Percolation — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Nonwovens, and what holds them together instead
A web of fibres laid down at random has no repeat, so the exact test for whether a fabric holds together has nothing to work on. What replaces it is a threshold, and the threshold is sharp.
A filter cloth has two jobs
Hold the soil back and pass the water. The first wants a close sett and the second wants an open one, so a filter cloth is not a fabric but an interval — one that is sometimes a single sett wide, and for a fine enough soil is empty. The empty case is the useful one, because it says the answer is not a woven cloth at all.
Milling holds the cloth a second time
This site's integrity criterion returns exactly the same answer for a melton as for the loose twill it was woven as, and it is right both times. What has changed is that a second network now holds the fabric together, made of migrated fibre rather than of thread crossings — and it is the one that decides whether a cut edge frays.
A ridge in the matrix is not a ridge in the cloth
A 2/2 twill's crowns join into a ridge across its matrix and a 2/2 hopsack's are islands, so a thin film on the twill should be continuous from the first gram and on the hopsack a scatter of patches. Laid on the cloth's own surface rather than its matrix, both films are patches — the twill's ridge crosses from one end to the next, and between two ends lies the gap the sett leaves. On a sheeting both join at the same depth, 116 grams into the 186 that flatten the face, and the weave's whole influence is a window of up to 27 grams at the setts where it opens at all.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
NonwovenSettThresholdAdd-onBearing curveCloth integrityCoatingCoverCrown lineFeltingFibre migrationFibre network