Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
The collection

Every essay — page 15

Page 15 of 19, continuing through the fields in the same order.

What cloth is Weaves Setting and geometry Knits and other structures Mechanics and drape Pattern and colour Compound and figured cloths After the loom Cloth doing a job

FieldsSeriesThreadsWeave indexRefutationsConceptsSearch

Setting and geometry

Yarn diameter, crimp and cover. How close threads can be set, why thread count is not what it is taken for, and which model produced any number.

The sett sets the pitch of the relief and not its height. A 2/2 twill in sheeting set from 14 to 29 ends per centimetre. The spacing of the crowns falls from 714 µm to 345 µm — in exact proportion to the sett, because it is the sett — while the height the surface swings through moves from 381 µm to 381 µm, which is not at all. The reason is the closure condition: the two crimp heights must add to the sum of the two diameters whatever the spacing, so the amplitude of the surface is pinned by the yarn and only its wavelength is free. The third curve is the root-mean-square roughness measured off the sampled surface, which wanders by a few per cent because it depends on where the sample grid falls relative to the crowns — it is drawn to show that it has no trend, not to be read off. A closer sett therefore makes a finer-grained cloth and not a smoother one, and the two are confused in every description of fabric handle. At 32 ends per centimetre the geometry refuses altogether: the cloth is close enough that its crimp can no longer divide equally, which is the jam arriving as a loss of symmetry rather than as a loss of room.

The sett owns the pitch and the yarn owns the height

Set a cloth twice as close and its surface does not get smoother. The crowns come twice as often, because that is what a sett is, and they stand at very nearly the same height, because the closure condition pins the amplitude to the yarn — so a fine cloth is finer-grained rather than flatter, and the two are confused in every description of handle.

6 figures · Sett The depth belongs to the fibre and the density to the yarn. Over a 5-fold range of cotton yarn counts, the hair layer's decay length moves by 6.2% and its population moves by 2.37-fold against a square root of 2.24. Both follow from one cancellation. The shell's share of the section is 4d_f/D, the migration period is a fixed number of yarn diameters, and λ = ½(kD)(4d_f/D) — the yarn's diameter divides out and leaves λ = 2k·d_f, a length belonging to the fibre alone. The density has no such cancellation and goes as √(nφ)/L. The two small departures visible here are not two facts: they are the shell's second-order term, and they are the same number to the last bit of a double. The consequence for a spinner is that a coarse yarn is hairier and its hairs are no longer, so everything that depends on reach — pilling, prickle, a printed edge — is decided by the fibre and not by the count.

Hairiness goes as the root of the count

A coarse yarn is hairier than a fine one and everybody knows it. What nobody has said is that its hairs are no longer — the count and the length obey different laws, one rises as a square root and the other does not move at all, and the identity behind both was asserted on this site for an entirely unrelated reason.

6 figures · Hair layer Compacting a spinning triangle moves one instrument and not the other. What happens to each hairiness reading when a 20 tex cotton yarn is spun compact instead of ring, as a percentage of the ring value. The total falls by 8% and the long hairs by 65%, a ratio of 8.3. The asymmetry is a prediction rather than a fit. Compaction removes ends that were unbound over a long stretch of the spinning triangle, which is the long population and nothing else; the short population is untouched, and it carries about 88% of the length the integrating instrument is adding up. So the instrument that sees everything barely moves and the one that sees only the tail collapses. The model under-states the fall in the total, because compaction certainly does something to the short population too and nothing here models it — the direction of that error is stated and it is the conservative one.

The spinning triangle decides the hair

A ring frame converges a flat ribbon of fibres to a round yarn, and for the length of that convergence the fibres at the ribbon's edges are held by nothing. Everything a spinner can do about hairiness is done in that triangle, and the two hairiness instruments respond to it by wildly different amounts.

6 figures · Twist How much of a thread is spent going round the one it crosses. The share of a warp end's length that lies inside the wrap — the arc of radius half the combined diameter, which is as close as two centre lines can get — for every cloth in this collection's table, with a jersey at the foot for comparison. It runs from 7% on an open scrim to 54% on a sheeting, and what is left over is a straight run with no shape to solve. A knitted loop's figure is zero: its peak curvature never reaches the wrap's, so it touches at points and is free in between. That is the whole reason the same solver refuses a shirting and converges on a jersey, and it is a statement about the two fabrics rather than about the arithmetic.

A woven thread has no room to bend

Set an elastica solver on an ordinary shirting and it refuses the problem. The refusal is the finding: a woven thread's whole crimp is spent going round the thread it crosses, between a fourteenth and a half of its length lies inside that wrap, and what is left has no slack to take a shape with.

6 figures · Elastica A knit's warmth is its thickness, and a rib's thickness is a machine setting. Thermal resistance in tog for a 20 tex cotton at a 3.5 mm loop, for a plain jersey and for a one-by-one rib at four bed gaps. The bar is the lower bound and the mark beyond it is the upper — Wiener's two bounds on a mixture of fibre and air at the fabric's own fibre fraction, which is 26.6% for the jersey and falls to 8.9% for the widest rib. The jersey holds 0.088 tog and the rib at five diameters 0.334 — a factor of 3.8, bought entirely by opening the beds. Every one of these is a small fraction of the still-air layer that clings to a garment's outside, which is worth about 1.2 tog on its own.

How dense a knitted fabric is

A fabric's areal weight is what the trade specifies and it says nothing about bulk. Divide it by a thickness and the answer is a density — 0.40 grams a cubic centimetre for a jersey, a quarter of the fibre it is made of — and that quarter, the share of the volume that is not air, is the number every other property follows.

6 figures · Weight A slack twisted yarn takes a coil of one size. A 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre. Its own torque is 1.177 µN·mm at the free bound, and a rod under tension T is stable while its torque stays under 2·√(B·T). Below that tension the straight state stops being a minimum and the thread wraps on itself at a radius of 1.59 mm. That radius is 2B/M, which is 2/(r·ω) once the torque is written out: it depends on the twist and on the ratio of the two stiffnesses, and on neither stiffness itself.

Why a slack yarn snarls

Let go of a twisted thread and it wraps on itself. That is not the yarn being badly behaved: it is a buckling, it has a criterion, and the criterion turns a nuisance into an instrument for measuring the one constant this collection cannot pin down.

6 figures · Twist How much of a yarn has to hang before it stops snarling. The tension a 20 tex cotton needs to stay straight, at each twist level, expressed as the length of the yarn's own weight that would supply it. The two curves are the two ends of the stiffness bracket: the fibres free to slide, and the section coherent. At 800 turns a metre they are 1.9 metres and 616. Anybody who has let go of a twisted yarn knows which of those is right, which makes this one of very few places where the bracket can be closed from the everyday end. Both rise as the square of the twist, because the torque does and the criterion is quadratic in it.

How much yarn has to hang

The tension a thread needs to stay straight, converted into the only unit anybody has an intuition for: the length of the yarn's own weight. One bound says two metres and the other says six hundred, and everybody who has handled thread already knows which.

6 figures · Twist A slack twisted yarn takes a coil of one size. A 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre. Its own torque is 1.177 µN·mm at the free bound, and a rod under tension T is stable while its torque stays under 2·√(B·T). Below that tension the straight state stops being a minimum and the thread wraps on itself at a radius of 1.59 mm. That radius is 2B/M, which is 2/(r·ω) once the torque is written out: it depends on the twist and on the ratio of the two stiffnesses, and on neither stiffness itself.

A snarl comes in one size

The radius a twisted thread coils to is twice its bending rigidity over its torque. Write the torque out and the bending rigidity cancels completely, leaving a number that depends on the twist and on the ratio of two stiffnesses — and on nothing else about the yarn at all.

6 figures · Twist Where a fold's two moments cancel, and where the trade folds. The two moments about a fold's own axis, for 2 singles of 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre. The falling curve is what the singles' own residual twist supplies, which the folding takes out of them; the rising one is what bending each single onto its helix costs. They cross at 161 turns a metre, a ratio of 0.201, and the closed form for that crossing is C/(B+C) — the ratio of the two stiffnesses and nothing else. The shaded band is where the trade actually folds, 0.6 to 0.75 of the singles twist. The balance point is nowhere near it, by a factor of three.

The folding rule is not a torque balance

Fold a two-fold yarn at about two thirds of its singles twist. This collection has carried that as a bracket copied from the trade and derived nowhere. It is now derivable, the derivation gives a fifth rather than two thirds, and reaching two thirds would need a fibre stiffer in torsion than in bending.

7 figures · Ply Three rules for how hard to fold a yarn, and which one the trade uses. For 2, 3, 4 folds of 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre: the ratio that makes the fold's surface helix angle equal its singles', the ratio that sets the fold's net moment to zero, and the ratio the trade actually folds at. The surface rule is 1/√n exactly, because a fold of n singles is √n times the diameter. The torque balance is C/(B+C), which for this fibre is 0.201 and is the same at every count, every twist and every number of folds. The trade's brackets contain the surface rule in all three rows and the torque balance in none of them.

The folding rule is a surface angle

Fold at two thirds for two singles, six tenths for three, a half for four. Those are one over the square root of the fold count, they are what makes a fold's surface twist angle equal its singles', and all three of the trade's brackets contain the number exactly.

7 figures · Ply The fold the trade actually makes. 2 singles of 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre, folded at 566 — a ratio of 0.707. That is 1/√2, the ratio at which the fold's surface helix angle equals its singles' — 22.8° — because a fold of 2 singles is √2 times the diameter. The trade's own bracket for 2 folds is 0.6 to 0.75, and it contains this number.

What a balanced yarn is balanced about

A specification that says a yarn is balanced does not say which of two conditions it means, and the two have different numbers, different dependences and different consequences. One of them is what folding achieves and the other is what folding is said to achieve.

6 figures · Ply Three rules for how hard to fold a yarn, and which one the trade uses. For 2, 3, 4 folds of 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre: the ratio that makes the fold's surface helix angle equal its singles', the ratio that sets the fold's net moment to zero, and the ratio the trade actually folds at. The surface rule is 1/√n exactly, because a fold of n singles is √n times the diameter. The torque balance is C/(B+C), which for this fibre is 0.201 and is the same at every count, every twist and every number of folds. The trade's brackets contain the surface rule in all three rows and the torque balance in none of them.

A cabled yarn is a fold of folds

The rule that sets a fold's twist is one over the square root of the number of components. Apply it twice and a cabled yarn's three twist levels are fixed by two integers — which is a prediction with no free constants, about a class of yarn the trade quotes no rule for at all.

7 figures · Ply How much of a yarn has to hang before it stops snarling. The tension a 20 tex cotton needs to stay straight, at each twist level, expressed as the length of the yarn's own weight that would supply it. The two curves are the two ends of the stiffness bracket: the fibres free to slide, and the section coherent. At 800 turns a metre they are 1.9 metres and 616. Anybody who has let go of a twisted yarn knows which of those is right, which makes this one of very few places where the bracket can be closed from the everyday end. Both rise as the square of the twist, because the torque does and the criterion is quadratic in it.

What a high-twist yarn costs a cloth

Twist buys strength up to a point and then loses it, and everything else it does is a cost. A crepe twist is chosen knowing that, and the trade's twist limits are a balance among five quantities that this collection can now put beside one another.

7 figures · Twist The section the fabric asks for, beside the one the model drew. A 20 tex cotton yarn in cross-section, at 900 times life size. The circle is what every solve in this collection has assumed: a diameter of 0.167 mm from the count and the packing factor. The ellipse has the same area and a minor axis of 78% of it, which is the closest the fabric's own adjacent courses come to one another — 0.130 mm. Nothing about that number was fitted to a fabric. It falls out of a solve that knew nothing about flattening, and it lands inside the range the trade reports for yarn in cloth, which this collection has carried as a free parameter ever since it first put a number on a sett.

What a sett is when the yarn is not round

A jamming condition says how close threads can be set, and it says it in terms of a diameter. A thread in a cloth does not have one diameter: it has a wide one and a narrow one, and which of them a jam is about depends on which way the threads are jamming.

7 figures · Sett The section the fabric asks for, beside the one the model drew. A 20 tex cotton yarn in cross-section, at 900 times life size. The circle is what every solve in this collection has assumed: a diameter of 0.167 mm from the count and the packing factor. The ellipse has the same area and a minor axis of 78% of it, which is the closest the fabric's own adjacent courses come to one another — 0.130 mm. Nothing about that number was fitted to a fabric. It falls out of a solve that knew nothing about flattening, and it lands inside the range the trade reports for yarn in cloth, which this collection has carried as a free parameter ever since it first put a number on a sett.

What a flattened yarn does to its cover

A cover factor is a sett times a diameter, and it decides how much of a cloth is thread and how much is hole. A flattened yarn is a third wider than a round one of the same area, so a cloth of flattened yarn covers more at the same sett — and every opacity, permeability and shade computed from a round diameter is wrong in one direction.

6 figures · Cover The flattening a knitted fabric asks for, against its own tightness. Every point is a solved fabric — 18 of them, over five loop lengths, three relaxation states and three counts — and the vertical axis is the closest its adjacent courses come, in diameters. The values run from 0.707 to 0.839 and they fall on one curve against the tightness factor, which is the model's only dimensionless group. That is what makes this a structural requirement rather than an arithmetical accident of one example: a tighter fabric demands a flatter yarn, by an amount its own tightness decides, and nothing about the fibre or the count enters except through that group.

The count that decides how flat

A knitted fabric's demanded flattening is a function of its tightness factor, and a tightness factor is the square root of a count over a loop length. So a coarser yarn at the same loop is flatter — which is a prediction about a spinner's choice that nobody has framed as one.

6 figures · Count What the count moves at 150 grams. Plain cotton cloths that all weigh 150 g/m², from 20 tex to 200 tex, with sett and crimp solved together. Thickness, which is two yarn diameters, rises 3.16 times across the line; the cover factor of each thread system falls 2.75 times; their product with one plus the crimp is the same number at every count, because the weight has fixed the volume of fibre and the count only decides whether it is laid out flat or stacked up.

A weight fixes the fibre and not the drape

Every plain cotton cloth of 150 grams a square metre contains the same fibre, and the count decides only how it is arranged. Across the counts that can make that weight, thickness rises threefold and cover falls in step, so their product holds still. The bending length does something stranger: at the bound a woven yarn actually sits near, it depends on neither the count nor the weight, only on the fibre.

6 figures · Weight

Weaves

Plain, twill and satin, and what actually separates them — float length, interlacing count, and a satin that cannot exist on six ends.

The 5-end satin. The 5-end satin on point paper, a filled square meaning the warp is on the face. Its longest float, its interlacing count and the number of separable cloths it describes were all counted from the matrix that drew it.

Plain, twill and satin

Three rules, and everything else in weaving is a variation on them. What separates the three is not appearance but one trade — how often a thread changes face against how far it runs when it does not.

6 figures · Foundation weaves Where the floats are in the 5-end satin. Every longest run of warp on the face, marked. A float is smooth because nothing interrupts it, which is the same reason it snags: there is a length of thread lying on the surface with nothing holding it down.

The float decides

How far a thread runs on the face before it goes under is one number, and it sits behind lustre, drape, snagging, abrasion, tear strength and how densely the cloth can be set. Almost nothing else in the subject has that reach.

6 figures · Float Which satins exist. For each order, the moves that give a satin — a step coprime with the order, and not the steps of one and one less which give a twill instead. Four and six admit none, so no regular satin exists on four ends or on six.

There is no satin on six ends

Weavers have known it as a rule for centuries. It is a theorem with a one-line proof about common factors, and it rules out four ends as well.

6 figures · Satin What an interlacing costs. Each weave's interlacing count beside the closest it can be set in the same yarn. The two run opposite ways, because a thread that changes face often has to bend often and a bend takes room.

Interlacings and firmness

Every time a thread changes face it has to bend, and a bend takes room. That one sentence decides how densely a cloth can be set, how firm it feels, and why the two run in opposite directions.

6 figures · Firmness The 2/2 twill both ways round. The same twill stepped one end to the right and one end to the left. Every quantity the matrix can produce is identical for the two, so the direction is real in the cloth and invisible in the arithmetic.

Twill direction, and how it is named

The two twills are mirror images, and every quantity the matrix can produce is identical for both. What separates them is the yarn, which has a handedness of its own — and the angle, which is forty-five degrees only in a square-set cloth.

6 figures · Foundation weaves A 2/2 twill reversed — the clean way. A twill reversed at intervals, generated from the rule rather than drawn. The count beside it is the number of adjacent ends that come out identical, which is the defect a weaver sees as a thick line at the seam and which no amount of looking at the grid announces.

Broken and herringbone twills

Reversing a twill is the cheapest way to turn a rule into a figure, and there are two ways to do it that look identical on paper. One of them leaves two adjacent ends doing exactly the same thing.

6 figures · Foundation weaves A double cloth. Two complete fabrics woven in one repeat, and what happens when a single intersection is turned over. The layer count beside the draft is computed from the matrix drawn, and the census below it is every single-square change tried in turn.

Backed and stitched constructions

A double cloth is two fabrics woven at once, and the check that verifies it says exactly two. Turn one intersection over and it says one — which means one mistake is enough to destroy the construction, and the enumeration says half of them would do it.

7 figures · Integrity