Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
Concept

Selvedge — where it appears

The woven edge of a piece of cloth, where the weft turns back, and where the waste of a bias layout is concentrated. It is invisible to a repeat, which is why the number of cloths a draft describes depends on what happens at the edge and not only in the middle.

Named by 12 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

One break, two outcomes. The same single break in a knit and in a weave. In the knit nothing holds the loop above the break, so the failure climbs the wale; in the weave every other thread is still held by the threads crossing it, and one thread comes loose.

Ravel, fray and run

Cut a woven cloth and one thread comes loose. Break one loop in a knit and every loop above it follows. The two structures fail in opposite ways, and the reason is topology rather than strength.

knits · Knit Where a bias cut's waste actually is. A bolt of cloth with panels placed at a stated angle, the ones that fit drawn and the rest of the cloth left shaded. Identical panels at a single angle tile the plane exactly, so the interior of the bolt loses nothing at all and the whole of the waste is at the two selvedges. The inset is the single-panel bounding box, which is the picture the usual account of bias cutting draws.

The bias cut and the selvedge

A bias-cut square costs exactly twice its own area, and every other shape costs more. That is an exact result about one panel — and it is not where a cutting room's waste comes from, because identical panels at one angle tile the plane. The loss is at the two selvedges, so it falls as the cloth gets wider, which no account in terms of the diagonal can explain.

applied · Cutting A cloth does not mind a hole. Strength left after a hole, against the width of the hole, for a woven cloth and for a film of the same width. The cloth's threads carry their own load, so it loses exactly the threads the hole removes and the loss is linear. The film is a continuum, so a hole of any size at all costs it the stress concentration factor — quoted from Kirsch's elasticity solution, not derived here — and the size of the hole does not enter.

A cloth does not mind a hole

A hole in a film costs it two thirds of its strength whatever the hole's size, because a continuum concentrates stress at an edge. A cloth's threads carry their own load and hand almost nothing to their neighbours, so a hole costs exactly the threads it removes — a loss that is linear in the hole, independent of the sett, and zero for a slit along the load.

applied · Damage A tube. A two-layer fabric 6 ends wide in each layer, with the weft's path drawn across the section below the draft. 1 piece of cloth, 0 free selvedges, 1 shuttle, and a developed width of 12 ends however the edges are joined. The connectivity of the infinite repeat is 2 for this draft and cannot tell this construction from the others.

A tube and two cloths are the same draft

Two separate fabrics, a cloth twice the width of the loom and a seamless tube are the same draft to the last square. The check this site is built on reports two layers for all three and is right every time — because the thing that separates them is four free selvedges, or two, or none, and a repeat has no selvedges in it.

fancy · Double cloth The same fault in the warp and in the weft. A 50 m piece 1500 mm wide, with a 3-thread fault in each direction. The width is drawn 9.3 times over scale so that the piece is a rectangle rather than a line, and the two faults are drawn as marks rather than at their own widths, which at this scale are a fifth of a pixel. They have the same cause size — 3 threads — and they condemn 0.063 m² and 0.0020 m² respectively, a ratio of 31 to one, because a warp fault runs the length of the piece and a weft fault runs its width. That ratio is the aspect ratio of the piece and nothing else, so it is a property of how cloth is made rather than of what went wrong. It is why a broken end stops the loom and a mispick often does not, and why the two faults are priced by every grading scheme as though they were different kinds of thing.

A missing end is a fault the length of the piece

A broken end and a mispick are the same size of accident — one thread — and they condemn areas that differ by a factor of thirty. The ratio is the aspect ratio of the piece and nothing else, which makes it a fact about how cloth is made rather than about what went wrong.

applied · Faults A repeat across a 1800-end warp. Four repeat widths laid across the same 1800-end warp, drawn at the warp's own scale. The pale bands at the two ends are the selvedge threading, 24 ends each, which weaves its own firmer weave and is not part of the design. Between them the body is ruled into whole repeats, alternating so they can be counted, and the marked bands at the two sides are the remainder — the part of a repeat that did not fit, split between the two selvedges because the trade centres the pattern. None of these four repeats divides the body exactly, and the leftovers run from 2 to 24 ends. What the drawing cannot show is what the break looks like: a quarter of a repeat at the selvedge reads as a border and half of one reads as a mistake, and where the line between those falls is a judgement.

A repeat has to fit the width

A repeat tiles the plane and a warp has two edges, so somewhere between them a repeat is cut through. The set of repeat widths that divide a warp exactly is the set of divisors of its body, and a body of a few thousand ends has a few dozen — two to eight per cent of the candidates. So a designer choosing a repeat for any reason except the width chooses one that does not fit, and the leftover averages half a repeat, split between the two selvedges.

cloth · Repeat What matching a pattern costs a cutting room. The cloth a matched panel needs beyond its own length, against the pattern repeat, for 6 panels of 70 cm. Every panel of a patterned cloth must start at the same phase of the repeat or the pattern breaks at the seams, so a panel's cut length is rounded up to a whole number of repeats. The bar is the allowance a cutting room budgets — a whole repeat a panel, because a panel's length is not a multiple of anything — and the mark is the waste actually expected, which is half a repeat. The two differ by (L + r)/(2L + r), which is between a half and two thirds and is nearer two thirds the larger the repeat. The rows marked in the second colour are the repeats that happen to divide the panel exactly and waste nothing at all, which is what makes the real cost jagged rather than smooth. What the bars cannot show is nesting: a cutting room lays many panels on one length and a short panel can sometimes be taken from another's waste.

A repeat has to fit the panel, and the panel is cut

The warp's width is fixed at warping and a piece's length is not, so the fitting problem in the two directions is not the same problem. Along the length a repeat has to fit a *panel*, because every panel of a patterned cloth must start at the same phase or the pattern breaks at the seams — and the allowance is a whole repeat per panel. A ten-centimetre repeat costs a seventy-centimetre panel twelve and a half per cent and a sixty-four-centimetre repeat costs it forty-eight.

cloth · Repeat The selvedge turns of a 2/2 twill, 4 ends wide, from the left. A strip of 2/2 twill 4 ends wide over 8 picks, the first thrown from the left, with the weft's turn between every pair of picks drawn at the edge it reaches. 0 of the 8 turns are caught, where the edge end is on the other face on the second pick, and 8 slip. Across all its edge placements the weave catches every turn at 8 of 16. What the drawing cannot show is how far a slipped loop travels, which the beat-up and the weft tension decide.

A selvedge holds only where its edge end changes face

A shuttle weft goes out on one pick and back on the next, and between them it turns round the end at the edge. The turn is caught only if that end is on the other face on the second pick; otherwise the loop has nothing to wrap and slides off. Plain weave catches every turn at every width. A 2/2 twill catches them at half its widths, and only if the first pick is thrown from the right side. A 3/1 twill, a hopsack and every satin catch them nowhere, and of the 22,874 four-by-four drafts, 9,636 cannot hold a selvedge at any width at all.

weaves · Firmness The selvedge turns of a 2/2 basket, 8 ends wide, from the left. A strip of 2/2 basket 8 ends wide over 8 picks, the first thrown from the left, with the weft's turn between every pair of picks drawn at the edge it reaches. 4 of the 8 turns are caught, where the edge end is on the other face on the second pick, and 4 slip. Across all its edge placements the weave catches every turn at 0 of 16. What the drawing cannot show is how far a slipped loop travels, which the beat-up and the weft tension decide.

A weave holds its selvedge with two of its own columns, or not at all

A selvedge holds where its edge end changes face at every turn of the weft there, and the turns at one edge fall on alternate pick boundaries. So an end can hold the right edge only if its column changes face at every odd boundary, and the left edge only at every even one. Whether a weave can hold a selvedge is then whether its set of columns contains one of each kind, and nothing about its width matters. Two ends re-entered on the right shafts make 13,238 of the 22,874 four-by-four drafts hold at any width, where 3,262 did. The other 9,636 need a shaft of their own. A weave with an odd number of picks has no column of either kind, and never can.

weaves · Firmness The tucked-in edges of a 2/2 twill, 8 ends wide. A strip of 2/2 twill 8 ends wide over 8 picks, woven with tucked-in edges: every pick is cut at both edges and each tail is laid back into the next shed, so between every pair of picks there is a turn at both edges. 8 of the 16 tucked turns are caught, where the edge end is on the other face in the next shed, and 8 are not. Across all its edge placements the weave catches every tucked turn at 0 of 16. What the drawing cannot show is the tail itself, which lies alongside the next pick for the tuck's length and doubles the weft there.

A tucked-in edge asks every weave the odd repeat's question

A shuttle weft turns at one edge per pick, alternately, and that alternation is what let a 2/2 twill hold both selvedges with two ends re-entered on its own shafts. A rapier or air-jet loom cuts every pick at both edges and tucks both tails into the next shed, so every boundary between picks is a turn at both edges — the question an odd repeat always asked. Only a plain column answers it. Of the 22,874 four-by-four drafts, 10,382 can still hold their edges on their own shafts, against 13,238 under a shuttle; the 2/2 twill is among the 2,856 lost. And the tucked zone carries two picks in every shed, which lies flat only below between a half and two thirds of a weave's maximum pick density.

weaves · Firmness 4 drops of 250 cm cut from one roll of a 64 cm repeat, three ways. 4 matched drops of 250 cm cut one after another from one roll of a cloth with a 64 cm repeat, drawn along the roll at its own scale, with the cloth lost between drops shaded and its length written below. A straight match has one place in the repeat where every drop must start, ticked above the roll, so each gap is 6 cm and 18 cm is lost. A half-drop's alternate widths start half a repeat lower, ticked below. Cut in the order the widths hang, A B A B, every gap goes from one class to the other and costs 38 cm, 114 cm in all; cut A A B B, the like gaps cost 6 cm and the job loses 50 cm. What the strip cannot show is the pattern itself, which is the same cloth in every row.

A half-drop wastes less, cut in the right order

A straight match has one place in the repeat where every drop may start, so a cutting room loses half a repeat between drops on average and a whole one at worst, in any order. A half-drop has two, because alternate widths start half a repeat lower — and that gives the cutter a choice the straight match never offers. Cut in the order the widths hang, a half-drop loses exactly what a straight match loses. Cut with like drops together when the remainder favours it and alternated when it does not, four drops of a pair of curtains lose a third less, and a long run half as much: (r/4)·n/(n − 1) a gap, against r/2. The rule needs one subtraction before the first cut.

cloth · Repeat One warp feed, in the body and in a tucked zone of plain weave. A section along one warp end of 20 tex cotton, in plain weave woven at 70 per cent of its maximum pick density, in the body of the cloth and in the tucked zone with two picks to a shed. Both ends are fed the same length per pick, so the zone's end rises only 0.124 mm against the body's 0.161 mm, and the weft takes up the difference. The cloth is 0.341 mm thick in the body and 0.377 mm in the zone, 11 per cent thicker. The climb between crossings is drawn smooth rather than as the model's arcs and tangent.

A tucked edge stands proud because its warp goes straight

A tucked zone holds two picks in every shed, and the obvious account is that the pairs run out of room and bulge. The loom says otherwise: the warp is let off as one sheet and the cloth taken up at one speed, so the zone's ends have only the body's length to spend. They rise less. The weft takes up the height, so the edge is proud well before the pairs stop fitting, and they stand up well after the count says they must.

weaves · Firmness

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

SpecificationPlain weaveRepeatCensusCuttingDirectionDivisorFinite fabricFloatFrayingJammingLaddering

All concepts