Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
Concept

Weave matrix — where it appears

The binary array that is the weave: one entry per intersection, saying whether the warp or the weft is on the face. Almost everything a weaver cares about is a decidable property of it — float length, interlacing count, symmetry, whether the cloth is one cloth — with no tolerance to choose and no residual to interpret.

Named by 10 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The channel through a muslin in plain. A cut across a muslin woven plain, at 373 µm per hundred pixels, showing one hole between two warp ends. The ends sit at the same level here, so the clear width between them is 250 µm at the waist against 250 µm straight through. The profile on the right is that width at every height in the 334 µm the threads occupy: the passage is an hourglass, its narrowest section is 250 µm across, and the band that every level contains — what a straight line of sight can use — is 250 µm. The two differ by 0.0 per cent, and the difference is the weave and nothing else.

A hole is a channel, not an opening

Every hole drawn so far has been drawn from above, and the sentence underneath every one of them says the same thing: the hole between four threads is the spacing less the diameter, and every hole is the same size. That is a picture of a cloth's shadow. A cloth has a thickness, so its hole has a length, and the narrowest place along it is not the place a person looking through can see.

cloth · Openings Seven weaves at one construction, and what each of them really passes. Every weave here is drawn at the same filter — the same yarn, the same sett, the same cover and therefore the same open area, equal to twelve decimal places. Each one shows an opening of 263.7 µm to anybody looking straight through it, and that is the number a specification quotes. The bar is what each will actually let past, which is the narrowest section anywhere along the channel rather than the narrowest view down it. The plain weave passes exactly what it shows and it is the only weave here that does: its ends transit at every gap, so the four threads round every hole are level in pairs and the waist is at the middle. A float leaves two ends together at the top of the cloth, their neighbours at the bottom, and a passage between them that is wider than its own mouth — up to 12.8 per cent over the rating, for the basket.

A filter is rated by the hole it does not show

A woven filter cloth is sold on two numbers pulling opposite ways: an opening small enough to hold the soil and an open area large enough to pass the water. Both are computed from the same holes, and they are not computed from the same statistic of them. One reads the maximum and the other reads the mean, so a change that improves either can worsen the other without moving a single measurable property of the cloth.

applied · Filtration The 14 drafts whose holes are all one size. Every four-by-four draft in which each end and each pick interlaces — 22874 of them — built and asked whether all sixteen of its holes pass the same thing. At a muslin's construction 14 of them do. Set the same yarn square and 170 do; turn the cloth over and it is 14 again. Only 2 drafts are in all three lists, and they are the plain weave and its complement, marked. The other 12 are uniform because this cloth's warp is set closer than its weft, so the gap across the ends is the smaller of the two and binds every hole whatever the picks are doing — a fact about the sett wearing a fact about the weave's clothes. Two of them carry floats of three, which is as long as this repeat allows.

Only a plain weave has one size of hole

A weave's holes come in kinds, and the kinds are read off the matrix. Asking which weaves have only one kind looks like a question with an obvious answer and a one-line proof. Every draft at four by four was built and asked instead, and the count came back fourteen — of which twelve turn out to be telling the truth about the sett rather than about the weave.

weaves · Openings A slot and a square of the same area do not pass the same air. A hole of 62500 square micrometres, drawn out from a square to a slot twenty times longer than it is wide, at constant area throughout. The open area is unchanged by construction and the flow is not: it falls to 39 per cent of the square's. Two things move the same way and neither is a correction to the other — the hydraulic diameter falls as the rectangle is drawn out, and the shape factor rises from 14.23 for a square towards 24 for an infinitely thin slit, which is Shah and London's result quoted rather than derived. This is why a weave's float matters to what it passes even where its cover does not: a float lays parallel threads side by side and the hole beside it is a slot.

A satin's hole is a slot

Two cloths at the same cover have the same open area, exactly, and do not pass the same air. A float lays parallel threads side by side and the hole beside them is long rather than square, and drawing a hole out at constant area cuts what it passes to two fifths — because the hydraulic diameter falls and the shape factor climbs, and both of them move the same way.

weaves · Float A plain weave with one end missing. A plain weave on the left and the same cloth with one end broken and not pieced up on the right, drawn over 2 repeats so that the fault can be seen as the cloth has it: absent from every repeat, for the whole length of the piece. The picks that were held by the missing end are now held by whatever is on either side of it, so the longest float across the ends goes from 1 to 3 end widths — measured in the width the cloth had rather than in the narrower repeat, because the place the end used to occupy is still there. Every pick still changes side somewhere, so the cloth holds together — which is what happens in 55% of all the ways a four-by-four draft can lose an end.

What a missing end does to the weave

Every four-by-four draft there is, with each of its four ends taken away in turn: ninety-one thousand cloths, and not one of them falls into layers. What happens instead is worse, and the criterion has never had to report it before.

weaves · Integrity One pick of a 2/2 twill made in the wrong shed. Pick 2 of a 2/2 twill laid in the shed belonging to another pick. The thread is there, it is beaten up in its place, and it is simply not the pick the design asked for — so the fault is a bar the whole width of the cloth and one pick deep. This one leaves the cloth sound, with its longest float at 3. Across every four-by-four draft and every possible wrong shed — 1,372,440 substitutions — 63.2% leave a cloth that still hangs together, 36.6% leave a thread loose, and 0.25% split the cloth. The same wrong shed is harmless in one draft and destroys another, so nothing about the size of the mistake predicts the size of the fault.

A mispick is one row in the wrong place

Every four-by-four draft, with each of its picks replaced by every shed the loom could have made instead: a million and a third substitutions. Two thirds leave a cloth that still hangs together, a third leave a thread held by nothing, and the same wrong shed is harmless in one draft and fatal in another.

weaves · Derivation The float a point fault gives a weave, over every draft there is. Every four-by-four draft that describes one cloth — 22,730 of them — laid out as 8 ends by 8 picks, with each intersection of its repeat reversed in turn and the longest float that produces kept. There are two answers and no others. 90 drafts hold the fault to a float of 3; 22,640 — 99.6% of every weave there is — hand it a float of 7. The mechanism behind the second number is that a reversal at a binding point joins the two floats on either side of it, so a weave with runs separated by single binding intersections gives a single mistake the sum of two of its own floats. The 90 that escape are the drafts whose floats are short and evenly spaced — the plain weave and the ribs — which is not the class of weave the trade recommends for hiding a fault.

Which weave hides a fault

The trade says a busy weave hides a mistake. Every four-by-four draft there is was laid out as cloth and given every wrong lift it could have, and ninety-nine in a hundred hand that single mistake a float of seven — because a reversal does not lengthen a float, it joins two.

weaves · Float Z twist at 1600 turns per metre. A 20 tex cotton yarn, 0.167 mm across, with its surface fibres drawn as the helices they are. The angle between a surface fibre and the yarn's axis is 40.0°, and it is the only quantity in this family: the yarn is 13.8% shorter than the fibre in it and carries 59% of the strength the same fibre would give lying straight.

The other crepe is in the yarn

A crepe weave puts the texture in the matrix. A crepe yarn puts it nowhere the matrix can see: the cloth is a plain weave, and the surface comes from a thread twisted so hard that it shortens by a seventh and spends the rest of its life trying to untwist.

weaves · Texture weaves A woven crossing, and the number that never changes. A warp end and a weft pick at 6% crimp, drawn with the thickness expanded three times so the interlacing can be seen. Each goes over its neighbour and comes back; neither passes through the other. The Gauss linking integral over the pair, closed far outside the crossing, returns 0.0000. It returns that at every crimp and for every weave, because crimp moves a thread up and down across its neighbour and a curve that goes over and comes back has done nothing a linking number can see.

A woven cloth is not linked at all

Every thread in every woven cloth passes over its neighbours and comes back. None of them passes through. So the linking number of any two threads in any weave is zero, at any crimp, permanently — and almost everything a cloth does that a knitted fabric does not follows from that one number being nought.

weaves · Topology How many cloths any one cloth derives into. The 426 four-by-four cloths sorted into the orbits the manuals' derivations cut them into. 12 orbits hold 1 cloth; 83 orbits hold 2 cloths; 62 orbits hold 4 cloths. The largest orbit in the whole catalogue holds 4, so no cloth derives into more than 3 others by any sequence of the named operations, however long. The derivations generate a group of 256 elements and it cuts the catalogue into 157 pieces. What the bars cannot show is which cloths are in which orbit, which is the next figure.

No cloth derives into more than three others

Every weaving manual opens by saying the three basic weaves generate the rest. This collection counted the reach and found nine of 426, and left the nine as a count. It is not a count: every derivation the manuals name is a relabelling of the grid or a complementation of it, both invertible, so they generate a group — and that group cuts the 426 cloths into 157 closed pieces of which the largest holds four. The claim is not merely wrong about how much derivation reaches; derivation cannot reach more than four cloths from anywhere, by any sequence of operations, however long.

weaves · Derivation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

EnumerationFloat lengthClear openingSettChannel waistCloth integrityFaultHydraulic radiusOpen areaCatalogueCriterionLoose end

All concepts