Fibre — where it appears
Named by 7 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A yarn's stiffness is a bracket, not a number
Two calculations are available for how stiff a thread is in bending, and both are exact. One treats the fibres as free to slide and gives the sum of their stiffnesses; the other treats them as locked and gives a solid rod. They differ by the fibre count, which for an ordinary cotton yarn is a factor of five hundred — and no measurement of the fibre narrows it by anything at all.
The crimp ratio is not a measurement
Peirce's geometry is two thread systems, four unknowns and three equations. It cannot say how the crimp divides between warp and weft, so every cloth solved so far has been drawn at a ratio somebody chose. Give the threads a stiffness and the missing equation arrives — and for six of the eight cloths in the table it arrives with no material constant in it at all.
The stiffness with no lower bound
A yarn's bending rigidity lies between two derivable ends and the ratio is the fibre count — wide, but closed. Its resistance to being squashed out of round has an upper bound of the same kind and a lower bound of exactly nothing, because fibres free to slide resist a change of shape with nothing at all. That is why nobody could ever compute the aspect ratio of a flattened thread.
The strong fibre is the one that pills
A pill survives while any one of its anchors holds, which is a maximum over a small sample rather than an average — and a maximum behaves nothing like an average. A fifth of a strong fibre in a blend buys four fifths of the pure strong fibre's pill life while leaving the whole of the weak fibre's fuzz supply in place.
A fibre that fills dyes deeper with every dip
Dipped eight times, a ring-dyed yarn is darker than after one dip but no deeper — if its fibres have room for all the dye they are offered. They do not: every dip's dye occupies some of the fibre's room, the next dip meets less affinity near the surface, and dye that is taken up less travels further before it is taken. How much further depends on one number the dip arithmetic never needed — the share of an empty fibre's room one dip fills — and eight dips turn that number into a ring 1.15 times deeper at five per cent and 1.68 times deeper at twenty.
Indigo is too little to close the pores it dyes through
Each dip of a fibre that fills carries its dye deeper, because the dye already fixed near the surface leaves less room there. But indigo is fixed as a solid, and some of it sits in the pores the next dip has to travel through, so a heavily dyed skin should also hold the next dip back. The two pull opposite ways, and which wins is decided by how much pigment there is. A dark denim's indigo, every grain of it placed in the pores, fills at most a fifth of them at the surface and takes back about a seventh of the ring's deepening — under two micrometres. The surface fills at the same rate whatever the pores do, so two cross-sections still tell the two effects apart.
A slow fibre starts its ring deep
Every account of an indigo dip here lets a cotton fibre take its dye at once. Give the fibre a clock of its own and the ring does not simply run deeper, which is what the question seemed to ask. A clock of a few seconds makes the ring shallower, by nearly a fifth at most, and only past about twenty-six seconds does it run deeper than an instant fibre's. Two sections tell the accounts apart that one cannot: an instant fibre earns its ring dip by dip, from 14 to 23.5 per cent of the radius over eight dips, and a fibre with a hundred-second clock starts at 23 and ends at 26.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Bending rigidityDenimDye affinityInter fibre porePacking factorRing dyeingSpecificationYarn diameterAbrasionFrictionTwistAreal density