Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
Theme

The thread: Structure before fibre — page 2

Page 2 of 5 of the essays on this thread.
A cotton fibre dry and wet. One cotton fibre in its dry state and saturated with water, both drawn at the same scale in both directions. It is 20% wider and 1.2% longer, so its cross-sectional area rises by 44% if the section stays similar to itself. The length difference is drawn and is nearly invisible, which is the point: a swelling that were the same in both directions would make a cloth bigger and change nothing about its structure, and this one changes every ratio of a diameter to a spacing in the cloth. What the drawing cannot show is the section: a cotton fibre is not a cylinder, and the directly measured area swelling of 40% to 42% does not agree with the square of the width change, which is a fact about the fibre. What cloth is

What water does to a thread

A cotton fibre in water is a fifth wider and a hundredth longer. If it grew equally in both directions a wet cloth would simply be a bigger cloth and nothing structural would follow; because it does not, every ratio of a diameter to a spacing in a cloth moves, and they all move the same way.

 How much a cloth can give back. Relaxation shrinkage against how much of the warp crimp the loom took out, with the area shrinkage above it and the ceiling drawn across. The ceiling is the crimp itself, read as c/(1+c): it is all the length there is to give, and no tension reaches past it. After the loom

A dimension without a state

Every essay in this field turned on the same omission, and collecting them produces a result none of them had on its own — the quantities a cloth's geometry determines divide cleanly into those a finishing works can move and those it cannot, and the division is not the one the vocabulary suggests.

 The loop that costs nothing to extend. A plain knitted loop at rest and extended by 35 per cent, with the arcs marked. The arcs' radius is the diameter of the yarn the loop wraps, 0.167 mm, and it is set by contact rather than by the fabric's dimensions — so extending the fabric lengthens the legs and bends nothing further. The bending energy is 0.0176 N·mm at both, and the model therefore asks no force at all for an extension a woven cloth would refuse. What the drawing cannot show is what a real knit's first few per cent do cost, which is friction and yarn flattening and is not a bending property. Knits and other structures

A knit is soft because it bends

Ask the same energy question of a woven cloth and a knitted one and the answers are not different by a factor — they are different in kind. A woven cloth's bending energy changes the moment it is extended. A knitted loop's does not change at all, exactly, over the whole of its extension, because its arcs are held to a radius by contact rather than by the fabric's dimensions.

 A tear breaks threads or pulls them out. The grip a cloth has on a thread at the tip of a tear, against the sett, with the thread's own strength drawn across. Below the line the thread slides and the yarns group, which is the trade's explanation of why a loose weave tears well; above it the thread breaks where it is and grouping never happens. The essay that asked it could not compute this: it needed a friction, and the fancy weaves supplied one. Cloth doing a job

A tear stops where the grip is

This collection asked whether a loose weave tears better and had to answer that the geometry could not say — it supplies a grip count and a slack, and neither is a force. The fancy weaves brought a friction. With it the question has an answer — a cloth's threads slide up to a computable sett and break above it — and a ripstop grid has a bound with no free parameter in it.

 The two calculations a yarn's stiffness admits. A bundle of 9 fibres bent with the fibres free to slide and with them locked together. Free, the rigidity is the sum of the fibres': 0.00141 N·mm² for a 30 tex cotton yarn. Locked, it is the fourth power of the yarn's own diameter: 0.689. The ratio is the fibre count over the square of the packing factor, 490, and nine fibres are drawn where the yarn has 176. What the drawing cannot show is where a real yarn sits between them, which is a question about friction rather than about fibre. Mechanics and drape

A yarn's stiffness is a bracket, not a number

Two calculations are available for how stiff a thread is in bending, and both are exact. One treats the fibres as free to slide and gives the sum of their stiffnesses; the other treats them as locked and gives a solid rod. They differ by the fibre count, which for an ordinary cotton yarn is a factor of five hundred — and no measurement of the fibre narrows it by anything at all.

 A yarn's voids against its fibres' swelling. One cotton yarn's cross-section at a packing factor of 0.60, drawn dry and with every fibre swollen by 20% while the yarn's own outline is held. The fibres now occupy 0.864 of the section, which is above the 0.75 a heavily compacted assembly reaches and above the 0.65 of a spun yarn, so the yarn cannot stay this size: it must grow by at least 7.3%. What the drawing cannot show is disorder — the fibres are laid on a lattice here to make the areas exact, and a real yarn's fibres are neither round nor evenly spaced, which is why the bound is quoted over three packing limits rather than at one. What cloth is

A yarn's voids are not enough

A ring-spun cotton yarn is sixty per cent fibre and forty per cent air, and its fibres gain forty-four per cent of area in water. The obvious thought is that the air takes it. The arithmetic says the air cannot, and gives a floor on how far the yarn itself must grow with no measurement of a yarn in it anywhere.

 The two routes a poplin has to a strain. A poplin drawn in section at three places: as woven, at the end of what its crimp can supply, and past that. Between the first two the warp's crimp falls from 8.97% to 4.85% and the weft takes on what it gave up, and the thread length is 0.4953 mm in both — nothing has stretched, and the cloth is 3.93% longer. Between the second and the third the geometry cannot move because the weft's straight run has vanished, so the cloth's extra 2.0% is the thread's extra 2.0%. What the drawing cannot show is which of the two a piece of cloth has had: the first two states look different and the last two look the same, and it is the last two that differ in whether the cloth comes back. What cloth is

A cloth gives back less than it took

Everything this collection computes about a deforming fabric is reversible, and no fabric is. The repair is not a new material property: a woven cloth has two routes to a strain, one of them costs its threads nothing and comes back in full, and where the first route runs out is a number about the sett with no fibre in it at all.

 Mock leno, 3 threads to a bundle. Threads that interlace identically have no weft passing between them, so nothing holds them apart and they lie touching. The reed still sets the average spacing, so the space they leave collects at the bundle's edge — a hole 0.60 by 0.60 mm, made without one thread crossing another. Drawn to scale on a fixed 9 mm square of cloth at 20 threads per centimetre and a 0.3 mm yarn. Weaves

A hole with nothing crossing

A real leno holds its holes open by crossing one thread over another, which is a topological arrangement and cannot come undone. A mock leno makes the same holes by grouping threads that nothing separates, and everything about it is friction.

 Two pore systems in one cloth — 24 threads per centimetre. A plain weave of 20 tex cotton in section, at 24 threads per centimetre, so the yarn is 167 µm across and the clear hole between two picks is 250 µm. That hole's hydraulic radius is 124.8 µm. Inside the yarn, fibres 14 µm across packed at 0.6 leave spaces of hydraulic radius 2.33 µm — 53 times finer, and by Jurin's law 53 times higher: 6.37 m against 119 mm. The yarn's interior is magnified 6 times and the two discs at the foot are the only part drawn at one scale. Cloth doing a job

How high a cloth wicks

A woven cloth has two capillary systems and they are a factor of twenty to a hundred apart. The one every diagram draws — the hole between four threads — lifts 119 mm. The one nobody draws, inside the yarn, lifts 6.37 m.

 The weight against the constant nobody has measured. Areal weight against the stitch-density constant, for four two-bed structures at 20 tex on a 0.35 cm loop with a tuck taken as 1.15 of one. Every line is exactly straight through the origin, because the weight is tex times yarn per repeat times k_s divided by the area of the repeat and there is no fitted constant anywhere in that division. The three vertical rules are the only measured values this site has — Munden's published k_s for plain single jersey in three relaxation states — and none of them is the right value for any structure drawn here. Where each line should be read is the whole of what is missing. After the loom

The constants do not compose

The yarn in a knitted structure is a sum of what each element takes, exactly, over structures nobody has measured. The size the structure relaxes to is not a sum of anything — and the whole gap between the two is one number per structure, which would cost forty-five fabrics each to obtain.

 The energy well, and where the cloth sits in it. The bending energy of a sheeting at every state on its own constant-thread-length locus, plotted against how the crimp divides between the two systems. The minimum is at 1.22 and the value every Peirce solution here is drawn at is 1.00, marked. The well's depth decides how firmly the ratio is settled, which is why an open scrim's measured crimp scatters and a close sheeting's does not. What the plot cannot show is the friction that stops a cloth reaching the bottom, which turns the minimum into a band. Setting and geometry

The crimp ratio is not a measurement

Peirce's geometry is two thread systems, four unknowns and three equations. It cannot say how the crimp divides between warp and weft, so every cloth solved so far has been drawn at a ratio somebody chose. Give the threads a stiffness and the missing equation arrives — and for six of the eight cloths in the table it arrives with no material constant in it at all.

 A knit's restoring force, and the column that does not move. A plain knit of 20 tex cotton at a loop length of 3.5 mm, over the extension range its own geometry admits. The bending energy stored in one loop is the same number at every extension — the loop's arcs are held to a radius by the thread they wrap rather than by the fabric's dimensions, so extending the fabric does not bend anything more. The frictional resistance at the interlocks is not zero: it is μ times the force pressing there, times 2.34 interlocks per millimetre of width. So a knit's resistance to extension is dissipative rather than elastic, which is why it does not spring back and why its dimensions depend on how much it has been agitated. What the rows cannot show is the interlock force itself, which this site does not have for a knit and which is recorded as missing. Knits and other structures

What stops a knit extending

A knitted loop's bending energy does not change as the fabric extends — exactly, over the whole range its geometry admits. Something resists, and it is not stiffness. It is friction at the interlocks, which is dissipative rather than elastic, and that single fact accounts for why a knit does not spring back, why a softener changes its dimensions and why the constants its size is quoted with contain no yarn property at all.

 The beat-up, at the fell. The last picks of a sheeting at 26 picks per centimetre, with the beat-up zone shaded. Driving the fell forward makes the warp take more crimp and more crimp takes more thread, which the warp can only supply by stretching — so the force is the warp tension times the crimp's elasticity with respect to the pick spacing, 0.182 here. That is 0.205 N per end and 573 N per metre of reed. What the drawing cannot show is that the shaded band's width cancels out of the derivation exactly; it is drawn because a reader needs to see what is being compressed, not because the answer depends on it. Setting and geometry

The blow that sets the pick

The take-up gear decides how far the cloth moves between picks and says nothing about the blow that puts each pick where it goes. That blow is a force, and a virtual-work argument gives it in one line — with the length of the beat-up zone cancelling out of the answer exactly, which is the part worth having.

 The interchange budget against cover, at three yarn counts. The extension a plain cloth can reach with no thread stretching, plotted against its warp cover factor, for 10, 20, 40 tex yarn. The three curves coincide, because every length in Peirce's geometry is a multiple of the yarn diameter and a spacing measured in diameters is a cover factor — so the count divides out exactly and the maximum is at 0.407782 for all of them, at a budget of 7.2857%. That the curve has a maximum at all is the finding: crimp is what a cloth spends, so more of it should be better, and past this cover the weft has nowhere to put what the warp gives up. What the plot cannot show is the balance, which moves the height of the maximum a long way and its position hardly at all. What cloth is

The most a cloth can give back

The extension a cloth can find without stretching a thread comes from crimp, so setting a cloth closer ought to give it more. It does, up to a point, and then takes it away again — and the point is a cover factor of 0.4078 at a budget of 7.2857 per cent, identical to six figures for every yarn count from five tex to a hundred.

 A coating over the hole it has to bridge. Four warp ends of 40 tex seen end-on at 20 per centimetre, with a 120 micrometre PVC film over them. The film is supported everywhere it lies on a thread and unsupported over the 252 micrometre clear span between them, which is the same span at every hole in the repeat. The film's thickness is drawn to scale against that span; the bulge is exaggerated. At 20 MPa the film will hold at most 381 bar, which is a bound and not a prediction. Cloth doing a job

A coated cloth fails at its holes

Spread a film over a fabric and it is supported everywhere it lies on a thread and unsupported over every hole. A woven cloth's holes are all the same size — exactly, because a repeat is a repeat — so the film has one span to bridge and the fabric has a burst pressure rather than a distribution. A nonwoven gives it a distribution, and a membrane fails at the largest hole it meets.

 A crossing before and after it is pressed. One warp end of a sheeting riding over three picks, drawn twice to the same scale. Unpressed, both sections are circles and the cloth is 0.388 mm thick. At 0.40 N per crossing the sections flatten to aspect ratios of 1.75 and 1.84, the cloth thins to 0.263 mm, and the warp runs flat for 0.109 mm over each pick before it begins to curve. What the drawing cannot show is why the cloth does not do this by itself: flattening shrinks the arc radius as well as the crimp height, so it costs bending energy, and a relaxed cloth keeps its threads round. Mechanics and drape

A flattened thread is a record of a force

A yarn in cloth is not round, and this site has modelled the flattening for as long as this collection has run with the amount of it left as a number somebody chose. Give the section a stiffness and ask what the cloth prefers, and the answer is a circle — at every stiffness, for every balanced cloth in the table. Flattening does not happen by itself; it happens because something pressed.

 The channel through a muslin in plain. A cut across a muslin woven plain, at 373 µm per hundred pixels, showing one hole between two warp ends. The ends sit at the same level here, so the clear width between them is 250 µm at the waist against 250 µm straight through. The profile on the right is that width at every height in the 334 µm the threads occupy: the passage is an hourglass, its narrowest section is 250 µm across, and the band that every level contains — what a straight line of sight can use — is 250 µm. The two differ by 0.0 per cent, and the difference is the weave and nothing else. What cloth is

A hole is a channel, not an opening

Every hole drawn so far has been drawn from above, and the sentence underneath every one of them says the same thing: the hole between four threads is the spacing less the diameter, and every hole is the same size. That is a picture of a cloth's shadow. A cloth has a thickness, so its hole has a length, and the narrowest place along it is not the place a person looking through can see.

 Munden's states against the fibre swelling. What a plain knit does between its relaxation states, beside the swelling of the fibre it is made of. Going from dry-relaxed to wet-relaxed a jersey loses 5.66% along its courses and 2.44% across its wales, and going on to fully relaxed it loses 9.1% and 7.0%. The fibre swells 20%. Two things rule the swelling out as the cause: it is several times the whole change, and the change is markedly anisotropic while a swelling enters both of a loop's dimensions through the same loop length. What the bars cannot show is what does cause it, which is friction — water lets the loops move to where the yarn's own bending had been trying to put them. Knits and other structures

A knit's change of state is not its swelling

A jersey is smaller wet-relaxed than dry-relaxed, by 5.7 per cent along its courses and 2.4 across its wales. Water is obviously involved, so the swelling is the obvious cause. Two things rule it out, and both are properties of the constants rather than measurements of a fabric.

 What holds a tuft in, in newtons. The withdrawal force of a V-fastened and a W-fastened tuft over the reported range of yarn-on-yarn friction, on a duck ground with 1.00 N in each pick. Each is the friction at the wraps, with each wrap's share dragged around every wrap between it and the pulled end — a capstan series rather than a single factor. W runs from 0.79 to 6.84 N and V from 0.15 to 0.41. Both are an order of magnitude below what a carpet is specified at, which is a finding about carpets rather than about the model. What the chart cannot show is the backing, which is where the rest of a tufted carpet's anchorage comes from. Compound and figured cloths

What holds a tuft in, in newtons

The pile ladder computed a tuft's anchorage as a capstan ratio and said, correctly, that a ratio was all it could offer. A ratio multiplies a tension and there was no tension anywhere on this site. There is one now — and the answer, put beside what a carpet is actually specified at, falls short by a factor of three.

 A muslin's warp, drawn at the diameters it actually has. 18 ends of a muslin's warp yarn, drawn at a seeded sample of their own diameters — mean 167 µm, coefficient of variation 15% — and spaced exactly, because the reed does not vary. The threads look even enough. The gaps do not: the widest here is 280 µm and the narrowest 229 µm, against a mean of 250 µm, and their coefficient of variation is 7% — larger than the yarn's, by the ratio of the diameter to the gap. That amplification is the whole reason a close cloth's holes are so much less uniform than its threads, and it gets worse as the cloth is set closer, because the gap in the denominator is the thing being shrunk. What cloth is

A cloth is a population, not a thread

Every number in this collection was computed from a diameter, and no yarn has one. Putting the distribution back changes some answers by nothing at all, some by a few per cent, and some by a factor — and which of the three happens is decided by one derivative.

 A plain knit's two relaxation steps. Munden's three relaxation states are usually given as three sets of constants. Read as a path they are two steps, and the two compose to the whole exactly — which is a real check, because the three sets were measured independently. The first step is the larger in the course direction and the smaller across the wales, and the second is 0.64 of the first lengthwise. That is the shape of a laundering series and it is the same mechanism: a fully relaxed state is reached by tumbling rather than by waiting, so what the standard specifies is a quantity of agitation and not a duration. What the bars cannot show is the loop length, which cancels out of all four numbers because every dimension of a knit is a loop length times a dimensionless constant. Knits and other structures

A knit relaxes for as long as it is allowed to

Munden's three states are usually given as three sets of constants. Read as a path they are two steps, they compose exactly, and the second is not a smaller version of the first — the fabric shrinks twice as much along its courses as across its wales on the first step and rather less than half as much on the second.

 Which seams slip and which break. For each cloth, the grip a 10 mm seam allowance offers divided by the thread's own breaking load. Above one the fabric or the thread gives first and the seam holds until it does; below one the threads slide out and the seam opens with the cloth intact. voile, batiste, poplin, sheeting break; cheesecloth, muslin, duck, filter slip. The allowance that would save every cloth in the table is 74 mm, which is set by the openest of them alone. What the chart cannot show is the stitching itself, which has its own strength and its own way of cutting the threads it passes through. Cloth doing a job

A seam slips before it breaks

A sewn seam fails in one of two ways and the trade names them separately: the threads pull out of the cloth beside the stitching, or something breaks. Which one a given cloth does is decided by whether its seam allowance clears the length at which grip beats strength — and at the ordinary ten millimetres, the table divides four against four.

 A crossing before and after it is pressed. One warp end of a sheeting riding over three picks, drawn twice to the same scale. Unpressed, both sections are circles and the cloth is 0.388 mm thick. At 0.42 N per crossing the sections flatten to aspect ratios of 1.79 and 1.88, the cloth thins to 0.260 mm, and the warp runs flat for 0.113 mm over each pick before it begins to curve. What the drawing cannot show is why the cloth does not do this by itself: flattening shrinks the arc radius as well as the crimp height, so it costs bending energy, and a relaxed cloth keeps its threads round. Setting and geometry

Peirce and Kemp are one cloth at two moments

This site has run two thread sections side by side since the setting field was built — a circle and a flattened racetrack — and said honestly that they disagree and that the disagreement is the point. They are not rival descriptions of the same fabric. They are descriptions of the same fabric before and after something pressed it, and the difference between them is a pressure that can now be named.

 The bracket that closes and the bracket that does not. A 25 tex cotton yarn at a packing factor of 0.6. Its bending rigidity lies between 0.00117 N·mm² — the sum of its fibres', with them free to slide — and 0.478, a solid rod of its own diameter: a factor of 408, and both ends are derivations. Its resistance to being squashed out of round has an upper bound of the same kind, 369 N/mm² for a solid section, and no lower bound at all, because fibres free to slide resist a change of shape with nothing. That is why the aspect ratio of a flattened yarn has been a free parameter here since the setting field was built: a quantity bounded below by zero cannot be estimated from its bounds, and has to be measured. Mechanics and drape

The stiffness with no lower bound

A yarn's bending rigidity lies between two derivable ends and the ratio is the fibre count — wide, but closed. Its resistance to being squashed out of round has an upper bound of the same kind and a lower bound of exactly nothing, because fibres free to slide resist a change of shape with nothing at all. That is why nobody could ever compute the aspect ratio of a flattened thread.

 The resting band with two coefficients in it. The range of extensions a sheeting can be left in, at rest and while being agitated, at three ratios of kinetic to static friction. The upper bar of each pair is the stuck band, held by the static coefficient; the lower is the band a cloth being shaken can be left in, held by the kinetic one. Agitation narrows the band but by less than the ratio of the coefficients: at 0.75 the narrowing is 0.868. The restoring force is not linear in the extension, so cutting the friction by a quarter does not move the band's edges by a quarter of the way in. What the bars cannot show is where a given piece of cloth actually stops inside its band, which depends on which side it came from. After the loom

Why agitation helps a cloth relax

Every standard relaxation procedure agitates: tumble it, wash it, steam it, work it. The explanation given is that agitation lets the fabric find its own dimensions, which is true and is not a mechanism. The mechanism is that a sliding contact resists less than a stuck one — and putting a number on it shows the effect is real, is smaller than the obvious arithmetic suggests, and does not account for what a relaxation procedure achieves.

 From a calender's line load to a force at one crossing. A sheeting through a nip loaded at 30 N per millimetre of bowl width, with the cloth in contact over 5.0 mm. The pressure is the first divided by the second, 6.00 N/mm², and the force at one crossing is that pressure times the area a crossing owns — the product of the two thread spacings, 0.1374 mm². So the crossing carries 0.824 N, the sections flatten to 2.42 and 2.63, and the cloth thins from 0.388 mm to 0.218 mm. What the drawing cannot show is that two cloths through the same nip are not given the same treatment: the area a crossing owns varies fivefold across the standard cloth table, and it is a factor in the force. After the loom

A calender spends the compression for good

Calendering was described here as moving a cloth from one thread-section model to another, which was right and had no number in it because the amount of the move was a free parameter. It is a pressure now — and the same nip setting turns out to give two cloths quite different treatments, because the force at a crossing is the pressure times the area a crossing owns.

 The size of the capstan correction. The ratio of the capstan crossover to the crossover a sum of independent contacts gives, for every cloth in the table at a friction coefficient of 0.30. It is exactly ln(1 + z)/z, where z is the thread's breaking load times the wrap angle, over the contact force — a quantity with no friction coefficient in it at all. That is why the earlier result that μ·L* is exactly constant survives this correction to twelve figures: μ was only ever in the factor outside the logarithm. The correction is largest for the duck, whose coarse strong yarn makes z large, and smallest for the batiste. What the rows cannot show is that a real cut edge frays at a friction nobody measured on that particular cloth. Cloth doing a job

How far a cut edge frays

A seam allowance, a fray width and a tuft's bound length are the same number wearing three hats, and the earlier estimate of it was four times too long. Correcting it moves the whole table across the boundary an ordinary allowance sits on — from four cloths holding and four slipping, to all eight holding — and turns a specification argument into a different one.

 How open a batiste is, against where the light is. One minus the cover is a cloth's openness to a light directly behind it, and for this batiste it is 40.1 per cent. Move off the normal and a line of sight has to clear the hole at the top of the cloth and the same hole one thickness below, so what it can use falls as t·tan α is taken off each side — reaching nothing at 39.0° across the ends. Averaged over the whole sky with Lambert's cosine weighting, the cloth is 6.42 per cent open — 6.3 times less than the covering rule says, and the whole of the difference is the thickness. One minus the cover is the openness of a cloth with no thickness, and no cloth has none. Pattern and colour

Opacity is not cover

The covering rule counts a thread as a bar that stops everything, and a single fine cotton thread held to a window plainly does not. What a cloth transmits is the open area plus whatever comes through the threads, so the covered fraction is a lever rather than a barrier — and the lever is longest exactly where the rule says the cloth is most closed. Nothing here computes a thread's transmittance, and saying why is the useful half.

 The evenness a cotton yarn cannot be better than. Lay staple fibres down at random and count how many cross a plane: the count is Poisson, its variance is its mean, and the coefficient of variation of the mass per unit length is therefore 1/√n with no material and no machine in it. The lower curve is that floor. At 20 tex there are 118 fibres in the section and the floor is 9.93 per cent; at 5 tex there are 29 and it is 19.86. The upper curve is what a yarn spun at an index of irregularity of 1.35 actually measures, which is the floor times a constant — so the whole shape belongs to the counting and none of it to the spinning. The exponent is exactly −½ and is asserted as such rather than fitted to the curve. What cloth is

The spread was never free

This collection has taken a yarn's irregularity off a delivery note and used it as an input. It is not an input. Counting the fibres in a cross-section puts a floor under it that no spinner can beat, and the floor is one over the square root of the count.

 A 5.0 mm cotton pile standing and crushed. A pile tuft standing 5.0 mm proud and the same tuft pressed flat, which turns it through a right angle over its own length and so bends it to a radius of 3.18 mm. Its fibres are strained 0.187% — an order of magnitude below the smallest strain anybody has measured a recovery at, so this file declines to say what fraction comes back. The consequence is that a crushed carpet is not held down by its fibres: what keeps a pile flat is the tufts leaning on one another and the friction where they touch. Below 0.469 mm the fibre does enter its measured range, which is the difference between a carpet and a velvet and has nothing to do with what either is made of. What the drawing cannot show is the neighbouring tufts, which are the mechanism. Compound and figured cloths

A crushed pile is not held down by its fibres

A carpet flattened under a foot has bent its tufts through a right angle, which sounds severe and is not: the fibres in a five-millimetre pile are strained under two tenths of a per cent, an order of magnitude below the smallest strain anybody has measured a recovery at. What holds a pile down is the tufts leaning on one another.

 When a knit has a hole between its loops, and when it has none. A loop's occupancy is its length times its diameter over the cell it sits in, and Munden's constants make that cell ℓ²/(k_c·k_w). The loop length cancels once and what is left is d·k_s/ℓ, where k_s is Munden's own stitch-density constant — so whether a knit has a hole between its loops depends on d/ℓ and on nothing else: no gauge, no count, no fabric dimension. The three curves are the three relaxed states of 20 tex cotton. Each crosses one at a loop length of 3.34, 3.63, 3.95 mm respectively, and a jersey is knitted at 2.63 to 3.44 mm — the shaded band. Every commercial jersey is therefore on the wrong side of the threshold in at least two of its three states: it closes its own holes as it relaxes, and its air goes through its threads rather than between them. Knits and other structures

A knit has no hole to lose

Every argument in this ladder is planar: threads at a spacing, a rectangle between four of them, a channel down it. Applied to a jersey it returns nothing at all, and the nothing is the finding. A loop's occupancy is its diameter times Munden's own stitch-density constant over its loop length, with no gauge and no fabric dimension in it — and the whole commercial range of tightness is on the wrong side of the threshold.

 The same error twice: scattered, and in a period. Two bands of 96 ends, drawn at spacings that differ from the reed's by the same root-mean-square amount — 6% of a dent, which is 25 µm. The upper band's errors are independent; the lower band's repeat every 8 ends, which is what one shaft set forward or one dent of the reed too wide produces. The displacement is drawn 8 times over scale, because at true scale it is half a pixel and both bands are picket fences; the arithmetic below it is at the true amplitude. The upper band reads as an even cloth with a little texture in it and the lower one has stripes, and nothing about the eye is needed to say why: at 96 ends the periodic arrangement is 7.7 times stronger at its own frequency than the scattered one is at any frequency, and over the 256 ends a buyer takes in at once it is 12.8. The ratio grows as the square root of how much cloth is looked at, which is why a fault-finding sweep is done at a distance rather than close up. Pattern and colour

A random error hides and a periodic one shows

A warp whose threads vary by fifteen per cent looks perfectly even. One dent of the reed a tenth of a millimetre wide makes a streak that gets the piece rejected. The same amount of error, arranged two ways — and the ratio between them is √(2n/π), with nothing fitted in it.

 Shrinkage from wetting, cloth by cloth. The change in each cloth's relaxed construction when its threads swell by 20% across and 1.2% along. Both states are least-energy states of their own constant-thread-length locus, which is the only comparison the locus admits: its minimum is a state at its own sett, so it may be compared with another minimum and not with a quoted construction. Positive is smaller. Every cloth that has a wet state closes up except the cheesecloth, which opens by half a per cent because the fibre's extra hundredth of length outruns the extra crimp a thicker partner costs. What the bars cannot show is the three cloths that are missing, which have no wet state at all. After the loom

Two shrinkages, one tape measure

A cloth that comes out of a wash smaller has done two different things and the tape cannot tell them apart. One is geometric, recoverable and finished in minutes; the other is frictional, permanent and needs agitation. This collection can now compute both, and they have different signatures.

 The two diameters of a 20 tex yarn. The pressure inside a twisted yarn is zero at its surface, so the outermost fibres are held by nothing but their own buried ends and some of them stand off as loops and ends. A yarn therefore has two diameters: a mass diameter of 167.1 µm, which is a volume divided by a length and is the one every other calculation on this site uses, and a contact diameter of 217.1 µm, which is what a neighbouring thread, a finger or an air stream meets. The gap is a hair layer of 25.0 µm on each side and it is measured, not computed — nothing here predicts hairiness. What is computed is the consequence, and it is 29.9% of the diameter every cover factor on this site was built from. What cloth is

The hairs are what touch

The pressure inside a twisted yarn falls to exactly zero at its surface, so the outermost fibres are held by nothing and some of them stand off. A yarn therefore has two diameters — the one its mass gives and the one a neighbour meets — and only the first is in the arithmetic.

 Shrinkage from wetting, cloth by cloth. The change in each cloth's relaxed construction when its threads swell by 20% across and 1.2% along. Both states are least-energy states of their own constant-thread-length locus, which is the only comparison the locus admits: its minimum is a state at its own sett, so it may be compared with another minimum and not with a quoted construction. Positive is smaller. Every cloth that has a wet state closes up except the cheesecloth, which opens by half a per cent because the fibre's extra hundredth of length outruns the extra crimp a thicker partner costs. What the bars cannot show is the three cloths that are missing, which have no wet state at all. Cloth doing a job

A garment is cut dry and worn wet

A cutting allowance is one number and the thing it allows for is two, in two directions. Worse: when the two directions differ, a panel cut on the bias does not merely shrink — it rotates, by half a degree for an ordinary poplin, which is nine and a half millimetres of skew across a metre and is invisible to a tape measure.

 One weft fault at three periods, a fraction of a millimetre apart. A 260 mm slice of a 1500 mm cloth at 22 picks per centimetre, 220 picks deep, with a thick place recurring along the weft. Each pick takes a whole width of yarn, so the marks land 35 to a pick across the full width and step sideways by the remainder of the width divided by the fault's period. On the left that remainder is zero and every thick place in the piece falls in the same columns — a warp-way stripe made entirely by a weft fault. In the middle the period is five hundredths of a millimetre longer and the same fault draws steep diagonals. On the right it is a third of a millimetre longer again, the marks land nowhere near each other, and the fault reads as texture. Nothing about the yarn distinguishes the three; the cloth's width does. The slice is drawn rather than the whole width because thirty-five marks a pick fill a panel solid at any step but zero, which is a true picture of a dense pattern and a useless one of its structure. Pattern and colour

A slub finds the width of the cloth

A thick place recurring along a weft yarn does not make a bar. It makes diagonals — and when the cloth's width happens to be a whole number of fault periods, it makes stripes down the piece instead, from a fault that is entirely in the weft.

 Cotton and viscose in every column this site carries. The two cellulosic fibres compared across every constant on this site. Both are cellulose at 1.52 g/cm³, both are given a modulus of 8 GPa and a fineness of 1.7 dtex, so a 20 tex yarn of either has the same diameter to the last figure — and therefore the same crimp, the same cover, the same jamming sett and the same bending bracket. Every geometric result on this site is the same number for the two fibres. Water separates them twice: viscose swells 1.75 times as far across and loses half its strength where cotton gains a tenth. What the table cannot show is why, which is a question about how cellulose is arranged inside a fibre and is not in this collection. Mechanics and drape

Water tells two fibres apart

Cotton and viscose are the same material by every constant this collection carries. Same density, same modulus, same fineness, so the same diameter at every count and the same crimp, cover, jamming sett and bending bracket. A wash separates them by a factor of two, and it is the only thing here that can.

 The surface of a 2/2 twill, in plan. One repeat of a 2/2 twill in sheeting, drawn 2 × 2 times, with every point painted in the colour of whichever thread owns the outside of the cloth there and at an opacity set by how high it is. The range is 221.0 µm from the highest point to the lowest, the root-mean-square roughness is 74.9 µm, and 30% of the plan is hole rather than surface. The bright ribbons are the float plateaux, where a thread lies straight across the threads it passes over and its outside is a horizontal line rather than a point — which is the whole of what follows. The warp crowns at 190.8 µm and the weft at 182.8 µm, a step of 8.0 µm, so the cloth touches the world on its warp alone until anything pressing on it has sunk that far. What cloth is

A cloth has an outside

Every quantity in this collection is a property of the inside of a fabric — a crimp, a cover, a hole, a fibre count. None of them says where the cloth stops. The outside is a height field the draft computes, its crowns stand at two different levels, and which of the two is higher decides what the cloth touches the world with.

 The same error twice: scattered, and in a period. Two bands of 96 ends, drawn at spacings that differ from the reed's by the same root-mean-square amount — 5% of a dent, which is 21 µm. The upper band's errors are independent; the lower band's repeat every 4 ends, which is what one shaft set forward or one dent of the reed too wide produces. The displacement is drawn 8 times over scale, because at true scale it is half a pixel and both bands are picket fences; the arithmetic below it is at the true amplitude. The upper band reads as an even cloth with a little texture in it and the lower one has stripes, and nothing about the eye is needed to say why: at 96 ends the periodic arrangement is 7.8 times stronger at its own frequency than the scattered one is at any frequency, and over the 256 ends a buyer takes in at once it is 12.8. The ratio grows as the square root of how much cloth is looked at, which is why a fault-finding sweep is done at a distance rather than close up. Knits and other structures

A course is one thread and a warp is many

A woven fabric draws its warp from two thousand packages side by side, so a yarn's drift averages out across the width. A weft knit takes whole courses from one package, so the same drift becomes a band — and the standard remedy for that turns an invisible error into a visible one.

 Seven weaves at one construction, and what each of them really passes. Every weave here is drawn at the same filter — the same yarn, the same sett, the same cover and therefore the same open area, equal to twelve decimal places. Each one shows an opening of 263.7 µm to anybody looking straight through it, and that is the number a specification quotes. The bar is what each will actually let past, which is the narrowest section anywhere along the channel rather than the narrowest view down it. The plain weave passes exactly what it shows and it is the only weave here that does: its ends transit at every gap, so the four threads round every hole are level in pairs and the waist is at the middle. A float leaves two ends together at the top of the cloth, their neighbours at the bottom, and a passage between them that is wider than its own mouth — up to 12.8 per cent over the rating, for the basket. Cloth doing a job

A filter is rated by the hole it does not show

A woven filter cloth is sold on two numbers pulling opposite ways: an opening small enough to hold the soil and an open area large enough to pass the water. Both are computed from the same holes, and they are not computed from the same statistic of them. One reads the maximum and the other reads the mean, so a change that improves either can worsen the other without moving a single measurable property of the cloth.

 A seersucker in section. A seersucker in section across four stripes, at a feed ratio of 1.30 — the slack warp let off 30 per cent faster than the tight one — over a 6.0 mm stripe. The surplus has nowhere to go in the plane, so it buckles, and the standard small-amplitude result gives 2.09 mm of rise, which is 4.2 times the cloth's own thickness of 0.500 mm. Nothing has to relax for this to appear: unlike a honeycomb, a seersucker comes off the loom already puckered, and washing deepens it rather than creating it. What the drawing cannot show is that the buckle's shape is an assumption — a sinusoid pinned at the stripe's edges — while its amplitude follows from the surplus and the half-wavelength alone. Weaves

A seersucker is made at the loom

Every other relief weave in this collection gets its shape after the loom, from a difference of crimp between two regions of a few per cent. A seersucker's surplus is thirty per cent and is put in as the cloth is woven — an order of magnitude more, which the square root turns into a factor of four in depth and no more than that.

 Shrinkage from wetting, cloth by cloth. The change in each cloth's relaxed construction when its threads swell by 20% across and 1.2% along. Both states are least-energy states of their own constant-thread-length locus, which is the only comparison the locus admits: its minimum is a state at its own sett, so it may be compared with another minimum and not with a quoted construction. Positive is smaller. Every cloth that has a wet state closes up except the cheesecloth, which opens by half a per cent because the fibre's extra hundredth of length outruns the extra crimp a thicker partner costs. What the bars cannot show is the three cloths that are missing, which have no wet state at all. Setting and geometry

Wetting moves a cloth to another locus

A cloth's constant-thread-length locus is built at a fixed thickness. Swelling changes the thickness, so a wetted cloth is not somewhere else on its own locus — it is on a different one, and the distance between the two least-energy states is the shrinkage. Five of the eight cloths here have a wet state, and one of them gets bigger.

 How much of a 20 tex yarn's unevenness survives being woven. Weaving averages, and the averaging is a square root. A patch of cloth 3 mm across contains 7.2 warp threads and as many picks, each contributing its own mass independently, so the patch's coefficient of variation is 3.53% against the yarn's 13.4% — a reduction of 3.8-fold. The rule at the top is the yarn's own figure. The curve steepens past the staple length, where a patch starts to contain independent samples along each thread as well as across them, and the second regime is the one a large area of cloth is judged in. Pattern and colour

A cloth cannot be more even than its yarn

It can be very much more even than its yarn, and by exactly the square root of the threads in view. Which raises a question the fineness argument left open — and the answer is that at a fixed cloth weight the count cancels out entirely.

 What a muslin passes, against how closely it is set. A muslin's air permeability at 100 Pa as the sett is closed from 6.9 to 34.2 threads per centimetre, with the two paths separated. The channels between the threads carry 8285 mm/s at the open end and 1330 at the close one, and they go to zero when the cloth jams. The threads themselves carry 1.7 to 6.4 mm/s and never go to zero at all, because a thread is sixty per cent fibre whatever the sett is. Extended to a cloth with no channel left, that path is 8.1 mm/s — a floor set by the yarn rather than by the construction, and a specification asking for less has asked for a fabric that cannot be woven from this yarn at any sett. Cloth doing a job

A cloth stops having holes before it stops passing air

Close a woven cloth up and the channels between its threads shut. What passes through it does not go to zero, because a thread is sixty per cent fibre and forty per cent air and stays that way whatever is done to the construction. So a fabric's permeability has a floor, the floor belongs to the yarn rather than to the weaver, and no sett on any loom reaches it.

 The tightest fold a 20 tex cotton yarn can be given. A cloth folded as sharply as it can be folded. The two yarn crowns on the inside of the fold cannot pass through one another, so the fold's radius is the yarn's own — 0.084 mm for a 20 tex cotton yarn — and there is no measurement of an iron anywhere in the argument. At that radius a fibre free to slide is strained 7.14%, which is √(packing × fibre tex ÷ yarn tex), and the whole yarn bending as a rod would be strained exactly one hundred per cent. Cotton's measured breaking extension is 6.0% to 10.0%, so the free bound does not survive and the locked one cannot. What the drawing cannot show is the fibres inside the yarn, which is exactly what the argument is about — the picture is the same either way and the strain is fourteen times different. After the loom

A crease is a fold the crimp cannot supply

A fold needs its outer face longer than its inner, and a woven cloth's way of supplying a length is to move crimp. That runs out at a radius of millimetres, and a pressed crease is tenths of one — so the fold is handed to the fibres. How hard it strains them turns on a question that two fields of these essays had left unsettled, and a crease settles it by refusing.

 Elastic recovery against strain, for seven fibres. The elastic recovery of seven fibres at the strains it is reported at: extend to a stated strain, unload, read the strain returned immediately. Each fibre's points are joined and the line stops where the measurements stop, which is the point of the figure — a fibre strained past the last point on its own line is a fibre this collection declines to answer for. Nothing here is measured below one per cent of strain, and a woven cloth just past its own interchange budget is at a thread strain of a few hundredths, so the region that matters most for a fabric is the region nobody has reported. Recovery falls monotonically for every fibre, which is what lets the unmeasured region be bracketed between the lowest measured value and one rather than extrapolated. What the plot cannot show is the delayed recovery, which is excluded by the convention and is largest for the fibre with the best reputation for recovering. Mechanics and drape

Recovery is measured and nothing predicts it

A fibre's stiffness is a bracket whose ends can be computed. What fraction of a strain it gives back is not: it has to be looked up, the tables are thin, they stop exactly where a fabric needs them, and the most attractive explanation for the ordering they show turns out to have no signal in it at all.

 The pressure a 30° twist puts on its own fibres. A twisted yarn squeezes itself. Every fibre under tension at a radius pulls inward with sin²θ of its tension per unit length, and integrating outward to the surface — where the pressure is zero by definition, because there is nothing outside to push against — gives p(r) = ½σ(cos²θ(r) − cos²α) in closed form. At a surface angle of 30° the pressure on the axis is 12.5 per cent of the core fibre's own axial stress and the mean over the section is 5.65 per cent of it. The shading is that closed form and the curve is the same function plotted; the shape is what matters, and its one uncompromising feature is the zero at the edge. The outermost fibres are held by nothing, which is why a yarn is hairy, why a surface fibre is the one that comes away on a finger, and why singeing changes a yarn's behaviour out of all proportion to the mass it removes. Compound and figured cloths

A tuft is set so it cannot untwist

A cut pile tuft has a free end, and at a free end the pressure holding the twist is zero. So the twist runs out over a computable length, the tuft opens, and a carpet loses its appearance long before it loses any material.

 single jersey, as loops. Three courses of the same structure drawn as yarn. A knitted needle takes a new loop through the one below; a tuck takes the yarn into the loop below and leaves it on the needle, so that loop is held for another course; a miss floats straight past. Six needles is as many as a loop diagram can carry, which is why the array beside it exists. Knits and other structures

A jersey has two surfaces

The face of a plain knit shows the legs of its loops, which run along the wale; the back shows the heads and feet, which run across it. So the two faces carry their crowns at right angles — the same situation as a damask's figure and its ground, in a fabric with no warp, no weft and no float.

 Four ways of closing a muslin, and the floor under all of them. The same muslin at four states: as woven, calendered to 3:1, wetted so its fibres swell by 20 per cent, and with the channel between its threads gone altogether. Air permeability at 100 Pa falls from 3505 mm/s to 8.1 — a factor of 434 — and stops there. The last figure is not a cloth with no holes in it: it is a cloth whose only remaining path is through the threads, which are sixty per cent fibre whatever is done to the construction. That number is the floor, it is a property of the yarn, and no sett reaches it. Note that the two middle routes are not in a fixed order: a 3:1 calender closes more than this swelling and a 2:1 calender closes less, so which is the stronger depends on how far each is taken. Cloth doing a job

A windproof cloth is at its yarn's limit

Windproof is a threshold on air permeability, and it is the only fabric specification on this site that the construction cannot settle. No weavable sett of an ordinary shirting yarn gets within two hundred times of it, layering the cloth barely helps because the resistance is inertial rather than viscous, and the floor set by the yarn's own porosity lands on the same order as the threshold with a fivefold bracket around it.

 Where Poiseuille's rule starts being true of a cloth. Every account of a fabric's air permeability quotes the fourth power: flow down a channel goes as the fourth power of its width, so a small change of sett is a large change of flow. That is Poiseuille's result and it is about the viscous drop. A channel through a cloth is about as long as it is wide and the air in it is moving fast, so most of the pressure goes on giving that air its kinetic energy instead — and the inertial term does not depend on the hole's size at all. Plotted against cover, the viscous share of the drop runs from 1.0 per cent in an open muslin to 61.6 in a close one, passing half at a cover of 0.571. Quoting the fourth power alone below that is wrong by a factor rather than by a correction: at the open end it overstates the flow 98-fold. Setting and geometry

The fourth power is a close cloth's rule

Every account of a fabric's air permeability quotes the same thing: flow down a channel goes as the fourth power of its width, so a small change of sett is a large change of flow. That is Poiseuille's result, it is about the viscous drop, and in an open cloth the viscous drop is two per cent of the pressure. The rule becomes true as the cloth closes, and where it starts being true is a number.

 The strain at a fold against the strain each fibre breaks at. For each fibre, the surface strain at the sharpest fold a 20 tex yarn of it can make — which is √(packing × fibre tex ÷ yarn tex), with no measurement of a crease in it — beside its own measured breaking extension. cotton and flax are strained past the low end of their breaking range, so some of their fibres break at the fold, and that is what a linen crease is. The rest survive, and among them viscose and wool return less than three fifths of what they were given, which is the other way a cloth creases. Both columns are needed: viscose survives with a factor of two to spare and is among the three worst by measurement. What the bars cannot show is wool, which the census puts in the wrong column because the recovery figures are the immediate ones and wool's is the most delayed of any fibre here. After the loom

Which fibres crease, and why there are two answers

Run the sharpest fold a yarn can make against every fibre's breaking extension and its recovery, and the ranking that falls out is the trade's own — linen worst, cotton next, wool and the melt-spun filaments best. It falls out of two columns rather than one, because two fibres in the bottom three get there by different mechanisms, and a treatment that fixes one does nothing for the other.

 A V-fastened tuft. A cut pile bound into its ground by V fastening, drawn in section. The pile end passes beneath 3 of the 6 ground picks and wraps 1 half-turn around them in all. The integrity criterion says the tuft is attached; how hard it is held is a different question with a different model behind it. Compound and figured cloths

A chenille is a yarn that is already a fabric

A chenille yarn is a woven gauze cut into strips. Every structural question this collection asks about cloth can be asked about it — does it hang together, how many systems has it, what holds the pile in — and the answers are the same answers one level down.

 What it costs to touch a cloth. The pressure needed to bring a stated fraction of the plan into contact, for plain, 2/2 twill, satin 8 in sheeting. Reaching two per cent of the plan takes 2.83 kPa on a plain and 0.05 on a satin 8, a factor of 55. The stiffness in this figure is fitted and is labelled as such. A yarn's resistance to being squashed out of round has no lower bound at all — a bundle of fibres free to slide is a fluid in cross-section — so no bracket exists to compute this from, and what is used is the value this collection fitted to measured fabric thickness. Every curve moves together across its published range, which is why the ratio between weaves survives and the absolute values are quoted with the fit named. What cloth is

How much of a cloth is touching

Press a fabric against a flat plate with the weight of a hand and ask what fraction of it is actually in contact. The bearing curve answers, and the answer is about four per cent — of which the great majority is not the cloth's surface at all, but the hairs standing off it, which nothing in this arithmetic can see.

 A yarn's diameter is a contour, not a length. The fraction of the space beside a 20 tex cotton yarn that is occupied by hair, against height, grossed up from the modelled population by the measured split between the long and short populations. At the yarn's own surface it is 8.9% — the layer is almost entirely gap — and it falls away exponentially from there. Every instrument that reports a yarn diameter is picking a contour of this curve, and the contours are far apart: a threshold that needs half the space filled is never met at all, one that needs a twentieth is met at 355 µm, and a hair counter triggers out at 2353 µm. The earlier model gave the layer a single thickness of 25 µm, which is a fair description of where most of the material is and wrong about its extent by more than a decade. What the curve cannot say is which contour any particular instrument uses, which is a fact about the instrument. Pattern and colour

A cloth is more opaque than it is closed

Opacity is not cover — this collection established that already and left the discrepancy attributed to the thickness of the threads. Part of it is not in the threads at all. A hair standing in a hole blocks light exactly as well as a thread does and costs nothing in air.

 Whether a cloth's hairs can reach one another. n_A λ² for each construction in this site's table — the hairs per square millimetre times the square of their own length, which is the pure number that asks whether a hair can touch its neighbour. It is a count times an area, so it has to be a pure number. Every one of them is under one, which means no ordinary woven cotton cloth has a hair layer at all: it has isolated whiskers on a bare surface. The dashed line is the threshold. The spread across the whole table is only 1.9-fold, because the density goes as the sett times the root of the count and those move in opposite directions as a cloth is made finer — so construction is almost powerless here, and everything that crosses this threshold does so by finishing rather than by weaving. Knits and other structures

A knit gives up its fibres more easily

Knitwear pills and shirting does not, and the fibres are often the same fibres. The difference is a count of yarn per unit area and a pressure between threads, and both of them push a knit over a threshold that a woven cloth of the same yarn cannot reach.

 The coarsest pore and the finest, in one muslin. A muslin's two pore systems asked the same question. Water at a contact angle of 120° is held back by a pore of radius r at a head of 2γ|cos θ|/ρgr, so the hole between four threads — hydraulic radius 134 µm — holds 56 mm of water, and the space between the fibres inside a thread — 2.50 µm — holds 2975 mm. Water takes the cheapest path, so the cloth leaks at the first of them and the second is never asked. Turn the contact angle round to a wetting one and the same two radii give a rise instead, and now it is the finest that decides, because that is the one that lifts highest: 5950 mm. One expression, two ends of a distribution, and the fabric's two properties read opposite ends of it. After the loom

The pore that wicks is the pore that leaks

A cloth's water resistance and a cloth's wicking are one expression, read at the two ends of a contact angle. The geometry cannot be chosen to give both, because it is the same geometry; the only thing that decides which a fabric does is a finish. And the two questions do not even read the same pore — a rise is set by the finest and a leak by the coarsest, so the same cloth lifts water three metres and holds it back at fifty-six millimetres.

 Where a muslin's warmth actually is. A muslin's own thermal resistance is 0.0108 m²K/W, and the still-air layer clinging to its outside is 0.12 — so 92 per cent of what a person is wearing is air that is not in the cloth. Wind takes it: the boundary layer thins as the square root of the speed, and above a few metres per second the air is also being driven straight through the fabric, which shorts out whatever resistance the fabric had. The pair leaves 22 per cent of the still-air value at 16 m/s. Both mechanisms take away air rather than cloth, which is why a windproof layer works and a thicker weave does not, and why the fibre — which the conductivity bracket could not separate anyway — never enters this figure. Cloth doing a job

The wind takes the air and not the cloth

A shirting's own thermal resistance is eight per cent of what a person wearing it has; the other ninety-two is a still-air layer half a millimetre thick clinging to its outside. Wind destroys both, and it destroys the larger one first and by a mechanism that has nothing to do with the fabric — so a windproof layer works by keeping air still rather than by resisting heat.

 Eight fibres through one cloth, and the bracket that hides them. A muslin is 19 per cent fibre and the rest air, so its thermal conductivity is a two-phase mixture, and how the fibre and the air are arranged is not something any amount of knowing the fractions settles. What is settled is Wiener's pair of bounds: heat across a series arrangement sees the harmonic mean and along a parallel one sees the volume average, and every real arrangement lies between. Each bar here is one fibre's whole band, from the series bound at its lowest published conductivity to the parallel bound at its highest. Not one of the eight clears any other, so this model cannot tell wool from nylon in a fabric — and the same cloth at twice the thickness has twice the resistance, exactly. Air's own conductivity is marked, and every band sits within a fifth of it. Mechanics and drape

Warmth is a thickness of air

A fabric is a tenth fibre and the rest air, so its thermal conductivity is a mixture of the two — and the pair of bounds that any mixture must lie between comes out narrower than the difference between wool and nylon. The model cannot tell one fibre from another in a cloth. What it can tell, exactly and with no bracket at all, is that twice the thickness is twice the warmth.

 Three kinds of surface, and only one of them starts open. The bearing curves of a 2/2 twill in sheeting, of a terry loop pile, and of a cut corduroy pile of 30 tex, over the first six per cent of a cloth's thickness. The woven curve opens as the square root of the depth and the loop pile's does the same, because a loop's top is a curved thread like any other. The cut pile does not open: it is a flat line at 5.2% of the plan, from a depth of nothing, because a blade severed every tuft in one pass and left every end in one plane. That is not a larger contact area, it is a different kind of contact area — one that does not vanish as the load goes to zero, which is a property no woven surface has. Compound and figured cloths

A pile is the only surface with no crowns

Every other fabric touches on the tops of curved threads, so its contact vanishes as the load goes to zero and the pressure on what is touching rises without limit. A cut pile touches on flat ends left in one plane by a blade — so its contact is finite at no load at all, its pressure concentration is bounded, and it is the only fabric whose abrasion mass loss is an honest measure of its damage.

 A knitted loop, solved rather than drawn. 3 courses by 3 wales of a 20 tex cotton jersey at a 3.5 mm loop, tightness factor 12.8, with one stitch picked out. The centre line is the curve that minimises the yarn's own bending between one interlacing and the next, and the yarn is drawn at its own width of 167 µm so that the crowding is the fabric's rather than the drawing's. It is rounder than the horseshoe a knitting diagram draws, and deliberately so: a diagram draws the topology and an elastica draws the mechanics, and a rod with a fixed length between two fixed points does not hug a rectangle. Half the yarn between two interlacings is spare — the straight line between them is 51% of the yarn available — which is what lets a loop be solved as a free elastica at all. The tightest bend anywhere on it is 1.00 times one over the yarn diameter, the curvature of a yarn wrapped hard round another of the same size. Nothing arranged that: the only things imposed are the loop length and the two spacings. Knits and other structures

A loop is nine tenths free run

Half the yarn in a knitted stitch is slack — the straight line between two interlacings is a little over half the thread available to span it. That is two orders of magnitude more room than a woven thread has, and it is why a knitted loop is a shape that can be solved rather than a shape that has to be constructed.

All themes