Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
The collection

Every essay — page 15

Page 15 of 23, continuing through the fields in the same order.

What cloth is Weaves Setting and geometry Knits and other structures Mechanics and drape Pattern and colour Compound and figured cloths After the loom Cloth doing a job

FieldsSeriesThreadsWeave indexRefutationsConceptsSearch

Pattern and colour

A draft is a periodic plane pattern with two states, so the symmetry is two-coloured. Colour order, and the things the eye reliably gets wrong.

A voile hung at 2.5 times its window, seen in plan. A curtain of voile gathered to 2.5 times the width of its window, drawn in plan with the window above it and a line of sight crossing a flank. A length of cloth spans its own length times the cosine of its flank angle, so a fullness of 2.5 stands every flank at 66.4 degrees and a line of sight normal to the window meets the cloth at that incidence. This cloth's holes close completely at 47.3 degrees, which is a fullness of 1.48, so at 2.5 times every flank passes no line of sight at all and the whole of what comes through arrives at the crests. Flat the cloth is 49.3% open and hung it is 3.0%. What the plan cannot show is the cloth's own drape, which rounds every fold drawn here as a corner.

A curtain is gathered so that it is seen edge-on

A curtain is hung with more cloth than window, and the surplus is not decoration. Laid in folds, a length of cloth spans its own length times the cosine of its flank angle, so the fullness is the secant of that angle exactly — and a line of sight through the window meets the cloth at it. A voile's view halves at a fullness of 1.08, its flanks shut completely at 1.48, and at the two and a half times a curtain is actually hung at, every flank passes nothing and the whole of what comes through is the crests.

7 figures · Opacity What a passer-by is looking at, for rooms of four reflectances. The street's view of a window behind a sheer white thread 49% open at 30 : 1, split into the part that is an image of the room, arriving through the holes, and the part that is the cloth's own threads lit by the street. a room reflecting 8% contributes 0.4% of the view; a room reflecting 20% contributes 1.0% of the view; a room reflecting 35% contributes 1.8% of the view; a room reflecting 60% contributes 3.1% of the view. The veil is identical in every row because the cloth and the street are: only the furniture changes. What the chart cannot show is where in each room that reflectance sits, and a dark room with a lit lamp in it is not its own average.

What a sheer hides is decided by the furniture

Every result these essays have produced assumed the room and the street reflect the same three tenths of the light on them. That was never a fact about cloth. A room reflecting a twentieth is hidden two hundred and thirty-eight times better than the street it faces and one reflecting four fifths only fifteen times, with the same curtain at the same window — and the day-and-night exchange they rested on, exact for equal scenes, is out by more than half the glow for an ordinary pair of unequal ones.

6 figures · Opacity The edge of a warp line in a 2/2 twill, at 3 and 4 threads. A light line in a dark 2/2 twill, drawn at 3 and 4 threads wide over 3 repeats with both of its boundaries traced crossing by crossing. The line has no gap at either width, and neither boundary is straight: at the crossings where the outermost thread of the band is under the ground, the edge retreats to the next thread in. At 3 it swings 2 threads with a period of 4; At 4 it swings 2 threads with a period of 4. What the drawing cannot show is distance, at which a swing of one thread width is below what an eye separates and a swing of three may not be.

An unbroken line is not a clean one

A line of colour has two boundaries and neither is straight, in any weave there is. The thread at the edge must go under somewhere, and where it does the edge retreats to its neighbour — so the boundary steps, and by exactly one thread less than the narrowest unbroken line the weave draws. Over 22,874 drafts there are three widths and three swings and no draft anywhere else, and widening the line past its narrowest unbroken width leaves the edge precisely where it was.

6 figures · Stripe The named colour-and-weave effects, sorted by the loom their weft needs. Each named colour-and-weave effect with the shortest band in its colour order and the cheapest loom that can throw that order in the weft, on a loom with 4 boxes a side. end-and-end, runs of 1 and 1, needs picking at will; hairline, runs of 1 and 1, needs picking at will; log cabin, runs of 1 and 1, needs picking at will; tattersall, runs of 1 and 9, needs picking at will; birdseye, runs of 2 and 2, needs boxes at one side; crow's foot, runs of 2 and 2, needs boxes at one side; step pattern, runs of 2 and 1, needs boxes at both sides; three-and-one, runs of 3 and 1, needs picking at will; houndstooth, runs of 4 and 4, needs boxes at one side; shepherd's check, runs of 6 and 6, needs boxes at one side; gun club, runs of 4 and 4 and 4 and 4, needs boxes at one side; glen check, runs of 4 and 4 and 4 and 4 and 2 and 2 and 2 and 2, needs boxes at one side. The warp costs nothing, because a colour order in the warp is laid out once at warping; the weft is thrown one pick at a time by shuttles that stay where they land, so an effect's price is its weft order alone. What the bars cannot show is the pattern, which is in neither the order nor the weave but in what they make of each other.

The finest colour-and-weave effects need the rarest loom

A houndstooth, a shepherd's check and a gun club check are thrown by the cheapest shuttle loom there is. A hairline, an end-and-end and a log cabin are thrown by none — a colour on every other pick is thrown from the same side every time, so its shuttles pile up at the far end of the loom and never come back. The dividing line is the parity of the bands and nothing else, which is why it survives the fact that no two sources agree about how wide a shepherd's check is.

5 figures · Stripe The surface of every even six-end shading, against the twill's. The height of the cloth's surface at each tone of a six-end shading on a sheeting at 0.50 N, for every chain of the 64 even classes, drawn once per distinct shape — 5 of them — and for the cyclic square's twill read one step at a time. The twill is level to the micrometre and floats 5, 4, 3, 4, 5. Every even chain sinks to exactly 43.3 µm at its midtone; the shapes differ only at the second and fourth tones. What the plot cannot show is which of these a raking light would reveal, which depends on the finish.

An even shading cannot keep its surface level

Sixty-four six-end shadings hold every middle tone to a float of two, and the question left over was whether any of them keeps a tone ramp's surface level the way a twill read in order does. None does, and all of them sink by exactly the same depth — 43.3 micrometres on a sheeting, a sixth of the cloth. The reason is a counting argument a recording engineer would recognise: a limit on how long a thread may float is a limit on run length, and a run-length limit forces a floor on how often the thread changes face. A level ramp needs every tone at the extremes' rate, which needs a float of half the repeat at the midtone and more beside it — exactly the floats the twill in order has.

6 figures · Shading A three-direction net over a square voile, averaged each way. The light passing through a 1.55 mm net of three thread directions in front of a 0.3 mm voile of two, 50 mm apart and seen from 3.0 m, sampled on a fine grid over 160 mm, averaged along one direction and smoothed over two net pitches. Down the voile the profile rises and falls with the 6.1 mm family one net set makes; across it, with the 27.4 mm family two sets together make; the vertical rules are the predicted spacings. Each panel is scaled to its own range, and the second family is roughly a tenth the strength of the first. What the profiles cannot show is the fringes' look in two dimensions, where both families cross.

A net of three directions beats a voile one way at a time

A tulle's threads run three ways at sixty degrees and a voile's run two ways at ninety, so a net hung over a voile could show one family of fringes, three, or a lattice of them. It shows two, at right angles, and they are nothing alike. Along the voile threads that lie parallel to one of the net's, the net beats exactly as a one-directional net does: six-millimetre fringes from three metres. Across them no set of the net lies anywhere near, and the only slow beat comes from a line of points two sets make together at √3 over the net's pitch — fringes four times wider and a fifteenth as strong, with a null at 8.8 metres where the strong family has none.

6 figures · Moire A 2/2 twill with warp 1/1 and weft 2/2, as drawn and woven across. A 2/2 twill coloured 1/1 in the warp and 2/2 in the weft, drawn as the face of the cloth, and the same cloth turned through a right angle, which is what the loom makes if the two colour orders are exchanged and the weave turned with them. As drawn the weft order is 2/2 and needs boxes at one side; woven across the weft order is 1/1 and needs a loom picking at will. What the drawings cannot show is whether the cloth's two systems can be exchanged, which depends on their yarns and setts.

A colour-and-weave look costs its cheaper order

The finest colour-and-weave effects need the rarest loom because a weft order is thrown pick by pick and a warp order is laid out once, so an effect's price was said to be its weft. That is true of a construction and false of a cloth. The same cloth can be woven lying across the loom, with its warp order thrown as weft and its weft order laid in the warp, and then it costs the other order. Over every two-colour look twelve small weaves make with orders up to six threads — 4,036 of them — 55 per cent need a loom picking at will as drawn and 31 per cent need one either way round. The looks turning rescues are the ones fine in one direction only, and not one of the trade's named effects is among them.

6 figures · Stripe 8×2 and 2×8 over every origin. Two grids of the 16 relative origins of 2/2 twill under 8-end satin, the row being how many picks the ground is started along and the column how many ends. The left grid is the census at a block 8×2, the right at 2×8; a square is filled where some of the 65,536 profiles separate. 8×2 fails at 8 origins and 2×8 at 8; both fail at 0 and neither at 0. Turning the cloth over and through a right angle sends each origin to another, and the letters mark where: every letter lands on a square with the same answer, so the two shapes are one census read at relabelled origins.

A turned block is a moved origin

An eight-end satin figured on a 2/2 twill fails on 55,536 profiles at a block eight picks by two ends and on none at two by eight, and that was read as a property of the block's shape. Sweep the relative origin as well and the two shapes trade places: at every one of the sixteen origins exactly one of them fails, and over the sixteen they fail equally often. A shape asymmetry that no origin removes exists, and it needs a satin whose move squared is not one.

6 figures · Blocks What a pair of colour orders does to the catalogue. Dark ends in the warp across against dark ends in the weft down, for the sixteen two-colour orders at four ends. Each cell gives the blind intersections of sixteen and the number of distinct surfaces the 22874 drafts collapse onto. Every cell stands for between one and thirty-six colour orders and they all behave identically, so the arrangement of the colours does not matter and only their counts do. The corner at four against nought is blind nowhere and separates every draft.

The colour order that hides least

A caption on this account's top essay left a question: whether a warp of long runs against a weft of short ones hides less than either would against itself, and called it a lever nobody uses. Sweeping all sixteen orders against all sixteen says the lever is real and the caption named the wrong variable. Run length has nothing to do with it — the blind count, the separation and the largest confused class all depend on the two orders' colour counts and on nothing else, and what a mixed pair saves is exactly the square of the difference between them.

5 figures · Pattern The depths an even eight-end shading can sink. Eight-end shading chains with every middle tone held to a float of three and the centre to two, sorted by the interlacing rate of their worst tone, with the depth that tone sinks below the extremes on a sheeting pressed at 0.50 N: 0.5000, 42.8 µm, 27,904 chains; 0.5625, 50.1 µm, 7,296 chains; 0.6250, 56.7 µm, 35,680 chains; 0.6875, 62.6 µm, 8,960 chains; 0.7500, 68.1 µm, 18,624 chains; 0.8125, 72.7 µm, 1,536 chains. The shallowest is the float argument's floor. The walk stopped after 100,000 chains, so the list is a lower bound on the depths the family has.

An eight-end shading is pinned at three everywhere but its centre

At six ends every even shading holds its middle tones to a float of two, and every one sinks to the same depth. The question left was whether eight ends does the same. It cannot even start: at eight ends no shading can hold its second tone to two, a float of three there needs the second mark of every pick exactly opposite the first, and then the third mark cannot undo it. Tones two, three, five and six are pinned at a float of three, only the centre is free, and a family with a free centre does not sink to one depth — it sinks to at least six.

7 figures · Shading Every way to make 4 intersections blind. The number of distinct surfaces the 22874 four-by-four drafts collapse onto, for every shape a set of 4 blind intersections can take, in however many colours it needs. 1×1 + 1×1 + 1×1 + 1×1: 3,632 surfaces, touching 8 threads, 4 colours needed; 1×1 + 1×1 + 1×2: 3,352 surfaces, touching 7 threads, 4 colours needed; 1×2 + 1×2: 3,102 surfaces, touching 6 threads, 3 colours needed; 1×2 + 2×1: 3,100 surfaces, touching 6 threads, 4 colours needed; 1×1 + 1×3: 3,038 surfaces, touching 6 threads, 3 colours needed; 1×4: 2,744 surfaces, touching 5 threads, 2 colours needed; 2×2: 2,402 surfaces, touching 4 threads, 3 colours needed. The same number of blind intersections keeps more of the catalogue apart the more threads it is spread over. What the chart cannot show is whether an eye can tell the surfaces apart.

A blind set hides less the thinner it is spread

Two colours showed that where a cloth's threads match in colour the draft underneath is invisible, and that how many intersections match is not what decides how much is hidden. More colours say what does. A third colour lets the blind count take every value from nought to ten; a fourth lets the blind intersections sit one to a thread. At a fixed count, the catalogue keeps more of its cloths apart the more threads the blind set is spread across — 3,632 surfaces for four scattered blind cells, 2,402 for the same four in a square.

5 figures · Pattern What a sheer multiplies a street reading's errors by. The factor by which an error in reading the light from a window is multiplied on its way into the room's reflectance, against the street-to-room light ratio, for three sheers and a room reflecting three tenths. It is the reading over the room's own image, the reciprocal of the share of the view that is room. white voile: 67.3 at 30 : 1, 3.6 at equal light, 1.6 at night; grey voile: 28.7 at 30 : 1, 2.1 at equal light, 1.3 at night; black net: 2.1 at 30 : 1, 1.1 at equal light, 1.0 at night. What the chart cannot show is the thread optics, which are assumed values here and not measured ones.

A sheer's privacy is the error it multiplies

Everything a passer-by sees of a room through a sheer is the room's image plus a veil the street lights, and the veil can be known without going in. So one subtraction and one division ought to read the room's reflectance from the pavement. They do not, and the reason is the curtain's whole purpose: every error in the veil arrives in the answer multiplied by the reading over the image — sixty-four through a white voile by day, three and a half at equal light. The privacy a sheer gives and the precision it denies are one number.

6 figures · Opacity What a pane of glass does to a sheer's multiplier. The factor by which an error in reading a window is multiplied on its way into the room's reflectance, against the angle a passer-by looks at the glass from, at 30 : 1, for three sheers behind a pane of window glass. The dashed level beside each is the same cloth with no glass. white voile: 64.0 bare, 59.8 behind glass straight on, 65.7 at 60°, 92.7 at 75°; grey voile: 27.3 bare, 28.7 behind glass straight on, 34.7 at 60°, 61.7 at 75°; black net: 2.0 bare, 5.2 behind glass straight on, 8.8 at 60°, 25.4 at 75°. The white voile is easier to read through glass up to 56.7°, because the pane dims the street on its threads by more than it mirrors; the black net is harder at every angle. The pane mirrors a street reflecting 0.3; a sky in the mirror would be brighter, and nothing here models one.

Glass hides a black net and not a white voile

A window pane in front of a curtain mirrors the street, and a mirror is a veil with no thread in it. It also dims the street's light on the cloth. For a white voile the two nearly cancel, and straight on the dimming wins, so the voile is slightly easier to read through glass than without it. For a black net the mirror is most of what a passer-by sees: its multiplier goes from 2 to 5 head-on and to 25 from along the pavement. The glass makes the net private, not the voile. The angle at which it stops helping does not depend on the time of day, and a polarising filter at Brewster's angle takes the mirror out altogether.

8 figures · Opacity The advantage of spreading a blind set, against the repeat. The number of distinct surfaces a blind set keeps when its cells are spread one to a thread, over the number it keeps when they are gathered into a block, against the size of the repeat: 4 blind, 1.512 at 4, 1.254 at 5, 1.129 at 6, 1.064 at 7, 1.032 at 8, 1.008 at 10, 1.002 at 12; 8 blind, 1.080 at 8, 1.020 at 10, 1.005 at 12. Sampled from forty thousand surfaces at each point. The dashed curves are the closed form — each thread the set misses must interlace on its own, which fails once in 2^(n−1) — and the sampled points sit on them from six threads up; at four and five the form overstates, because a thread the set does touch can still fail there. At four by four spreading keeps half as much again; at eight, a few per cent; at twelve, nothing to speak of. What the chart cannot show is whether an eye can tell the surfaces apart.

A blind cell costs half the cloths at any real repeat

At four by four, spreading a blind set over more threads kept half as many cloths apart again as gathering it. At eight by eight the same rule holds, and it is almost nothing: three per cent for four blind cells, eight for eight. The reason is one factor. A blind set's surfaces are the count's bound, 2^(n² − b), times the chance that every thread it misses interlaces on its own, and at eight threads a thread lies all on one face once in 128 tries. So shapes that touch the same number of threads tie exactly, whatever their rectangles; every blind cell costs very nearly half the catalogue; and by twelve threads the arrangement is free.

5 figures · Pattern Every even eight-end shading, by the depth it sinks. All 1,001,574,400 eight-end shading chains whose middle tones float at most three and whose centre floats at most two, counted exactly and sorted by the interlacing rate of their worst tone, with the depth that tone sinks below the extremes on a sheeting at 0.50 N. 0.50000: 10.6 per cent, 42.8 µm; 0.53125: 0.9 per cent, 46.4 µm; 0.56250: 4.3 per cent, 50.1 µm; 0.59375: 1.0 per cent, 53.3 µm; 0.62500: 17.1 per cent, 56.7 µm; 0.65625: 2.3 per cent, 59.7 µm; 0.68750: 13.3 per cent, 62.6 µm; 0.71875: 2.3 per cent, 65.2 µm; 0.75000: 37.8 per cent, 68.1 µm; 0.78125: 0.2 per cent, 70.4 µm; 0.81250: 3.0 per cent, 72.7 µm; 0.87500: 3.0 per cent, 76.7 µm; 0.93750: 2.1 per cent, 80.5 µm; 1.00000: 2.1 per cent, 83.6 µm. The largest class is 0.7500, with 37.8 per cent of the family. Beside each share is the share the walk's first hundred thousand chains gave it, which reached 6 of the fourteen classes and put 27.9 per cent at the floor against a true 10.6.

Only one start in six can reach the shallowest shading

The even eight-end shadings — middle tones floating three, centre floating two — were too many to walk, and a walk stopped at a hundred thousand chains found six depths. Split at the centre, the family can be counted whole: 1,001,574,400 chains in fourteen depths, every one of them decided by the centre alone. Only 816 of the 5,040 ways to begin a shading can still reach the shallowest ramp, and a designer who wants it has to choose the first two parts before anything else.

6 figures · Shading What an upper window's glass does to a white voile. How many times harder a room is to read through a white voile behind glass than through the bare cloth, against how far the passer-by stands out from the façade, for a window centred 1.5, 4.5 and 7.5 m up in a street twelve metres wide between ten-metre terraces, under an overcast sky, at 30 : 1. Below one the glass helps. ground floor: 0.95 from 2 m, 0.95 from 5 m, 0.95 from 9 m; first floor: 2.34 from 2 m, 1.55 from 5 m, 0.94 from 9 m; second floor: 4.92 from 2 m, 1.86 from 5 m, 1.49 from 9 m. The first floor's curve drops by a step at 6.3 m, where its pane stops mirroring the sky and starts mirroring the terrace opposite. What the chart cannot show is a clear sky, which is brighter again near the horizon.

An upper pane mirrors a sky no curtain can afford

A pane in front of a sheer helps a reading only while what it mirrors is dim: for a white voile, below about half the brightness of a white wall lit like the window. A street-level pane mirrors the terrace across the road and stays under that. An upper pane, seen from the pavement below, mirrors the sky, and an overcast horizon — the darkest sky there is — is already twice the limit. Whether a first-floor pane shows sky depends on how far out from the façade the passer-by stands and on nothing else, so the same window is harder to see into from close up than from across the street.

6 figures · Opacity What tilting a window pane does to a curtain behind it. How many times harder a room is to read through a white voile behind glass than through the bare cloth, against the tilt of the pane — leaned forward to the left, tilted back to the right — for windows centred 1.5, 4.5 and 7.5 m up, seen from 3 m out in a street twelve metres wide between ten-metre terraces, under an overcast sky. Each curve jumps where its pane starts to mirror the sky: the ground floor tilted back past 18.6°, the first floor leaned forward less than 9.7°, the second floor leaned forward less than 25.6°. Upright the three read 0.95, 1.82, 2.89; leaned forward 26°, 0.97, 0.94, 0.93. What the chart cannot show is a canopy or blind over a shop window, which a pane leaned forward would mirror instead of the street.

A pane leaned forward loses the sky and finds no darker mirror

A pane tilted by some angle sends a passer-by's line of sight off at twice that angle more, and the passer-by's place along the street still drops out. Tilted back about twenty degrees, a street-level pane mirrors sky from everywhere in the street and nearly doubles what a white voile hides. Leaned forward ten degrees, a first-floor pane stops mirroring sky from three metres out, and the voile behind it reads better through glass than bare. Leaning further finds nothing darker: under an overcast sky the road is a brighter mirror than the terrace opposite, by a seventh.

6 figures · Opacity A 2/2 twill line's ends where the reed leaves them. A light warp line 3 ends wide in a dark 2/2 twill, with the ends drawn at their true places at a cover of 60% and both boundaries traced. Set evenly the edge swings 2.00 thread spacings. With 3 ends to a dent, closed by 40% of a spacing so that they touch, and the line on the dent's edge, it swings 1.20. One end along in the same reed it swings 2.40, more than if it had been set evenly. The weave and the reed are the same in the last two. Only where the line starts has changed.

A stripe's edge is cleanest inside one dent

No weave can draw a line with a straight edge, since the thread at the boundary must go under somewhere. A cloth has one freedom its weave lacks, which is the spacing of its ends, and it looked as though crowding a stripe's outer end could halve the swing. It cannot, in most cloth: two ends stop at a diameter apart, so the swing falls only as far as the cover. The freedom that costs nothing is another one. A line's narrowest unbroken width is exactly its swing plus one, so it fits one dent of a reed, and the same reed gives 1.2 thread spacings or 2.4 according to which end of the dent the line begins on.

6 figures · Stripe

Setting and geometry

Yarn diameter, crimp and cover. How close threads can be set, why thread count is not what it is taken for, and which model produced any number.

The same thread count, twice. Two cloths with identical thread counts and different yarn. The count is the same number in both; the fraction of the surface the threads actually occupy is not, and that fraction is what thread count is usually taken to mean.

Thread count is not quality

It counts threads. It says nothing about how much of the cloth they cover, it can be inflated by counting plies, and it ranks fabrics in nearly the wrong order. The quantity it is mistaken for is cover factor, and that one is computable.

6 figures · Cover Pull it lengthways and it narrows. The same cloth before and after a small extension along the warp. No thread has stretched: the extension came out of the warp crimp, that crimp went into the weft, and the fabric is narrower for it.

Crimp, and why cloth narrows when it is pulled

A thread in cloth is longer than the cloth it crosses. Pull the fabric one way and that extra length is taken out of one direction and put into the other, so the cloth gets narrower without a single fibre stretching.

7 figures · Crimp What an interlacing costs. Each weave's interlacing count beside the closest it can be set in the same yarn. The two run opposite ways, because a thread that changes face often has to bend often and a bend takes room.

How close can threads be set

There is a maximum. Push more threads into a cloth than the geometry allows and they simply will not go, and the limit depends on the weave as much as on the yarn.

6 figures · Sett Six ways of saying how fine a yarn is. The same four yarns written in six count systems, all placed on one axis of tex. A direct system states mass per unit length and rises as the yarn coarsens; an indirect one states length per unit mass and falls. Both kinds are in daily use and neither says which it is.

The yarn count systems, and why there are several

Half the ways of saying how fine a yarn is get bigger as it gets finer and half get smaller. That is not carelessness — and one of the constants buried in the oldest rule of thumb turns out to be a measurement nobody wrote down.

6 figures · Count Two sections, one yarn. The same yarn given a circular cross-section and a racetrack one of equal area, both jammed. The spacing the two models allow is nearly the same; the cover and the cloth thickness they predict are not.

Peirce against the racetrack, measured

Two models of a yarn's cross-section, given the same yarn and the same closure condition, agree on how densely the cloth can be set and disagree by nearly half on how thick it is. Which quantity is being asked about decides whether the choice of model matters at all.

6 figures · Sett Balanced, and not. Three weaves in section along one warp end, with the share of the face each thread system takes. The share is the mean of the matrix; what follows from it — which system wears, which carries the colour — does not follow from the matrix at all.

Balance, and what an unbalanced cloth does

How much of the surface each thread system takes is the mean of the weave matrix, and it is one of the very few quantities in this subject that can be read straight off. Almost nothing that follows from it can.

7 figures · Cover