Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
Concept

Net section — where it appears

The strength left after material is removed, counted in a cloth as the threads a hole severs rather than as a stress concentration at its edge. Counting threads rather than integrating a stress is what makes a cloth different from a plate, and it is why a fabric does not mind a hole.

Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A cloth does not mind a hole. Strength left after a hole, against the width of the hole, for a woven cloth and for a film of the same width. The cloth's threads carry their own load, so it loses exactly the threads the hole removes and the loss is linear. The film is a continuum, so a hole of any size at all costs it the stress concentration factor — quoted from Kirsch's elasticity solution, not derived here — and the size of the hole does not enter.

A cloth does not mind a hole

A hole in a film costs it two thirds of its strength whatever the hole's size, because a continuum concentrates stress at an edge. A cloth's threads carry their own load and hand almost nothing to their neighbours, so a hole costs exactly the threads it removes — a loss that is linear in the hole, independent of the sett, and zero for a slit along the load.

applied · Damage A tear breaks threads or pulls them out. The grip a cloth has on a thread at the tip of a tear, against the sett, with the thread's own strength drawn across. Below the line the thread slides and the yarns group, which is the trade's explanation of why a loose weave tears well; above it the thread breaks where it is and grouping never happens. The essay that asked it could not compute this: it needed a friction, and the fancy weaves supplied one.

A tear stops where the grip is

This collection asked whether a loose weave tears better and had to answer that the geometry could not say — it supplies a grip count and a slack, and neither is a force. The fancy weaves brought a friction. With it the question has an answer — a cloth's threads slide up to a computable sett and break above it — and a ripstop grid has a bound with no free parameter in it.

applied · Damage A cloth loses its strength long before it loses its mass. Rubbing a 2/2 twill in sheeting down, plotted against how much of its own solid volume has gone. The lower curve is the fraction of the plan the rubbing is touching; the upper is the fraction of the warp's section that has been cut away. They are wildly different because the wear is spread and the damage is concentrated: material comes off the whole surface, but it comes off every thread at the same place, and a thread breaks at its thinnest place. At one per cent of the mass gone the section is already 5% smaller. That is why a fabric that looks barely worn fails a strength test, and why abrasion resistance measured as mass loss and abrasion resistance measured as residual strength are two different quantities that are quoted as one.

A cloth loses its strength before its mass

Rub a fabric and it sheds material from all over its surface, but it sheds it from every thread at the same place — and a thread breaks at its thinnest place. So the strength gone is always several times the mass gone, the ratio is computable from the bearing curve, and it is worst for the weave whose crowns are points.

applied · Damage

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

PropagationSpecificationAbrasionAreal densityBearing curveCapstanCrown lineDamageDirectionFrayingFrictionLaddering

All concepts