Preform — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The crimp is the price of being cloth
A woven reinforcement is bought for stiffness along its fibres, and the usual explanation of what it gives up — fibre content, lost to the crimp — has the sign wrong. At a given thickness a woven fabric holds slightly more fibre than two flat plies of the same tows. What the crimp costs is stiffness, and the float length is the knob.
A fabric to fill and a fabric to load
A reinforcement has to hold as much fibre as possible and still let a resin through it, and the two demands are the same decision pulling opposite ways. Both bounds are computable, the interval between them narrows as the square of the part, and past a certain size it is empty — which is the most useful thing the arithmetic says.
The third index is not a repeat
The fancy weaves left three-dimensional weaving open as a possible fifth escape from the binary matrix. It is not one. The criterion that decides whether a plain weave is one cloth decides a five-layer preform unchanged — and what a third dimension actually takes away is periodicity, because a thickness has a top and a bottom and a repeat does not.
Shear locking in a composite preform
Laying a woven reinforcement over a mould is the bias mechanism doing useful work, and it stops dead at the angle where the threads jam. Where the cloth wrinkles is a geometric prediction with a radius attached.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Fibre volume fractionSpecificationTowBinderCloth integrityConnectivityCoverCrimpDrapeFloat lengthGaussian curvatureInfusion