Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
The collection

Every essay — page 17

Page 17 of 23, continuing through the fields in the same order.

What cloth is Weaves Setting and geometry Knits and other structures Mechanics and drape Pattern and colour Compound and figured cloths After the loom Cloth doing a job

FieldsSeriesThreadsWeave indexRefutationsConceptsSearch

Setting and geometry

Yarn diameter, crimp and cover. How close threads can be set, why thread count is not what it is taken for, and which model produced any number.

Both halves of the twist curve, at 28 mm staple. The falling curve is obliquity and is exact — the affine end of the bracket, computed from the helix and nothing else. The rising curve is cohesion and is the half this collection had declined: a fibre end is gripped by friction under the twist's own radial pressure, the fibre's strength and the yarn's load cancel out of the comparison, and what is left is a critical length that depends on the twist through a pure function of the angle. Their product has a maximum at a twist factor of 3101 — 693 turns per metre at 20 tex, a surface angle of 20° — which is inside the range spinners use. The scale of the rising curve is fitted, through a contact efficiency of 0.05, and moving it moves the optimum; what it cannot move is the ordering between two staples or two fibres, which is what the two claims made from this figure are about.

The other half of the twist curve

This collection computed the falling half of the strength–twist curve exactly and declined the rising half as being out of reach. It is not out of reach. With the grip derived rather than assumed, the optimum comes out at a twist factor — and the same twist factor at every count, which is why the trade quotes twist factors at all.

6 figures · Twist Folding, and what it takes out of the singles. Two 20 tex singles spun at 800 turns per metre and folded the other way at 540 — a ratio of 0.675, which is the trade's own and is a measurement rather than a derivation. A single held at its ends and wound round its neighbour turns about its own axis once for every turn of the fold, so it is left with 260 turns per metre of its own: its surface fibres lie at 7.8° to its axis rather than the 22.8° they were spun at. Folding untwists. The short strokes are drawn at that residual angle; the two long curves are centre lines and are not the yarn — each strand is itself a bundle of 118 fibres, and the residual angle is what holds them.

Folding is untwisting

Wind two singles round each other and each one turns about its own axis once per turn of the fold. So a folded yarn's singles are not the singles that went into it, and at a folding ratio of exactly one half the two helices cancel.

6 figures · Ply Folding improves the evenness and not the yarn. Two independent singles of 15% give a fold of 10.61%, because independent errors add in quadrature: an improvement of exactly √2. The floor falls by exactly √2 as well, from 9.93 per cent to 7.02, because the fibre count is 2 times what it was. So the index of irregularity is unchanged — 1.511 before and 1.511 after, equal to twelve figures, not merely close. Folding does not make a better yarn; it makes a bigger one, and every part of the improvement is the part the count was going to give anyway. What folding does buy is elsewhere: the torque, the surface, and where the grip comes from.

A two-fold yarn is not twice a single

Folding halves nothing. It improves a yarn's evenness by exactly √2 and lowers the floor that evenness is measured against by exactly √2, so the index of irregularity comes out identical — folding does not make a better yarn, it makes a bigger one.

6 figures · Ply One yarn, two packing factors. The same 20 tex cotton yarn — the same fibres, the same count, the same mass per metre — drawn at a packing factor of 0.45 and of 0.75. Its diameter is 192.9 µm in one and 149.5 µm in the other, a difference of 29.1%, because a diameter goes as the inverse square root of the packing. Every cover factor, every jammed sett and every hole in this collection went through that number, and the site's value of 0.6 was obtained by inverting a rule published for cotton yarns at one particular twist. Nothing here models how packing moves with twist; the figure is here to show the size of the thing that has been held constant.

The diameter was quoted at one twist

Every diameter in this collection came from a packing factor of 0.6, and that number was got by inverting a rule published for cotton yarns at one particular twist. Here is what moves if it is wrong by the width of the range real yarns occupy — and which single quantity does not move at all.

6 figures · Sett The sett sets the pitch of the relief and not its height. A 2/2 twill in sheeting set from 14 to 29 ends per centimetre. The spacing of the crowns falls from 714 µm to 345 µm — in exact proportion to the sett, because it is the sett — while the height the surface swings through moves from 381 µm to 381 µm, which is not at all. The reason is the closure condition: the two crimp heights must add to the sum of the two diameters whatever the spacing, so the amplitude of the surface is pinned by the yarn and only its wavelength is free. The third curve is the root-mean-square roughness measured off the sampled surface, which wanders by a few per cent because it depends on where the sample grid falls relative to the crowns — it is drawn to show that it has no trend, not to be read off. A closer sett therefore makes a finer-grained cloth and not a smoother one, and the two are confused in every description of fabric handle. At 32 ends per centimetre the geometry refuses altogether: the cloth is close enough that its crimp can no longer divide equally, which is the jam arriving as a loss of symmetry rather than as a loss of room.

The sett owns the pitch and the yarn owns the height

Set a cloth twice as close and its surface does not get smoother. The crowns come twice as often, because that is what a sett is, and they stand at very nearly the same height, because the closure condition pins the amplitude to the yarn — so a fine cloth is finer-grained rather than flatter, and the two are confused in every description of handle.

6 figures · Sett The depth belongs to the fibre and the density to the yarn. Over a 5-fold range of cotton yarn counts, the hair layer's decay length moves by 6.2% and its population moves by 2.37-fold against a square root of 2.24. Both follow from one cancellation. The shell's share of the section is 4d_f/D, the migration period is a fixed number of yarn diameters, and λ = ½(kD)(4d_f/D) — the yarn's diameter divides out and leaves λ = 2k·d_f, a length belonging to the fibre alone. The density has no such cancellation and goes as √(nφ)/L. The two small departures visible here are not two facts: they are the shell's second-order term, and they are the same number to the last bit of a double. The consequence for a spinner is that a coarse yarn is hairier and its hairs are no longer, so everything that depends on reach — pilling, prickle, a printed edge — is decided by the fibre and not by the count.

Hairiness goes as the root of the count

A coarse yarn is hairier than a fine one and everybody knows it. What nobody has said is that its hairs are no longer — the count and the length obey different laws, one rises as a square root and the other does not move at all, and the identity behind both was asserted on this site for an entirely unrelated reason.

6 figures · Hair layer Compacting a spinning triangle moves one instrument and not the other. What happens to each hairiness reading when a 20 tex cotton yarn is spun compact instead of ring, as a percentage of the ring value. The total falls by 8% and the long hairs by 65%, a ratio of 8.3. The asymmetry is a prediction rather than a fit. Compaction removes ends that were unbound over a long stretch of the spinning triangle, which is the long population and nothing else; the short population is untouched, and it carries about 88% of the length the integrating instrument is adding up. So the instrument that sees everything barely moves and the one that sees only the tail collapses. The model under-states the fall in the total, because compaction certainly does something to the short population too and nothing here models it — the direction of that error is stated and it is the conservative one.

The spinning triangle decides the hair

A ring frame converges a flat ribbon of fibres to a round yarn, and for the length of that convergence the fibres at the ribbon's edges are held by nothing. Everything a spinner can do about hairiness is done in that triangle, and the two hairiness instruments respond to it by wildly different amounts.

6 figures · Twist How much of a thread is spent going round the one it crosses. The share of a warp end's length that lies inside the wrap — the arc of radius half the combined diameter, which is as close as two centre lines can get — for every cloth in this collection's table, with a jersey at the foot for comparison. It runs from 7% on an open scrim to 54% on a sheeting, and what is left over is a straight run with no shape to solve. A knitted loop's figure is zero: its peak curvature never reaches the wrap's, so it touches at points and is free in between. That is the whole reason the same solver refuses a shirting and converges on a jersey, and it is a statement about the two fabrics rather than about the arithmetic.

A woven thread has no room to bend

Set an elastica solver on an ordinary shirting and it refuses the problem. The refusal is the finding: a woven thread's whole crimp is spent going round the thread it crosses, between a fourteenth and a half of its length lies inside that wrap, and what is left has no slack to take a shape with.

6 figures · Elastica A knit's warmth is its thickness, and a rib's thickness is a machine setting. Thermal resistance in tog for a 20 tex cotton at a 3.5 mm loop, for a plain jersey and for a one-by-one rib at four bed gaps. The bar is the lower bound and the mark beyond it is the upper — Wiener's two bounds on a mixture of fibre and air at the fabric's own fibre fraction, which is 26.6% for the jersey and falls to 8.9% for the widest rib. The jersey holds 0.088 tog and the rib at five diameters 0.334 — a factor of 3.8, bought entirely by opening the beds. Every one of these is a small fraction of the still-air layer that clings to a garment's outside, which is worth about 1.2 tog on its own.

How dense a knitted fabric is

A fabric's areal weight is what the trade specifies and it says nothing about bulk. Divide it by a thickness and the answer is a density — 0.40 grams a cubic centimetre for a jersey, a quarter of the fibre it is made of — and that quarter, the share of the volume that is not air, is the number every other property follows.

6 figures · Weight A slack twisted yarn takes a coil of one size. A 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre. Its own torque is 1.177 µN·mm at the free bound, and a rod under tension T is stable while its torque stays under 2·√(B·T). Below that tension the straight state stops being a minimum and the thread wraps on itself at a radius of 1.59 mm. That radius is 2B/M, which is 2/(r·ω) once the torque is written out: it depends on the twist and on the ratio of the two stiffnesses, and on neither stiffness itself.

Why a slack yarn snarls

Let go of a twisted thread and it wraps on itself. That is not the yarn being badly behaved: it is a buckling, it has a criterion, and the criterion turns a nuisance into an instrument for measuring the one constant this collection cannot pin down.

6 figures · Twist How much of a yarn has to hang before it stops snarling. The tension a 20 tex cotton needs to stay straight, at each twist level, expressed as the length of the yarn's own weight that would supply it. The two curves are the two ends of the stiffness bracket: the fibres free to slide, and the section coherent. At 800 turns a metre they are 1.9 metres and 616. Anybody who has let go of a twisted yarn knows which of those is right, which makes this one of very few places where the bracket can be closed from the everyday end. Both rise as the square of the twist, because the torque does and the criterion is quadratic in it.

How much yarn has to hang

The tension a thread needs to stay straight, converted into the only unit anybody has an intuition for: the length of the yarn's own weight. One bound says two metres and the other says six hundred, and everybody who has handled thread already knows which.

6 figures · Twist A slack twisted yarn takes a coil of one size. A 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre. Its own torque is 1.177 µN·mm at the free bound, and a rod under tension T is stable while its torque stays under 2·√(B·T). Below that tension the straight state stops being a minimum and the thread wraps on itself at a radius of 1.59 mm. That radius is 2B/M, which is 2/(r·ω) once the torque is written out: it depends on the twist and on the ratio of the two stiffnesses, and on neither stiffness itself.

A snarl comes in one size

The radius a twisted thread coils to is twice its bending rigidity over its torque. Write the torque out and the bending rigidity cancels completely, leaving a number that depends on the twist and on the ratio of two stiffnesses — and on nothing else about the yarn at all.

6 figures · Twist Where a fold's two moments cancel, and where the trade folds. The two moments about a fold's own axis, for 2 singles of 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre. The falling curve is what the singles' own residual twist supplies, which the folding takes out of them; the rising one is what bending each single onto its helix costs. They cross at 161 turns a metre, a ratio of 0.201, and the closed form for that crossing is C/(B+C) — the ratio of the two stiffnesses and nothing else. The shaded band is where the trade actually folds, 0.6 to 0.75 of the singles twist. The balance point is nowhere near it, by a factor of three.

The folding rule is not a torque balance

Fold a two-fold yarn at about two thirds of its singles twist. This collection has carried that as a bracket copied from the trade and derived nowhere. It is now derivable, the derivation gives a fifth rather than two thirds, and reaching two thirds would need a fibre stiffer in torsion than in bending.

7 figures · Ply Three rules for how hard to fold a yarn, and which one the trade uses. For 2, 3, 4 folds of 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre: the ratio that makes the fold's surface helix angle equal its singles', the ratio that sets the fold's net moment to zero, and the ratio the trade actually folds at. The surface rule is 1/√n exactly, because a fold of n singles is √n times the diameter. The torque balance is C/(B+C), which for this fibre is 0.201 and is the same at every count, every twist and every number of folds. The trade's brackets contain the surface rule in all three rows and the torque balance in none of them.

The folding rule is a surface angle

Fold at two thirds for two singles, six tenths for three, a half for four. Those are one over the square root of the fold count, they are what makes a fold's surface twist angle equal its singles', and all three of the trade's brackets contain the number exactly.

7 figures · Ply The fold the trade actually makes. 2 singles of 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre, folded at 566 — a ratio of 0.707. That is 1/√2, the ratio at which the fold's surface helix angle equals its singles' — 22.8° — because a fold of 2 singles is √2 times the diameter. The trade's own bracket for 2 folds is 0.6 to 0.75, and it contains this number.

What a balanced yarn is balanced about

A specification that says a yarn is balanced does not say which of two conditions it means, and the two have different numbers, different dependences and different consequences. One of them is what folding achieves and the other is what folding is said to achieve.

6 figures · Ply Three rules for how hard to fold a yarn, and which one the trade uses. For 2, 3, 4 folds of 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre: the ratio that makes the fold's surface helix angle equal its singles', the ratio that sets the fold's net moment to zero, and the ratio the trade actually folds at. The surface rule is 1/√n exactly, because a fold of n singles is √n times the diameter. The torque balance is C/(B+C), which for this fibre is 0.201 and is the same at every count, every twist and every number of folds. The trade's brackets contain the surface rule in all three rows and the torque balance in none of them.

A cabled yarn is a fold of folds

The rule that sets a fold's twist is one over the square root of the number of components. Apply it twice and a cabled yarn's three twist levels are fixed by two integers — which is a prediction with no free constants, about a class of yarn the trade quotes no rule for at all.

7 figures · Ply How much of a yarn has to hang before it stops snarling. The tension a 20 tex cotton needs to stay straight, at each twist level, expressed as the length of the yarn's own weight that would supply it. The two curves are the two ends of the stiffness bracket: the fibres free to slide, and the section coherent. At 800 turns a metre they are 1.9 metres and 616. Anybody who has let go of a twisted yarn knows which of those is right, which makes this one of very few places where the bracket can be closed from the everyday end. Both rise as the square of the twist, because the torque does and the criterion is quadratic in it.

What a high-twist yarn costs a cloth

Twist buys strength up to a point and then loses it, and everything else it does is a cost. A crepe twist is chosen knowing that, and the trade's twist limits are a balance among five quantities that this collection can now put beside one another.

7 figures · Twist The section the fabric asks for, beside the one the model drew. A 20 tex cotton yarn in cross-section, at 900 times life size. The circle is what every solve here has assumed: a diameter of 0.167 mm from the count and the packing factor. The ellipse has the same area and a minor axis of 78% of it, which is the closest the fabric's own adjacent courses come to one another — 0.130 mm. Nothing about that number was fitted to a fabric. It falls out of a solve that knew nothing about flattening, and it lands inside the range the trade reports for yarn in cloth, which has been carried here as a free parameter ever since it first put a number on a sett.

What a sett is when the yarn is not round

A jamming condition says how close threads can be set, and it says it in terms of a diameter. A thread in a cloth does not have one diameter: it has a wide one and a narrow one, and which of them a jam is about depends on which way the threads are jamming.

7 figures · Sett The section the fabric asks for, beside the one the model drew. A 20 tex cotton yarn in cross-section, at 900 times life size. The circle is what every solve here has assumed: a diameter of 0.167 mm from the count and the packing factor. The ellipse has the same area and a minor axis of 78% of it, which is the closest the fabric's own adjacent courses come to one another — 0.130 mm. Nothing about that number was fitted to a fabric. It falls out of a solve that knew nothing about flattening, and it lands inside the range the trade reports for yarn in cloth, which has been carried here as a free parameter ever since it first put a number on a sett.

What a flattened yarn does to its cover

A cover factor is a sett times a diameter, and it decides how much of a cloth is thread and how much is hole. A flattened yarn is a third wider than a round one of the same area, so a cloth of flattened yarn covers more at the same sett — and every opacity, permeability and shade computed from a round diameter is wrong in one direction.

6 figures · Cover The flattening a knitted fabric asks for, against its own tightness. Every point is a solved fabric — 18 of them, over five loop lengths, three relaxation states and three counts — and the vertical axis is the closest its adjacent courses come, in diameters. The values run from 0.707 to 0.839 and they fall on one curve against the tightness factor, which is the model's only dimensionless group. That is what makes this a structural requirement rather than an arithmetical accident of one example: a tighter fabric demands a flatter yarn, by an amount its own tightness decides, and nothing about the fibre or the count enters except through that group.

The count that decides how flat

A knitted fabric's demanded flattening is a function of its tightness factor, and a tightness factor is the square root of a count over a loop length. So a coarser yarn at the same loop is flatter — which is a prediction about a spinner's choice that nobody has framed as one.

6 figures · Count What the count moves at 150 grams. Plain cotton cloths that all weigh 150 g/m², from 20 tex to 200 tex, with sett and crimp solved together. Thickness, which is two yarn diameters, rises 3.16 times across the line; the cover factor of each thread system falls 2.75 times; their product with one plus the crimp is the same number at every count, because the weight has fixed the volume of fibre and the count only decides whether it is laid out flat or stacked up.

A weight fixes the fibre and not the drape

Every plain cotton cloth of 150 grams a square metre contains the same fibre, and the count decides only how it is arranged. Across the counts that can make that weight, thickness rises threefold and cover falls in step, so their product holds still. The bending length does something stranger: at the bound a woven yarn actually sits near, it depends on neither the count nor the weight, only on the fibre.

6 figures · Weight Which end of its interval a construction falls to. For a balanced 20 tex, 24-thread reference with its weft count and weft sett scaled, the share of the crossing height the warp takes at the least-energy state. 25 of the 28 solvable constructions land at an end of their own feasible interval — nought, with the warp dead straight, or one, with the weft dead straight — and the few between them are the frontier where the two regions meet.

The energy has no crimp ratio to give

The account left a gap at its top: a construction whose preferred crimp ratio lies outside the interval its geometry admits sits at a boundary, and boundary states had not been studied. Profiling the whole energy rather than its minimum says there are two regions and a frontier — six of the eight cloths in the table of cloths here fall to an end of their own interval with the weft dead straight, and the two that do not have wells 3.27 and 0.52 per cent deep, against a rigidity known to within a factor of 408.

5 figures · Crimp Every count that can make 150 g/m² as plain jersey. Areal weight against count for plain jersey in the fully relaxed state: the shaded wedge is every knit between a tightness factor of 1.3 and 1.6, whose weights are kₛ times the tightness times the root of the count. The rule at 150 g/m² crosses it between 15.8 and 23.9 tex, a ratio of 1.51. A plain woven cloth of the same weight can be made from anything between 20 and at least 200 tex, a range of at least 10 to one against the knit's 1.51.

A knit's weight nearly names its yarn

A woven cloth's weight is one equation in four unknowns, and a hundred and fifty grams can be woven from anything between twenty tex and two hundred. A plain jersey's weight has the loop in it and nothing else to spare, and the loop is bounded by the yarn it is knitted from. Put the two together and the loop cancels: the weight is a constant times the tightness times the root of the count, so at one weight the count is fixed to within half again — and in each relaxed state it is fixed to a different half.

6 figures · Weight The crimp split of a muslin against the warp's tension. The warp's crimp and the weft's at the least-energy state of a muslin at its own sett, with the warp held at tensions from 0.0001 to 1.0 newtons, and the yarn's rigidity 4.0 times the free bound. With no pull the warp holds 28.5 per cent and the weft 0.0; they are equal at 0.019 N, and by the front shaft's 0.52 N the warp holds 0.00 per cent. What the plot cannot show is friction: a real cloth is held wherever its crossings stop it, not at the least state.

The loom hands the crimp to the weft

Bending alone gave the fixed-sett energy nothing to say: six of eight cloths fell to the end of their interval with the weft dead straight. Put the warp's tension in and the answer is not a well but a switch. The crimp changes hands across a factor of two or three in tension, at a few hundredths of a newton — and the loom holds its warp at half a newton, so on the loom every cloth's warp is as straight as its geometry allows.

7 figures · Crimp