Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
The collection

Every essay — page 2

Page 2 of 19, continuing through the fields in the same order.

What cloth is Weaves Setting and geometry Knits and other structures Mechanics and drape Pattern and colour Compound and figured cloths After the loom Cloth doing a job

FieldsSeriesThreadsWeave indexRefutationsConceptsSearch

Cloth doing a job

What happens when a fabric has to meet a specification rather than merely be described. A reinforcement that must hold fibre and still admit resin, a filter that must retain the soil and still pass water, a seam that must grip harder than the load without perforating the cloth, a pattern cut for a shape it does not yet have. Every requirement here is a pair of inequalities on quantities the earlier fields compute — and the useful answer is sometimes that no fabric satisfies both.

Four ways of closing a muslin, and the floor under all of them. The same muslin at four states: as woven, calendered to 3:1, wetted so its fibres swell by 20 per cent, and with the channel between its threads gone altogether. Air permeability at 100 Pa falls from 3505 mm/s to 8.1 — a factor of 434 — and stops there. The last figure is not a cloth with no holes in it: it is a cloth whose only remaining path is through the threads, which are sixty per cent fibre whatever is done to the construction. That number is the floor, it is a property of the yarn, and no sett reaches it. Note that the two middle routes are not in a fixed order: a 3:1 calender closes more than this swelling and a 2:1 calender closes less, so which is the stronger depends on how far each is taken.

A windproof cloth is at its yarn's limit

Windproof is a threshold on air permeability, and it is the only fabric specification on this site that the construction cannot settle. No weavable sett of an ordinary shirting yarn gets within two hundred times of it, layering the cloth barely helps because the resistance is inertial rather than viscous, and the floor set by the yarn's own porosity lands on the same order as the threshold with a fivefold bracket around it.

6 figures · Permeability Where a muslin's warmth actually is. A muslin's own thermal resistance is 0.0108 m²K/W, and the still-air layer clinging to its outside is 0.12 — so 92 per cent of what a person is wearing is air that is not in the cloth. Wind takes it: the boundary layer thins as the square root of the speed, and above a few metres per second the air is also being driven straight through the fabric, which shorts out whatever resistance the fabric had. The pair leaves 22 per cent of the still-air value at 16 m/s. Both mechanisms take away air rather than cloth, which is why a windproof layer works and a thicker weave does not, and why the fibre — which the conductivity bracket could not separate anyway — never enters this figure.

The wind takes the air and not the cloth

A shirting's own thermal resistance is eight per cent of what a person wearing it has; the other ninety-two is a still-air layer half a millimetre thick clinging to its outside. Wind destroys both, and it destroys the larger one first and by a mechanism that has nothing to do with the fabric — so a windproof layer works by keeping air still rather than by resisting heat.

6 figures · Insulation What a tear asks for is the weakest of a few. A tensile test pulls every thread in the width and averages them. A tear pulls the handful in the triangle at the tip of the cut, and what lets it move is whichever of those is weakest — so the quantity that governs is the minimum of a small sample, and two things follow that no mean can show. Its expectation is below the mean: at CV 15% the weakest of 4 is 0.853 of the mean thread, and the weakest of 40 is 0.718. And its scatter is enormous compared with a tensile test's: 10.9% against the 0.75% a mean of four hundred threads would show. A tear strength that varies by a tenth between specimens of the same cloth is not a badly run test. It is the only answer an extreme of four can give.

A tear asks fewer threads than a pull

A strip test averages a hundred threads and a tear interrogates four. That difference alone accounts for the two things everybody knows about tear testing — that it reads low, and that it scatters — without anything about the cloth being different between the two tests.

6 figures · Damage The same fault in the warp and in the weft. A 50 m piece 1500 mm wide, with a 3-thread fault in each direction. The width is drawn 9.3 times over scale so that the piece is a rectangle rather than a line, and the two faults are drawn as marks rather than at their own widths, which at this scale are a fifth of a pixel. They have the same cause size — 3 threads — and they condemn 0.063 m² and 0.0020 m² respectively, a ratio of 31 to one, because a warp fault runs the length of the piece and a weft fault runs its width. That ratio is the aspect ratio of the piece and nothing else, so it is a property of how cloth is made rather than of what went wrong. It is why a broken end stops the loom and a mispick often does not, and why the two faults are priced by every grading scheme as though they were different kinds of thing.

A missing end is a fault the length of the piece

A broken end and a mispick are the same size of accident — one thread — and they condemn areas that differ by a factor of thirty. The ratio is the aspect ratio of the piece and nothing else, which makes it a fact about how cloth is made rather than about what went wrong.

6 figures · Faults Folding, and what it takes out of the singles. Two 20 tex singles spun at 800 turns per metre and folded the other way at 460 — a ratio of 0.575, which is the trade's own and is a measurement rather than a derivation. A single held at its ends and wound round its neighbour turns about its own axis once for every turn of the fold, so it is left with 340 turns per metre of its own: its surface fibres lie at 10.1° to its axis rather than the 22.8° they were spun at. Folding untwists. The short strokes are drawn at that residual angle; the two long curves are centre lines and are not the yarn — each strand is itself a bundle of 118 fibres, and the residual angle is what holds them.

A sewing thread is a different animal

It is folded, balanced, lubricated and finished, and every one of those is an answer to a requirement no weaving yarn has. The lubricant is the interesting one: it makes the thread sewable by lowering the friction that was holding its own fibres together.

6 figures · Seams A cloth loses its strength long before it loses its mass. Rubbing a 2/2 twill in sheeting down, plotted against how much of its own solid volume has gone. The lower curve is the fraction of the plan the rubbing is touching; the upper is the fraction of the warp's section that has been cut away. They are wildly different because the wear is spread and the damage is concentrated: material comes off the whole surface, but it comes off every thread at the same place, and a thread breaks at its thinnest place. At one per cent of the mass gone the section is already 5% smaller. That is why a fabric that looks barely worn fails a strength test, and why abrasion resistance measured as mass loss and abrasion resistance measured as residual strength are two different quantities that are quoted as one.

A cloth loses its strength before its mass

Rub a fabric and it sheds material from all over its surface, but it sheds it from every thread at the same place — and a thread breaks at its thinnest place. So the strength gone is always several times the mass gone, the ratio is computable from the bearing curve, and it is worst for the weave whose crowns are points.

6 figures · Damage A seam stands 763 µm proud of a cloth 382 µm thick. A 10 mm seam allowance of 3 plies in a 60 mm panel of one, in sheeting. The seam stands 763 µm above the body of the garment — which is 102 times the depth at which the body cloth first comes into contact with anything at all. So a flat surface rubbed across this garment touches only the seam, over 16.7% of the area drawn, until it has crushed a whole thickness of fabric. Everything this collection computes about where wear lands on a woven surface applies inside that 16.7%, and the other 83.3% is not being touched.

A seam stands proud and wears first

A seam allowance is three plies where the garment is one, so it stands three quarters of a millimetre above a cloth whose own surface has a few micrometres of contact in it. Anything flat rubbed across the garment touches the seam and nothing else — all of the wear on two or three per cent of the area, until a whole thickness of fabric has been crushed.

7 figures · Seams How much of an abrasion loss is not damage. The share of a reported abrasion mass loss that is hair rather than cloth, for sheeting as woven and raised 64-fold. The first material off a fabric is its hair layer, which is 0.107% of a bare cloth's mass and 6.84% of a napped one's — and which regenerates, so it keeps coming off. A bare cloth is through it by 5344 cycles and the test then reaches the crowns, where the loss means damage. A napped cloth is not through it by 342000, which is more cycles than any standard test runs, so a Martindale on a fleece never measures the fabric at all. Two cloths taken to the same mass loss have therefore not lost the same thing, and the more heavily napped one may not have been damaged. a-cloth-loses-its-strength-before-its-mass made the same point about a different pair of quantities; this is the same failure one layer further out.

Abrasion takes the hairs first

An abrasion test reports milligrams lost against cycles, and the first milligrams off any fabric are not fabric. On a bare cloth that stage is over in a few thousand cycles. On a napped one it is not over by the end of the test, so a Martindale on a fleece never measures the fleece.

6 figures · Damage The strong fibre is the one that pills. Standing pills per unit area by fibre, relative to wool, at one and the same fuzz supply — every row is the same cloth raised the same amount, so the only thing varying is how long a pill survives once it exists. A pill is not made, it is kept: rubbing generates it and rubbing breaks the anchor fibres that hold it, and an anchor survives in proportion to how much force it takes to break. So polyester carries 18 times wool's standing population from the same generation rate, and the ordering here is exactly the ordering of tenacity and nothing else. Wool sheds its pills because wool anchors break. No two real fabrics have the same fuzz supply, which is why a wool knit still pills more than a cotton shirting in practice — the comparison drawn here isolates the anchor and says nothing about the generation, and reading it as a ranking of fabrics would be wrong.

A pill is anchored, not made

Every account of pilling starts with how a ball of fibre forms and stops there, which explains why fabrics pill and not why some of them stay pilled. A pill is not a thing that happens; it is a standing population, and the number on a fabric at any moment is a generation rate times a lifetime.

6 figures · Pilling A fifth of a strong fibre buys most of its pilling. How long a pill survives on a wool fabric as nylon is blended into it, relative to the pure wool. A pill is held by several anchor fibres and survives while any of them holds, so its life is set by the strongest anchor it happens to have — and the chance that a pill with 8 anchors has at least one strong one is 1 − (1 − x)^8, which is already 83% at a fifth. The blend therefore gets 83% of the pure strong fibre's pill life while keeping the whole of the weak fibre's fuzz supply, which is the worst of both. Nine tenths of the way arrives by 30%. No average of the two fibres' properties produces this curve: it is a maximum over a small sample, and a maximum is not an average. It is also why a fifteen-per-cent polyamide in a wool knit is notorious, and the arithmetic says the reputation is deserved.

The strong fibre is the one that pills

A pill survives while any one of its anchors holds, which is a maximum over a small sample rather than an average — and a maximum behaves nothing like an average. A fifth of a strong fibre in a blend buys four fifths of the pure strong fibre's pill life while leaving the whole of the weak fibre's fuzz supply in place.

7 figures · Pilling Thirty micrometres is a buckling load. The wool fibre diameter at which a protruding end reaches the measured threshold for prickle, against how far it protrudes. A fibre end pressed against skin is a column held at the cloth and free to slide at its tip, so it buckles at 20.19EI/ℓ² and carries no more load than that; below the threshold it bends away and is felt as touch, above it the load stands and is felt as pain. At a two-millimetre protrusion — which this site's own hair model puts in the top fifth of a wool's population — the threshold diameter is 32 µm, bracketed at 29–34 by the range of the measured force. Neither the thirty micrometres nor the two millimetres was put in. The band is the force bracket, and the fourth power in I = πd⁴/64 is what makes the boundary sharp: at a mean of 21 µm and a spread of 24%, 3.2% of the fibres are over it, and it is that few per cent that decides whether a garment can be worn.

Prickle is a buckling load

The wool trade specifies comfort against skin by the percentage of fibres coarser than thirty micrometres, and the thirty is a measured boundary with no derivation attached. It is a column formula: solve for the diameter at which a protruding fibre end stops bending away and starts standing its ground, and thirty micrometres falls out.

6 figures · Prickle A woven filter catches what its rating says it cannot. What fraction of a particle stream is intercepted by the hair layer of a filter cloth, against particle size, at three levels of raising. The cloth's own largest opening is 290 µm, so by geometry it stops nothing smaller than that at all — and the hairs catch a few per cent of particles ten and a hundred times finer, because a particle whose path passes within its own radius of a hair touches it. On a bare cloth the numbers are small; the point is that they are not zero, because a cake grows from the particles that stop, and once a cake exists the cloth is no longer doing the filtering. Raising the same cloth 32-fold takes a ten-micrometre capture from 0.8% to 23%, which is why a napped filter cloth exists. Interception is taken as the bare geometric ratio of the two diameters with no flow model behind it, so every number here is a lower bound.

A woven filter beats its own rating

A filter cloth's rating comes from the largest channel through it, and by geometry it stops nothing smaller. It stops a few per cent of particles ten times smaller anyway, on the fibre ends standing in its holes — and a few per cent is not filtration. It is exactly enough to start a cake, and after that the cloth is not filtering.

6 figures · Filtration What holds a thread in, as two factors. The two quantities whose product is the grip on a buried thread, for a woven poplin and a jersey of the same yarn. Each contact in the knit is lighter by 8.0 times, and the contacts are further apart by 5.6 — one per half loop length against one per thread spacing. They multiply rather than competing, so the grip per millimetre of buried thread is 31 times weaker in the knit, and the crossover length at which a thread breaks rather than slides moves with it: 11.6 mm in the cloth and 461 in the knit. The two factors are drawn separately because their product is two orders of magnitude and a bar chart of it would put the knit's bar below the width of a line.

The knitted pilling criterion gets its number

Knitwear pills and shirting does not, and the standing explanation here has been that a knit presents more exposed yarn under less pressure between its threads. The second half had no number. It has one now, and it is bigger than the argument needed: the grip on a buried fibre is thirty times weaker in a knit than in a woven cloth of the same yarn.

6 figures · Pilling What a run has to overcome. The friction holding one loop in the loop below it, against how tightly the fabric is knitted. It is the coefficient of friction times the contact force times the two interlacings a stitch makes, and it runs from 14.7 to 35.1 millinewtons across the knittable range — a factor of 2.4 for a factor of under two in tightness factor, because the contact force and the tightness move together. That is the arithmetic behind a rule every knitter has: a slack fabric runs and a tight one does not, and tightening it is the only lever that works. The figures are upper bounds, since a set yarn presses less.

A run is a race between two energies

A dropped stitch travels when a loop can be pulled out of the loop below it, and there are two candidate drivers: the energy the loop releases by unravelling, and the load the garment is under. One of them turns out to be negligible, and knowing which changes what a knitter can do about it.

6 figures · Damage What a knit gives when it is pulled. Force against course-wise extension for a 20 tex cotton jersey at a 3.5 mm loop, computed from the loop's own bending with the relaxed shape as the yarn's natural one. The loop length is the same at every point on the curve: nothing here is the yarn stretching. It reaches 92% extension at 2.96 N per metre and then stiffens by a factor of 85 over the rest of the range, as the straight line between two interlacings runs up against the yarn between them. This is the number the collection's second phase recorded as a lower bound it could not compute, and it is still a lower bound in one respect: friction at the contacts is not in it, so a real fabric is stiffer than this and does not come back along the same curve.

A seam must give what the knit gives

A knitted seam fails because it is too short, not because it is too weak: the thread in it is nearly two thousand times stronger than the load it carries. What decides whether it survives is one line of geometry — the extension a seam can reach is twice the fabric's thickness times the stitches per unit length.

6 figures · Seams A knit's warmth is its thickness, and a rib's thickness is a machine setting. Thermal resistance in tog for a 20 tex cotton at a 3.5 mm loop, for a plain jersey and for a one-by-one rib at four bed gaps. The bar is the lower bound and the mark beyond it is the upper — Wiener's two bounds on a mixture of fibre and air at the fabric's own fibre fraction, which is 26.6% for the jersey and falls to 8.9% for the widest rib. The jersey holds 0.088 tog and the rib at five diameters 0.334 — a factor of 3.8, bought entirely by opening the beds. Every one of these is a small fraction of the still-air layer that clings to a garment's outside, which is worth about 1.2 tog on its own.

A knit is warm because of where its yarn is not

Warmth is a thickness of still air, and until a knitted fabric had a thickness there was nothing to compute. It has one now, and the answer is that a rib's warmth is a machine setting: opening the beds from two diameters to five nearly trebles the fabric's resistance without changing a gram of yarn.

6 figures · Insulation What a knitted band presses a limb with. Pressure against extension for a 20 tex cotton band at a 3.5 mm loop, wrapped round a 30 mm radius — a wrist. The pressure is the fabric's own tension per unit width divided by that radius, and the tension is the loop's bending with the relaxed shape as the yarn's natural one, so nothing here is fitted. Over the range a cuff is actually used across it runs from a twentieth of a millimetre of mercury to 0.85. The shaded bands are what a compression garment is specified at, and the curve does not reach the lowest of them until 277 per cent — which is not a cuff, it is a fabric stretched almost to the point where its yarn runs straight.

What a cuff presses with

A rib cuff holds a sleeve on a wrist, so it must be pressing. Divide its own recovery force by the radius it is wrapped round and the pressure comes out at eight tenths of a millimetre of mercury — a fiftieth of the lightest medical compression, and two orders below what the same fabric resists being squashed with.

6 figures · Pressure A rib crosses a gap where a jersey crosses a diameter. A one-by-one rib in section across 5 wales, drawn at a bed gap of 3 yarn diameters — 0.501 mm — because the relaxed gap of a rib is a measurement this collection does not hold and every figure of one says what it was drawn at. Alternate wales sit on opposite beds, so every sinker loop between them travels the whole gap. In a jersey the same yarn climbs one diameter, 0.167 mm. That single difference takes the contact force from 38.30 mN at 11.7° out of the fabric to 72.51 mN at 16.2°, and the through-thickness part from 7.81 mN to 20.17 mN.

A run cannot cross a bed

A dropped stitch unroves because its neighbour above can pull it out along a path that costs almost nothing. In a rib the neighbour above is on the other bed, and the path goes through the gap — so a run in a two-bed fabric has to pay for a climb before it can take a single loop.

6 figures · Damage A knot, and the tension falling through it. A 20 tex cotton thread wrapped through 1 turn at a bend radius of 1 yarn diameters, with a coefficient of friction of 0.30. The wrap is drawn as a spiral because a thread taken round a pin comes back beside itself rather than onto itself. The marks round it are the fraction of the entry tension still there: 100%, 69%, 47%, 32%, 22%, 15%. The bend has already spent 3.6% of strain at the outside of the thread before any of that happens, against a breaking strain of 6.6%. So the largest total is at the entry, before the knot has done any gripping at all — which is where a knot in a real yarn is observed to break, and why a knot's efficiency is a property of its first bend rather than of the knot.

A knot is nothing but contact

A knot has no fastening in it. Nothing is glued, hooked, sewn or threaded through a hole: a thread is bent round itself until the friction where it presses on itself is more than the load. That makes a knot the purest contact problem in the subject, and the place to look first for what contact does.

6 figures · Contact A knot, and the tension falling through it. A 20 tex cotton thread wrapped through 1 turn at a bend radius of 1 yarn diameters, with a coefficient of friction of 0.30. The wrap is drawn as a spiral because a thread taken round a pin comes back beside itself rather than onto itself. The marks round it are the fraction of the entry tension still there: 100%, 69%, 47%, 32%, 22%, 15%. The bend has already spent 3.6% of strain at the outside of the thread before any of that happens, against a breaking strain of 6.6%. So the largest total is at the entry, before the knot has done any gripping at all — which is where a knot in a real yarn is observed to break, and why a knot's efficiency is a property of its first bend rather than of the knot.

Where a knot breaks

It breaks at the entry, before the knot has done any gripping at all. Two quantities run along a knot's path and only one of them rises; the other falls from the first millimetre; and their sum is largest where the thread arrives.

6 figures · Damage What a knot costs, and what decides it. Knot efficiency against the radius the thread is bent to, for 5 fibres at 20 tex, computed at the free end of the stiffness bracket — each fibre bending about its own axis, so the strain at the outside of the bend is half a fibre diameter over the radius. At one yarn diameter of radius, cotton keeps 46%, which is the rule of thumb that a knot halves a rope's strength. What separates the curves is not the knot and not the friction: it is the fibre's own breaking strain, which is how much the bend is allowed to spend before there is nothing left.

A knot halves a yarn and says why

The rule is quoted for every rope and every knot and derived nowhere. It comes out at forty-six per cent for a cotton — but only if the yarn's fibres bend individually. A yarn bending as a solid section has already spent five times its breaking strain before any load arrives, so it could not be knotted at all.

6 figures · Tensile What a knot costs, and what decides it. Knot efficiency against the radius the thread is bent to, for 5 fibres at 20 tex, computed at the free end of the stiffness bracket — each fibre bending about its own axis, so the strain at the outside of the bend is half a fibre diameter over the radius. At one yarn diameter of radius, cotton keeps 46%, which is the rule of thumb that a knot halves a rope's strength. What separates the curves is not the knot and not the friction: it is the fibre's own breaking strain, which is how much the bend is allowed to spend before there is nothing left.

Which yarns knot well

A knot's efficiency depends on three things and only one of them is the knot. The other two are the fibre's fineness and its breaking strain, and across this collection's own table those give efficiencies from six per cent to eighty-three at exactly the same bend.

6 figures · Tensile A tube of an elastic band knitted 157 mm round, up one leg. A tube knitted 157 mm round from an elastic band, pulled up an illustrative leg and read at four stations. At each the tube is stretched by the leg's circumference over its own, pulls back with the band's tension at that stretch, and presses with that tension over the leg's radius: ankle 22 cm, stretched 40%, 20.0 mmHg; lower calf 29 cm, stretched 85%, 32.1 mmHg; calf 36 cm, stretched 129%, 39.4 mmHg; below the knee 34 cm, stretched 116%, 37.6 mmHg. The calf is pressed 1.97 times as hard as the ankle. What the bars cannot show is the leg's own give, which a firm tube flattens and which changes the radius the law divides by.

A tube of one size presses the calf harder than the ankle

A band presses a limb with its tension over the limb's radius, so it is easy to conclude that a band grips hardest where the limb is thinnest. That is true of a band held at one tension, and no knitted tube is. A tube knitted to one size is stretched further wherever the leg is thicker, and its tension rises faster than the radius does: an elastic tube pressing an ankle at twenty millimetres of mercury presses the calf at thirty-nine, and a cotton jersey tube presses its calf three and a half times as hard as its ankle. A stocking graduated the other way has to pull hardest where it presses less.

6 figures · Pressure An inflated tube in section at 0.5, 1, 1.6 times its wrinkling moment. The cross-section of an inflated tube of 100 mm radius at 50 kPa, bent by 0.5 times, 1 times, 1.6 times its wrinkling moment of 78.5 N·m, with the outside of the bend at the top. Each stroke is the wall's axial tension at that point: the pressure's even 2.5 kN/m with the bending's cosine added. At half the wrinkling moment the inside is still in tension; at the wrinkling moment it falls to nothing; past it the inside has gone slack over a dashed arc and the rest carries both the pressure's end force and the moment. What the drawing cannot show is the wrinkles themselves, whose wavelength a cloth's bending stiffness decides and this section leaves out.

An inflated beam wrinkles at a moment with no cloth in it

An air-filled tube can be used as a beam because the pressure pulls its cloth taut along its length, and a cloth that cannot carry a push can carry a bending moment for exactly as long as that pull outweighs it. The inside of the bend goes slack at πpr³/2 and the tube folds at πpr³ — seventy-nine and a hundred and fifty-seven newton metres for a tube a fifth of a metre across at half a bar — and there is no property of the cloth in either. The cloth decides how far the beam bends on the way, and how much pressure it can be pumped to.

5 figures · Membrane