Third system — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The third index is not a repeat
The fancy weaves left three-dimensional weaving open as a possible fifth escape from the binary matrix. It is not one. The criterion that decides whether a plain weave is one cloth decides a five-layer preform unchanged — and what a third dimension actually takes away is periodicity, because a thickness has a top and a bottom and a repeat does not.
Pile is a third thread system
Velvet, corduroy, plush and carpet all carry threads that are not woven into the ground in the ordinary sense. Two of the three systems make a perfectly good matrix and the third is not in it — so the encoding this whole site rests on has nothing to say about the part of the fabric a hand actually touches.
Hair, nap and pile are one construction
This site now has three surfaces made of fibre standing off a cloth, arrived at from three different directions and in three different fields. They are the same object at three settings, and what separates them is not what they are but how much of them anybody decided.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Cloth integrityConnectivityPileRepeatAnchorageBinderCanopy criterionCanopy depthHair layerIntegrityNapPreform