Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
Concept

Packing factor — where it appears

The fraction of a yarn's cross-section that is fibre rather than air, which turns a count into a diameter and depends on how hard the yarn was twisted. It is the one number standing between a count and every geometric result on this site, and it is a measurement rather than a constant.

Named by 43 essays across 7 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

How much fibre a woven reinforcement holds. A unit cell of a woven reinforcement in section: flat tows, the thickness they add up to, and the wave the warp makes to cross them. The bar below is the fibre volume fraction against the same tows laid flat in two plies and against the packing factor of a tow, which is the most any cloth of them could be. The vertical scale is exaggerated so the interlacing is legible; the horizontal scale is the cloth's own.

The crimp is the price of being cloth

A woven reinforcement is bought for stiffness along its fibres, and the usual explanation of what it gives up — fibre content, lost to the crimp — has the sign wrong. At a given thickness a woven fabric holds slightly more fibre than two flat plies of the same tows. What the crimp costs is stiffness, and the float length is the knob.

applied · Preform Two sections, one yarn. The same yarn given a circular cross-section and a racetrack one of equal area, both jammed. The spacing the two models allow is nearly the same; the cover and the cloth thickness they predict are not.

A tow is not a yarn

Every geometric model on this site assumes a thread with a diameter. A reinforcement tow has a width and a thickness instead, and the two are eight to one — which moves the jammed sett, the crimp, the cover and the cloth's thickness at once, in four different directions, from one change.

applied · Sett Six ways of saying how fine a yarn is. The same four yarns written in six count systems, all placed on one axis of tex. A direct system states mass per unit length and rises as the yarn coarsens; an indirect one states length per unit mass and falls. Both kinds are in daily use and neither says which it is.

The yarn count systems, and why there are several

Half the ways of saying how fine a yarn is get bigger as it gets finer and half get smaller. That is not carelessness — and one of the constants buried in the oldest rule of thumb turns out to be a measurement nobody wrote down.

setting · Count Z twist at 800 turns per metre. A 20 tex cotton yarn, 0.167 mm across, with its surface fibres drawn as the helices they are. The angle between a surface fibre and the yarn's axis is 22.8°, and it is the only quantity in this family: the yarn is 4.1% shorter than the fibre in it and carries 85% of the strength the same fibre would give lying straight.

Twist is one angle

Every model on this site treats a yarn as a cylinder with a diameter. It is a bundle of loose fibres, and what makes it behave like a cylinder is twist — which is a helix, so the whole subject is one angle, and the trade's twist factor turns out to be the only combination of count and turns that decides anything.

setting · Twist Swelling, at the same count. The same yarn before and after mercerisation, drawn to one scale. Its linear density has not changed — the same grams per kilometre go into the cloth — but the fibre occupies more volume, which is a lower packing factor and a larger diameter. Every consequence in this field follows from that single number.

Mercerising is a packing factor

Cotton held in caustic soda swells, and everything the treatment is famous for follows from one number in this site's diameter calculation. The lustre it is actually sold for does not, and saying which consequences are computed and which are not is the whole of the discipline here.

finishing · Lustre finish A cotton fibre dry and wet. One cotton fibre in its dry state and saturated with water, both drawn at the same scale in both directions. It is 20% wider and 1.2% longer, so its cross-sectional area rises by 44% if the section stays similar to itself. The length difference is drawn and is nearly invisible, which is the point: a swelling that were the same in both directions would make a cloth bigger and change nothing about its structure, and this one changes every ratio of a diameter to a spacing in the cloth. What the drawing cannot show is the section: a cotton fibre is not a cylinder, and the directly measured area swelling of 40% to 42% does not agree with the square of the width change, which is a fact about the fibre.

What water does to a thread

A cotton fibre in water is a fifth wider and a hundredth longer. If it grew equally in both directions a wet cloth would simply be a bigger cloth and nothing structural would follow; because it does not, every ratio of a diameter to a spacing in a cloth moves, and they all move the same way.

cloth · Water The two calculations a yarn's stiffness admits. A bundle of 9 fibres bent with the fibres free to slide and with them locked together. Free, the rigidity is the sum of the fibres': 0.00141 N·mm² for a 30 tex cotton yarn. Locked, it is the fourth power of the yarn's own diameter: 0.689. The ratio is the fibre count over the square of the packing factor, 490, and nine fibres are drawn where the yarn has 176. What the drawing cannot show is where a real yarn sits between them, which is a question about friction rather than about fibre.

A yarn's stiffness is a bracket, not a number

Two calculations are available for how stiff a thread is in bending, and both are exact. One treats the fibres as free to slide and gives the sum of their stiffnesses; the other treats them as locked and gives a solid rod. They differ by the fibre count, which for an ordinary cotton yarn is a factor of five hundred — and no measurement of the fibre narrows it by anything at all.

mechanics · Yarn stiffness A yarn's voids against its fibres' swelling. One cotton yarn's cross-section at a packing factor of 0.60, drawn dry and with every fibre swollen by 20% while the yarn's own outline is held. The fibres now occupy 0.864 of the section, which is above the 0.75 a heavily compacted assembly reaches and above the 0.65 of a spun yarn, so the yarn cannot stay this size: it must grow by at least 7.3%. What the drawing cannot show is disorder — the fibres are laid on a lattice here to make the areas exact, and a real yarn's fibres are neither round nor evenly spaced, which is why the bound is quoted over three packing limits rather than at one.

A yarn's voids are not enough

A ring-spun cotton yarn is sixty per cent fibre and forty per cent air, and its fibres gain forty-four per cent of area in water. The obvious thought is that the air takes it. The arithmetic says the air cannot, and gives a floor on how far the yarn itself must grow with no measurement of a yarn in it anywhere.

cloth · Water Two pore systems in one cloth — 24 threads per centimetre. A plain weave of 20 tex cotton in section, at 24 threads per centimetre, so the yarn is 167 µm across and the clear hole between two picks is 250 µm. That hole's hydraulic radius is 124.8 µm. Inside the yarn, fibres 14 µm across packed at 0.6 leave spaces of hydraulic radius 2.33 µm — 53 times finer, and by Jurin's law 53 times higher: 6.37 m against 119 mm. The yarn's interior is magnified 6 times and the two discs at the foot are the only part drawn at one scale.

How high a cloth wicks

A woven cloth has two capillary systems and they are a factor of twenty to a hundred apart. The one every diagram draws — the hole between four threads — lifts 119 mm. The one nobody draws, inside the yarn, lifts 6.37 m.

applied · Wicking The energy well, and where the cloth sits in it. The bending energy of a sheeting at every state on its own constant-thread-length locus, plotted against how the crimp divides between the two systems. The minimum is at 1.22 and the value every Peirce solution here is drawn at is 1.00, marked. The well's depth decides how firmly the ratio is settled, which is why an open scrim's measured crimp scatters and a close sheeting's does not. What the plot cannot show is the friction that stops a cloth reaching the bottom, which turns the minimum into a band.

The crimp ratio is not a measurement

Peirce's geometry is two thread systems, four unknowns and three equations. It cannot say how the crimp divides between warp and weft, so every cloth solved so far has been drawn at a ratio somebody chose. Give the threads a stiffness and the missing equation arrives — and for six of the eight cloths in the table it arrives with no material constant in it at all.

setting · Crimp The interchange budget against cover, at three yarn counts. The extension a plain cloth can reach with no thread stretching, plotted against its warp cover factor, for 10, 20, 40 tex yarn. The three curves coincide, because every length in Peirce's geometry is a multiple of the yarn diameter and a spacing measured in diameters is a cover factor — so the count divides out exactly and the maximum is at 0.407782 for all of them, at a budget of 7.2857%. That the curve has a maximum at all is the finding: crimp is what a cloth spends, so more of it should be better, and past this cover the weft has nowhere to put what the warp gives up. What the plot cannot show is the balance, which moves the height of the maximum a long way and its position hardly at all.

The most a cloth can give back

The extension a cloth can find without stretching a thread comes from crimp, so setting a cloth closer ought to give it more. It does, up to a point, and then takes it away again — and the point is a cover factor of 0.4078 at a budget of 7.2857 per cent, identical to six figures for every yarn count from five tex to a hundred.

cloth · Memory A crossing before and after it is pressed. One warp end of a sheeting riding over three picks, drawn twice to the same scale. Unpressed, both sections are circles and the cloth is 0.388 mm thick. At 0.40 N per crossing the sections flatten to aspect ratios of 1.75 and 1.84, the cloth thins to 0.263 mm, and the warp runs flat for 0.109 mm over each pick before it begins to curve. What the drawing cannot show is why the cloth does not do this by itself: flattening shrinks the arc radius as well as the crimp height, so it costs bending energy, and a relaxed cloth keeps its threads round.

A flattened thread is a record of a force

A yarn in cloth is not round, and this site has modelled the flattening for as long as this collection has run with the amount of it left as a number somebody chose. Give the section a stiffness and ask what the cloth prefers, and the answer is a circle — at every stiffness, for every balanced cloth in the table. Flattening does not happen by itself; it happens because something pressed.

mechanics · Compression The bracket that closes and the bracket that does not. A 25 tex cotton yarn at a packing factor of 0.6. Its bending rigidity lies between 0.00117 N·mm² — the sum of its fibres', with them free to slide — and 0.478, a solid rod of its own diameter: a factor of 408, and both ends are derivations. Its resistance to being squashed out of round has an upper bound of the same kind, 369 N/mm² for a solid section, and no lower bound at all, because fibres free to slide resist a change of shape with nothing. That is why the aspect ratio of a flattened yarn has been a free parameter here since the setting field was built: a quantity bounded below by zero cannot be estimated from its bounds, and has to be measured.

The stiffness with no lower bound

A yarn's bending rigidity lies between two derivable ends and the ratio is the fibre count — wide, but closed. Its resistance to being squashed out of round has an upper bound of the same kind and a lower bound of exactly nothing, because fibres free to slide resist a change of shape with nothing at all. That is why nobody could ever compute the aspect ratio of a flattened thread.

mechanics · Compression How open a batiste is, against where the light is. One minus the cover is a cloth's openness to a light directly behind it, and for this batiste it is 40.1 per cent. Move off the normal and a line of sight has to clear the hole at the top of the cloth and the same hole one thickness below, so what it can use falls as t·tan α is taken off each side — reaching nothing at 39.0° across the ends. Averaged over the whole sky with Lambert's cosine weighting, the cloth is 6.42 per cent open — 6.3 times less than the covering rule says, and the whole of the difference is the thickness. One minus the cover is the openness of a cloth with no thickness, and no cloth has none.

Opacity is not cover

The covering rule counts a thread as a bar that stops everything, and a single fine cotton thread held to a window plainly does not. What a cloth transmits is the open area plus whatever comes through the threads, so the covered fraction is a lever rather than a barrier — and the lever is longest exactly where the rule says the cloth is most closed. Nothing here computes a thread's transmittance, and saying why is the useful half.

pattern · Opacity A sheeting's crossing, dry and wetted. One crossing of a sheeting in section at three swellings: dry, at the swelling where its geometry has its last state, and fully wetted at 20%. The closure condition is that the two systems' crimp heights add to the cloth's thickness, and each can supply at most the height it reaches when its straight portion has just vanished. Swelling raises the demand in proportion and the supply more slowly, so the margin closes and then goes negative — at 9.29% for this cloth against cotton's 20%. The bottom panel is drawn as far as the threads reach and no further, because there is no state to draw. What the drawing cannot show is what happens instead, which is that the yarn is compacted.

The swelling a cloth cannot take

Three of the eight cloths in this collection's table have no wet state at all. A thread of fixed length cannot wrap a partner that has grown by a fifth, so the closure condition fails and the geometry has nothing to offer. What happens instead costs megapascals, and the alternative route is not merely dearer but unavailable — the thread would break first.

mechanics · Compression The two diameters of a 20 tex yarn. The pressure inside a twisted yarn is zero at its surface, so the outermost fibres are held by nothing but their own buried ends and some of them stand off as loops and ends. A yarn therefore has two diameters: a mass diameter of 167.1 µm, which is a volume divided by a length and is the one every other calculation on this site uses, and a contact diameter of 217.1 µm, which is what a neighbouring thread, a finger or an air stream meets. The gap is a hair layer of 25.0 µm on each side and it is measured, not computed — nothing here predicts hairiness. What is computed is the consequence, and it is 29.9% of the diameter every cover factor on this site was built from.

The hairs are what touch

The pressure inside a twisted yarn falls to exactly zero at its surface, so the outermost fibres are held by nothing and some of them stand off. A yarn therefore has two diameters — the one its mass gives and the one a neighbour meets — and only the first is in the arithmetic.

cloth · Hairiness Cotton and viscose in every column this site carries. The two cellulosic fibres compared across every constant on this site. Both are cellulose at 1.52 g/cm³, both are given a modulus of 8 GPa and a fineness of 1.7 dtex, so a 20 tex yarn of either has the same diameter to the last figure — and therefore the same crimp, the same cover, the same jamming sett and the same bending bracket. Every geometric result on this site is the same number for the two fibres. Water separates them twice: viscose swells 1.75 times as far across and loses half its strength where cotton gains a tenth. What the table cannot show is why, which is a question about how cellulose is arranged inside a fibre and is not in this collection.

Water tells two fibres apart

Cotton and viscose are the same material by every constant this collection carries. Same density, same modulus, same fineness, so the same diameter at every count and the same crimp, cover, jamming sett and bending bracket. A wash separates them by a factor of two, and it is the only thing here that can.

mechanics · Yarn stiffness What a muslin passes, against how closely it is set. A muslin's air permeability at 100 Pa as the sett is closed from 6.9 to 34.2 threads per centimetre, with the two paths separated. The channels between the threads carry 8285 mm/s at the open end and 1330 at the close one, and they go to zero when the cloth jams. The threads themselves carry 1.7 to 6.4 mm/s and never go to zero at all, because a thread is sixty per cent fibre whatever the sett is. Extended to a cloth with no channel left, that path is 8.1 mm/s — a floor set by the yarn rather than by the construction, and a specification asking for less has asked for a fabric that cannot be woven from this yarn at any sett.

A cloth stops having holes before it stops passing air

Close a woven cloth up and the channels between its threads shut. What passes through it does not go to zero, because a thread is sixty per cent fibre and forty per cent air and stays that way whatever is done to the construction. So a fabric's permeability has a floor, the floor belongs to the yarn rather than to the weaver, and no sett on any loom reaches it.

applied · Permeability The tightest fold a 20 tex cotton yarn can be given. A cloth folded as sharply as it can be folded. The two yarn crowns on the inside of the fold cannot pass through one another, so the fold's radius is the yarn's own — 0.084 mm for a 20 tex cotton yarn — and there is no measurement of an iron anywhere in the argument. At that radius a fibre free to slide is strained 7.14%, which is √(packing × fibre tex ÷ yarn tex), and the whole yarn bending as a rod would be strained exactly one hundred per cent. Cotton's measured breaking extension is 6.0% to 10.0%, so the free bound does not survive and the locked one cannot. What the drawing cannot show is the fibres inside the yarn, which is exactly what the argument is about — the picture is the same either way and the strain is fourteen times different.

A crease is a fold the crimp cannot supply

A fold needs its outer face longer than its inner, and a woven cloth's way of supplying a length is to move crimp. That runs out at a radius of millimetres, and a pressed crease is tenths of one — so the fold is handed to the fibres. How hard it strains them turns on a question this collection has been unable to settle for two fields, and a crease settles it by refusing.

finishing · Crease Elastic recovery against strain, for seven fibres. The elastic recovery of seven fibres at the strains it is reported at: extend to a stated strain, unload, read the strain returned immediately. Each fibre's points are joined and the line stops where the measurements stop, which is the point of the figure — a fibre strained past the last point on its own line is a fibre this collection declines to answer for. Nothing here is measured below one per cent of strain, and a woven cloth just past its own interchange budget is at a thread strain of a few hundredths, so the region that matters most for a fabric is the region nobody has reported. Recovery falls monotonically for every fibre, which is what lets the unmeasured region be bracketed between the lowest measured value and one rather than extrapolated. What the plot cannot show is the delayed recovery, which is excluded by the convention and is largest for the fibre with the best reputation for recovering.

Recovery is measured and nothing predicts it

A fibre's stiffness is a bracket this collection can compute the ends of. What fraction of a strain it gives back is not: it has to be looked up, the tables are thin, they stop exactly where a fabric needs them, and the most attractive explanation for the ordering they show turns out to have no signal in it at all.

mechanics · Yarn stiffness Four ways of closing a muslin, and the floor under all of them. The same muslin at four states: as woven, calendered to 3:1, wetted so its fibres swell by 20 per cent, and with the channel between its threads gone altogether. Air permeability at 100 Pa falls from 3505 mm/s to 8.1 — a factor of 434 — and stops there. The last figure is not a cloth with no holes in it: it is a cloth whose only remaining path is through the threads, which are sixty per cent fibre whatever is done to the construction. That number is the floor, it is a property of the yarn, and no sett reaches it. Note that the two middle routes are not in a fixed order: a 3:1 calender closes more than this swelling and a 2:1 calender closes less, so which is the stronger depends on how far each is taken.

A windproof cloth is at its yarn's limit

Windproof is a threshold on air permeability, and it is the only fabric specification on this site that the construction cannot settle. No weavable sett of an ordinary shirting yarn gets within two hundred times of it, layering the cloth barely helps because the resistance is inertial rather than viscous, and the floor set by the yarn's own porosity lands on the same order as the threshold with a fivefold bracket around it.

applied · Permeability The strain at a fold against the strain each fibre breaks at. For each fibre, the surface strain at the sharpest fold a 20 tex yarn of it can make — which is √(packing × fibre tex ÷ yarn tex), with no measurement of a crease in it — beside its own measured breaking extension. cotton and flax are strained past the low end of their breaking range, so some of their fibres break at the fold, and that is what a linen crease is. The rest survive, and among them viscose and wool return less than three fifths of what they were given, which is the other way a cloth creases. Both columns are needed: viscose survives with a factor of two to spare and is among the three worst by measurement. What the bars cannot show is wool, which the census puts in the wrong column because the recovery figures are the immediate ones and wool's is the most delayed of any fibre here.

Which fibres crease, and why there are two answers

Run the sharpest fold a yarn can make against every fibre's breaking extension and its recovery, and the ranking that falls out is the trade's own — linen worst, cotton next, wool and the melt-spun filaments best. It falls out of two columns rather than one, because two fibres in the bottom three get there by different mechanisms, and a treatment that fixes one does nothing for the other.

finishing · Crease The coarsest pore and the finest, in one muslin. A muslin's two pore systems asked the same question. Water at a contact angle of 120° is held back by a pore of radius r at a head of 2γ|cos θ|/ρgr, so the hole between four threads — hydraulic radius 134 µm — holds 56 mm of water, and the space between the fibres inside a thread — 2.50 µm — holds 2975 mm. Water takes the cheapest path, so the cloth leaks at the first of them and the second is never asked. Turn the contact angle round to a wetting one and the same two radii give a rise instead, and now it is the finest that decides, because that is the one that lifts highest: 5950 mm. One expression, two ends of a distribution, and the fabric's two properties read opposite ends of it.

The pore that wicks is the pore that leaks

A cloth's water resistance and a cloth's wicking are one expression, read at the two ends of a contact angle. The geometry cannot be chosen to give both, because it is the same geometry; the only thing that decides which a fabric does is a finish. And the two questions do not even read the same pore — a rise is set by the finest and a leak by the coarsest, so the same cloth lifts water three metres and holds it back at fifty-six millimetres.

finishing · Wicking Eight fibres through one cloth, and the bracket that hides them. A muslin is 19 per cent fibre and the rest air, so its thermal conductivity is a two-phase mixture, and how the fibre and the air are arranged is not something any amount of knowing the fractions settles. What is settled is Wiener's pair of bounds: heat across a series arrangement sees the harmonic mean and along a parallel one sees the volume average, and every real arrangement lies between. Each bar here is one fibre's whole band, from the series bound at its lowest published conductivity to the parallel bound at its highest. Not one of the eight clears any other, so this model cannot tell wool from nylon in a fabric — and the same cloth at twice the thickness has twice the resistance, exactly. Air's own conductivity is marked, and every band sits within a fifth of it.

Warmth is a thickness of air

A fabric is a tenth fibre and the rest air, so its thermal conductivity is a mixture of the two — and the pair of bounds that any mixture must lie between comes out narrower than the difference between wool and nylon. The model cannot tell one fibre from another in a cloth. What it can tell, exactly and with no bracket at all, is that twice the thickness is twice the warmth.

mechanics · Insulation A yarn's diameter is a contour, not a length. The fraction of the space beside a 20 tex cotton yarn that is occupied by hair, against height, grossed up from the modelled population by the measured split between the long and short populations. At the yarn's own surface it is 8.9% — the layer is almost entirely gap — and it falls away exponentially from there. Every instrument that reports a yarn diameter is picking a contour of this curve, and the contours are far apart: a threshold that needs half the space filled is never met at all, one that needs a twentieth is met at 355 µm, and a hair counter triggers out at 2353 µm. The earlier model gave the layer a single thickness of 25 µm, which is a fair description of where most of the material is and wrong about its extent by more than a decade. What the curve cannot say is which contour any particular instrument uses, which is a fact about the instrument.

A yarn has a diameter for every instrument

Conservation of volume gives a yarn one diameter and every other route gives a different one. The disagreement is not experimental scatter: a yarn's outside is a coverage that falls away exponentially, and each instrument stops at whatever contour of it will trigger the instrument.

cloth · Hair layer 20 tex, counted. The cross-section of a 20 tex cotton yarn, with every fibre in it drawn. The count is a division and nothing else: a 20 tex yarn spun from 0.17 tex fibre has 117.6 fibres crossing any plane through it, and the yarn is 14.0 fibre diameters across because n fibres packed at 0.6 fill a circle √(n/φ) times as wide. The arrangement is drawn on a lattice and is not claimed: real fibres are not on one, they migrate between the core and the surface as they run, and everything this collection says about a yarn's strength turns on their doing so.

How many fibres make a thread

Every number in this collection began with a diameter, and a diameter is not a measurement — it is a count of fibres, divided. Once the division is written down, three quantities that had nothing to do with each other turn out to be the same number.

setting · Assembly Folding, and what it takes out of the singles. Two 20 tex singles spun at 800 turns per metre and folded the other way at 540 — a ratio of 0.675, which is the trade's own and is a measurement rather than a derivation. A single held at its ends and wound round its neighbour turns about its own axis once for every turn of the fold, so it is left with 260 turns per metre of its own: its surface fibres lie at 7.8° to its axis rather than the 22.8° they were spun at. Folding untwists. The short strokes are drawn at that residual angle; the two long curves are centre lines and are not the yarn — each strand is itself a bundle of 118 fibres, and the residual angle is what holds them.

Folding is untwisting

Wind two singles round each other and each one turns about its own axis once per turn of the fold. So a folded yarn's singles are not the singles that went into it, and at a folding ratio of exactly one half the two helices cancel.

setting · Ply Which end of the bracket a thread in cloth is at. A yarn bends as a solid rod while its fibres cannot slide and as a loose bundle once they can, and the crossover is a curvature: the coherent state demands an axial force in the outer fibre that has to be built up by friction under the twist's own radial pressure. The curves are the crossover radius against twist at four contact efficiencies, the top one being 1.0 — the claim that fibres touch along their whole length, which nobody makes. The rule at the bottom is the radius a thread is bent to by its own crimp in a cloth, about 0.25 mm. Every curve is above the rule by at least 19-fold, so a thread in cloth is at the free end of its bracket at every twist and every efficiency, and the collection's habit of using the lower bound is a result rather than a convention.

Twist decides where in the bracket

A yarn's bending rigidity can only be bracketed, and the bracket is three hundred wide. What decides where a yarn sits in it is whether its fibres can slide — and for a thread bent by its own crimp in a cloth, the answer is not close.

mechanics · Yarn stiffness One yarn, two packing factors. The same 20 tex cotton yarn — the same fibres, the same count, the same mass per metre — drawn at a packing factor of 0.45 and of 0.75. Its diameter is 192.9 µm in one and 149.5 µm in the other, a difference of 29.1%, because a diameter goes as the inverse square root of the packing. Every cover factor, every jammed sett and every hole in this collection went through that number, and the site's value of 0.6 was obtained by inverting a rule published for cotton yarns at one particular twist. Nothing here models how packing moves with twist; the figure is here to show the size of the thing that has been held constant.

The diameter was quoted at one twist

Every diameter in this collection came from a packing factor of 0.6, and that number was got by inverting a rule published for cotton yarns at one particular twist. Here is what moves if it is wrong by the width of the range real yarns occupy — and which single quantity does not move at all.

setting · Sett The depth belongs to the fibre and the density to the yarn. Over a 5-fold range of cotton yarn counts, the hair layer's decay length moves by 6.2% and its population moves by 2.37-fold against a square root of 2.24. Both follow from one cancellation. The shell's share of the section is 4d_f/D, the migration period is a fixed number of yarn diameters, and λ = ½(kD)(4d_f/D) — the yarn's diameter divides out and leaves λ = 2k·d_f, a length belonging to the fibre alone. The density has no such cancellation and goes as √(nφ)/L. The two small departures visible here are not two facts: they are the shell's second-order term, and they are the same number to the last bit of a double. The consequence for a spinner is that a coarse yarn is hairier and its hairs are no longer, so everything that depends on reach — pilling, prickle, a printed edge — is decided by the fibre and not by the count.

Hairiness goes as the root of the count

A coarse yarn is hairier than a fine one and everybody knows it. What nobody has said is that its hairs are no longer — the count and the length obey different laws, one rises as a square root and the other does not move at all, and the identity behind both was asserted on this site for an entirely unrelated reason.

setting · Hair layer Two courses at the yarn's own width, and the place they overlap. The solved course of a 20 tex cotton jersey at a 3.5 mm loop, drawn in plan with the course below it, each strand at the yarn's own diameter of 0.167 mm. Where the two overlap, the fabric is occupying the same space twice. The interlacing is where the model placed them one diameter apart. The closest they come is 0.130 mm — 0.780 of a diameter — and it is not at the interlacing. A round yarn cannot occupy this arrangement; a yarn flattened to 78% of its round diameter can, and flattened is what a yarn in a fabric measurably is.

The fabric that does not fit

Every solve in this collection minimises an energy over a centre line, and a centre line has no thickness. Nobody had checked whether the fabric that comes out of it can be built. It cannot: two adjacent courses of the relaxed jersey approach to four fifths of a yarn diameter, so the yarn passes through itself, at rest, everywhere.

knits · Contact The section the fabric asks for, beside the one the model drew. A 20 tex cotton yarn in cross-section, at 900 times life size. The circle is what every solve in this collection has assumed: a diameter of 0.167 mm from the count and the packing factor. The ellipse has the same area and a minor axis of 78% of it, which is the closest the fabric's own adjacent courses come to one another — 0.130 mm. Nothing about that number was fitted to a fabric. It falls out of a solve that knew nothing about flattening, and it lands inside the range the trade reports for yarn in cloth, which this collection has carried as a free parameter ever since it first put a number on a sett.

The flattening nobody fitted

A yarn in cloth is not round, everybody knows it, and nothing has ever predicted how flat. This collection's own knitted geometry turns out to require a flattening of four fifths — from a solve that knew nothing about flattening, made no allowance for it, and would have been written the same way if the idea had never occurred to anybody.

knits · Contact The flattening a knitted fabric asks for, against its own tightness. Every point is a solved fabric — 18 of them, over five loop lengths, three relaxation states and three counts — and the vertical axis is the closest its adjacent courses come, in diameters. The values run from 0.707 to 0.839 and they fall on one curve against the tightness factor, which is the model's only dimensionless group. That is what makes this a structural requirement rather than an arithmetical accident of one example: a tighter fabric demands a flatter yarn, by an amount its own tightness decides, and nothing about the fibre or the count enters except through that group.

A flattening that follows the tightness factor

Eighteen solved fabrics — five loop lengths, three relaxation states, three counts — and the flattening each one's geometry demands falls on a single curve against one dimensionless group. Nothing about the fibre or the count survives except through that group, which is what turns an arithmetical result into a structural requirement.

knits · Contact Three rules for how hard to fold a yarn, and which one the trade uses. For 2, 3, 4 folds of 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre: the ratio that makes the fold's surface helix angle equal its singles', the ratio that sets the fold's net moment to zero, and the ratio the trade actually folds at. The surface rule is 1/√n exactly, because a fold of n singles is √n times the diameter. The torque balance is C/(B+C), which for this fibre is 0.201 and is the same at every count, every twist and every number of folds. The trade's brackets contain the surface rule in all three rows and the torque balance in none of them.

The folding rule is a surface angle

Fold at two thirds for two singles, six tenths for three, a half for four. Those are one over the square root of the fold count, they are what makes a fold's surface twist angle equal its singles', and all three of the trade's brackets contain the number exactly.

setting · Ply What a knot costs, and what decides it. Knot efficiency against the radius the thread is bent to, for 5 fibres at 20 tex, computed at the free end of the stiffness bracket — each fibre bending about its own axis, so the strain at the outside of the bend is half a fibre diameter over the radius. At one yarn diameter of radius, cotton keeps 46%, which is the rule of thumb that a knot halves a rope's strength. What separates the curves is not the knot and not the friction: it is the fibre's own breaking strain, which is how much the bend is allowed to spend before there is nothing left.

A knot halves a yarn and says why

The rule is quoted for every rope and every knot and derived nowhere. It comes out at forty-six per cent for a cotton — but only if the yarn's fibres bend individually. A yarn bending as a solid section has already spent five times its breaking strain before any load arrives, so it could not be knotted at all.

applied · Tensile Three rules for how hard to fold a yarn, and which one the trade uses. For 2, 3, 4 folds of 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre: the ratio that makes the fold's surface helix angle equal its singles', the ratio that sets the fold's net moment to zero, and the ratio the trade actually folds at. The surface rule is 1/√n exactly, because a fold of n singles is √n times the diameter. The torque balance is C/(B+C), which for this fibre is 0.201 and is the same at every count, every twist and every number of folds. The trade's brackets contain the surface rule in all three rows and the torque balance in none of them.

A cabled yarn is a fold of folds

The rule that sets a fold's twist is one over the square root of the number of components. Apply it twice and a cabled yarn's three twist levels are fixed by two integers — which is a prediction with no free constants, about a class of yarn the trade quotes no rule for at all.

setting · Ply What a knot costs, and what decides it. Knot efficiency against the radius the thread is bent to, for 5 fibres at 20 tex, computed at the free end of the stiffness bracket — each fibre bending about its own axis, so the strain at the outside of the bend is half a fibre diameter over the radius. At one yarn diameter of radius, cotton keeps 46%, which is the rule of thumb that a knot halves a rope's strength. What separates the curves is not the knot and not the friction: it is the fibre's own breaking strain, which is how much the bend is allowed to spend before there is nothing left.

Which yarns knot well

A knot's efficiency depends on three things and only one of them is the knot. The other two are the fibre's fineness and its breaking strain, and across this collection's own table those give efficiencies from six per cent to eighty-three at exactly the same bend.

applied · Tensile Where a wet cloth keeps its water. For four cloths of this collection's own table, the share of the water a saturated cloth holds that sits inside the fibre as regain, between the fibres inside the yarn, and between the yarns in the cloth's own holes. muslin at 99 grams a square metre holds 183 per cent of its own weight, 4.6 per cent of it in the fibre; sheeting at 155 grams a square metre holds 113 per cent of its own weight, 7.5 per cent of it in the fibre; poplin at 100 grams a square metre holds 165 per cent of its own weight, 5.2 per cent of it in the fibre; duck at 207 grams a square metre holds 139 per cent of its own weight, 6.1 per cent of it in the fibre. The fibre's own water — the property cotton is sold on — is a twentieth to a thirteenth of the total, and the other nineteen twentieths are geometry. What the bars cannot show is the hair layer, which holds water outside all three of these and which this arithmetic has no place for.

A cotton's own water is a twentieth of what a cloth holds

A wet cloth keeps water in three places and only one of them is the fibre. A sheeting saturated holds 113 per cent of its own dry weight: 7.5 per cent of that inside the cotton as regain, 39 per cent in the channels between the fibres of its yarns, and 54 per cent in the holes four threads bound. The same construction in polyester, whose regain is a fortieth of cotton's, holds 105 per cent — an eight-point difference from a fortyfold one, because absorbency is a geometry with a fibre in it rather than a fibre with a geometry round it.

cloth · Water The section the fabric asks for, beside the one the model drew. A 20 tex cotton yarn in cross-section, at 900 times life size. The circle is what every solve in this collection has assumed: a diameter of 0.167 mm from the count and the packing factor. The ellipse has the same area and a minor axis of 78% of it, which is the closest the fabric's own adjacent courses come to one another — 0.130 mm. Nothing about that number was fitted to a fabric. It falls out of a solve that knew nothing about flattening, and it lands inside the range the trade reports for yarn in cloth, which this collection has carried as a free parameter ever since it first put a number on a sett.

What a sett is when the yarn is not round

A jamming condition says how close threads can be set, and it says it in terms of a diameter. A thread in a cloth does not have one diameter: it has a wide one and a narrow one, and which of them a jam is about depends on which way the threads are jamming.

setting · Sett A fibre's two stiffnesses, as the ratio that survives the bracket. C over B for every fibre in the table, at 20 tex, which is 2G/E and nothing else. The mark beyond each bar is the range the shear modulus is reported over. Glass is the control and is not a measurement: it is a drawn isotropic solid, so its ratio must be 1/(1+ν) and at ν = 0.2 that is 0.833, which is what the table says. Every fibre with molecules drawn out along its axis sits below the isotropic value, and the ordering is the subject rather than an accident — a fibre is stiff along its axis because its molecules are drawn out along it, and the same orientation that raises E leaves G to whatever holds one chain to the next. Aramid, the most oriented thing here, is twenty times softer in torsion relative to its bending than the glass beside it.

A thread has a second stiffness

Every mechanical number here came from one material constant: how hard a thread is to bend. A thread also resists being twisted, nothing here has ever used that, and the ratio between the two turns out to be the only stiffness number about a yarn that can be known at all.

mechanics · Torsion The flattening a knitted fabric asks for, against its own tightness. Every point is a solved fabric — 18 of them, over five loop lengths, three relaxation states and three counts — and the vertical axis is the closest its adjacent courses come, in diameters. The values run from 0.707 to 0.839 and they fall on one curve against the tightness factor, which is the model's only dimensionless group. That is what makes this a structural requirement rather than an arithmetical accident of one example: a tighter fabric demands a flatter yarn, by an amount its own tightness decides, and nothing about the fibre or the count enters except through that group.

The count that decides how flat

A knitted fabric's demanded flattening is a function of its tightness factor, and a tightness factor is the square root of a count over a loop length. So a coarser yarn at the same loop is flatter — which is a prediction about a spinner's choice that nobody has framed as one.

setting · Count What flattening costs, against what the loop's bending is worth. The energy of squashing a 20 tex cotton to the 78% the fabric's geometry demands, as a multiple of the whole bending energy of one stitch, at three lateral rigidities. The free bound is exactly zero: a bundle of fibres free to slide resists a change of shape at constant area not at all, so flattening is free and the bracket on it has no floor. The coherent bound is 36 times the loop's bending, so a yarn that could not rearrange could not be knitted into this fabric at all. The fabric flattens, so it is reading the free end — which is the fourth ordinary observation on this site to land at that end of the bracket.

Flattening is free and impossible

The fabric demands a flattening and the yarn has to supply it. At one end of this collection's oldest bracket the deformation costs exactly nothing; at the other it costs thirty-six times the whole bending energy of a stitch. The fabric flattens — which is the fourth everyday observation in one phase to land at the same end.

mechanics · Contact Two stiffnesses, one bracket, and a ratio that does not move. The bending and torsional rigidities of a cotton yarn against its count, each drawn at both ends of its own bracket, on a logarithmic scale. The four curves are two parallel pairs: the torsional bracket is the bending bracket exactly — the fibre count over the square of the packing factor, 327 at 20 tex — so the vertical gap between the two bounds is the same for both deformations. The consequence is the useful part: the ratio C/B is 0.250 at the top of the bracket and at the bottom and everywhere between, because the polar second moment of a circle is exactly twice its flexural one.

A fabric reads its own bracket four ways

A yarn's stiffness is unknown to a factor of three hundred, and no laboratory measurement has closed it. Four unrelated everyday observations — a snarl, a knot, a flattened yarn and a cloth's own thickness — all say the same thing about which end of it a yarn sits at.

mechanics · Yarn stiffness

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Yarn diameterBending rigidityJammingSpecificationContactCover factorFibre countCloth thicknessCrimpFibre finenessMeasurementMoisture

All concepts