contains 7.2 warp threads and as many picks, each contributing its own mass independently, so the patch's coefficient of variation is 3.53% against the yarn's 13.4% — a reduction of 3.8-fold. The rule at the top is the yarn's own figure. The curve steepens past the staple length, where a patch starts to contain independent samples along each thread as well as across them, and the second regime is the one a large area of cloth is judged in.

A cloth cannot be more even than its yarn

It can be very much more even than its yarn, and by exactly the square root of the threads in view. Which raises a question the fineness argument left open — and the answer is that at a fixed cloth weight the count cancels out entirely.

6 figures · Variation A damask's figure and ground trade places when the cloth is turned. A satin 8 figure on a sateen 8 ground in sheeting — one cloth, one set of threads, one sett, and the ground is the figure's own complement. Their total specular areas are within a few per cent of one another, so neither is intrinsically the brighter. What differs is the direction: the figure's crowns run with the warp and the ground's with the weft. So the contrast between them is 2.0-to-one with the light coming from 8° and 0.47-to-one from 90° — it reverses, exactly, a quarter turn apart. That is what makes a damask visible in one colour, and it is not the step in its surface: the step is fifty micrometres and returns no light at all under a diffuse illumination, while this contrast is a factor of 2.0 and is present whenever there is a direction in the light.

A figure shows by its shine, not its step

A damask is one cloth in one colour and its pattern is plainly visible. This collection attributed that to the step in its surface — fifty micrometres of relief, computed from the interlacing rates. The step is real and returns almost no light. What makes the figure visible is that its crowns run at right angles to the ground's, so the two trade places when the cloth is turned.

7 figures · Blocks A yarn's diameter is a contour, not a length. The fraction of the space beside a 20 tex cotton yarn that is occupied by hair, against height, grossed up from the modelled population by the measured split between the long and short populations. At the yarn's own surface it is 8.9% — the layer is almost entirely gap — and it falls away exponentially from there. Every instrument that reports a yarn diameter is picking a contour of this curve, and the contours are far apart: a threshold that needs half the space filled is never met at all, one that needs a twentieth is met at 355 µm, and a hair counter triggers out at 2353 µm. The earlier model gave the layer a single thickness of 25 µm, which is a fair description of where most of the material is and wrong about its extent by more than a decade. What the curve cannot say is which contour any particular instrument uses, which is a fact about the instrument.

A cloth is more opaque than it is closed

Opacity is not cover — this collection established that already and left the discrepancy attributed to the thickness of the threads. Part of it is not in the threads at all. A hair standing in a hole blocks light exactly as well as a thread does and costs nothing in air.

6 figures · Opacity A slack twisted yarn takes a coil of one size. A 20 tex cotton at 1400 turns a metre. Its own torque is 2.060 µN·mm at the free bound, and a rod under tension T is stable while its torque stays under 2·√(B·T). Below that tension the straight state stops being a minimum and the thread wraps on itself at a radius of 0.91 mm. That radius is 2B/M, which is 2/(r·ω) once the torque is written out: it depends on the twist and on the ratio of the two stiffnesses, and on neither stiffness itself.

A crepe is a yarn that will not lie still

A crepe cloth's pebbled surface is the yarn's own torque acting on a cloth that cannot resist it. The instability that makes a slack yarn snarl says how large the pebbles should be, and the answer is a millimetre — which is what a crepe looks like.

6 figures · Variation Twist is not torsion: a straight rod, twisted. A rod drawn with a cross painted along it, and the cross turned through 2 full turns from one end to the other. The rod is straight, so it has no Frenet frame at all — a straight line has no osculating plane to turn. The two discs above are the rod's ends seen down its own axis, which is where the twist is an angle rather than a foreshortened wiggle. The twist is the rotation of the painted cross about the rod's own tangent, and it is 2 turns whatever the centre line does. That is the quantity a torsional rigidity resists, and it is why a collection that solved a plane curve had not thereby dealt with torsion.

A shadow stripe is two twists

A cloth striped in one colour, where the stripe is visible only because alternate bands are spun the other way round. The pattern is carried entirely by which way the fibres lie on the yarn's surface, and it disappears when the light moves.

6 figures · Stripe The surface of an 8-end shading. The height of the cloth's own surface at each tone of an 8-end shading, for the two chains, on a sheeting at 0.50 N in the end. A thread presses on the thread it crosses only where it turns, so a region that turns more often is pressed more often and finishes thinner — and firmness rises towards the midtone of a shading. The spread chain therefore sinks 84 µm between its ends and its midtone and the consecutive chain 43 µm, with 2 of its steps at exactly one thickness against the spread chain's 0. The tone scale is level by construction and the surface under it is not. What the plot cannot show is the light: a step in the surface reads as a line under a raking beam whatever the tone is doing, which is why a relief nobody specified is visible at all.

A tone ramp is a valley, and the satin digs it

A shading's tone is exact and its lustre is measured; its thickness is neither, and nobody specifies it. A firmer weave is pressed harder at every crossing and finishes thinner, so an eight-end shading sinks eighty-four micrometres between its ends and its midtone — about a third of the cloth's whole thickness, on every cloth tried. Build the same chain on a twill instead of a satin and the sag is exactly nothing.

7 figures · Shading The cyclic decomposition of a 4-end repeat. A 4-end repeat split into 4 parts, each with exactly one warp mark in every end and every pick, drawn above with each intersection numbered by the part it belongs to. That object is a Latin square, and it is what a shading actually requires: a tone step is a union of parts, so it has exactly k marks in every end and pick and its tone is k over 4 exactly. This is the cyclic square, which is what a satin's cosets write — and at four and six ends there is no satin, so the same square has to be reached through a twill instead. The drafts below are the tone steps in the best order this square admits, whose longest floats run 3, 1, 3. What the drawing cannot show is that the numbering is arbitrary: relabelling the parts gives the same square and a different chain, which is exactly the freedom the order is chosen out of.

A tone step does not need a satin

Every account of shading builds its tone steps out of satin cosets, and at four ends and at six there is no satin to build them from. The construction was never about satins: what a tone step actually needs is that every end and every pick carry the same number of marks, which makes a chain of them a Latin square. A four-end repeat has twenty-four of those and a six-end repeat 1,128,960.

7 figures · Shading One tone of an 8-end cell, arranged three ways. The same 32 marks in the same 8 × 8 cell, placed three ways, with the number of marks in each end printed beneath it. On the left the clustered dot a halftone screen makes: 4 of its threads carry every mark or none, so they never leave a face, and the criterion reports 16 separable layers rather than one cloth. In the middle a cloth built from the tone step by moving 2 marks sideways within their own picks — every pick still carries 4, the ends run 3 to 5, and that difference is a warp stripe of 25.0% contrast the design did not draw. On the right the tone step: every end and every pick at exactly 4. What the drawing cannot show is how visible the middle one's stripe is, which depends on the sett and on the viewing distance and is not computed here.

A weave is a halftone screen with n greys

An eight-by-eight cell of dots gives a printer sixty-five levels of grey. The same cell in cloth gives seven. Sixteen of the missing fifty-eight go to the requirement that every thread reach both faces and forty-two go to the requirement that every thread carry the same number of marks — so evenness, not interlacing, is what a weave pays for its tone scale.

6 figures · Shading A colour order against a 2/2 twill. The visible face of a 2/2 twill under 2 colour orders, drawn at the repeat the divisor arithmetic allows and outlined at the repeat the surface has. A filled cell is a dark thread on the face, which is the warp's colour where the warp is up and the weft's where it is not — so none of these patterns is in the draft, and the draft is the same in all of them. The colour period and the weave repeat beat exactly as a reed's grouping beats against a weave: the surface repeats on the least common multiple of the two, which here is 8×8 and 4×4. What the panels cannot show is colour: the two threads are drawn as filled and empty, and two colours of similar value make a pattern far weaker than this.

A colour order beats the weave it is threaded on

The reed's grouping beats against the weave repeat and the arithmetic is a least common multiple. A colour order is a second grouping of the same warp and the arithmetic is identical — but where the reed's beat is a fault to be dented out of a cloth, the colour order's beat is the pattern the cloth is sold for. Across 472 colour orders on four weaves the divisor bound is the surface's exact repeat in 470 or more, and the handful that beat it have no pattern left at all.

7 figures · Moire The magnification a cloth will carry. The largest magnification a moiré can be read at, against the irregularity of the cloth making it. The points are measured: a grating whose spacings are drawn from a seeded lognormal is laid against a perfect one, the fringes are found from the phase difference, and the gain is recorded at which their count first departs from what the ideal beat predicts. The product of the irregularity and that gain comes out at 0.82 to 0.84 across every irregularity tried, so the ceiling is 0.84 divided by the coefficient of variation — the solid curve. The dashed curve is the accumulated-wander model, in which position errors random-walk and the ceiling goes as the inverse square; it is wrong by a factor of 42 at a two per cent irregularity. What the plot cannot show is what a cloth's spacing irregularity actually is: it has not been measured, and the curve is therefore a prediction with an unmeasured input.

A moiré is a vernier, and it magnifies the error too

Two gratings a per cent apart in pitch beat at a hundred pitches, so a moiré reads a pitch difference at a hundred times — which is what a vernier is. The magnification is free and its ceiling is not: the fringes split when one thread's own spacing error reaches 0.84 of the pitch difference the beat is built on, so the usable gain is 0.84 divided by the cloth's coefficient of variation, inversely and not inverse-squarely. At an ordinary yarn's spacing irregularity, a moiré carries a magnification of five.

6 figures · Moire The warp floats across a tone edge on 8 ends. 2 strips of point paper, each one repeat of a tone on either side of a straight edge between picks, with the edge ruled and every warp float of the greatest length that crosses it drawn along its thread. Ground the exact complement: tones of 7 and 1 marks per end (cosets 1 to 7 against coset 0), not nested, and the longest warp float across the edge is 8 against 7 inside either tone. Ground one pick along: tones of 1 and 7 marks per end (coset 1 against cosets 1 to 7), nested, and the longest warp float across the edge is 7 against 7 inside either tone. A float drawn in the warning colour is longer than anything either tone has on its own. What the strips cannot show is the cloth: the edge here is one intersection wide, and in a woven piece the two tones take up yarn differently, so the change is spread over threads that point paper draws as belonging wholly to one side or the other.

A damask's edge floats further than its figure

Figure and ground in a damask carry the same longest float, which is true of both areas and false along the line between them. A float can cross the edge where two tones meet, and when one tone's marks lie inside the other's it can never be longer than a float either tone already has. A damask built as an exact complement is the one place in n that its ground can start which breaks this, and it floats n picks at its edge against n − 1 inside.

8 figures · Shading Two layers in depth, and the beat perspective makes. An eye, a near grid and a far grid of the same pitch, with a ray from the eye to every bar of the far grid and a dot where each ray crosses the near one. The far bars land on the near layer at 8 to every 9, so the two grids drift out of register and back into it every 8 bars: in register the gaps line up and light comes through, half-way between them the far bars sit in the near gaps and block it. That spacing is the distance divided by the gap, times the pitch, and nothing about the threads or the angle between the layers enters it. The gap here is drawn at one eighth of the distance so the bars can be counted; two sheers 50 mm apart seen from 3 m are at a gain of 60. What the drawing cannot show is a real layer's thickness and its own irregular spacing, both of which the arithmetic treats as absent.

Two sheers make a moiré that walks with the viewer

Hang two identical sheer curtains a few centimetres apart and a moiré appears with no angle between them and no difference in their threads. Perspective alone makes the far one look finer. The fringes are p·V/D apart, which means they cover the same angle from every distance; they move one for one with a person walking past, which is the parallax of the horizon; and a far layer stretched by one per cent makes them vanish at exactly one distance, which says which layer is coarser and by how much.

7 figures · Moire Seeing through a white voile, from the street and from the room. How much of a scene's contrast survives a white voile, whose open area is 49%, looked through from the street into the room and from the room out to the street, against how much brighter the street is than the room. The scene comes through the clear lines of sight and nothing else; everywhere else the viewer sees thread lit from the viewer's own side, which returns light with no image in it. On a bright day, a hundred times brighter outside, 0.5% of the room's contrast reaches the street and 65% of the street's reaches the room. At equal light both are 28% — the curves cross at a ratio of one whatever the cloth — and with the lamps on after dark the room is the side on show, at 63%. What the plot cannot show is the threads' own optics: their reflectance and transmittance are assumed values for a white sheer rather than measurements, and only the crossing point is independent of them.

A sheer hides whichever side is darker

A net curtain hides a room by day and shows it at night, and the cloth has nothing to do with which. What a viewer sees through a sheer is an image through its clear lines of sight against a veil of lit thread, and the only thing that decides their balance is how much brighter one side is than the other. At equal light the two views are identical for every cloth there is. And a black sheer of the same openness shows twelve times more of the room by day than a white one.

6 figures · Opacity