Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
Concept

Propagation — where it appears

A failure running on from where it started, as a tear does thread by thread or a knitted ladder does loop by loop. Whether it runs or stops is decided by what happens at the crack tip, which in a cloth is a question about grip rather than about toughness.

Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

One break, two outcomes. The same single break in a knit and in a weave. In the knit nothing holds the loop above the break, so the failure climbs the wale; in the weave every other thread is still held by the threads crossing it, and one thread comes loose.

Ravel, fray and run

Cut a woven cloth and one thread comes loose. Break one loop in a knit and every loop above it follows. The two structures fail in opposite ways, and the reason is topology rather than strength.

knits · Knit A cloth does not mind a hole. Strength left after a hole, against the width of the hole, for a woven cloth and for a film of the same width. The cloth's threads carry their own load, so it loses exactly the threads the hole removes and the loss is linear. The film is a continuum, so a hole of any size at all costs it the stress concentration factor — quoted from Kirsch's elasticity solution, not derived here — and the size of the hole does not enter.

A cloth does not mind a hole

A hole in a film costs it two thirds of its strength whatever the hole's size, because a continuum concentrates stress at an edge. A cloth's threads carry their own load and hand almost nothing to their neighbours, so a hole costs exactly the threads it removes — a loss that is linear in the hole, independent of the sett, and zero for a slit along the load.

applied · Damage A tear breaks threads or pulls them out. The grip a cloth has on a thread at the tip of a tear, against the sett, with the thread's own strength drawn across. Below the line the thread slides and the yarns group, which is the trade's explanation of why a loose weave tears well; above it the thread breaks where it is and grouping never happens. The essay that asked it could not compute this: it needed a friction, and the fancy weaves supplied one.

A tear stops where the grip is

This collection asked whether a loose weave tears better and had to answer that the geometry could not say — it supplies a grip count and a slack, and neither is a force. The fancy weaves brought a friction. With it the question has an answer — a cloth's threads slide up to a computable sett and break above it — and a ripstop grid has a bound with no free parameter in it.

applied · Damage What a tear asks for is the weakest of a few. A tensile test pulls every thread in the width and averages them. A tear pulls the handful in the triangle at the tip of the cut, and what lets it move is whichever of those is weakest — so the quantity that governs is the minimum of a small sample, and two things follow that no mean can show. Its expectation is below the mean: at CV 15% the weakest of 4 is 0.853 of the mean thread, and the weakest of 40 is 0.718. And its scatter is enormous compared with a tensile test's: 10.9% against the 0.75% a mean of four hundred threads would show. A tear strength that varies by a tenth between specimens of the same cloth is not a badly run test. It is the only answer an extreme of four can give.

A tear asks fewer threads than a pull

A strip test averages a hundred threads and a tear interrogates four. That difference alone accounts for the two things everybody knows about tear testing — that it reads low, and that it scatters — without anything about the cloth being different between the two tests.

applied · Damage

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

FrayingFrictionLadderingNet sectionSelvedgeSpecificationStress concentrationTear strengthAreal densityCapstanCoefficient of variationDirection

All concepts