Theme

The thread: Structure before fibre

Most of what a fabric does follows from how it is put together rather than from what it is made of. The same yarn gives a shirting or a satin, and they behave nothing alike.

The 5-end satin. The 5-end satin on point paper, a filled square meaning the warp is on the face. Its longest float, its interlacing count and the number of separable cloths it describes were all counted from the matrix that drew it.

Weaves

Plain, twill and satin

Three rules, and everything else in weaving is a variation on them. What separates the three is not appearance but one trade — how often a thread changes face against how far it runs when it does not.

$How much fibre a woven reinforcement holds. A unit cell of a woven reinforcement in section: flat tows, the thickness they add up to, and the wave the warp makes to cross them. The bar below is the fibre volume fraction against the same tows laid flat in two plies and against the packing factor of a tow, which is the most any cloth of them could be. The vertical scale is exaggerated so the interlacing is legible; the horizontal scale is the cloth's own.$ Cloth doing a job

The crimp is the price of being cloth

A woven reinforcement is bought for stiffness along its fibres, and the usual explanation of what it gives up — fibre content, lost to the crimp — has the sign wrong. At a given thickness a woven fabric holds slightly more fibre than two flat plies of the same tows. What the crimp costs is stiffness, and the float length is the knob.

Knits and other structures

The loop

A knit is one thread bent into loops, each drawn through the loop below. Nothing in it is straight, which is why it stretches in every direction while a woven cloth stretches only at an angle.

$The same thread count, twice. Two cloths with identical thread counts and different yarn. The count is the same number in both; the fraction of the surface the threads actually occupy is not, and that fraction is what thread count is usually taken to mean.$ Setting and geometry

Thread count is not quality

It counts threads. It says nothing about how much of the cloth they cover, it can be inflated by counting plies, and it ranks fabrics in nearly the wrong order. The quantity it is mistaken for is cover factor, and that one is computable.

The plain. The plain on point paper, a filled square meaning the warp is on the face. Its longest float, its interlacing count and the number of separable cloths it describes were all counted from the matrix that drew it.

What cloth is

A fabric is a structure, not a material

Cotton is a material. Cloth is an arrangement, and almost everything a fabric does follows from how the threads are put together rather than from what they are made of.

The same thread, on the loom and off it. One warp end in section over eight picks, drawn twice at the same scale. The thread is the same length in both panels; in the lower one more of that length is in the bends, so the cloth it spans is shorter. Nothing has been lost — the length has moved into the crimp. The thread's thickness and the height of its bends are drawn larger than scale so the interlacing is legible; the two panels' spacings are not.

After the loom

What comes off the loom is not the cloth

Every number on this site so far describes a fabric in one particular condition — held under tension, stretched to the reed width, never wetted — and none of them says so. That condition lasts until the cloth is taken off the machine, which is the first thing that happens to it.

Cloth doing a job

A fabric to fill and a fabric to load

A reinforcement has to hold as much fibre as possible and still let a resin through it, and the two demands are the same decision pulling opposite ways. Both bounds are computable, the interval between them narrows as the square of the part, and past a certain size it is empty — which is the most useful thing the arithmetic says.

Where the floats are in the 5-end satin. Every longest run of warp on the face, marked. A float is smooth because nothing interrupts it, which is the same reason it snags: there is a length of thread lying on the surface with nothing holding it down.

Weaves

The float decides

How far a thread runs on the face before it goes under is one number, and it sits behind lustre, drape, snagging, abrasion, tear strength and how densely the cloth can be set. Almost nothing else in the subject has that reach.

Why one curls and the other does not. A knitted loop is not symmetric front to back. Worked every course the same way, the asymmetries add along the edges and the fabric rolls; worked alternately, consecutive courses point opposite ways and cancel.

Knits and other structures

Why stockinette curls

A knitted loop is not symmetric front to back. Work every course the same way and the asymmetries add up along the edges; alternate them and they cancel. That is the whole difference between a fabric that rolls and one that lies flat.

Two sections, one yarn. The same yarn given a circular cross-section and a racetrack one of equal area, both jammed. The spacing the two models allow is nearly the same; the cover and the cloth thickness they predict are not.

Cloth doing a job

A tow is not a yarn

Every geometric model on this site assumes a thread with a diameter. A reinforcement tow has a width and a thickness instead, and the two are eight to one — which moves the jammed sett, the crimp, the cover and the cloth's thickness at once, in four different directions, from one change.

What an interlacing costs. Each weave's interlacing count beside the closest it can be set in the same yarn. The two run opposite ways, because a thread that changes face often has to bend often and a bend takes room.

Setting and geometry

How close can threads be set

There is a maximum. Push more threads into a cloth than the geometry allows and they simply will not go, and the limit depends on the weave as much as on the yarn.

One break, two outcomes. The same single break in a knit and in a weave. In the knit nothing holds the loop above the break, so the failure climbs the wale; in the weave every other thread is still held by the threads crossing it, and one thread comes loose.

Knits and other structures

Ravel, fray and run

Cut a woven cloth and one thread comes loose. Break one loop in a knit and every loop above it follows. The two structures fail in opposite ways, and the reason is topology rather than strength.

How much a cloth can give back. Relaxation shrinkage against how much of the warp crimp the loom took out, with the area shrinkage above it and the ceiling drawn across. The ceiling is the crimp itself, read as c/(1+c): it is all the length there is to give, and no tension reaches past it.

After the loom

Why the warp shrinks more

A woven cloth almost always loses more length than width, and the reason is not in the cloth. It is in the machine — the warp is held under tension for the whole of weaving and the weft is held for a fraction of a second — so the two systems arrive at the finishing works with different amounts of crimp missing.

The cantilever test. A strip of cloth pushed out over an edge until its tip has drooped to the stated angle. The overhang at that moment gives the bending length, and cubing it with the mass per unit area gives the flexural rigidity.

Mechanics and drape

Bending stiffness and the drape coefficient

Two standard measurements try to say how a fabric hangs. One measures a length and cubes it; the other measures an area and, on the geometry, turns out to be answering a different question from the one it is asked.

The plait braid. A braid written as a word of crossings and drawn from it. Each strand is coloured by the component of the above-and-below relation it belongs to, so a word describing two independent braids rather than one shows as two colours. This one is 1 braid.

What cloth is

Braids and the third thread system

A braid is one set of strands interlacing with itself at an angle, so the question of whether it holds together is the same question a weave answers — and most crossing sequences answer it badly.

Weaves

Interlacings and firmness

Every time a thread changes face it has to bend, and a bend takes room. That one sentence decides how densely a cloth can be set, how firm it feels, and why the two run in opposite directions.

The draft for 8-end satin, as a loom holds it. The 8-end satin written the way a weaver writes it: the threading above, saying which shaft each end hangs on; the lifting plan to the right, saying which shafts rise on each pick; and the cloth below, which is not copied from the weave but produced by running those two against one another and then checked against it.

Compound and figured cloths

A jacquard is every end its own shaft

The machine is usually described as the one that weaves anything. What it actually does is abolish one of the loom's two budgets and make the other proportional to the width of the repeat — which turns a constraint on the design's kind into a constraint on its size, and those are very different things to be short of.

Six ways of saying how fine a yarn is. The same four yarns written in six count systems, all placed on one axis of tex. A direct system states mass per unit length and rises as the yarn coarsens; an indirect one states length per unit mass and falls. Both kinds are in daily use and neither says which it is.

Setting and geometry

The yarn count systems, and why there are several

Half the ways of saying how fine a yarn is get bigger as it gets finer and half get smaller. That is not carelessness — and one of the constants buried in the oldest rule of thumb turns out to be a measurement nobody wrote down.

What cloth is

What the matrix cannot say

A weave is a binary matrix, and the whole of this collection rests on it. So it is worth setting down, in one place and precisely, what that encoding decides exactly, what it decides while appearing to decide something else, and the four quite different reasons a real fabric can fall outside it altogether.

A web at 6 fibre lengths squared per unit area. Straight fibres dropped at random positions and random angles. The largest connected group is drawn solid; everything not joined to it is drawn faintly. Whether that group reaches both edges is what decides whether this is a sheet or a heap.

What cloth is

Nonwovens, and what holds them together instead

A web of fibres laid down at random has no repeat, so the exact test for whether a fabric holds together has nothing to work on. What replaces it is a threshold, and the threshold is sharp.

Setting and geometry

Peirce against the racetrack, measured

Two models of a yarn's cross-section, given the same yarn and the same closure condition, agree on how densely the cloth can be set and disagree by nearly half on how thick it is. Which quantity is being asked about decides whether the choice of model matters at all.

1×1 rib — alternate wales to the back. A knitted fabric seen in section across the wales. Alternate wales pulled to the back fold the fabric like a concertina, so its relaxed width is a projection; pulling it wide unfolds the section and no yarn changes length while it happens.

Knits and other structures

Rib and interlock

A rib fabric is a plain knit folded like a concertina, and its enormous widthwise stretch is the fold opening out. Nothing in it is elastic, and the extension available is a cosine.

A cloth laid over a sphere. Every thread segment is exactly one pitch and none has stretched. What has changed is the angle at each crossing, and the amount is decided by the surface — a developable one costs nothing and a curved one costs more the further the cloth goes.

Mechanics and drape

Shear locking in a composite preform

Laying a woven reinforcement over a mould is the bias mechanism doing useful work, and it stops dead at the angle where the threads jam. Where the cloth wrinkles is a geometric prediction with a radius attached.

The 2/2 twill both ways round. The same twill stepped one end to the right and one end to the left. Every quantity the matrix can produce is identical for the two, so the direction is real in the cloth and invisible in the arithmetic.

Weaves

Twill direction, and how it is named

The two twills are mirror images, and every quantity the matrix can produce is identical for both. What separates them is the yarn, which has a handedness of its own — and the angle, which is forty-five degrees only in a square-set cloth.

Cloth doing a job

A filter cloth has two jobs

Hold the soil back and pass the water. The first wants a close sett and the second wants an open one, so a filter cloth is not a fabric but an interval — one that is sometimes a single sett wide, and for a fine enough soil is empty. The empty case is the useful one, because it says the answer is not a woven cloth at all.

Setting and geometry

Balance, and what an unbalanced cloth does

How much of the surface each thread system takes is the mean of the weave matrix, and it is one of the very few quantities in this subject that can be read straight off. Almost nothing that follows from it can.

A V-fastened tuft. A cut pile bound into its ground by V fastening, drawn in section. The pile end passes beneath 3 of the 6 ground picks and wraps 1 half-turn around them in all. The integrity criterion says the tuft is attached; how hard it is held is a different question with a different model behind it.

Compound and figured cloths

Pile is a third thread system

Velvet, corduroy, plush and carpet all carry threads that are not woven into the ground in the ordinary sense. Two of the three systems make a perfectly good matrix and the third is not in it — so the encoding this whole site rests on has nothing to say about the part of the fabric a hand actually touches.

After the loom

The cloth gains weight by losing size

Mass per unit area is the number a fabric is bought by, and it rises by eleven per cent when a cloth relaxes — with nothing added, nothing removed and no thread changed. The quantity is a ratio, and finishing moves its denominator.

Four ways a fabric gets longer without stretching. Extension available from each mechanism, computed from the geometry that provides it. None of these numbers involves a yarn changing length; every one of them is a shape changing, and they differ by an order of magnitude.

Knits and other structures

Why a knit recovers and a woven does not

Four fabrics get longer without a single yarn stretching, and the four mechanisms are worth wildly different amounts. Three of them are recoverable and one is very nearly not, and which is which follows from where the extension came from.

Wrinkles 127 mm apart. A 300 mm width of a 120 g/m² cloth whose bending length is 20 mm, held under 5 newtons per metre across it and compressed. It cannot carry the compression in the plane, so it leaves the plane, at a wavelength the bending rigidity and the tension settle between them: 127 mm, which is 2.4 wrinkles across the width. The amplitude is drawn and is not computed — this arithmetic sets the spacing and says nothing about the depth.

Mechanics and drape

A cloth cannot carry a push

The net model that runs this site's mechanics has no bending stiffness at all, so it buckles under any compression whatever, into wrinkles of any wavelength whatever. What picks the wavelength is the competition the net leaves out — and the answer is a quarter power, which is why a wrinkle is so hard to change.

A double cloth. Two complete fabrics woven in one repeat, and what happens when a single intersection is turned over. The layer count beside the draft is computed from the matrix drawn, and the census below it is every single-square change tried in turn.

Weaves

Backed and stitched constructions

A double cloth is two fabrics woven at once, and the check that verifies it says exactly two. Turn one intersection over and it says one — which means one mistake is enough to destroy the construction, and the enumeration says half of them would do it.

$What a balanced cloth wastes under pressure. The fraction of a balanced fabric's fibre that is along for the ride, in a stress field of each ratio. A closed cylinder is exactly two to one — the ratio of the two areas the pressure acts on — so a balanced cloth reaches its limit around the circumference with the axial system at half its capacity, and a quarter of the fibre is doing nothing.$ Cloth doing a job

An inflated cylinder wants an unbalanced cloth

Balance is a virtue in almost every other cloth. Under pressure it is a defect with a size — a closed cylinder carries exactly twice the stress around its circumference as along its axis, so a balanced fabric reaches its limit in one direction with a quarter of its fibre doing nothing at all.

Milling, on the nonwoven's own scale. Migrated fibre accumulating with agitation, measured against the stick-percolation threshold this site uses for nonwovens. Above the line the fibre network holds on its own, which is why a milled cloth can be cut without fraying — the weave is no longer the only thing keeping it together.

After the loom

Milling holds the cloth a second time

This site's integrity criterion returns exactly the same answer for a melton as for the loose twill it was woven as, and it is right both times. What has changed is that a second network now holds the fabric together, made of migrated fibre rather than of thread crossings — and it is the one that decides whether a cut edge frays.

The number the drape test does not record. A 150 mm specimen over a 90 mm pedestal, for fabrics from limp to stiff. The curve is the fold count the buckling argument predicts — three quarters of a power of the specimen's radius over its own bending length — and it runs from 2 folds to 11. The number beside each mark is the drape coefficient the same specimen would report, which moves by a few points across the whole range.

Mechanics and drape

The nodes a drape test throws away

A drape test lays a circular specimen over a pedestal, photographs the shadow and reports one number. The specimen also falls into a definite number of folds, which is a buckling mode set by the fabric's own bending length — and the standard method observes it, does not record it, and reports the number it is least sensitive to.

$Where the twenty-eight comes from. The setting a cotton cover factor of 28 prescribes, and the setting at which the threads would cover the surface geometrically, against yarn count. They are one curve: the trade's scale is Peirce's diameter with the units taken out. Below them is the sett at which each weave actually jams, which is a fixed fraction of it.$ Setting and geometry

Where the cover factor comes from

A cotton cover factor is threads per inch over the root of the count, and the scale says twenty-eight means a covered surface. The twenty-eight is not a convention: it is the reciprocal of Peirce's yarn diameter, and the trade's practical ceilings of fourteen and twenty-two fall straight out of it.

The highlights of a 8-end satin, move 3. Every unbroken run of warp on the face, drawn as the band of light it returns. A yarn is a cylinder and a cylinder reflects a line rather than a point, so a float's highlight is as long as the float — and how long that is, in inches, is the float divided by the picks per inch the weave can be set to.

Weaves

Why satin shines

Lustre is usually filed under fibre, and silk gets the credit. It is a property of the weave: a cylinder reflects a line rather than a point, so the highlight a cloth returns is exactly as long as its longest float.

Cloth doing a job

A membrane is cut smaller than it is

A tensioned fabric roof is cut to a pattern smaller than the shape it will take, because stressing it makes it grow. At a fixed cloth thickness a prestress can only interchange crimp — one direction grows and the other shrinks — so everything that makes both directions grow is the crossings flattening, which is the one quantity here this site cannot compute.

Terry at a let-off of 5 to one. Towelling has two warp beams. The ground warp is held at ordinary tension; the pile warp is let off 5 times as fast, and the excess has nowhere to go but up. The loop height follows from the ratio and the pick spacing, and no float length appears in it.

Compound and figured cloths

Terry needs two beams

A towel's pile is not woven longer. It is fed longer — from a second warp beam let off several times faster than the first — so the loop height follows from a ratio and a pick spacing, and the float length that decides a corduroy does not appear in it anywhere.

Yarn per needle, by structure. Wale spacings of yarn per needle position, at one loop length. A knitted loop is 4.30 of them — Munden's constant, measured rather than derived — a float across one needle is exactly one, and a tuck is taken as a stated multiple of a loop. Everything else follows by counting, so the percentages beside the bars are not estimates.

Knits and other structures

What a tuck costs

A knitted loop is about four wale spacings of yarn and a float across one needle is exactly one, so replacing a knit with a miss removes three quarters of a loop. That much is a count. What it does to the fabric's size is not, and this essay is careful about which is which.

The same yarn, flattened. One yarn's cross-section at five degrees of flattening, all drawn at one scale and all of the same area. Nothing is added: the yarn is wider because it is thinner. The cover rises for that reason alone, which is why a calendered cloth is more opaque than the cloth that went into the machine.

After the loom

Calendering is the cloth arriving at the other model

This site has carried two thread sections side by side since its foundation — Peirce's circle and Kemp's racetrack — and has been careful to say which produced any number. They are not two opinions about one yarn. They are one yarn on either side of a finishing machine.

single float as an array. One cell per needle per course, over 2 repeats each way. K knits a new loop and casts the old one off, T tucks the yarn into the loop below without casting off, M misses the needle and floats past it. The margins carry the two conditions: a wale with no K in it never casts off, and a course with no K in it is never caught by anything. Both hold here.

Knits and other structures

The float in a knit

Five rungs of this anchor have taken the float to be a length of thread on the surface with nothing holding it down. A knit has one too, and it behaves the same way in the light and the opposite way in the hand — because a woven float lengthens its thread and a knitted one shortens its fabric.

Z twist at 800 turns per metre. A 20 tex cotton yarn, 0.167 mm across, with its surface fibres drawn as the helices they are. The angle between a surface fibre and the yarn's axis is 22.8°, and it is the only quantity in this family: the yarn is 4.1% shorter than the fibre in it and carries 85% of the strength the same fibre would give lying straight.

Setting and geometry

Twist is one angle

Every model on this site treats a yarn as a cylinder with a diameter. It is a bundle of loose fibres, and what makes it behave like a cylinder is twist — which is a helix, so the whole subject is one angle, and the trade's twist factor turns out to be the only combination of count and turns that decides anything.

One cloth, before the knife. Double plush: two ground cloths woven face to face with a pile warp shuttling between them. Uncut, the pile is the only thing either ground touches the other through, and the integrity criterion says one cloth. Cut down the middle, every pile end is severed and the same criterion says two. The whole manufacture is the deliberate destruction of an integrity the criterion otherwise exists to confirm.

Compound and figured cloths

Velvet is cut apart

Two ground cloths are woven face to face with a pile warp shuttling between them, and while it does the whole thing is one cloth — the criterion says so, and the pile is the only reason it is true. Then a knife runs down the middle and the same criterion says two. The manufacture is the deliberate destruction of cloth integrity.

How much of the curvature a cloth can take without being cut. The dart angle a spherical cap still demands after the fabric's own shear has absorbed what it can, against how closely the cloth is set. The total the cap demands is fixed by Gauss–Bonnet and is the same for all of them; what changes is how much of it the trellis can supply before its threads jam. An open cloth drapes a hemisphere with no dart at all; a closely set one has to be cut from the start.

Cloth doing a job

A hemisphere costs one full turn

The total angle a pattern must remove to cover a hemisphere is exactly 360 degrees, and it is the same for a hat and for a stadium dome. What changes with the fabric is how much of that the cloth can supply by shearing instead of by being cut — and that is a property of the sett, computed from the angle at which its threads jam.

Where a thread stops sliding and starts breaking. A pick of sheeting gripped over a length of cloth, drawn one crossing at a time. The resistance is 0.30 times the 0.599 N each crossing presses with, so it rises with the length held; the breaking load of 3.74 N does not. The two are equal at 7.4 mm. What the drawing cannot show is that μ is a range rather than a constant, so the mark is a band and its position is exactly inversely proportional to the friction.

What cloth is

A thread is held one crossing at a time

Grip a thread over a length of cloth and its resistance to being pulled out rises with that length, because it is held at every crossing it makes. Its own breaking load does not rise at all. The two curves cross, and the length at which they cross turns out to be a seam allowance, a frayed edge and a tuft's anchorage — three rules of thumb with one number under them.

A leno and the open plain weave it is not. Two warp ends and the picks they hold. On the left the doup end passes under its partner between picks and comes up the other side; on the right it never crosses, which is an open plain weave at the same sett. The layer count under each panel is computed by the same criterion that decides every other draft, and it returns the same verdict for both.

Compound and figured cloths

Leno is not a matrix

A doup end crosses under its partner between picks and comes up on the other side, so the end at position three on pick two is a different end on pick three. The entry W[i][j] does not name anything. The encoding is not wrong about leno; it is undefined for it.

Swelling, at the same count. The same yarn before and after mercerisation, drawn to one scale. Its linear density has not changed — the same grams per kilometre go into the cloth — but the fibre occupies more volume, which is a lower packing factor and a larger diameter. Every consequence in this field follows from that single number.

After the loom

Mercerising is a packing factor

Cotton held in caustic soda swells, and everything the treatment is famous for follows from one number in this site's diameter calculation. The lustre it is actually sold for does not, and saying which consequences are computed and which are not is the whole of the discipline here.

Z twill, Z twist. A square of cloth with two directions on it. The broad lines are the twill, whose angle 45.0° from the warp comes from the setts alone — 24 ends and 24 picks per centimetre. The fine lines are the surface fibres of the warp ends, at 25.3° from the warp because the yarn is twisted 900 turns per metre. Between them is 19.7°, and that is the whole of the rule.

Setting and geometry

Twist and the twill line

The oldest rule of thumb in weaving says to weave a Z twill from S-twist warp for a bold line and from Z-twist warp for a subdued one. Both halves of it are geometry: the twill's angle comes from the two setts, the fibres' angle comes from the twist factor, and the rule is their difference.

The shed in section. A warp line 1200 mm from the fell of the cloth at the left to the back rest at the right, with 8 shafts at 300 mm and every 16 mm behind it. Each shaft lifts its ends in proportion to its own distance from the fell, which is what gives the same 30 mm clear opening at the reed from every shaft. The resulting extension is 0.460 per cent at the front shaft and 0.722 per cent at the back, a ratio of 1.57. Vertical scale exaggerated 4 times.

Mechanics and drape

The shed is an extension

Every model of a finished cloth treats a thread as inextensible, and every one of them is about a fabric that has left the loom. On the loom the warp is stretched thousands of times a minute by the shed itself, and the amount is exact trigonometry with nothing fitted in it: the square of the shed's tangent, times the shaft's own distance from the fell, over twice what is left behind it.

Every cloth at 150 grams. The counts and setts that all weigh 150 g/m² at a crimp of 7 per cent and a balance of 1. Hollow marks are past the jam — arithmetic rather than cloth. Among the 10 that can be woven the cover factor runs from 0.28 to 0.77, a factor of 2.77, and every one of them is the fabric the specification asked for.

Setting and geometry

What a fabric weighs

Every fabric is sold by its weight in grams per square metre, and the number is a sum of four products in which no term appears alone. One equation, four unknowns: a hundred and fifty grams describes an open coarse cloth and a close fine one, and the cover factors differ by a factor of nearly three.

What a figure costs in shafts. Two families of block designs in 8-end satin on 8-end sateen at blocks of 8. One repeats three block-columns however wide it gets and costs 24 shafts at every width from 24 to 120 ends. The other gives every block-column a different pattern and costs 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 shafts as it grows — exactly 8 more per new column. Shafts are counted as distinct columns of the composite matrix.

Pattern and colour

What a figure costs the loom

A block design's shaft count does not depend on how wide the figure is, or how deep, or how many blocks it has. It depends on how many *different* block-columns it has, and each new one costs exactly one repeat of the ground weave — 8 shafts, then 16, then 24, in a straight line with no slope to fit.

Cloth doing a job

What holds a thread in a seam

A seam fails in two quite different ways, and the one the trade worries about is not the stitches breaking. It is the cloth's own threads sliding out of the weave beside the seam — and what resists that is friction at the crossings, accumulating multiplicatively, so a satin gives a seam a thousandth of the grip a plain weave gives it.

A fashioned edge at 1 wales in 2 courses. A knitted panel narrowing by 1 wale every 2 courses, drawn at the fabric's own aspect: a wale is 1.2791 times as wide as a course is tall, which is Munden's ratio of the two published constants. The edge therefore stands at 32.60 degrees from the wale, and that angle is the same in every yarn, at every gauge and at every loop length. Marks show where the 8 transfers fall.

Knits and other structures

A fashioned edge has a quantised angle

A knitted panel is shaped by transferring loops, so its edge steps by whole wales at whole courses and its angle is the arctangent of a fraction. The available angles turn out to be the same for every plain knit there has ever been — in any yarn, at any gauge, at any loop length — because the constant they scale by cancels the loop out. There are eighteen of them, and 16.67° between the last two.

The staircase a woven outline is. Four straight edges on a block grid, stepping 1 across in 1, 1 across in 2, 2 across in 1, 1 across in 4. Each tread is one repeat of 8-end satin, which at 24 by 22 threads per centimetre is 3.33 mm across and 3.64 mm up. A jacquard hook at 140 cm width is 1.17 mm, so the machine resolves 2.9 times finer than the cloth can use.

Pattern and colour

A woven outline is a staircase

A jacquard's resolution is quoted as its hook count, and on a 1,200-hook machine 140 cm wide that is a step of 1.17 mm. The cloth cannot use it. A figure's smallest feature is one repeat of the ground weave, which on an eight-end satin is 3.33 mm — so the machine resolves nearly three times finer than the fabric can hold, and a finer machine buys nothing at all.

The stitch density that makes the strongest seam. Seam strength against stitch density, as the two limits that decide it: the sewing thread crossing the seam, which rises with the stitches, and the fabric the needle perforates, which falls. The seam is the lower of the two, so the optimum is where they cross — and whether the fabric line falls at all is decided by the clear gap between threads against the width of the needle.

Cloth doing a job

The stitch that weakens the seam

More stitches per centimetre put more sewing thread across a seam and more holes through the cloth beside it, so seam strength rises, crosses and falls. Whether the fabric line falls at all is decided by the clear gap between two threads against the width of the needle — the same arithmetic a filter cloth is specified by, doing a different job.

Stick, slip, and the ratio between the two coefficients. The force in a thread as a cloth is agitated, with a static coefficient of 0.300 and a kinetic one of 0.225 — a ratio of 0.75, which is what fibre on fibre measures. The force climbs until it reaches the static limit, the contact breaks away, and while it is sliding it resists only at the kinetic limit. So a cloth that is being shaken can be left anywhere in the narrower band, and a cloth at rest anywhere in the wider one. What the trace cannot show is how much this buys: the band does not narrow in the ratio of the coefficients, because the restoring force stiffens away from the minimum, and the real narrowing is nearer 0.87 than 0.75.

What cloth is

Two coefficients, not one

Every friction on this site is a single number, and the account of why a cloth relaxes better when it is agitated depends entirely on there being two. Separating static from kinetic changes what a resting state is: a cloth at rest is held by one coefficient and a cloth being shaken by the other, and the band it can be left in narrows — by less than the ratio, because a cloth's restoring force is not linear in its extension.

Cloth doing a job

A cloth does not mind a hole

A hole in a film costs it two thirds of its strength whatever the hole's size, because a continuum concentrates stress at an edge. A cloth's threads carry their own load and hand almost nothing to their neighbours, so a hole costs exactly the threads it removes — a loss that is linear in the hole, independent of the sett, and zero for a slit along the load.

Float lengths in a honeycomb. The same draft twice. On the left, filled where the warp is on the face — which is all point paper says. On the right, every intersection shaded by the length of the float it belongs to, from one at the palest to 6 at the strongest. The gradient on the right is the whole mechanism of a relief weave and it is invisible on the left.

Weaves

A honeycomb gets its cells in the wash

The obvious mechanism is take-up on the loom, and the arithmetic says it is wrong: every end of a diamond passes through the long floats and the tight ones alike. What is left is finishing, and a cell is a region that wanted to shrink less than the cloth around it.

After the loom

A knit's dimensions come from its loop

A relaxed plain knit's courses, wales and stitch density depend on the loop length and on nothing else — not the yarn count, not the fibre, not the machine gauge. The constants are measured rather than derived, and the interesting thing about the published set is that it does not quite satisfy its own arithmetic.

How far a tube can be tapered by its loop. The same 10 wales by 10 courses of plain knit at the two ends of the usable loop range for a 20 tex yarn — 3.44 mm at the loose end and 2.80 mm at the tight one — drawn at a common scale in centimetres. On 240 needles the circumference falls from 192.0 cm to 156.0 cm, a taper of 18.8 per cent, and the fabric becomes 1.51 times as dense.

Knits and other structures

A tube can only be shaped by its loop

On a circular machine the needle count is the cylinder, so a seamless tube's circumference is its wale count times its wale spacing — and the wale spacing is the loop length over one constant. The loop is the only free quantity, the yarn bounds it at both ends, and what is left is a taper of 18.8 per cent bought at the price of a fabric half again as dense.

A cotton fibre dry and wet. One cotton fibre in its dry state and saturated with water, both drawn at the same scale in both directions. It is 20% wider and 1.2% longer, so its cross-sectional area rises by 44% if the section stays similar to itself. The length difference is drawn and is nearly invisible, which is the point: a swelling that were the same in both directions would make a cloth bigger and change nothing about its structure, and this one changes every ratio of a diameter to a spacing in the cloth. What the drawing cannot show is the section: a cotton fibre is not a cylinder, and the directly measured area swelling of 40% to 42% does not agree with the square of the width change, which is a fact about the fibre.

What cloth is

What water does to a thread

A cotton fibre in water is a fifth wider and a hundredth longer. If it grew equally in both directions a wet cloth would simply be a bigger cloth and nothing structural would follow; because it does not, every ratio of a diameter to a spacing in a cloth moves, and they all move the same way.

After the loom

A dimension without a state

Every essay in this field turned on the same omission, and collecting them produces a result none of them had on its own — the quantities a cloth's geometry determines divide cleanly into those a finishing works can move and those it cannot, and the division is not the one the vocabulary suggests.

The loop that costs nothing to extend. A plain knitted loop at rest and extended by 35 per cent, with the arcs marked. The arcs' radius is the diameter of the yarn the loop wraps, 0.167 mm, and it is set by contact rather than by the fabric's dimensions — so extending the fabric lengthens the legs and bends nothing further. The bending energy is 0.0176 N·mm at both, and the model therefore asks no force at all for an extension a woven cloth would refuse. What the drawing cannot show is what a real knit's first few per cent do cost, which is friction and yarn flattening and is not a bending property.

Knits and other structures

A knit is soft because it bends

Ask the same energy question of a woven cloth and a knitted one and the answers are not different by a factor — they are different in kind. A woven cloth's bending energy changes the moment it is extended. A knitted loop's does not change at all, exactly, over the whole of its extension, because its arcs are held to a radius by contact rather than by the fabric's dimensions.

A tear breaks threads or pulls them out. The grip a cloth has on a thread at the tip of a tear, against the sett, with the thread's own strength drawn across. Below the line the thread slides and the yarns group, which is the trade's explanation of why a loose weave tears well; above it the thread breaks where it is and grouping never happens. The essay that asked it could not compute this: it needed a friction, and the fancy weaves supplied one.

Cloth doing a job

A tear stops where the grip is

This collection asked whether a loose weave tears better and had to answer that the geometry could not say — it supplies a grip count and a slack, and neither is a force. The fancy weaves brought a friction. With it the question has an answer — a cloth's threads slide up to a computable sett and break above it — and a ripstop grid has a bound with no free parameter in it.

The two calculations a yarn's stiffness admits. A bundle of 9 fibres bent with the fibres free to slide and with them locked together. Free, the rigidity is the sum of the fibres': 0.00141 N·mm² for a 30 tex cotton yarn. Locked, it is the fourth power of the yarn's own diameter: 0.689. The ratio is the fibre count over the square of the packing factor, 490, and nine fibres are drawn where the yarn has 176. What the drawing cannot show is where a real yarn sits between them, which is a question about friction rather than about fibre.

Mechanics and drape

A yarn's stiffness is a bracket, not a number

Two calculations are available for how stiff a thread is in bending, and both are exact. One treats the fibres as free to slide and gives the sum of their stiffnesses; the other treats them as locked and gives a solid rod. They differ by the fibre count, which for an ordinary cotton yarn is a factor of five hundred — and no measurement of the fibre narrows it by anything at all.

A yarn's voids against its fibres' swelling. One cotton yarn's cross-section at a packing factor of 0.60, drawn dry and with every fibre swollen by 20% while the yarn's own outline is held. The fibres now occupy 0.864 of the section, which is above the 0.75 a heavily compacted assembly reaches and above the 0.65 of a spun yarn, so the yarn cannot stay this size: it must grow by at least 7.3%. What the drawing cannot show is disorder — the fibres are laid on a lattice here to make the areas exact, and a real yarn's fibres are neither round nor evenly spaced, which is why the bound is quoted over three packing limits rather than at one.

What cloth is

A yarn's voids are not enough

A ring-spun cotton yarn is sixty per cent fibre and forty per cent air, and its fibres gain forty-four per cent of area in water. The obvious thought is that the air takes it. The arithmetic says the air cannot, and gives a floor on how far the yarn itself must grow with no measurement of a yarn in it anywhere.

The two routes a poplin has to a strain. A poplin drawn in section at three places: as woven, at the end of what its crimp can supply, and past that. Between the first two the warp's crimp falls from 8.97% to 4.85% and the weft takes on what it gave up, and the thread length is 0.4953 mm in both — nothing has stretched, and the cloth is 3.93% longer. Between the second and the third the geometry cannot move because the weft's straight run has vanished, so the cloth's extra 2.0% is the thread's extra 2.0%. What the drawing cannot show is which of the two a piece of cloth has had: the first two states look different and the last two look the same, and it is the last two that differ in whether the cloth comes back.

What cloth is

A cloth gives back less than it took

Everything this collection computes about a deforming fabric is reversible, and no fabric is. The repair is not a new material property: a woven cloth has two routes to a strain, one of them costs its threads nothing and comes back in full, and where the first route runs out is a number about the sett with no fibre in it at all.

Mock leno, 3 threads to a bundle. Threads that interlace identically have no weft passing between them, so nothing holds them apart and they lie touching. The reed still sets the average spacing, so the space they leave collects at the bundle's edge — a hole 0.60 by 0.60 mm, made without one thread crossing another. Drawn to scale on a fixed 9 mm square of cloth at 20 threads per centimetre and a 0.3 mm yarn.

Weaves

A hole with nothing crossing

A real leno holds its holes open by crossing one thread over another, which is a topological arrangement and cannot come undone. A mock leno makes the same holes by grouping threads that nothing separates, and everything about it is friction.

Two pore systems in one cloth — 24 threads per centimetre. A plain weave of 20 tex cotton in section, at 24 threads per centimetre, so the yarn is 167 µm across and the clear hole between two picks is 250 µm. That hole's hydraulic radius is 124.8 µm. Inside the yarn, fibres 14 µm across packed at 0.6 leave spaces of hydraulic radius 2.33 µm — 53 times finer, and by Jurin's law 53 times higher: 6.37 m against 119 mm. The yarn's interior is magnified 6 times and the two discs at the foot are the only part drawn at one scale.

Cloth doing a job

How high a cloth wicks

A woven cloth has two capillary systems and they are a factor of twenty to a hundred apart. The one every diagram draws — the hole between four threads — lifts 119 mm. The one nobody draws, inside the yarn, lifts 6.37 m.

The weight against the constant nobody has measured. Areal weight against the stitch-density constant, for four two-bed structures at 20 tex on a 0.35 cm loop with a tuck taken as 1.15 of one. Every line is exactly straight through the origin, because the weight is tex times yarn per repeat times k_s divided by the area of the repeat and there is no fitted constant anywhere in that division. The three vertical rules are the only measured values this site has — Munden's published k_s for plain single jersey in three relaxation states — and none of them is the right value for any structure drawn here. Where each line should be read is the whole of what is missing.

After the loom

The constants do not compose

The yarn in a knitted structure is a sum of what each element takes, exactly, over structures nobody has measured. The size the structure relaxes to is not a sum of anything — and the whole gap between the two is one number per structure, which would cost forty-five fabrics each to obtain.

Setting and geometry

The crimp ratio is not a measurement

Peirce's geometry is two thread systems, four unknowns and three equations. It cannot say how the crimp divides between warp and weft, so every cloth solved so far has been drawn at a ratio somebody chose. Give the threads a stiffness and the missing equation arrives — and for six of the eight cloths in the table it arrives with no material constant in it at all.

A knit's restoring force, and the column that does not move. A plain knit of 20 tex cotton at a loop length of 3.5 mm, over the extension range its own geometry admits. The bending energy stored in one loop is the same number at every extension — the loop's arcs are held to a radius by the thread they wrap rather than by the fabric's dimensions, so extending the fabric does not bend anything more. The frictional resistance at the interlocks is not zero: it is μ times the force pressing there, times 2.34 interlocks per millimetre of width. So a knit's resistance to extension is dissipative rather than elastic, which is why it does not spring back and why its dimensions depend on how much it has been agitated. What the rows cannot show is the interlock force itself, which this site does not have for a knit and which is recorded as missing.

Knits and other structures

What stops a knit extending

A knitted loop's bending energy does not change as the fabric extends — exactly, over the whole range its geometry admits. Something resists, and it is not stiffness. It is friction at the interlocks, which is dissipative rather than elastic, and that single fact accounts for why a knit does not spring back, why a softener changes its dimensions and why the constants its size is quoted with contain no yarn property at all.

The beat-up, at the fell. The last picks of a sheeting at 26 picks per centimetre, with the beat-up zone shaded. Driving the fell forward makes the warp take more crimp and more crimp takes more thread, which the warp can only supply by stretching — so the force is the warp tension times the crimp's elasticity with respect to the pick spacing, 0.182 here. That is 0.205 N per end and 573 N per metre of reed. What the drawing cannot show is that the shaded band's width cancels out of the derivation exactly; it is drawn because a reader needs to see what is being compressed, not because the answer depends on it.

Setting and geometry

The blow that sets the pick

The take-up gear decides how far the cloth moves between picks and says nothing about the blow that puts each pick where it goes. That blow is a force, and a virtual-work argument gives it in one line — with the length of the beat-up zone cancelling out of the answer exactly, which is the part worth having.

The interchange budget against cover, at three yarn counts. The extension a plain cloth can reach with no thread stretching, plotted against its warp cover factor, for 10, 20, 40 tex yarn. The three curves coincide, because every length in Peirce's geometry is a multiple of the yarn diameter and a spacing measured in diameters is a cover factor — so the count divides out exactly and the maximum is at 0.407782 for all of them, at a budget of 7.2857%. That the curve has a maximum at all is the finding: crimp is what a cloth spends, so more of it should be better, and past this cover the weft has nowhere to put what the warp gives up. What the plot cannot show is the balance, which moves the height of the maximum a long way and its position hardly at all.

What cloth is

The most a cloth can give back

The extension a cloth can find without stretching a thread comes from crimp, so setting a cloth closer ought to give it more. It does, up to a point, and then takes it away again — and the point is a cover factor of 0.4078 at a budget of 7.2857 per cent, identical to six figures for every yarn count from five tex to a hundred.

A coating over the hole it has to bridge. Four warp ends of 40 tex seen end-on at 20 per centimetre, with a 120 micrometre PVC film over them. The film is supported everywhere it lies on a thread and unsupported over the 252 micrometre clear span between them, which is the same span at every hole in the repeat. The film's thickness is drawn to scale against that span; the bulge is exaggerated. At 20 MPa the film will hold at most 381 bar, which is a bound and not a prediction.

Cloth doing a job

A coated cloth fails at its holes

Spread a film over a fabric and it is supported everywhere it lies on a thread and unsupported over every hole. A woven cloth's holes are all the same size — exactly, because a repeat is a repeat — so the film has one span to bridge and the fabric has a burst pressure rather than a distribution. A nonwoven gives it a distribution, and a membrane fails at the largest hole it meets.

A crossing before and after it is pressed. One warp end of a sheeting riding over three picks, drawn twice to the same scale. Unpressed, both sections are circles and the cloth is 0.388 mm thick. At 0.40 N per crossing the sections flatten to aspect ratios of 1.75 and 1.84, the cloth thins to 0.263 mm, and the warp runs flat for 0.109 mm over each pick before it begins to curve. What the drawing cannot show is why the cloth does not do this by itself: flattening shrinks the arc radius as well as the crimp height, so it costs bending energy, and a relaxed cloth keeps its threads round.

Mechanics and drape

A flattened thread is a record of a force

A yarn in cloth is not round, and this site has modelled the flattening for as long as this collection has run with the amount of it left as a number somebody chose. Give the section a stiffness and ask what the cloth prefers, and the answer is a circle — at every stiffness, for every balanced cloth in the table. Flattening does not happen by itself; it happens because something pressed.

What cloth is

A hole is a channel, not an opening

Every hole drawn so far has been drawn from above, and the sentence underneath every one of them says the same thing: the hole between four threads is the spacing less the diameter, and every hole is the same size. That is a picture of a cloth's shadow. A cloth has a thickness, so its hole has a length, and the narrowest place along it is not the place a person looking through can see.

Munden's states against the fibre swelling. What a plain knit does between its relaxation states, beside the swelling of the fibre it is made of. Going from dry-relaxed to wet-relaxed a jersey loses 5.66% along its courses and 2.44% across its wales, and going on to fully relaxed it loses 9.1% and 7.0%. The fibre swells 20%. Two things rule the swelling out as the cause: it is several times the whole change, and the change is markedly anisotropic while a swelling enters both of a loop's dimensions through the same loop length. What the bars cannot show is what does cause it, which is friction — water lets the loops move to where the yarn's own bending had been trying to put them.

Knits and other structures

A knit's change of state is not its swelling

A jersey is smaller wet-relaxed than dry-relaxed, by 5.7 per cent along its courses and 2.4 across its wales. Water is obviously involved, so the swelling is the obvious cause. Two things rule it out, and both are properties of the constants rather than measurements of a fabric.

Compound and figured cloths

What holds a tuft in, in newtons

The pile ladder computed a tuft's anchorage as a capstan ratio and said, correctly, that a ratio was all it could offer. A ratio multiplies a tension and there was no tension anywhere on this site. There is one now — and the answer, put beside what a carpet is actually specified at, falls short by a factor of three.

What cloth is

A cloth is a population, not a thread

Every number in this collection was computed from a diameter, and no yarn has one. Putting the distribution back changes some answers by nothing at all, some by a few per cent, and some by a factor — and which of the three happens is decided by one derivative.

A plain knit's two relaxation steps. Munden's three relaxation states are usually given as three sets of constants. Read as a path they are two steps, and the two compose to the whole exactly — which is a real check, because the three sets were measured independently. The first step is the larger in the course direction and the smaller across the wales, and the second is 0.64 of the first lengthwise. That is the shape of a laundering series and it is the same mechanism: a fully relaxed state is reached by tumbling rather than by waiting, so what the standard specifies is a quantity of agitation and not a duration. What the bars cannot show is the loop length, which cancels out of all four numbers because every dimension of a knit is a loop length times a dimensionless constant.

Knits and other structures

A knit relaxes for as long as it is allowed to

Munden's three states are usually given as three sets of constants. Read as a path they are two steps, they compose exactly, and the second is not a smaller version of the first — the fabric shrinks twice as much along its courses as across its wales on the first step and rather less than half as much on the second.

Which seams slip and which break. For each cloth, the grip a 10 mm seam allowance offers divided by the thread's own breaking load. Above one the fabric or the thread gives first and the seam holds until it does; below one the threads slide out and the seam opens with the cloth intact. voile, batiste, poplin, sheeting break; cheesecloth, muslin, duck, filter slip. The allowance that would save every cloth in the table is 74 mm, which is set by the openest of them alone. What the chart cannot show is the stitching itself, which has its own strength and its own way of cutting the threads it passes through.

Cloth doing a job

A seam slips before it breaks

A sewn seam fails in one of two ways and the trade names them separately: the threads pull out of the cloth beside the stitching, or something breaks. Which one a given cloth does is decided by whether its seam allowance clears the length at which grip beats strength — and at the ordinary ten millimetres, the table divides four against four.

Setting and geometry

Peirce and Kemp are one cloth at two moments

This site has run two thread sections side by side since the setting field was built — a circle and a flattened racetrack — and said honestly that they disagree and that the disagreement is the point. They are not rival descriptions of the same fabric. They are descriptions of the same fabric before and after something pressed it, and the difference between them is a pressure that can now be named.

The bracket that closes and the bracket that does not. A 25 tex cotton yarn at a packing factor of 0.6. Its bending rigidity lies between 0.00117 N·mm² — the sum of its fibres', with them free to slide — and 0.478, a solid rod of its own diameter: a factor of 408, and both ends are derivations. Its resistance to being squashed out of round has an upper bound of the same kind, 369 N/mm² for a solid section, and no lower bound at all, because fibres free to slide resist a change of shape with nothing. That is why the aspect ratio of a flattened yarn has been a free parameter here since the setting field was built: a quantity bounded below by zero cannot be estimated from its bounds, and has to be measured.

Mechanics and drape

The stiffness with no lower bound

A yarn's bending rigidity lies between two derivable ends and the ratio is the fibre count — wide, but closed. Its resistance to being squashed out of round has an upper bound of the same kind and a lower bound of exactly nothing, because fibres free to slide resist a change of shape with nothing at all. That is why nobody could ever compute the aspect ratio of a flattened thread.

The resting band with two coefficients in it. The range of extensions a sheeting can be left in, at rest and while being agitated, at three ratios of kinetic to static friction. The upper bar of each pair is the stuck band, held by the static coefficient; the lower is the band a cloth being shaken can be left in, held by the kinetic one. Agitation narrows the band but by less than the ratio of the coefficients: at 0.75 the narrowing is 0.868. The restoring force is not linear in the extension, so cutting the friction by a quarter does not move the band's edges by a quarter of the way in. What the bars cannot show is where a given piece of cloth actually stops inside its band, which depends on which side it came from.

After the loom

Why agitation helps a cloth relax

Every standard relaxation procedure agitates: tumble it, wash it, steam it, work it. The explanation given is that agitation lets the fabric find its own dimensions, which is true and is not a mechanism. The mechanism is that a sliding contact resists less than a stuck one — and putting a number on it shows the effect is real, is smaller than the obvious arithmetic suggests, and does not account for what a relaxation procedure achieves.

From a calender's line load to a force at one crossing. A sheeting through a nip loaded at 30 N per millimetre of bowl width, with the cloth in contact over 5.0 mm. The pressure is the first divided by the second, 6.00 N/mm², and the force at one crossing is that pressure times the area a crossing owns — the product of the two thread spacings, 0.1374 mm². So the crossing carries 0.824 N, the sections flatten to 2.42 and 2.63, and the cloth thins from 0.388 mm to 0.218 mm. What the drawing cannot show is that two cloths through the same nip are not given the same treatment: the area a crossing owns varies fivefold across this site's table, and it is a factor in the force.

After the loom

A calender spends the compression for good

Calendering was described on this site as moving a cloth from one thread-section model to another, which was right and had no number in it because the amount of the move was a free parameter. It is a pressure now — and the same nip setting turns out to give two cloths quite different treatments, because the force at a crossing is the pressure times the area a crossing owns.

The size of the capstan correction. The ratio of the capstan crossover to the crossover a sum of independent contacts gives, for every cloth in the table at a friction coefficient of 0.30. It is exactly ln(1 + z)/z, where z is the thread's breaking load times the wrap angle, over the contact force — a quantity with no friction coefficient in it at all. That is why the earlier result that μ·L* is exactly constant survives this correction to twelve figures: μ was only ever in the factor outside the logarithm. The correction is largest for the duck, whose coarse strong yarn makes z large, and smallest for the batiste. What the rows cannot show is that a real cut edge frays at a friction nobody measured on that particular cloth.

Cloth doing a job

How far a cut edge frays

A seam allowance, a fray width and a tuft's bound length are the same number wearing three hats, and the earlier estimate of it was four times too long. Correcting it moves the whole table across the boundary an ordinary allowance sits on — from four cloths holding and four slipping, to all eight holding — and turns a specification argument into a different one.

How open a batiste is, against where the light is. One minus the cover is a cloth's openness to a light directly behind it, and for this batiste it is 40.1 per cent. Move off the normal and a line of sight has to clear the hole at the top of the cloth and the same hole one thickness below, so what it can use falls as t·tan α is taken off each side — reaching nothing at 39.0° across the ends. Averaged over the whole sky with Lambert's cosine weighting, the cloth is 6.42 per cent open — 6.3 times less than the covering rule says, and the whole of the difference is the thickness. One minus the cover is the openness of a cloth with no thickness, and no cloth has none.

Pattern and colour

Opacity is not cover

The covering rule counts a thread as a bar that stops everything, and a single fine cotton thread held to a window plainly does not. What a cloth transmits is the open area plus whatever comes through the threads, so the covered fraction is a lever rather than a barrier — and the lever is longest exactly where the rule says the cloth is most closed. Nothing here computes a thread's transmittance, and saying why is the useful half.

The evenness a cotton yarn cannot be better than. Lay staple fibres down at random and count how many cross a plane: the count is Poisson, its variance is its mean, and the coefficient of variation of the mass per unit length is therefore 1/√n with no material and no machine in it. The lower curve is that floor. At 20 tex there are 118 fibres in the section and the floor is 9.93 per cent; at 5 tex there are 29 and it is 19.86. The upper curve is what a yarn spun at an index of irregularity of 1.35 actually measures, which is the floor times a constant — so the whole shape belongs to the counting and none of it to the spinning. The exponent is exactly −½ and is asserted as such rather than fitted to the curve.

What cloth is

The spread was never free

This collection has taken a yarn's irregularity off a delivery note and used it as an input. It is not an input. Counting the fibres in a cross-section puts a floor under it that no spinner can beat, and the floor is one over the square root of the count.

$A 5.0 mm cotton pile standing and crushed. A pile tuft standing 5.0 mm proud and the same tuft pressed flat, which turns it through a right angle over its own length and so bends it to a radius of 3.18 mm. Its fibres are strained 0.187% — an order of magnitude below the smallest strain anybody has measured a recovery at, so this file declines to say what fraction comes back. The consequence is that a crushed carpet is not held down by its fibres: what keeps a pile flat is the tufts leaning on one another and the friction where they touch. Below 0.469 mm the fibre does enter its measured range, which is the difference between a carpet and a velvet and has nothing to do with what either is made of. What the drawing cannot show is the neighbouring tufts, which are the mechanism.$ Compound and figured cloths

A crushed pile is not held down by its fibres

A carpet flattened under a foot has bent its tufts through a right angle, which sounds severe and is not: the fibres in a five-millimetre pile are strained under two tenths of a per cent, an order of magnitude below the smallest strain anybody has measured a recovery at. What holds a pile down is the tufts leaning on one another.

When a knit has a hole between its loops, and when it has none. A loop's occupancy is its length times its diameter over the cell it sits in, and Munden's constants make that cell ℓ²/(k_c·k_w). The loop length cancels once and what is left is d·k_s/ℓ, where k_s is Munden's own stitch-density constant — so whether a knit has a hole between its loops depends on d/ℓ and on nothing else: no gauge, no count, no fabric dimension. The three curves are the three relaxed states of 20 tex cotton. Each crosses one at a loop length of 3.34, 3.63, 3.95 mm respectively, and a jersey is knitted at 2.63 to 3.44 mm — the shaded band. Every commercial jersey is therefore on the wrong side of the threshold in at least two of its three states: it closes its own holes as it relaxes, and its air goes through its threads rather than between them.

Knits and other structures

A knit has no hole to lose

Every argument in this ladder is planar: threads at a spacing, a rectangle between four of them, a channel down it. Applied to a jersey it returns nothing at all, and the nothing is the finding. A loop's occupancy is its diameter times Munden's own stitch-density constant over its loop length, with no gauge and no fabric dimension in it — and the whole commercial range of tightness is on the wrong side of the threshold.

Pattern and colour

A random error hides and a periodic one shows

A warp whose threads vary by fifteen per cent looks perfectly even. One dent of the reed a tenth of a millimetre wide makes a streak that gets the piece rejected. The same amount of error, arranged two ways — and the ratio between them is √(2n/π), with nothing fitted in it.

Shrinkage from wetting, cloth by cloth. The change in each cloth's relaxed construction when its threads swell by 20% across and 1.2% along. Both states are least-energy states of their own constant-thread-length locus, which is the only comparison the locus admits: its minimum is a state at its own sett, so it may be compared with another minimum and not with a quoted construction. Positive is smaller. Every cloth that has a wet state closes up except the cheesecloth, which opens by half a per cent because the fibre's extra hundredth of length outruns the extra crimp a thicker partner costs. What the bars cannot show is the three cloths that are missing, which have no wet state at all.

After the loom

Two shrinkages, one tape measure

A cloth that comes out of a wash smaller has done two different things and the tape cannot tell them apart. One is geometric, recoverable and finished in minutes; the other is frictional, permanent and needs agitation. This collection can now compute both, and they have different signatures.

$The two diameters of a 20 tex yarn. The pressure inside a twisted yarn is zero at its surface, so the outermost fibres are held by nothing but their own buried ends and some of them stand off as loops and ends. A yarn therefore has two diameters: a mass diameter of 167.1 µm, which is a volume divided by a length and is the one every other calculation on this site uses, and a contact diameter of 217.1 µm, which is what a neighbouring thread, a finger or an air stream meets. The gap is a hair layer of 25.0 µm on each side and it is measured, not computed — nothing here predicts hairiness. What is computed is the consequence, and it is 29.9% of the diameter every cover factor on this site was built from.$ What cloth is

The hairs are what touch

The pressure inside a twisted yarn falls to exactly zero at its surface, so the outermost fibres are held by nothing and some of them stand off. A yarn therefore has two diameters — the one its mass gives and the one a neighbour meets — and only the first is in the arithmetic.

Cloth doing a job

A garment is cut dry and worn wet

A cutting allowance is one number and the thing it allows for is two, in two directions. Worse: when the two directions differ, a panel cut on the bias does not merely shrink — it rotates, by half a degree for an ordinary poplin, which is nine and a half millimetres of skew across a metre and is invisible to a tape measure.

$One weft fault at three periods, a fraction of a millimetre apart. A 260 mm slice of a 1500 mm cloth at 22 picks per centimetre, 220 picks deep, with a thick place recurring along the weft. Each pick takes a whole width of yarn, so the marks land 35 to a pick across the full width and step sideways by the remainder of the width divided by the fault's period. On the left that remainder is zero and every thick place in the piece falls in the same columns — a warp-way stripe made entirely by a weft fault. In the middle the period is five hundredths of a millimetre longer and the same fault draws steep diagonals. On the right it is a third of a millimetre longer again, the marks land nowhere near each other, and the fault reads as texture. Nothing about the yarn distinguishes the three; the cloth's width does. The slice is drawn rather than the whole width because thirty-five marks a pick fill a panel solid at any step but zero, which is a true picture of a dense pattern and a useless one of its structure.$ Pattern and colour

A slub finds the width of the cloth

A thick place recurring along a weft yarn does not make a bar. It makes diagonals — and when the cloth's width happens to be a whole number of fault periods, it makes stripes down the piece instead, from a fault that is entirely in the weft.

Cotton and viscose in every column this site carries. The two cellulosic fibres compared across every constant on this site. Both are cellulose at 1.52 g/cm³, both are given a modulus of 8 GPa and a fineness of 1.7 dtex, so a 20 tex yarn of either has the same diameter to the last figure — and therefore the same crimp, the same cover, the same jamming sett and the same bending bracket. Every geometric result on this site is the same number for the two fibres. Water separates them twice: viscose swells 1.75 times as far across and loses half its strength where cotton gains a tenth. What the table cannot show is why, which is a question about how cellulose is arranged inside a fibre and is not in this collection.

Mechanics and drape

Water tells two fibres apart

Cotton and viscose are the same material by every constant this collection carries. Same density, same modulus, same fineness, so the same diameter at every count and the same crimp, cover, jamming sett and bending bracket. A wash separates them by a factor of two, and it is the only thing here that can.

The surface of a 2/2 twill, in plan. One repeat of a 2/2 twill in sheeting, drawn 2 × 2 times, with every point painted in the colour of whichever thread owns the outside of the cloth there and at an opacity set by how high it is. The range is 221.0 µm from the highest point to the lowest, the root-mean-square roughness is 74.9 µm, and 30% of the plan is hole rather than surface. The bright ribbons are the float plateaux, where a thread lies straight across the threads it passes over and its outside is a horizontal line rather than a point — which is the whole of what follows. The warp crowns at 190.8 µm and the weft at 182.8 µm, a step of 8.0 µm, so the cloth touches the world on its warp alone until anything pressing on it has sunk that far.

What cloth is

A cloth has an outside

Every quantity in this collection is a property of the inside of a fabric — a crimp, a cover, a hole, a fibre count. None of them says where the cloth stops. The outside is a height field the draft computes, its crowns stand at two different levels, and which of the two is higher decides what the cloth touches the world with.

Knits and other structures

A course is one thread and a warp is many

A woven fabric draws its warp from two thousand packages side by side, so a yarn's drift averages out across the width. A weft knit takes whole courses from one package, so the same drift becomes a band — and the standard remedy for that turns an invisible error into a visible one.

Cloth doing a job

A filter is rated by the hole it does not show

A woven filter cloth is sold on two numbers pulling opposite ways: an opening small enough to hold the soil and an open area large enough to pass the water. Both are computed from the same holes, and they are not computed from the same statistic of them. One reads the maximum and the other reads the mean, so a change that improves either can worsen the other without moving a single measurable property of the cloth.

Weaves

A seersucker is made at the loom

Every other relief weave in this collection gets its shape after the loom, from a difference of crimp between two regions of a few per cent. A seersucker's surplus is thirty per cent and is put in as the cloth is woven — an order of magnitude more, which the square root turns into a factor of four in depth and no more than that.

Setting and geometry

Wetting moves a cloth to another locus

A cloth's constant-thread-length locus is built at a fixed thickness. Swelling changes the thickness, so a wetted cloth is not somewhere else on its own locus — it is on a different one, and the distance between the two least-energy states is the shrinkage. Five of the eight cloths here have a wet state, and one of them gets bigger.

$How much of a 20 tex yarn's unevenness survives being woven. Weaving averages, and the averaging is a square root. A patch of cloth 3 mm across contains 7.2 warp threads and as many picks, each contributing its own mass independently, so the patch's coefficient of variation is 3.53% against the yarn's 13.4% — a reduction of 3.8-fold. The rule at the top is the yarn's own figure. The curve steepens past the staple length, where a patch starts to contain independent samples along each thread as well as across them, and the second regime is the one a large area of cloth is judged in.$ Pattern and colour

A cloth cannot be more even than its yarn

It can be very much more even than its yarn, and by exactly the square root of the threads in view. Which raises a question the fineness argument left open — and the answer is that at a fixed cloth weight the count cancels out entirely.

Cloth doing a job

A cloth stops having holes before it stops passing air

Close a woven cloth up and the channels between its threads shut. What passes through it does not go to zero, because a thread is sixty per cent fibre and forty per cent air and stays that way whatever is done to the construction. So a fabric's permeability has a floor, the floor belongs to the yarn rather than to the weaver, and no sett on any loom reaches it.

$The tightest fold a 20 tex cotton yarn can be given. A cloth folded as sharply as it can be folded. The two yarn crowns on the inside of the fold cannot pass through one another, so the fold's radius is the yarn's own — 0.084 mm for a 20 tex cotton yarn — and there is no measurement of an iron anywhere in the argument. At that radius a fibre free to slide is strained 7.14%, which is √(packing × fibre tex ÷ yarn tex), and the whole yarn bending as a rod would be strained exactly one hundred per cent. Cotton's measured breaking extension is 6.0% to 10.0%, so the free bound does not survive and the locked one cannot. What the drawing cannot show is the fibres inside the yarn, which is exactly what the argument is about — the picture is the same either way and the strain is fourteen times different.$ After the loom

A crease is a fold the crimp cannot supply

A fold needs its outer face longer than its inner, and a woven cloth's way of supplying a length is to move crimp. That runs out at a radius of millimetres, and a pressed crease is tenths of one — so the fold is handed to the fibres. How hard it strains them turns on a question this collection has been unable to settle for two fields, and a crease settles it by refusing.

Elastic recovery against strain, for seven fibres. The elastic recovery of seven fibres at the strains it is reported at: extend to a stated strain, unload, read the strain returned immediately. Each fibre's points are joined and the line stops where the measurements stop, which is the point of the figure — a fibre strained past the last point on its own line is a fibre this collection declines to answer for. Nothing here is measured below one per cent of strain, and a woven cloth just past its own interchange budget is at a thread strain of a few hundredths, so the region that matters most for a fabric is the region nobody has reported. Recovery falls monotonically for every fibre, which is what lets the unmeasured region be bracketed between the lowest measured value and one rather than extrapolated. What the plot cannot show is the delayed recovery, which is excluded by the convention and is largest for the fibre with the best reputation for recovering.

Mechanics and drape

Recovery is measured and nothing predicts it

A fibre's stiffness is a bracket this collection can compute the ends of. What fraction of a strain it gives back is not: it has to be looked up, the tables are thin, they stop exactly where a fabric needs them, and the most attractive explanation for the ordering they show turns out to have no signal in it at all.

The pressure a 30° twist puts on its own fibres. A twisted yarn squeezes itself. Every fibre under tension at a radius pulls inward with sin²θ of its tension per unit length, and integrating outward to the surface — where the pressure is zero by definition, because there is nothing outside to push against — gives p(r) = ½σ(cos²θ(r) − cos²α) in closed form. At a surface angle of 30° the pressure on the axis is 12.5 per cent of the core fibre's own axial stress and the mean over the section is 5.65 per cent of it. The shading is that closed form and the curve is the same function plotted; the shape is what matters, and its one uncompromising feature is the zero at the edge. The outermost fibres are held by nothing, which is why a yarn is hairy, why a surface fibre is the one that comes away on a finger, and why singeing changes a yarn's behaviour out of all proportion to the mass it removes.

Compound and figured cloths

A tuft is set so it cannot untwist

A cut pile tuft has a free end, and at a free end the pressure holding the twist is zero. So the twist runs out over a computable length, the tuft opens, and a carpet loses its appearance long before it loses any material.

single jersey, as loops. Three courses of the same structure drawn as yarn. A knitted needle takes a new loop through the one below; a tuck takes the yarn into the loop below and leaves it on the needle, so that loop is held for another course; a miss floats straight past. Six needles is as many as a loop diagram can carry, which is why the array beside it exists.

Knits and other structures

A jersey has two surfaces

The face of a plain knit shows the legs of its loops, which run along the wale; the back shows the heads and feet, which run across it. So the two faces carry their crowns at right angles — the same situation as a damask's figure and its ground, in a fabric with no warp, no weft and no float.

Four ways of closing a muslin, and the floor under all of them. The same muslin at four states: as woven, calendered to 3:1, wetted so its fibres swell by 20 per cent, and with the channel between its threads gone altogether. Air permeability at 100 Pa falls from 3505 mm/s to 8.1 — a factor of 434 — and stops there. The last figure is not a cloth with no holes in it: it is a cloth whose only remaining path is through the threads, which are sixty per cent fibre whatever is done to the construction. That number is the floor, it is a property of the yarn, and no sett reaches it. Note that the two middle routes are not in a fixed order: a 3:1 calender closes more than this swelling and a 2:1 calender closes less, so which is the stronger depends on how far each is taken.

Cloth doing a job

A windproof cloth is at its yarn's limit

Windproof is a threshold on air permeability, and it is the only fabric specification on this site that the construction cannot settle. No weavable sett of an ordinary shirting yarn gets within two hundred times of it, layering the cloth barely helps because the resistance is inertial rather than viscous, and the floor set by the yarn's own porosity lands on the same order as the threshold with a fivefold bracket around it.

Setting and geometry

The fourth power is a close cloth's rule

Every account of a fabric's air permeability quotes the same thing: flow down a channel goes as the fourth power of its width, so a small change of sett is a large change of flow. That is Poiseuille's result, it is about the viscous drop, and in an open cloth the viscous drop is two per cent of the pressure. The rule becomes true as the cloth closes, and where it starts being true is a number.

The strain at a fold against the strain each fibre breaks at. For each fibre, the surface strain at the sharpest fold a 20 tex yarn of it can make — which is √(packing × fibre tex ÷ yarn tex), with no measurement of a crease in it — beside its own measured breaking extension. cotton and flax are strained past the low end of their breaking range, so some of their fibres break at the fold, and that is what a linen crease is. The rest survive, and among them viscose and wool return less than three fifths of what they were given, which is the other way a cloth creases. Both columns are needed: viscose survives with a factor of two to spare and is among the three worst by measurement. What the bars cannot show is wool, which the census puts in the wrong column because the recovery figures are the immediate ones and wool's is the most delayed of any fibre here.

After the loom

Which fibres crease, and why there are two answers

Run the sharpest fold a yarn can make against every fibre's breaking extension and its recovery, and the ranking that falls out is the trade's own — linen worst, cotton next, wool and the melt-spun filaments best. It falls out of two columns rather than one, because two fibres in the bottom three get there by different mechanisms, and a treatment that fixes one does nothing for the other.

Compound and figured cloths

A chenille is a yarn that is already a fabric

A chenille yarn is a woven gauze cut into strips. Every structural question this collection asks about cloth can be asked about it — does it hang together, how many systems has it, what holds the pile in — and the answers are the same answers one level down.

$What it costs to touch a cloth. The pressure needed to bring a stated fraction of the plan into contact, for plain, 2/2 twill, satin 8 in sheeting. Reaching two per cent of the plan takes 2.83 kPa on a plain and 0.05 on a satin 8, a factor of 55. The stiffness in this figure is fitted and is labelled as such. A yarn's resistance to being squashed out of round has no lower bound at all — a bundle of fibres free to slide is a fluid in cross-section — so no bracket exists to compute this from, and what is used is the value this collection fitted to measured fabric thickness. Every curve moves together across its published range, which is why the ratio between weaves survives and the absolute values are quoted with the fit named.$ What cloth is

How much of a cloth is touching

Press a fabric against a flat plate with the weight of a hand and ask what fraction of it is actually in contact. The bearing curve answers, and the answer is about four per cent — of which the great majority is not the cloth's surface at all, but the hairs standing off it, which nothing in this arithmetic can see.

$A yarn's diameter is a contour, not a length. The fraction of the space beside a 20 tex cotton yarn that is occupied by hair, against height, grossed up from the modelled population by the measured split between the long and short populations. At the yarn's own surface it is 8.9% — the layer is almost entirely gap — and it falls away exponentially from there. Every instrument that reports a yarn diameter is picking a contour of this curve, and the contours are far apart: a threshold that needs half the space filled is never met at all, one that needs a twentieth is met at 355 µm, and a hair counter triggers out at 2353 µm. The earlier model gave the layer a single thickness of 25 µm, which is a fair description of where most of the material is and wrong about its extent by more than a decade. What the curve cannot say is which contour any particular instrument uses, which is a fact about the instrument.$ Pattern and colour

A cloth is more opaque than it is closed

Opacity is not cover — this collection established that already and left the discrepancy attributed to the thickness of the threads. Part of it is not in the threads at all. A hair standing in a hole blocks light exactly as well as a thread does and costs nothing in air.

Whether a cloth's hairs can reach one another. n_A λ² for each construction in this site's table — the hairs per square millimetre times the square of their own length, which is the pure number that asks whether a hair can touch its neighbour. It is a count times an area, so it has to be a pure number. Every one of them is under one, which means no ordinary woven cotton cloth has a hair layer at all: it has isolated whiskers on a bare surface. The dashed line is the threshold. The spread across the whole table is only 1.9-fold, because the density goes as the sett times the root of the count and those move in opposite directions as a cloth is made finer — so construction is almost powerless here, and everything that crosses this threshold does so by finishing rather than by weaving.

Knits and other structures

A knit gives up its fibres more easily

Knitwear pills and shirting does not, and the fibres are often the same fibres. The difference is a count of yarn per unit area and a pressure between threads, and both of them push a knit over a threshold that a woven cloth of the same yarn cannot reach.

The coarsest pore and the finest, in one muslin. A muslin's two pore systems asked the same question. Water at a contact angle of 120° is held back by a pore of radius r at a head of 2γ|cos θ|/ρgr, so the hole between four threads — hydraulic radius 134 µm — holds 56 mm of water, and the space between the fibres inside a thread — 2.50 µm — holds 2975 mm. Water takes the cheapest path, so the cloth leaks at the first of them and the second is never asked. Turn the contact angle round to a wetting one and the same two radii give a rise instead, and now it is the finest that decides, because that is the one that lifts highest: 5950 mm. One expression, two ends of a distribution, and the fabric's two properties read opposite ends of it.

After the loom

The pore that wicks is the pore that leaks

A cloth's water resistance and a cloth's wicking are one expression, read at the two ends of a contact angle. The geometry cannot be chosen to give both, because it is the same geometry; the only thing that decides which a fabric does is a finish. And the two questions do not even read the same pore — a rise is set by the finest and a leak by the coarsest, so the same cloth lifts water three metres and holds it back at fifty-six millimetres.

Where a muslin's warmth actually is. A muslin's own thermal resistance is 0.0108 m²K/W, and the still-air layer clinging to its outside is 0.12 — so 92 per cent of what a person is wearing is air that is not in the cloth. Wind takes it: the boundary layer thins as the square root of the speed, and above a few metres per second the air is also being driven straight through the fabric, which shorts out whatever resistance the fabric had. The pair leaves 22 per cent of the still-air value at 16 m/s. Both mechanisms take away air rather than cloth, which is why a windproof layer works and a thicker weave does not, and why the fibre — which the conductivity bracket could not separate anyway — never enters this figure.

Cloth doing a job

The wind takes the air and not the cloth

A shirting's own thermal resistance is eight per cent of what a person wearing it has; the other ninety-two is a still-air layer half a millimetre thick clinging to its outside. Wind destroys both, and it destroys the larger one first and by a mechanism that has nothing to do with the fabric — so a windproof layer works by keeping air still rather than by resisting heat.

$Eight fibres through one cloth, and the bracket that hides them. A muslin is 19 per cent fibre and the rest air, so its thermal conductivity is a two-phase mixture, and how the fibre and the air are arranged is not something any amount of knowing the fractions settles. What is settled is Wiener's pair of bounds: heat across a series arrangement sees the harmonic mean and along a parallel one sees the volume average, and every real arrangement lies between. Each bar here is one fibre's whole band, from the series bound at its lowest published conductivity to the parallel bound at its highest. Not one of the eight clears any other, so this model cannot tell wool from nylon in a fabric — and the same cloth at twice the thickness has twice the resistance, exactly. Air's own conductivity is marked, and every band sits within a fifth of it.$ Mechanics and drape

Warmth is a thickness of air

A fabric is a tenth fibre and the rest air, so its thermal conductivity is a mixture of the two — and the pair of bounds that any mixture must lie between comes out narrower than the difference between wool and nylon. The model cannot tell one fibre from another in a cloth. What it can tell, exactly and with no bracket at all, is that twice the thickness is twice the warmth.

Three kinds of surface, and only one of them starts open. The bearing curves of a 2/2 twill in sheeting, of a terry loop pile, and of a cut corduroy pile of 30 tex, over the first six per cent of a cloth's thickness. The woven curve opens as the square root of the depth and the loop pile's does the same, because a loop's top is a curved thread like any other. The cut pile does not open: it is a flat line at 5.2% of the plan, from a depth of nothing, because a blade severed every tuft in one pass and left every end in one plane. That is not a larger contact area, it is a different kind of contact area — one that does not vanish as the load goes to zero, which is a property no woven surface has.

Compound and figured cloths

A pile is the only surface with no crowns

Every other fabric touches on the tops of curved threads, so its contact vanishes as the load goes to zero and the pressure on what is touching rises without limit. A cut pile touches on flat ends left in one plane by a blade — so its contact is finite at no load at all, its pressure concentration is bounded, and it is the only fabric whose abrasion mass loss is an honest measure of its damage.

A knitted loop, solved rather than drawn. 3 courses by 3 wales of a 20 tex cotton jersey at a 3.5 mm loop, tightness factor 12.8, with one stitch picked out. The centre line is the curve that minimises the yarn's own bending between one interlacing and the next, and the yarn is drawn at its own width of 167 µm so that the crowding is the fabric's rather than the drawing's. It is rounder than the horseshoe a knitting diagram draws, and deliberately so: a diagram draws the topology and an elastica draws the mechanics, and a rod with a fixed length between two fixed points does not hug a rectangle. Half the yarn between two interlacings is spare — the straight line between them is 51% of the yarn available — which is what lets a loop be solved as a free elastica at all. The tightest bend anywhere on it is 1.00 times one over the yarn diameter, the curvature of a yarn wrapped hard round another of the same size. Nothing arranged that: the only things imposed are the loop length and the two spacings.

Knits and other structures

A loop is nine tenths free run

Half the yarn in a knitted stitch is slack — the straight line between two interlacings is a little over half the thread available to span it. That is two orders of magnitude more room than a woven thread has, and it is why a knitted loop is a shape that can be solved rather than a shape that has to be constructed.

A slack twisted yarn takes a coil of one size. A 20 tex cotton at 1400 turns a metre. Its own torque is 2.060 µN·mm at the free bound, and a rod under tension T is stable while its torque stays under 2·√(B·T). Below that tension the straight state stops being a minimum and the thread wraps on itself at a radius of 0.91 mm. That radius is 2B/M, which is 2/(r·ω) once the torque is written out: it depends on the twist and on the ratio of the two stiffnesses, and on neither stiffness itself.

Pattern and colour

A crepe is a yarn that will not lie still

A crepe cloth's pebbled surface is the yarn's own torque acting on a cloth that cannot resist it. The instability that makes a slack yarn snarl says how large the pebbles should be, and the answer is a millimetre — which is what a crepe looks like.

An operation multiplies a spread by its own log-slope. A transformation does not leave a population's spread alone: if y goes as the kth power of x then a small spread in x becomes k times that spread in y, exactly in the limit and nearly so at the CVs a yarn has. So an operation with an exponent below one narrows the population it acts on — a thickness that goes as the square root of a load comes out at half the spread it went in with — and one with an exponent of four widens it fourfold. This is the same derivative that decided every bias in this ladder, read for its magnitude rather than for its curvature, and it is why a finish can be a variance-reducing operation without anyone having chosen it for that. The straight line through the origin is the whole of the rule; the departure from it at the right-hand end is the second-order term arriving, which is where the linearisation stops being one.

After the loom

A finish spends a spread before it spends a mean

Every operation on a cloth multiplies the variation it inherits by its own log-slope, so an operation with an exponent below one makes the cloth more even and one above it makes the cloth less even. Calendering, which is bought for evenness, has an exponent of 1.4.

What a tear asks for is the weakest of a few. A tensile test pulls every thread in the width and averages them. A tear pulls the handful in the triangle at the tip of the cut, and what lets it move is whichever of those is weakest — so the quantity that governs is the minimum of a small sample, and two things follow that no mean can show. Its expectation is below the mean: at CV 15% the weakest of 4 is 0.853 of the mean thread, and the weakest of 40 is 0.718. And its scatter is enormous compared with a tensile test's: 10.9% against the 0.75% a mean of four hundred threads would show. A tear strength that varies by a tenth between specimens of the same cloth is not a badly run test. It is the only answer an extreme of four can give.

Cloth doing a job

A tear asks fewer threads than a pull

A strip test averages a hundred threads and a tear interrogates four. That difference alone accounts for the two things everybody knows about tear testing — that it reads low, and that it scatters — without anything about the cloth being different between the two tests.

The crossings under a 25 mm² presser foot. A 25 mm² foot on a muslin covers 12 ends and 11 picks, which is 132 crossings — and a first guess treats those as 132 chances of finding a thick place. They are not independent chances. Every crossing along one end shares that end's diameter, so the largest crossing is the largest end plus the largest pick, and the number of tries is 23: the threads. Each cell here is shaded by its own two diameters, and the darkest is at the meeting of the darkest row and the darkest column, which is what that identity looks like. The gauge rests on it and reads 0.431 mm, against 0.342 for the cloth's mean crossing — 26% over.

Mechanics and drape

A thickness is a maximum, not a mean

A presser foot rests on whatever is highest beneath it, so the thickness of a fabric is an extreme value — and an extreme grows with how much cloth is asked. The standard specifies the foot's area because the foot's area is in the answer.

Setting and geometry

Half the air goes through a tenth of the holes

A permeability computed from the average hole says nothing about which holes the air uses. Once the threads have a spread, the answer is: not many of them — and in a close cloth, half the flow leaves through less than a tenth of the openings.

$A 20 tex cotton yarn and the fibre standing off it. 6 mm of a 20 tex ring-spun cotton yarn with the hair population this site computes from the yarn's own count and staple — 0.89 hairs per millimetre, every one of them drawn. The two axes are at different scales and have to be — the yarn is 167 µm across and its hairs reach past a millimetre, so a picture at one scale is either a bare line or a black rectangle. Along the yarn is 99 pixels to the millimetre and off it is 74, a 1-fold exaggeration of the vertical. Lengths are drawn from the exponential the model predicts, mean 621 µm; the rules mark one, two and three millimetres with the count a hair-counting instrument reports at each, and the hairs crossing each rule in the drawing are the ones those counts are about. At the yarn's own surface the long hairs cover 1.1% of the space beside it, which is why the picture is mostly gap. Nothing here is the short population, which carries most of the protruding length and none of the reach; and a hair reaching past the room the canvas has is drawn to the edge of it, so the very longest few are shortened in the drawing and not in the arithmetic.$ What cloth is

A yarn's surface is a distribution

This collection has computed where a cloth stops, and every one of those numbers is a statement about yarn. What a finger, a plate, a droplet or a ray of light actually meets first is a population of fibre ends standing off the yarn — and it is a population, with a count and a length, rather than a layer with a thickness.

Compound and figured cloths

Hair, nap and pile are one construction

This site now has three surfaces made of fibre standing off a cloth, arrived at from three different directions and in three different fields. They are the same object at three settings, and what separates them is not what they are but how much of them anybody decided.

Twist is not torsion: a straight rod, twisted. A rod drawn with a cross painted along it, and the cross turned through 2 full turns from one end to the other. The rod is straight, so it has no Frenet frame at all — a straight line has no osculating plane to turn. The two discs above are the rod's ends seen down its own axis, which is where the twist is an angle rather than a foreshortened wiggle. The twist is the rotation of the painted cross about the rod's own tangent, and it is 2 turns whatever the centre line does. That is the quantity a torsional rigidity resists, and it is why a collection that solved a plane curve had not thereby dealt with torsion.

Pattern and colour

A shadow stripe is two twists

A cloth striped in one colour, where the stripe is visible only because alternate bands are spun the other way round. The pattern is carried entirely by which way the fibres lie on the yarn's surface, and it disappears when the light moves.

Where a muslin's warp jams, over 40 ends. 40 ends drawn at their own diameters, with every neighbouring pair's combined width plotted beneath. A cloth cannot be set closer than its threads will lie, and the pair that decides that is not the average pair — it is the widest one anywhere across the warp, which here is ends 8 and 9 at 205 µm apiece against a mean of 167 µm. Over the 2000 ends of a real warp rather than the 40 drawn here the worst pair is 42% above the mean, and it goes on growing with the width of the cloth: the same yarn in a wider loom jams sooner. The naive estimate that treats every window as an independent try overstates it by 0.48%, which is small enough to say that the overlap between neighbouring windows is not what is going on here.

Setting and geometry

A warp jams where its threads are thickest

The closest a cloth can be set is decided by its worst pair of neighbours, not its average thread — and the worst pair depends on how many pairs there are. The same yarn in a wider loom jams sooner, which makes a jammed sett a property of the machine as well as of the yarn.

Singeing is the cheapest change to a surface

Pass a cloth through a flame fast enough and it loses under one per cent of its mass. What it loses is the part of itself that was doing most of the touching, and lustre, friction, printability, pilling and measured cover all move at once.

A yarn has a diameter for every instrument

Conservation of volume gives a yarn one diameter and every other route gives a different one. The disagreement is not experimental scatter: a yarn's outside is a coverage that falls away exponentially, and each instrument stops at whatever contour of it will trigger the instrument.

$20 tex, counted. The cross-section of a 20 tex cotton yarn, with every fibre in it drawn. The count is a division and nothing else: a 20 tex yarn spun from 0.17 tex fibre has 117.6 fibres crossing any plane through it, and the yarn is 14.0 fibre diameters across because n fibres packed at 0.6 fill a circle √(n/φ) times as wide. The arrangement is drawn on a lattice and is not claimed: real fibres are not on one, they migrate between the core and the surface as they run, and everything this collection says about a yarn's strength turns on their doing so.$ Setting and geometry

How many fibres make a thread

Every number in this collection began with a diameter, and a diameter is not a measurement — it is a count of fibres, divided. Once the division is written down, three quantities that had nothing to do with each other turn out to be the same number.

What a raising machine can catch in a 2/2 twill. The draft with every weft float long enough for a raising wire to lift marked on it. The teeth need an unsupported length of thread on the surface, so a cloth in which every thread is bound at every crossing offers them nothing at all — which is why a napped fabric is always a twill or a satin and never a plain weave.

After the loom

Raising moves the surface onto the hairs

A raising machine pulls fibre ends up out of the floats, and what a finger or a light then meets is not the cloth's surface at all but a layer of loose fibre standing above it. The criterion for which cloths can be raised is the same criterion, exactly, that decides which cloths have crown line — so raising spends the surface that would have made the fabric shine.

Knits and other structures

A jersey gets taller before it gets shorter

Pull a knit along its courses and the first thing it does is grow along its wales — by two per cent, over the first eighty per cent of extension, before it turns round and contracts. The transverse response changes sign, and there is no material in the explanation at all.

Setting and geometry

A finer yarn is a worse yarn

Fineness is the thing a yarn is priced for, and it is bought with irregularity at a fixed exchange rate. Once the spread is a function of the count, every correction this collection computes becomes a function of the count too — and the cheapest yarn on the shelf is the one the arithmetic describes best.

Where the strain goes, at a 25° twist. Extend a twisted yarn and the fibres in it are not all strained alike. If each stays at its own radius — the affine model — a fibre at helix angle θ takes cos²θ of the yarn's strain, so the fibre on the axis takes all of it and the fibre at the surface takes 82.1% of it. The core reaches its breaking extension first and the yarn cannot realise its own fibres. If instead every fibre migrates between the core and the surface, every fibre has the same mean strain and they all break together. The two are exactly computable — 0.8214 against 0.9509 of what the fibres could give — and the ratio between them, 2/(cos α(1 + cos α)) = 1.158, is what migration is worth. The shading is that arithmetic and the two panels use the same scale.

Mechanics and drape

A straight fibre cannot share the load

Extend a twisted yarn and its fibres are not all strained alike: the one on the axis takes the whole of it and the one at the surface takes cos²α. So they do not break together, and what a wandering fibre is worth comes out as one expression with nothing fitted in it.

Z twist at 1600 turns per metre. A 20 tex cotton yarn, 0.167 mm across, with its surface fibres drawn as the helices they are. The angle between a surface fibre and the yarn's axis is 40.0°, and it is the only quantity in this family: the yarn is 13.8% shorter than the fibre in it and carries 59% of the strength the same fibre would give lying straight.

Weaves

The other crepe is in the yarn

A crepe weave puts the texture in the matrix. A crepe yarn puts it nowhere the matrix can see: the cloth is a plain weave, and the surface comes from a thread twisted so hard that it shortens by a seventh and spends the rest of its life trying to untwist.

What it takes to bury a cloth's crowns. The film needed to fill a fabric's surface to a stated level, for plain, 2/2 twill, satin 8 in sheeting, at a film density of 1.2 g/cm³. Burying the crowns entirely takes 187 g/m² on the plain, 186 g/m² on the 2/2 twill, 183 g/m² on the satin 8 — and the ordering is not the ordering of roughness. A weave with plateaux presents a wide flat top that a thin film covers, and a weave with points presents crowns with valleys between them that the film has to fill before it is continuous anywhere. Every gram spent filling a valley is a gram that is not bridging a hole, which is where a coated cloth fails.

After the loom

A coating fills the crowns before it bridges the holes

A film does not sit on a cloth, it fills it — and the volume it has to supply to reach a level is the integral of one minus the bearing area. Burying an ordinary sheeting's crowns takes 185 grams a square metre, which is more than the cloth weighs, and the whole of the weave's influence is spent in the first ten of them.

At 0.1 kilopascals the plate is standing on hair. A flat foot pressed onto sheeting at 0.1 kPa, over 3 mm of cloth. It stops 25 µm above the cloth's own crowns, because that is where the hairs it is bending can carry the load: of the 10 hairs drawn, 9 reach higher than the foot and are laid over under it, and the rest are untouched. The vertical scale is set by the approach and not by the layer — 5188 pixels to the millimetre off the cloth against 192 along it — because the foot's height above the crowns is tens of micrometres and the layer it stands in is more than a millimetre, so a picture at one scale shows the second and not the first. The thickness reported is 0.432 mm against 0.382 mm for the cloth itself, so 12% of the reading is a population and not a fabric. The hair layer carries up to 0.23 kPa before the foot reaches the crowns at all. A laid-over hair is drawn as two straight segments where a real one is an elastica: the corner is a convenience and the height it turns at is the measurement. What the picture cannot show is that a bent hair leans on its neighbours, which the arithmetic behind it does not know either.

What cloth is

A light touch never reaches the crowns

This collection found that a plain weave touches at points and every other cloth touches along lines, and that the difference is an exponent rather than a factor. It is a real result about a real surface, and at the pressures a fabric is actually touched at, nothing ever reaches that surface.

A round thread reflects a beam into a fan. A round thread seen end-on, with a beam arriving from straight above. Every point across the thread has its own normal, tilted by the angle it sits at, and mirrors the beam through twice that angle — so a single direction in becomes a whole fan out, spread across the thread and not at all along it. Seen from the front that fan is a highlight lying along the thread, exactly as long as the length of thread that is straight, which is the float. Nothing about this depends on the fibre. A cylinder of any material returns a fan, and the only way to narrow it is to stop the section being a cylinder — which is what a calender does.

Weaves

A float reflects into a line

A cylinder cannot return a beam to a point. Its normals sweep the whole half-turn across it and nothing at all along it, so a straight thread throws light into a fan — seen as a highlight lying along the thread, exactly as long as the length of thread that is straight. The lobe of a satin is twice as narrow along the thread as across it; the lobe of a plain weave is exactly round.

A seam stands 763 µm proud of a cloth 382 µm thick. A 10 mm seam allowance of 3 plies in a 60 mm panel of one, in sheeting. The seam stands 763 µm above the body of the garment — which is 102 times the depth at which the body cloth first comes into contact with anything at all. So a flat surface rubbed across this garment touches only the seam, over 16.7% of the area drawn, until it has crushed a whole thickness of fabric. Everything this collection computes about where wear lands on a woven surface applies inside that 16.7%, and the other 83.3% is not being touched.

Cloth doing a job

A seam stands proud and wears first

A seam allowance is three plies where the garment is one, so it stands three quarters of a millimetre above a cloth whose own surface has a few micrometres of contact in it. Anything flat rubbed across the garment touches the seam and nothing else — all of the wear on two or three per cent of the area, until a whole thickness of fabric has been crushed.

One canopy, two opposite outcomes, decided by a sign. What a canopy does to a drop, for sheeting raised 32-fold. A rough surface multiplies the cosine of the intrinsic contact angle by its roughness ratio, which here is 2.0 — a hair is a cylinder and contributes πd of surface for every d of shadow. So a fibre that wets at all is driven to complete spreading, and one that does not is driven to a Cassie state sitting on 32.4% solid and air. The dashed diagonal is what the bare fibre would do; the canopy pushes every point away from ninety degrees, in whichever direction it already lay. Raising is therefore not a wetting treatment or a repellency treatment — it is an amplifier, and which one it turns out to be was settled by the chemistry before the raising machine was switched on. What the figure cannot show is which state a real drop reaches, because both are available near the hinge and the one it finds depends on how it arrived.

What cloth is

The hairs decide the sign of the wetting

Raising a cloth is not a wetting treatment and it is not a repellency treatment. It is an amplifier, and which of the two it turns out to be was settled in the dyehouse before the raising machine was switched on — by whether the fibre's own contact angle was above or below ninety degrees.

Why a cuff is ribbed. The force a knit pulls back with, over the range a cuff is used across. It rises the whole way — 0.79 N per metre at 23% to 3.38 at 104% — and it is small throughout, which is the combination a cuff needs and almost nothing else supplies. A rib gets its extension by geometry, folding alternate wales to opposite faces so that its relaxed width is about half its opened one, and it gets its recovery from the loop reconfiguring. Neither is the yarn stretching, which is why a cuff made of a fibre with no elastic recovery at all still works.

Knits and other structures

A rib pulls back on a force the loop supplies

A cuff has to give a great deal at almost no load and come back reliably, and no ordinary material does both. A rib gets its extension from folding, which is geometry, and its return from the loop reconfiguring, which is now a computable force — under four newtons a metre over the whole range a cuff works across.

Folding, and what it takes out of the singles. Two 20 tex singles spun at 800 turns per metre and folded the other way at 540 — a ratio of 0.675, which is the trade's own and is a measurement rather than a derivation. A single held at its ends and wound round its neighbour turns about its own axis once for every turn of the fold, so it is left with 260 turns per metre of its own: its surface fibres lie at 7.8° to its axis rather than the 22.8° they were spun at. Folding untwists. The short strokes are drawn at that residual angle; the two long curves are centre lines and are not the yarn — each strand is itself a bundle of 118 fibres, and the residual angle is what holds them.

Setting and geometry

Folding is untwisting

Wind two singles round each other and each one turns about its own axis once per turn of the fold. So a folded yarn's singles are not the singles that went into it, and at a folding ratio of exactly one half the two helices cancel.

How much every four-by-four draft can shine. All 22,874 four-by-four drafts in which every end and every pick interlaces, at sheeting's construction and a tolerance of 2°, counted by specular area. The range runs from 0.02% to 0.93%, a factor of 60.0, and the distribution is not smooth — it clusters, because the quantity behind it is a count of whole crossings and takes only certain values. The dullest drafts in the catalogue are the plain weaves, which have no plateau at all and shine only from the crowns of their turns; the brightest carry the most float on the face, with the fewest turns interrupting it. Lustre over the catalogue is a length census, and nothing about the yarn enters it.

Weaves

Lustre is a length times a width

The specular area of a cloth factors exactly: a length of crown line, which the draft supplies, times a width of section within the tolerance, which the yarn and the finish supply. Neither factor knows anything about the other, and over the four-by-four catalogue the first alone spans a factor of sixty.

A hair layer is a balance, so singeing does not stay done. The hair population of a 20 tex cotton yarn under rubbing, started from a singed cloth and from an unusually fuzzy one. Abrasion does two opposite things: it frees ends that spinning left buried, from a supply of 2.23 per millimetre in the surface shell, and it removes hairs that are long enough to be caught. Where the two meet is a fixed point at 1.43 per millimetre, and the cloth goes there from either side with the same time constant — 248 cycles to halve the distance, whichever direction it is travelling. A singeing is therefore undone in a few hundred rubs, because the flame changed the stock and not the balance. What is predicted here is that a fixed point exists, that it does not remember the starting state, and that one rate serves both directions; where it sits relative to the spun level needs two rates the model does not supply, and it is set to reproduce the one thing everyone has noticed, which is that fabrics get fuzzier as they are worn.

After the loom

A hair layer is a balance, not a stock

Singeing takes under one per cent of a cloth's mass and changes its lustre, its friction, its printability and its pilling. It also does not stay done, because rubbing frees fibre ends as fast as it breaks them off, and a flame changes the stock while leaving the balance exactly where it was.

Cloth doing a job

Abrasion takes the hairs first

An abrasion test reports milligrams lost against cycles, and the first milligrams off any fabric are not fabric. On a bare cloth that stage is over in a few thousand cycles. On a napped one it is not over by the end of the test, so a Martindale on a fleece never measures the fleece.

A rib crosses a gap where a jersey crosses a diameter. A one-by-one rib in section across 5 wales, drawn at a bed gap of 3 yarn diameters — 0.501 mm — because the relaxed gap of a rib is a measurement this collection does not hold and every figure of one says what it was drawn at. Alternate wales sit on opposite beds, so every sinker loop between them travels the whole gap. In a jersey the same yarn climbs one diameter, 0.167 mm. That single difference takes the contact force from 38.30 mN at 11.7° out of the fabric to 72.51 mN at 16.2°, and the through-thickness part from 7.81 mN to 20.17 mN.

Knits and other structures

A rib climbs a gap

A jersey's yarn crosses one diameter between interlacings because that is what a crossing of two threads is. A rib's crosses the whole distance between the two beds. Nothing else in the model changes, and that one length is the whole mechanical difference between the fabrics.

The force at an interlacing, which no longer lies in the fabric. A crossing of a relaxed jersey in section on the left, with the thickness expanded 3×, and on the right the contact force drawn at the angle the solve gives it — which is a true angle, unlike anything in the section beside it. The head of one course and the feet of the next lie one yarn diameter apart through the fabric, 0.167 mm, so the interlacing is not a point in a plane and the force at it is not in one either. It comes out at 38.30 mN a stitch, turned 11.75° out of the fabric: 37.50 mN along the wales, which is what friction has to hold, and 7.81 mN through the thickness, which is what holds the two faces apart. Divided by the area a stitch occupies the second is 15.1 kPa, or 113 mmHg — a pressure, and the quantity a compression measurement reports.

What cloth is

What a thickness gauge reads on a knit

The structure says two yarn diameters and the gauge says more, and the gap is not an error in either. A gauge lands on the highest crowns, through a canopy of protruding fibre, under a load that has already begun to compress both — and it does that on a surface that is nothing but crowns.

Setting and geometry

A two-fold yarn is not twice a single

Folding halves nothing. It improves a yarn's evenness by exactly √2 and lowers the floor that evenness is measured against by exactly √2, so the index of irregularity comes out identical — folding does not make a better yarn, it makes a bigger one.

A calender multiplies the highlight by 32, and all of it is width. A 2/2 twill in sheeting pressed at increasing force, with the specular area recomputed at each state from the site's own compression model. It rises from 0.91% of the plan to 28.9%, a factor of 32, while the cloth thins from 381.6 µm to 186.1 µm. The gain is not in the length of the crowns: that moves by 5 per cent. It is in their width, which moves by 31.8 times, because pressing puts a flat top on the section and a flat top has one normal rather than a fan of them. The finish does not polish the thread. It changes the dimension of the highlight, from a line to a band, and the arithmetic says so by refusing to put any of the gain in the other factor.

Weaves

A calender buys the width

Press a cloth and its lustre multiplies by twenty-four. None of that comes from the length of its crowns, which moves by six per cent; all of it comes from their width, because a flattened section has a plane on top of it and a plane has one normal rather than a fan of them. The arithmetic refuses to put any of the gain in the other factor.

The strong fibre is the one that pills. Standing pills per unit area by fibre, relative to wool, at one and the same fuzz supply — every row is the same cloth raised the same amount, so the only thing varying is how long a pill survives once it exists. A pill is not made, it is kept: rubbing generates it and rubbing breaks the anchor fibres that hold it, and an anchor survives in proportion to how much force it takes to break. So polyester carries 18 times wool's standing population from the same generation rate, and the ordering here is exactly the ordering of tenacity and nothing else. Wool sheds its pills because wool anchors break. No two real fabrics have the same fuzz supply, which is why a wool knit still pills more than a cotton shirting in practice — the comparison drawn here isolates the anchor and says nothing about the generation, and reading it as a ranking of fabrics would be wrong.

Cloth doing a job

A pill is anchored, not made

Every account of pilling starts with how a ball of fibre forms and stops there, which explains why fabrics pill and not why some of them stay pilled. A pill is not a thing that happens; it is a standing population, and the number on a fabric at any moment is a generation rate times a lifetime.

$A print is as sharp as the hairs are long. How far ink carried on a hair reaches past a printed edge into the unprinted cloth, for sheeting in three states. A hair lying near the edge bridges as far as its own length, and the number bridging at least a distance x is (n_A λ/2)e^(−x/λ) — an exponential with the population's own decay length — so the visible feather is a quantile rather than a mean, taken here at one hair per 50 millimetres of edge. As woven the feather is 1911 µm, which is a fifteenth of an inch and coarser than any screen worth engraving: the cloth cannot hold better than 7 lines to the inch whatever the printer does. Singeing caps it at the flame's own reach of 200 µm and takes the cloth to 63 lines — a factor of 10, bought by burning off a fraction of one per cent of the cloth's mass. That is why singeing comes before printing and why nobody prints a fine figure on a raised cloth.$ After the loom

A print is as sharp as the hairs are long

Singeing comes before printing in every finishing route ever written down and the reason given is that the cloth must be smooth. The reason is sharper than that: ink carried on a fibre end reaches as far as the fibre is long, so the feather on a printed edge is a quantile of a hair population and nothing else.

Knits and other structures

Where a two-bed fabric's yarn is

Thirteen named structures, and for each of them the share of its yarn that crosses between the beds — read off its own traverse rather than quoted. It separates the fabrics into three groups, and one of the groups turns out not to be a fabric at all.

The contact force turns as the climb grows. The two components of the contact force against the climb, for a 20 tex cotton jersey at a 3.5 mm loop. The force along the wales is what friction has to hold and the force through the thickness is what holds the fabric open, and the second is bought at the expense of the first. At a jersey's own climb of one diameter they are 37.50 mN and 7.81 mN; at four diameters, which is a rib on an open gap, they are 22.39 mN and 18.61 mN. The friction balance is the ratio: friction has the whole force to work with and only the along-the-wales part to hold, so the coefficient a relaxed knit would need falls from a half to 0.490.

What cloth is

Every fabric's thread lies in a plane

A woven thread's crimp wave lies in a plane at right angles to the cloth. A knitted loop lies in a plane twelve degrees off it. Both halves of this collection turn out to be one picture with one angle in it, and the angle decides how much of a fabric's contact force acts through its thickness.

A designed thin place does not get worse and an accidental one does. The thinnest place a yarn reaches, against how many gauge lengths of it are tested, for a slub yarn and for a randomly uneven yarn of the same 36.3% coefficient of variation. The slub's floor is its base count — 89% of its mean — and it is a horizontal line, because a designed variation has a stated minimum and never goes below it. The random yarn's minimum is an order statistic and falls without limit: 56% over 10 lengths and 22% over 30000. So the advantage is not a number but a function of how much yarn is being asked about, running from 1.6× to 4.0×. What the curve cannot show is the break itself: a yarn's strength at a thin place is not proportional to its linear density there, and the conversion needs a fibre model.

Compound and figured cloths

A designed thin place is kinder than an accidental one

A slub yarn and a badly spun one can carry exactly the same coefficient of variation, and the number tells a mill nothing about which it has. The designed variation has a floor — its base count, and it never goes below it — while the accidental one has a tail that falls further the more yarn is tested. At 36% CV the slub bottoms at 89% of its mean and the random yarn reaches 24%, and the gap widens from 1.6 to 3.7 times as the test grows from ten gauge lengths to ten thousand.

One yarn, two packing factors. The same 20 tex cotton yarn — the same fibres, the same count, the same mass per metre — drawn at a packing factor of 0.45 and of 0.75. Its diameter is 192.9 µm in one and 149.5 µm in the other, a difference of 29.1%, because a diameter goes as the inverse square root of the packing. Every cover factor, every jammed sett and every hole in this collection went through that number, and the site's value of 0.6 was obtained by inverting a rule published for cotton yarns at one particular twist. Nothing here models how packing moves with twist; the figure is here to show the size of the thing that has been held constant.

Setting and geometry

The diameter was quoted at one twist

Every diameter in this collection came from a packing factor of 0.6, and that number was got by inverting a rule published for cotton yarns at one particular twist. Here is what moves if it is wrong by the width of the range real yarns occupy — and which single quantity does not move at all.

Turn the cloth and the highlight changes hands. A 2/2 twill in sheeting turned under a light, with the specular area of each system counted separately at each angle. The warp peaks at 0° and the weft at 83°, a quarter turn apart, and neither returns anything worth seeing where the other peaks. The reason needs no dye and no interference: a warp crown's normals all lie in the plane across the warp and have no component along it, so a warp float can only mirror light that arrives from across the warp. A cloth woven with one colour in the warp and another in the weft therefore shows one colour at one angle and the other a quarter turn away, which is the whole of shot silk — a geometric effect that has been sold as a mysterious one for three hundred years.

Weaves

Turn the cloth and the shine changes hands

A warp crown's normals all lie in the plane across the warp and have no component along it, so a warp float can only mirror light that arrives from across the warp. Turn the cloth a quarter turn and the weft takes over. That is the whole of shot silk — a geometric effect with no dye that changes and no interference in it.

A fifth of a strong fibre buys most of its pilling. How long a pill survives on a wool fabric as nylon is blended into it, relative to the pure wool. A pill is held by several anchor fibres and survives while any of them holds, so its life is set by the strongest anchor it happens to have — and the chance that a pill with 8 anchors has at least one strong one is 1 − (1 − x)^8, which is already 83% at a fifth. The blend therefore gets 83% of the pure strong fibre's pill life while keeping the whole of the weak fibre's fuzz supply, which is the worst of both. Nine tenths of the way arrives by 30%. No average of the two fibres' properties produces this curve: it is a maximum over a small sample, and a maximum is not an average. It is also why a fifteen-per-cent polyamide in a wool knit is notorious, and the arithmetic says the reputation is deserved.

Cloth doing a job

The strong fibre is the one that pills

A pill survives while any one of its anchors holds, which is a maximum over a small sample rather than an average — and a maximum behaves nothing like an average. A fifth of a strong fibre in a blend buys four fifths of the pure strong fibre's pill life while leaving the whole of the weak fibre's fuzz supply in place.

What a knit gives when it is pulled. Force against course-wise extension for a 20 tex cotton jersey at a 3.5 mm loop, computed from the loop's own bending with the relaxed shape as the yarn's natural one. The loop length is the same at every point on the curve: nothing here is the yarn stretching. It reaches 92% extension at 2.96 N per metre and then stiffens by a factor of 85 over the rest of the range, as the straight line between two interlacings runs up against the yarn between them. This is the number the collection's second phase recorded as a lower bound it could not compute, and it is still a lower bound in one respect: friction at the contacts is not in it, so a real fabric is stiffer than this and does not come back along the same curve.

After the loom

A loop is set and not sprung

The way out of a model that predicts a jersey should spread is to stop treating its yarn as a straight rod bent into a loop. A yarn that has been wetted, heated and dried has taken the loop as its own natural shape — and once the natural shape is the loop, every force downstream becomes computable with the relaxed fabric as the origin.

A bouclé at an overfeed of 0.80. A core of 20 tex running straight, an effect thread of 30 tex delivered 80 per cent faster than it, and a binder of 15 tex over the top. The surplus effect thread has nowhere to go but into loops, and their size is not a free choice: a semicircular loop of radius r consumes r(π − 2) of surplus, so at one loop every 3 mm the radius is 2.10 mm — 0.70 of the spacing. The yarn's resultant count is 89 tex and the sum of its three components is 65, because the effect enters multiplied by its own overfeed. What the drawing cannot show is the load path: the core and the binder are at the yarn's own length and the effect thread is longer than the yarn, so a pull on the yarn is carried by 39 per cent of its mass and the loops stay slack.

Compound and figured cloths

A fancy yarn has its crimp in the wrong thread

A bouclé is made by feeding an effect thread eighty per cent faster than the core it wraps, so the yarn contains more thread than it is long — which is crimp by this collection's own definition. A cloth's crimp is in the thread that carries the load, so removing it is the cloth's first extension. A bouclé's surplus is in a thread that carries nothing, so pulling the yarn stretches the core at once and the loops never straighten. Thirty-nine per cent of the yarn's mass is on the load path, and the other sixty-one is decoration.

Setting and geometry

The sett owns the pitch and the yarn owns the height

Set a cloth twice as close and its surface does not get smoother. The crowns come twice as often, because that is what a sett is, and they stand at very nearly the same height, because the closure condition pins the amplitude to the yarn — so a fine cloth is finer-grained rather than flatter, and the two are confused in every description of handle.

A thickness is a property of the pressure it was measured at. What a gauge reports for sheeting against the pressure it presses with. At 1 kPa it reads 0.382 mm, which is the cloth; at 0.02 kPa it reads 0.555 mm, which is the cloth plus 87 µm of hair on each face. The difference is 31% of the reading and it is not a compressibility: nothing in the fabric has been squashed, the foot has simply stopped in a different place. That is why every thickness standard specifies its pressure to two figures, and why comparing a thickness from one standard with a thickness from another is comparing two different measurements of two different objects. The dashed line is the cloth's own geometric thickness, which no reading below the crossover ever reaches.

Mechanics and drape

A compression curve is two laws in series

A published fabric compression exponent is a fitted number with no derivation attached, and this site has already said why: the range it is fitted over straddles two regimes. One of them turns out not to be in the cloth at all.

Thirty micrometres is a buckling load. The wool fibre diameter at which a protruding end reaches the measured threshold for prickle, against how far it protrudes. A fibre end pressed against skin is a column held at the cloth and free to slide at its tip, so it buckles at 20.19EI/ℓ² and carries no more load than that; below the threshold it bends away and is felt as touch, above it the load stands and is felt as pain. At a two-millimetre protrusion — which this site's own hair model puts in the top fifth of a wool's population — the threshold diameter is 32 µm, bracketed at 29–34 by the range of the measured force. Neither the thirty micrometres nor the two millimetres was put in. The band is the force bracket, and the fourth power in I = πd⁴/64 is what makes the boundary sharp: at a mean of 21 µm and a spread of 24%, 3.2% of the fibres are over it, and it is that few per cent that decides whether a garment can be worn.

Cloth doing a job

Prickle is a buckling load

The wool trade specifies comfort against skin by the percentage of fibres coarser than thirty micrometres, and the thirty is a measured boundary with no derivation attached. It is a column formula: solve for the diameter at which a protruding fibre end stops bending away and starts standing its ground, and thirty micrometres falls out.

A loop is bent about as hard as its yarn allows. The tightest curvature anywhere on a relaxed loop, against the knitter's own tightness factor, in units of one over the yarn diameter — which is the curvature of a yarn wrapped hard round another of the same size, and the tightest bend any fabric asks for. Across the whole range a knitter can reach it stays between 0.73 and 1.27, crossing one at a tightness factor of about thirteen — which is where the trade's own usable band begins. Nothing arranged that. The only things imposed are the loop length, the yarn diameter and the two measured spacings, and the curvature is whatever the minimisation returns.

After the loom

Two knits with one tightness factor are one knit

The loop model has exactly one dimensionless group in it — the yarn's diameter over the loop length — so two fabrics that share it have the same loop, to fifteen figures, whatever they are made of. That group is the knitter's own tightness factor, and it explains why an index quoted as empirical works as well as it does.

Knits and other structures

Which knitted fabrics lie flat

Curl was explained here by counting face changes between courses, which works for stockinette and garter and reaches nothing else. The same question turns out to be a signed sum over a structure's own grid — and it answers for every fabric a two-bed machine can make, including the ones nobody has a rule for.

Two courses as centre lines, and their closest approach. The solved course of a 20 tex cotton jersey at a 3.5 mm loop, drawn in plan with the course below it, as centre lines, with the closest approach marked. The interlacing is where the model placed them one diameter apart. The closest they come is 0.130 mm — 0.780 of a diameter — and it is not at the interlacing. A round yarn cannot occupy this arrangement; a yarn flattened to 78% of its round diameter can, and flattened is what a yarn in a fabric measurably is.

What cloth is

The closest approach is not the crossing

Two wavy curves that touch at a point are not necessarily closest at that point. Whether they are depends on one thing: whether they run alongside one another or cross. That distinction decides which of this collection's two fabrics fits together and which does not.

Seeing through a white voile, from the street and from the room. How much of a scene's contrast survives a white voile, whose open area is 49%, looked through from the street into the room and from the room out to the street, against how much brighter the street is than the room. The scene comes through the clear lines of sight and nothing else; everywhere else the viewer sees thread lit from the viewer's own side, which returns light with no image in it. On a bright day, a hundred times brighter outside, 0.5% of the room's contrast reaches the street and 65% of the street's reaches the room. At equal light both are 28% — the curves cross at a ratio of one whatever the cloth — and with the lamps on after dark the room is the side on show, at 63%. What the plot cannot show is the threads' own optics: their reflectance and transmittance are assumed values for a white sheer rather than measurements, and only the crossing point is independent of them.

Pattern and colour

A sheer hides whichever side is darker

A net curtain hides a room by day and shows it at night, and the cloth has nothing to do with which. What a viewer sees through a sheer is an image through its clear lines of sight against a veil of lit thread, and the only thing that decides their balance is how much brighter one side is than the other. At equal light the two views are identical for every cloth there is. And a black sheer of the same openness shows twelve times more of the room by day than a white one.

Setting and geometry

Hairiness goes as the root of the count

A coarse yarn is hairier than a fine one and everybody knows it. What nobody has said is that its hairs are no longer — the count and the length obey different laws, one rises as a square root and the other does not move at all, and the identity behind both was asserted on this site for an entirely unrelated reason.

Warmth is a canopy, and a canopy grows as a logarithm. Thermal resistance of sheeting against how much its hair population has been multiplied by raising, both faces counted. The unraised cloth is given no still air at all, because its hairs cannot reach one another — n_A λ² is under one and there is no canopy to hold air still. Past the threshold the canopy's depth is λ·ln(n_A λ²), so every doubling of the hair population adds the same depth of nap and no more: the steps here are 434 µm apiece, all the way up. At 256× the nap is 3.07 mm deep and worth 39 times the cloth it grows on, which is the whole reason a flannel is warm and a poplin of the same yarn is not — a canopy is two parts in ten thousand fibre, so its conductivity is air's, while the cloth itself is a quarter fibre. What is claimed is a conduction resistance across a depth of nearly still air; whether the air is still is a question about flow and is not asked here.

Mechanics and drape

Warmth is mostly the hairs

This collection established that a fabric's thermal resistance is its thickness and not its fibre, and that twice the thickness is twice the warmth. It never asked what the thickness was made of. On a raised cloth almost none of it is cloth.

A shot effect needs a fibre with no ends. The peak-to-trough contrast of an eight-end satin in sheeting as the cloth is turned in the light, against how much hair stands on it. Bare, the contrast is 37 to one, because a straight thread's normals lie in the plane across it and the warp and the weft therefore reflect a quarter turn apart. A hair layer does two things and only one of them matters: it blocks, which takes the same factor off the peak and the trough and changes no contrast at all, and it returns light of its own, which is added to both. A hair population points every way at once, so its return has no azimuth in it — and adding a constant to both ends of a ratio of 37 destroys the ratio. On an ordinary spun cotton the contrast is already down to 5.1 to one; singeing recovers it to 29; raising kills it outright at 1.00. The one fibre with no staple length is the one fibre with no fibre ends, and every shot fabric ever woven is made of one.

Weaves

A hair layer veils a highlight

An eight-end satin's shine swings by a large factor as the cloth is turned, because a straight thread's normals lie in the plane across it. Put fibre ends on it and the swing disappears — not because the hairs block the light, which changes no contrast at all, but because they return light of their own that has no direction in it.

$A woven filter catches what its rating says it cannot. What fraction of a particle stream is intercepted by the hair layer of a filter cloth, against particle size, at three levels of raising. The cloth's own largest opening is 290 µm, so by geometry it stops nothing smaller than that at all — and the hairs catch a few per cent of particles ten and a hundred times finer, because a particle whose path passes within its own radius of a hair touches it. On a bare cloth the numbers are small; the point is that they are not zero, because a cake grows from the particles that stop, and once a cake exists the cloth is no longer doing the filtering. Raising the same cloth 32-fold takes a ten-micrometre capture from 0.8% to 23%, which is why a napped filter cloth exists. Interception is taken as the bare geometric ratio of the two diameters with no flow model behind it, so every number here is a lower bound.$ Cloth doing a job

A woven filter beats its own rating

A filter cloth's rating comes from the largest channel through it, and by geometry it stops nothing smaller. It stops a few per cent of particles ten times smaller anyway, on the fibre ends standing in its holes — and a few per cent is not filtration. It is exactly enough to start a cake, and after that the cloth is not filtering.

Knits and other structures

A tube and an interlock balance for different reasons

Two structures come out identically flat on a signed count and are as unalike as two knitted fabrics get. One is two jerseys that curl in opposite directions and are joined at the edges; the other is a fabric whose every course crosses. Telling them apart needs a different question asked of the same grid.

What cloth is

Where a yarn is thinnest

A yarn in a fabric is pressed where it crosses and free where it does not, so its section changes along its own length. Every flattening this collection has ever quoted is a single number for a profile that runs from four fifths of a diameter to nearly four.

Compacting a spinning triangle moves one instrument and not the other. What happens to each hairiness reading when a 20 tex cotton yarn is spun compact instead of ring, as a percentage of the ring value. The total falls by 8% and the long hairs by 65%, a ratio of 8.3. The asymmetry is a prediction rather than a fit. Compaction removes ends that were unbound over a long stretch of the spinning triangle, which is the long population and nothing else; the short population is untouched, and it carries about 88% of the length the integrating instrument is adding up. So the instrument that sees everything barely moves and the one that sees only the tail collapses. The model under-states the fall in the total, because compaction certainly does something to the short population too and nothing here models it — the direction of that error is stated and it is the conservative one.

Setting and geometry

The spinning triangle decides the hair

A ring frame converges a flat ribbon of fibres to a round yarn, and for the length of that convergence the fibres at the ribbon's edges are held by nothing. Everything a spinner can do about hairiness is done in that triangle, and the two hairiness instruments respond to it by wildly different amounts.

Knits and other structures

How thick a knit is

Two centre lines pass at a diameter and each has a radius on either side, so a plain jersey is two yarn diameters thick with nothing fitted. It does not depend on the gauge, it lands inside the band of this collection's woven cloths, and it is lower than any gauge will read.

A knitted loop is a plane curve in a plane that is not the fabric's. A relaxed 20 tex jersey at a 3.5 mm loop, seen from the end of a course. Each course is a straight line because it is one: a half period leaves and arrives along the course direction, so the plane it bends in contains that direction, and a plane curve seen along a line in its own plane projects to a segment. The upper panel expands the thickness 3× so the arrangement can be seen and no angle may be measured off it; the lower panel is the same fabric at one scale, where the tilt is what it really is. The angle is 11.75°: a climb of one yarn diameter, 0.167 mm, against a drop of a course spacing and a diameter, 0.803 mm. Successive courses overlap by exactly one diameter, which is the interlacing, and the fabric is therefore 0.334 mm thick — two yarn diameters, with nothing fitted.

After the loom

A state is a thickness too

This collection's rule is that a fabric dimension quoted without its relaxation state is not a measurement. A knitted fabric has three dimensions and only two of them obey the rule: its thickness is the same in every state, because the interlacing that sets it does not relax.

Where a loop's bending actually is. Half a stitch — from the crown of a needle loop's head to the bottom of the next sinker loop — with the curvature at every station drawn as a spine standing off the curve, in units of one over the yarn diameter. The centre line is drawn as a line rather than at the yarn's own width here, because the subject of this figure is the curvature and a yarn drawn at true width covers its own spines. The peak is 1.00, at 28% of the way along, and the curvature varies smoothly from one end to the other with no jump anywhere. That smoothness is the whole point: Peirce's construction joins an arc of constant curvature to a straight line of none, so its bending moment steps at the join, and a step in moment is a point force no thread can carry. An elastica has no steps in it, which is why its forces exist at all and his do not.

Mechanics and drape

A thread between two crossings is an elastica

Every crossing force Peirce's thread path can give comes from a tension, and a cloth on a table has none. What presses its threads together there is their own unwillingness to be bent — and recovering that needs a shape nobody had, because a path assembled from an arc and a straight line has a bending moment that jumps.

What the third dimension changes, and by how much. Every number the planar loop model produced, beside the same number with the climb in it, for a 20 tex cotton jersey at a 3.5 mm loop. Four of the five fall and none moves by as much as four per cent, which is the useful part of the answer: the planar model was not wrong about a jersey, it was a projection of the right curve. What it could not have at all is the quantity that is not on this list — the force through the fabric's thickness, 7.81 mN a stitch, which a model with no thickness has nowhere to put.

After the loom

The constants say nothing about thickness

Munden's two constants give a knitted fabric's wale and course spacings from its loop length alone, and the tightness factor collapses every fabric's shape onto one curve. Neither reaches the third dimension: two knits that are one knit in plan are two different thicknesses.

Weaves

A woven cloth asked the same question

A knitted fabric's two adjacent courses occupy the same space by a fifth of a diameter. A woven cloth's two systems overlap by nothing at all in an open cloth and by four and a half per cent in a dense one — and the difference is that they cross rather than run alongside.

$20 tex yarn in one layer and in 2. Sections across the width, to scale, of a cloth of 20 tex cotton at a cover of 0.8, and of the same yarn per area divided into 2 layers two ways: by count, 10.0 tex at the same sett, and by sett, 20 tex at 1/2 of the ends. Divided by count the cloth is 1.41 times as thick with a cover of 0.57 in each layer; divided by sett it is 2.00 times as thick with a cover of 0.40. At the free end of the yarn's stiffness bracket both are exactly as stiff as the single cloth; at the coherent end the first is 0.50 times as stiff and the second 1.00. What the sections cannot show is crimp, which thickens every layer by an amount the weave decides.$ Compound and figured cloths

A double cloth is only softer if its yarn is set

A double cloth is sold as weight without stiffness: two light cloths in place of one heavy one. Divide the same yarn into two layers and the cloth is √2 or twice as thick, but at the free end of a yarn's stiffness bracket — where an unset yarn sits — its bending rigidity does not move at all, because it is the number of fibres across the width times the stiffness of one. Only a set yarn makes the double cloth the softer, and stitching the layers together pushes it the other way.

Pattern and colour

A figured sheer is a negative from one side

A net curtain with a pattern in it carries two patterns, one for each side, and by day they are opposites. A more open figure in a white voile is a dark figure a quarter below its ground from the street and a light one five per cent above it from the room, and after dark the two views trade places exactly. The figure vanishes from the street at one light ratio and from the room at another. And a figure can be made that the room cannot see at all while the street sees it nearly black — along one line of openness and thread tone, and never from both sides at once.

$A knit's warmth is its thickness, and a rib's thickness is a machine setting. Thermal resistance in tog for a 20 tex cotton at a 3.5 mm loop, for a plain jersey and for a one-by-one rib at four bed gaps. The bar is the lower bound and the mark beyond it is the upper — Wiener's two bounds on a mixture of fibre and air at the fabric's own fibre fraction, which is 26.6% for the jersey and falls to 8.9% for the widest rib. The jersey holds 0.088 tog and the rib at five diameters 0.334 — a factor of 3.8, bought entirely by opening the beds. Every one of these is a small fraction of the still-air layer that clings to a garment's outside, which is worth about 1.2 tog on its own.$ Setting and geometry

How dense a knitted fabric is

A fabric's areal weight is what the trade specifies and it says nothing about bulk. Divide it by a thickness and the answer is a density — 0.40 grams a cubic centimetre for a jersey, a quarter of the fibre it is made of — and that quarter, the share of the volume that is not air, is the number every other property follows.

What leaving the plane costs, which is less than nothing. Bending energy a stitch against how far the yarn climbs between one interlacing and the next, for a 20 tex cotton jersey at a 3.5 mm loop. The curve falls. A climb is not an extra bend added to a curve that was otherwise unchanged; it is part of the straight line the thread has to span, so a longer climb leaves less slack to be spent on curvature. At a jersey's own climb of one diameter the energy is 24395 nJ against 25060 for the planar model — 2.7% lower, where an earlier estimate on this site put the ride at three per cent of the loop's bending and had the sign the other way round. At a rib's climb of three or four diameters the fall is 33%.

After the loom

A rib's relaxation is not its bending either

A jersey does not settle where its bending energy is least, and this collection has said so for several rungs. A rib does not either, and the model now says how far from least it would have to go: sixteen yarn diameters of bed gap before the yarn runs out, against the two or three a machine is set to.

What a group of 2 threads behaves as. A group of 2 threads of 250 µm with nothing separating them, beside the single thread of the same width and the single thread of the same yarn, all drawn to one scale. The bars are the group's four readings as ratios. Cover is a width and adds, so the group covers exactly what a 500 µm thread would — with 50 per cent of its yarn. Bending rigidity is a second moment and does not add: 2 threads free to slide give 12.5 per cent of the thick thread's and the same 2 fused into one body give 62.5, so a real group is somewhere between and where depends on friction. Against the thread of the same yarn the two readings point opposite ways: the group covers 1.41 times as much and bends 0.50 times as stiffly if free. What the drawing cannot show is the friction that decides where between the two limits a finished cloth sits.

Weaves

A group is one thread for cover and two for bending

The rung below leaves a limitation standing: two ends with nothing between them lie touching, and whether they behave as one thread of twice the diameter was said to depend on twist, hairiness and finish. Three of the four measures have exact answers with no friction in them and no two agree. A pair covers exactly what a double-diameter thread covers, with half its yarn, and bends at between an eighth and five eighths of its rigidity — and at equal yarn it covers forty per cent more and bends half as stiffly.

Mechanics and drape

What a loop model still cannot say

A planar rod with a natural curvature and point contacts gets a knit's forces, its modulus and its extension. It does not get torsion, it does not get the third dimension the interlacing actually needs, and it does not stop adjacent courses passing through one another — which is why its extension ceiling sits three times beyond any jersey.

A knit is warm because of where its yarn is not

Warmth is a thickness of still air, and until a knitted fabric had a thickness there was nothing to compute. It has one now, and the answer is that a rib's warmth is a machine setting: opening the beds from two diameters to five nearly trebles the fabric's resistance without changing a gram of yarn.

A slack twisted yarn takes a coil of one size. A 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre. Its own torque is 1.177 µN·mm at the free bound, and a rod under tension T is stable while its torque stays under 2·√(B·T). Below that tension the straight state stops being a minimum and the thread wraps on itself at a radius of 1.59 mm. That radius is 2B/M, which is 2/(r·ω) once the torque is written out: it depends on the twist and on the ratio of the two stiffnesses, and on neither stiffness itself.

Setting and geometry

Why a slack yarn snarls

Let go of a twisted thread and it wraps on itself. That is not the yarn being badly behaved: it is a buckling, it has a criterion, and the criterion turns a nuisance into an instrument for measuring the one constant this collection cannot pin down.

How much of a yarn has to hang before it stops snarling. The tension a 20 tex cotton needs to stay straight, at each twist level, expressed as the length of the yarn's own weight that would supply it. The two curves are the two ends of the stiffness bracket: the fibres free to slide, and the section coherent. At 800 turns a metre they are 1.9 metres and 616. Anybody who has let go of a twisted yarn knows which of those is right, which makes this one of very few places where the bracket can be closed from the everyday end. Both rise as the square of the twist, because the torque does and the criterion is quadratic in it.

After the loom

A yarn that has been set has no torque

Every torque on the torsion ladder assumes a yarn is elastic in twist for ever. It is not: a steamed yarn's residual torque is gone, its twist is unchanged, and the process that removes one without the other is the trade's whole answer to liveliness.

A warp rib's cord, at doublings of 2 and 4. One warp end drawn in section along the cloth, over the pick groups of a warp rib, at doublings of 2 and 4 and at one scale. The cord's crests are the pick groups and its two dimensions come from different places. The height is the weft's own crimp amplitude and Peirce's closure condition caps it at the two yarn diameters together — 500 µm here — so it runs 304 µm at a doubling of 2 and 361 at 4, which is 61 and 72 per cent of the ceiling. The pitch is the doubling times the pick spacing and has no ceiling at all. So a larger doubling gives a taller cord and a wider one, and wider faster: the aspect falls from 0.40 to 0.29. What the section cannot show is what a finish does, which flattens the cord without changing either the pitch or the ceiling.

Weaves

A cord's height has a ceiling and its width has none

A warp rib's cord is a wave, and its two dimensions come from two different places. The height is the weft's own crimp amplitude, and Peirce's closure condition caps it at the two yarn diameters together — 500 µm for a quarter-millimetre yarn, of which a 2/2 rib reaches 304 and a 6/6 rib 391. The pitch is the doubling times the pick spacing and has no cap at all. So a bolder rib is taller and wider, and wider faster: the aspect falls from 0.41 to 0.22.

A bouclé cloth jammed at its loops and at its count, overfeed 0.8. Sections across 36 mm of plain-woven cloth in a bouclé of 89 tex — a 20 tex core, a 30 tex effect overfed 80% with loops every 3 mm, and a 15 tex binder — drawn to scale. The loops stand 2.10 mm off the core, so the yarn's outline is 4.43 mm across while the diameter its count implies is 0.352 mm, 12.6 times smaller. Jammed at the outline the cloth takes 1.13 ends a centimetre and weighs 20 g/m²; jammed at the count, 14.2 and 252 g/m². What the drawing cannot show is where between the two a real cloth jams, which is how far its loops interleave with their neighbours'.

Compound and figured cloths

A bouclé is set by its loops and weighed by its count

A bouclé yarn has two diameters: the one its count implies, a third of a millimetre, and the one its loops occupy, over four millimetres. A cloth jams where its yarns touch, and a bouclé's yarns can touch at either — so its jamming sett is a bracket twelve and a half times wide, from 1.1 to 14 ends a centimetre. The weight follows the count wherever in that bracket the cloth is set, which puts the open end at a twelfth of the close end's weight with four per cent of its area covered by yarn.

Mechanics and drape

The modulus a knit has instead of one

A fabric's stiffness in extension is usually its yarn's modulus with the geometry taken out. A knit's is not: dimensionally it can only be a bending rigidity over a length cubed, and the same yarn laid straight and parallel is thirty thousand times stiffer than the fabric made of it.

Setting and geometry

How much yarn has to hang

The tension a thread needs to stay straight, converted into the only unit anybody has an intuition for: the length of the yarn's own weight. One bound says two metres and the other says six hundred, and everybody who has handled thread already knows which.

After the loom

The twist a fabric gives back

A T-shirt that hung straight in the shop has its side seam round the front after three washes. The torque was there all along, the setting had hidden it, and the water gave it back — which makes spirality a finishing failure rather than a knitting one.

A white thread 70% open figure behind a net 60% open, from both sides. A lozenge figure in the inner curtain of a pair, drawn as the street sees it and as the room sees it through a plain net 60% open, with the street 30 : 1 as bright as the room. From the street the figure's contrast against its ground is −7.0% where a single curtain would have given −24.6%; from the room it is +6.9% where a single curtain would have given +5.4%. Each panel is shaded relative to its own brighter region, both at one gain, so the two steps are to scale against each other, and the contrast is stretched 9 times to be visible at all — the numbers rather than the depth of the shading are the measurement. What the drawing cannot show is the light between the two curtains, which is 19.80 times the room's illuminance from the street and 0.57 from the room, nor the thread optics, which are assumed.

Pattern and colour

A net in front gives the figure to the room

The commonest double curtain is a plain net outside a patterned one, and the plain net does not merely dim the pattern. It weakens the figure from the street by a factor of three and a half and strengthens it from the room by a quarter, so a pattern four and a half times stronger outside than in becomes one the room sees slightly better. A figure designed to be invisible from indoors reappears at nearly three per cent, and the day-and-night exchange a single curtain obeyed exactly stops holding at all.

Cloth doing a job

A run cannot cross a bed

A dropped stitch unroves because its neighbour above can pull it out along a path that costs almost nothing. In a rib the neighbour above is on the other bed, and the path goes through the gap — so a run in a two-bed fabric has to pay for a climb before it can take a single loop.

The section the fabric asks for, beside the one the model drew. A 20 tex cotton yarn in cross-section, at 900 times life size. The circle is what every solve in this collection has assumed: a diameter of 0.167 mm from the count and the packing factor. The ellipse has the same area and a minor axis of 78% of it, which is the closest the fabric's own adjacent courses come to one another — 0.130 mm. Nothing about that number was fitted to a fabric. It falls out of a solve that knew nothing about flattening, and it lands inside the range the trade reports for yarn in cloth, which this collection has carried as a free parameter ever since it first put a number on a sett.

Knits and other structures

The flattening nobody fitted

A yarn in cloth is not round, everybody knows it, and nothing has ever predicted how flat. This collection's own knitted geometry turns out to require a flattening of four fifths — from a solve that knew nothing about flattening, made no allowance for it, and would have been written the same way if the idea had never occurred to anybody.

The flattening a knitted fabric asks for, against its own tightness. Every point is a solved fabric — 18 of them, over five loop lengths, three relaxation states and three counts — and the vertical axis is the closest its adjacent courses come, in diameters. The values run from 0.707 to 0.839 and they fall on one curve against the tightness factor, which is the model's only dimensionless group. That is what makes this a structural requirement rather than an arithmetical accident of one example: a tighter fabric demands a flatter yarn, by an amount its own tightness decides, and nothing about the fibre or the count enters except through that group.

After the loom

A wet knit's yarn is flatter

A knitted fabric's own geometry demands a flattened yarn, and how flat depends on how much room the fabric leaves. A wet cotton yarn is a tenth thicker than a dry one at the same length, so a wet fabric leaves less room — and asks its yarn to be flatter by an amount the geometry gives.

How hard each grouping holds its own threads. The grip a cloth has on one of its own threads inside a 10 mm seam allowance, for six members of the doubled family at 24 threads per centimetre and a friction coefficient of 0.3. Grip accumulates multiplicatively at every crossing — the capstan equation on Peirce's own weave angle — so it is exponential in the crossings, and the crossings are the interlacing rate times the intersections in the allowance. The family's interlacing rate has a closed form, (a + b)/2ab, which is half the sum of the two reciprocals — so the two groupings enter symmetrically and each one saturates. The dashed line is the thread's own strength: a cloth whose grip falls short of it lets the thread slide out rather than break, which is seam slippage. A 2/2 hopsack is below it at this allowance and a 1/4 warp rib is above, on cloths whose firmness differs by an eighth. What the bars cannot show is the friction coefficient, which is measured and is not a constant of cloth; the ordering holds at every value anybody reports and the sizes do not.

Weaves

What nothing separates comes out together

The doubled family's interlacing rate has a closed form — half the sum of the two groupings' reciprocals — so a seam's grip on its own threads is the exponential of a harmonic mean, and it saturates in each grouping separately. At a ten-millimetre allowance a 2/2 hopsack holds a thread at seventy-four times the applied tension and a 1/4 warp rib at two hundred and eighteen, on cloths whose firmness differs by an eighth.

Bouclé loops on 3 mm binder spacing at overfeeds of 30%, 80%, 150%, 300%, 500%. Loops of an overfed effect thread drawn to one scale, each between two binder points on a straight core, as the curve of least bending energy with its ends along the core. Overfeed 30%: 1.30 times its base in thread, 1.10 mm tall, a bell, against a semicircle of 0.79 mm; Overfeed 80%: 1.80 times its base in thread, 1.95 mm tall, a bell, against a semicircle of 2.10 mm; Overfeed 150%: 2.50 times its base in thread, 2.92 mm tall, overhanging, against a semicircle of 3.94 mm; Overfeed 300%: 4.00 times its base in thread, 4.83 mm tall, overhanging, against a semicircle of 7.88 mm; Overfeed 500%: 6.00 times its base in thread, 7.25 mm tall, overhanging, against a semicircle of 13.14 mm. The dashed arcs are the semicircles, drawn where they fit. What the drawing cannot show is the binder's own path and thickness, which the loop's feet are taken to sit exactly on.

Compound and figured cloths

A bouclé loop is an elastica, not a semicircle

A bouclé's loop was taken to be a semicircle, and the semicircle cannot be right: it meets the core at a right angle, and at eighty per cent overfeed it is wider than the gap it stands in. Solved as what it is — a length of thread leaving the core along the core at two binder points — the loop is taller than the semicircle below an overfeed of two thirds and shorter above it, overhangs at 119 per cent and closes its neck at 559. Nothing of the fibre is in its shape, and the bouclé's jamming bracket at eighty per cent is 11.7 wide rather than 12.6.

Knits and other structures

A flattening that follows the tightness factor

Eighteen solved fabrics — five loop lengths, three relaxation states, three counts — and the flattening each one's geometry demands falls on a single curve against one dimensionless group. Nothing about the fibre or the count survives except through that group, which is what turns an arithmetical result into a structural requirement.

A bouclé loop at 80 per cent overfeed, pressed to four heights. One loop of a bouclé at 80 per cent overfeed on 3 millimetre binder spacing, drawn to scale at 100, 80, 50, 20 per cent of its free height, with the force it pushes back with beneath each. The pressed loop is the same elastica the free one is, with one condition added: at its apex the tangent is along the core again, so a pressed loop is two half-loops each with its rise prescribed. At 100 per cent it stands 1.95 millimetres and pushes with -0.00 millinewtons; At 80 per cent it stands 1.56 millimetres and pushes with 12.19 millinewtons; At 50 per cent it stands 0.97 millimetres and pushes with 10.02 millinewtons; At 20 per cent it stands 0.39 millimetres and pushes with 4.90 millinewtons. What the drawing cannot show is the stiffness bracket: the force is the lower bound, with the fibres free to slide.

Compound and figured cloths

A loop has a maximum force in it

A bouclé loop pressed by its neighbour is the same elastica the free one is, with one condition added — at its apex the tangent lies along the core again, so a pressed loop is two half-loops with their rise prescribed and needs no contact solve at all. Solved, the eighty-per-cent loop pushes back with nothing at its free height, twelve millinewtons at four fifths of it, and two and a half at a tenth. A curve with a maximum in it is a softening spring, and the promise this account made — a cloth's position read from its beat-up — cannot be kept, because the whole bracket sits at one pressure.

Mechanics and drape

A loop is a plane curve in another plane

A knitted loop was solved as a flat curve because two curves in one plane cannot pass through one another and a loop must. Letting it out of the plane turns out to change nothing about its shape: the loop is still planar, and its plane is the fabric's turned through twelve degrees.

Three rules for how hard to fold a yarn, and which one the trade uses. For 2, 3, 4 folds of 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre: the ratio that makes the fold's surface helix angle equal its singles', the ratio that sets the fold's net moment to zero, and the ratio the trade actually folds at. The surface rule is 1/√n exactly, because a fold of n singles is √n times the diameter. The torque balance is C/(B+C), which for this fibre is 0.201 and is the same at every count, every twist and every number of folds. The trade's brackets contain the surface rule in all three rows and the torque balance in none of them.

Setting and geometry

The folding rule is a surface angle

Fold at two thirds for two singles, six tenths for three, a half for four. Those are one over the square root of the fold count, they are what makes a fold's surface twist angle equal its singles', and all three of the trade's brackets contain the number exactly.

The section the fabric asks for, beside the one the model drew. A 24.2 tex cotton yarn in cross-section, at 900 times life size. The circle is what every solve in this collection has assumed: a diameter of 0.184 mm from the count and the packing factor. The ellipse has the same area and a minor axis of 76% of it, which is the closest the fabric's own adjacent courses come to one another — 0.140 mm. Nothing about that number was fitted to a fabric. It falls out of a solve that knew nothing about flattening, and it lands inside the range the trade reports for yarn in cloth, which this collection has carried as a free parameter ever since it first put a number on a sett.

After the loom

The diameter that does need a state

A fabric dimension quoted without its relaxation state is not a measurement. The rule was applied to the two plan dimensions and then to the thickness, and it was never applied to the one dimension that is not the fabric's at all — the yarn's.

A 100-gram bouclé in section, with the depth to its own load path. A bouclé cloth of 100 grams a square metre in section: the core and binder along the bottom, carrying everything, with the effect thread's loops standing 0.31 millimetres above them. The cloth's surface is the loops and nothing else — its loop envelope is 12.6 times its count diameter — so a rubbing surface meets effect thread first and reaches the core only after that depth. 60.7 per cent of the yarn's mass is effect thread on no load path and 39.3 per cent is core and binder. What the section cannot show is the third dimension: the loops of neighbouring yarns lie between these and are pressed by them.

Compound and figured cloths

A bouclé wears from the loops down

A cloth loses its strength before its mass, because a woven cloth's crowns are the very threads that carry the tension. A bouclé inverts it exactly. Its surface is its loops, its loops hang off a core that carries everything, and 61 per cent of its yarn is on no load path at all — so a rub takes three tenths of a millimetre of thread that does nothing before it reaches anything that does, and the cloth is ruined to look at while it is still as strong as it was woven.

The fold the trade actually makes. 2 singles of 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre, folded at 566 — a ratio of 0.707. That is 1/√2, the ratio at which the fold's surface helix angle equals its singles' — 22.8° — because a fold of 2 singles is √2 times the diameter. The trade's own bracket for 2 folds is 0.6 to 0.75, and it contains this number.

Setting and geometry

What a balanced yarn is balanced about

A specification that says a yarn is balanced does not say which of two conditions it means, and the two have different numbers, different dependences and different consequences. One of them is what folding achieves and the other is what folding is said to achieve.

Cloth doing a job

A knot halves a yarn and says why

The rule is quoted for every rope and every knot and derived nowhere. It comes out at forty-six per cent for a cotton — but only if the yarn's fibres bend individually. A yarn bending as a solid section has already spent five times its breaking strain before any load arrives, so it could not be knotted at all.

A cotton yarn at a fold, at both ends of its bending bracket. The same 20 tex cotton yarn bent to a radius of 0.084 mm under the two assumptions this site's bending bracket is drawn between. If the fibres slide freely past one another each bends about its own middle and the surface strain is 7.14%; if they are locked the bundle bends as a rod and the outermost fibre is strained 100%. The ratio is 14.0, which is the ratio of the two diameters and therefore the square root of the fibre count over the packing — so the bracket of 327 this site carries in a stiffness is a bracket of 14.0 in a strain. What the drawing cannot show is which of the two a real yarn does, and the answer is settled by a refusal: at the tightest fold a cloth can make, the locked bound asks for a strain of one, and a creased cloth does not fall apart.

After the loom

A wrinkle cannot settle what a crease settles

The first rung of this ladder found that a pressed crease decides a question this collection had been unable to settle for two fields — whether a bent yarn's fibres slide or bend as one body — and it decides it by refusing: the coherent branch would strain the fibres by eighty-four per cent and cotton breaks at six. A wrinkle is the same fold at twenty times the radius, and there both branches are survivable. So the bracket that a crease collapses stays fourteen times wide at every radius anybody actually creases a cloth at accidentally.

Setting and geometry

A cabled yarn is a fold of folds

The rule that sets a fold's twist is one over the square root of the number of components. Apply it twice and a cabled yarn's three twist levels are fixed by two integers — which is a prediction with no free constants, about a class of yarn the trade quotes no rule for at all.

Cloth doing a job

Which yarns knot well

A knot's efficiency depends on three things and only one of them is the knot. The other two are the fibre's fineness and its breaking strain, and across this collection's own table those give efficiencies from six per cent to eighty-three at exactly the same bend.

A 4-layer stack round a 180° fold. 4 layers of 260 µm cloth taken round a 180 degree fold, drawn as concentric arcs at their own separation. The outer layer runs round a larger radius than the inner one, so it must be longer — by the angle times the separation, which is 2.45 mm here and 0.82 mm at every interface. In a loose stack that length is found by the layers sliding over one another at the fold. In a stitched seam they cannot: the stitches pin them every 3 mm, so the slip a fold needs is 82 per cent of the distance between two stitches and has nowhere to come from. What the arcs cannot show is what happens instead, which is that the fold opens out to a radius the stack can manage.

After the loom

A crease cannot cross a seam

The outer layer of a folded stack has further to go than the inner, by the fold's angle times the stack's own thickness. A four-layer seam of quarter-millimetre cloth taken through a half turn needs its outer layer to be 2.45 millimetres longer than its inner — and a stitch line every three millimetres has pinned them. So the fold opens out where it crosses the seam, which is what a trouser crease visibly does, and the arithmetic gives the radius it opens to.

Compound and figured cloths

A damask is the only figure that costs its beam nothing

Figure and ground consume warp at different rates, and the difference accumulates down the length of the figure. An eight-end satin figure on a plain ground puts its two regions fourteen per cent apart, which on a loom absorbing a millimetre of slack bounds the figure at eight and a half millimetres. A damask's two regions are the same satin used two ways, so complementation leaves both float lengths where they were — and their crimps are identical rather than close, to the last bit of a double.

What cloth is

A cotton's own water is a twentieth of what a cloth holds

A wet cloth keeps water in three places and only one of them is the fibre. A sheeting saturated holds 113 per cent of its own dry weight: 7.5 per cent of that inside the cotton as regain, 39 per cent in the channels between the fibres of its yarns, and 54 per cent in the holes four threads bound. The same construction in polyester, whose regain is a fortieth of cotton's, holds 105 per cent — an eight-point difference from a fortyfold one, because absorbency is a geometry with a fibre in it rather than a fibre with a geometry round it.

The surface of every even six-end shading, against the twill's. The height of the cloth's surface at each tone of a six-end shading on a sheeting at 0.50 N, for every chain of the 64 even classes, drawn once per distinct shape — 5 of them — and for the cyclic square's twill read one step at a time. The twill is level to the micrometre and floats 5, 4, 3, 4, 5. Every even chain sinks to exactly 43.3 µm at its midtone; the shapes differ only at the second and fourth tones. What the plot cannot show is which of these a raking light would reveal, which depends on the finish.

Pattern and colour

An even shading cannot keep its surface level

Sixty-four six-end shadings hold every middle tone to a float of two, and the question left over was whether any of them keeps a tone ramp's surface level the way a twill read in order does. None does, and all of them sink by exactly the same depth — 43.3 micrometres on a sheeting, a sixth of the cloth. The reason is a counting argument a recording engineer would recognise: a limit on how long a thread may float is a limit on run length, and a run-length limit forces a floor on how often the thread changes face. A level ramp needs every tone at the extremes' rate, which needs a float of half the repeat at the midtone and more beside it — exactly the floats the twill in order has.

How little eccentricity a curl needs. The radius a jersey would curl to, against how far the fabric's neutral surface fails to bisect its loops. The model's own loop is bisected exactly — its crest sits half a diameter behind the mid-surface and its trough half a diameter in front — so it carries no curling moment at all, and the curve here is what any departure from that would buy. The moment is proportional to the eccentricity, so one solve settles the whole curve. A radius of three millimetres, which is about what a fine jersey rolls to, needs 5.6% of a yarn diameter — 9.4 micrometres on a yarn 167 micrometres across. That is why curl is easy to see and hard to model: the whole of it lives inside a rounding error on the geometry. Only the course-wise edges are drawn, because bending about the other axis turns the thread's end tangents out of the fabric and a free thread given turned ends buckles clean out of it — 3.2 times the fabric's own thickness, for 37% off its energy. That configuration is not available to a thread with neighbours, so the second moment is refused rather than computed.

Mechanics and drape

How little asymmetry a curl needs

A model with a thickness can finally be asked why stockinette rolls. It answers that it does not — its curling moment is exactly zero, by a symmetry — and the useful part is what that costs to break: five per cent of a yarn diameter buys the whole of the curl anybody has ever seen.

Setting and geometry

What a high-twist yarn costs a cloth

Twist buys strength up to a point and then loses it, and everything else it does is a cost. A crepe twist is chosen knowing that, and the trade's twist limits are a balance among five quantities that this collection can now put beside one another.

A tube of an elastic band knitted 157 mm round, up one leg. A tube knitted 157 mm round from an elastic band, pulled up an illustrative leg and read at four stations. At each the tube is stretched by the leg's circumference over its own, pulls back with the band's tension at that stretch, and presses with that tension over the leg's radius: ankle 22 cm, stretched 40%, 20.0 mmHg; lower calf 29 cm, stretched 85%, 32.1 mmHg; calf 36 cm, stretched 129%, 39.4 mmHg; below the knee 34 cm, stretched 116%, 37.6 mmHg. The calf is pressed 1.97 times as hard as the ankle. What the bars cannot show is the leg's own give, which a firm tube flattens and which changes the radius the law divides by.

Cloth doing a job

A tube of one size presses the calf harder than the ankle

A band presses a limb with its tension over the limb's radius, so it is easy to conclude that a band grips hardest where the limb is thinnest. That is true of a band held at one tension, and no knitted tube is. A tube knitted to one size is stretched further wherever the leg is thicker, and its tension rises faster than the radius does: an elastic tube pressing an ankle at twenty millimetres of mercury presses the calf at thirty-nine, and a cotton jersey tube presses its calf three and a half times as hard as its ankle. A stocking graduated the other way has to pull hardest where it presses less.

Which knitted structures present a float a raising wire could catch. Each of the named two-bed structures, with how many of its floats lie exposed on a face rather than inside the cloth. A plain jersey has no float at all; the ribs and the cardigans have none; the interlocks and milanos have floats and every one of them is interior, closed over by the other fabric. a single jersey with a float and a three-by-one rib with a float present an exposed float, on the back. So the criterion that decides which woven cloths can be napped decides the same question here and answers it for 2 of 13. What the bars cannot show is the hair layer, which a wire also catches and which no float census can see.

After the loom

A jersey has no float for a wire to catch

Only a float can be raised, and the four-by-four census answers which woven cloths qualify: two. Asked of a knit the same question needs this collection's knitted float rather than a draft's, and the answer is that a plain jersey has no float at all — not a short one, none — while the ribs and cardigans have none either and the interlocks and milanos have floats every one of which is interior. Of 1,135 two-bed structures a machine could make, twenty present a float a wire could hook, and not one of them presents it on both faces.

The suction water supplies, against the pressure twist supplies. The pressure pressing a yarn's fibres together, against its twist, with the suction inside the menisci of a damp yarn's own pores drawn as a level. The suction is 0.0624 newtons a square millimetre — 2γ over the pore radius of 2.3 micrometres — and it does not depend on the twist at all. The twist's pressure crosses it at about 186 turns a metre, so water is worth as much as the first 186 turns and nothing more: at 600 turns it is 11 per cent of what the twist already supplies. What the chart cannot show is the saturation, at which the suction vanishes because a full yarn has no meniscus in it.

What cloth is

A wet fibre is stiffer and a wet yarn is not locked

The intuitive reason a damp cloth stiffens is that water pulls the fibres together — a meniscus is curved, the pressure inside it is below atmospheric, and the suction presses the assembly exactly as twist does. Computed, that suction is worth the first 186 turns a metre of twist and nothing after them: six per cent of what an ordinary yarn's twist already supplies, and nowhere near enough to stop the fibres sliding. What wetting actually does is fatten the fibres, and a fibre's bending rigidity goes as the fourth power of its diameter — so a wet cotton fibre is 2.07 times as stiff with no contact in the argument at all.

Mechanics and drape

What a knit gives up when it is pressed

The woven half of this collection has had a compression curve for several rungs — a thickness that falls under load, a bearing area that grows, a pressure at every point. The knitted half had a plan and no depth. It has a relaxed thickness and an initial slope now, and the two fabrics turn out to resist for different reasons.

Setting and geometry

What a sett is when the yarn is not round

A jamming condition says how close threads can be set, and it says it in terms of a diameter. A thread in a cloth does not have one diameter: it has a wide one and a narrow one, and which of them a jam is about depends on which way the threads are jamming.

An inflated tube in section at 0.5, 1, 1.6 times its wrinkling moment. The cross-section of an inflated tube of 100 mm radius at 50 kPa, bent by 0.5 times, 1 times, 1.6 times its wrinkling moment of 78.5 N·m, with the outside of the bend at the top. Each stroke is the wall's axial tension at that point: the pressure's even 2.5 kN/m with the bending's cosine added. At half the wrinkling moment the inside is still in tension; at the wrinkling moment it falls to nothing; past it the inside has gone slack over a dashed arc and the rest carries both the pressure's end force and the moment. What the drawing cannot show is the wrinkles themselves, whose wavelength a cloth's bending stiffness decides and this section leaves out.

Cloth doing a job

An inflated beam wrinkles at a moment with no cloth in it

An air-filled tube can be used as a beam because the pressure pulls its cloth taut along its length, and a cloth that cannot carry a push can carry a bending moment for exactly as long as that pull outweighs it. The inside of the bend goes slack at πpr³/2 and the tube folds at πpr³ — seventy-nine and a hundred and fifty-seven newton metres for a tube a fifth of a metre across at half a bar — and there is no property of the cloth in either. The cloth decides how far the beam bends on the way, and how much pressure it can be pumped to.

The beams a disc 12 blocks across needs, column by column. A disc 12 blocks across, 12 blocks by 12, figure shaded, with the beam feeding each column of ends written above it, for a figure floating 8 on a ground floating 1, whose warp crimps are 14.15 per cent apart, at 4 mm blocks over a 100 m piece with 1.2 mm of slack. It has 4 distinct columns and 4 distinct shares of the repeat in figure, and needs 4 beams. What the grid cannot show is the cloth's own crimp interchange, which would move tension between the columns instead.

Compound and figured cloths

A figured warp needs a beam for every share of its figure

Figure and ground take up warp at different rates, so a figured cloth on one beam is bounded in how long its figure may run, and a second beam is the obvious escape. It escapes only for ends that live wholly in one region. An end that crosses the figure for part of the repeat consumes warp at its own rate, and two ends can share a beam only if they spend the same share of the repeat in the figure and never drift a slack apart inside it. So a round figure twelve blocks across needs four beams, ninety-six blocks across needs twenty-nine, and any crimp difference at all — a third of a per cent will do — costs every one of them over a piece.

A fibre's two stiffnesses, as the ratio that survives the bracket. C over B for every fibre in the table, at 20 tex, which is 2G/E and nothing else. The mark beyond each bar is the range the shear modulus is reported over. Glass is the control and is not a measurement: it is a drawn isotropic solid, so its ratio must be 1/(1+ν) and at ν = 0.2 that is 0.833, which is what the table says. Every fibre with molecules drawn out along its axis sits below the isotropic value, and the ordering is the subject rather than an accident — a fibre is stiff along its axis because its molecules are drawn out along it, and the same orientation that raises E leaves G to whatever holds one chain to the next. Aramid, the most oriented thing here, is twenty times softer in torsion relative to its bending than the glass beside it.

Mechanics and drape

A thread has a second stiffness

Every mechanical number here came from one material constant: how hard a thread is to bend. A thread also resists being twisted, nothing here has ever used that, and the ratio between the two turns out to be the only stiffness number about a yarn that can be known at all.

Setting and geometry

What a flattened yarn does to its cover

A cover factor is a sett times a diameter, and it decides how much of a cloth is thread and how much is hole. A flattened yarn is a third wider than a round one of the same area, so a cloth of flattened yarn covers more at the same sett — and every opacity, permeability and shade computed from a round diameter is wrong in one direction.

8/3 at 1.00 and 8/3 at 1.29, drawn in cloth. Satin marks drawn over two repeats at the spacings of a cloth, with the pick direction stretched by the sett ratio — ends per centimetre over picks per centimetre — and every closest pair of marks joined. 8-end satin, move 3 at a sett ratio of 1.000: closest pairs point one way: a row; 8-end satin, move 3 at a sett ratio of 1.291: closest pairs point 2 ways: no row. What the drawing cannot show is the float each mark interrupts, which is what a reader of the cloth actually sees.

Weaves

A satin's row belongs to its sett

Point paper draws an end and a pick as equal squares, and every result about which satins have a row was taken there. A cloth is not square: it is set at so many ends and so many picks a centimetre, and in cloth the ties that made twelve satin orders row-free are ties between steps of different shape, which break at the first per cent of unequal sett. The reverse happens too. An eight-end satin, rowed on paper, has no row at exactly 1.291 ends per pick; an eleven-end at 1.265 and 1.528. And the only scatter that survives a range of setts is an irregular satin whose closest steps are mirror images — which nine ends has from the first per cent and ten only by 1.3.

Mechanics and drape

Twist is not torsion

A curve has a torsion and a material has a twist, they share a word, and only one of them is what a torsional rigidity resists. Getting them the wrong way round would have made this collection conclude that a knitted loop carries no twist, on the strength of a theorem that says nothing of the kind.

Setting and geometry

The count that decides how flat

A knitted fabric's demanded flattening is a function of its tightness factor, and a tightness factor is the square root of a count over a loop length. So a coarser yarn at the same loop is flatter — which is a prediction about a spinner's choice that nobody has framed as one.

How many derivation orbits each measure separates. For the 426 four-by-four cloths in 157 derivation orbits, the number of classes each invariant measure cuts the orbits into: marks, up to exchanging face and back, 5; interlacings, 8; layers, 2; plane group, 12; floats of both faces, both systems, 60; changes of face per end and per pick, 12; distinct ends and distinct picks, 4; all seven familiar measures, 120; census of two-by-two patches, 127; all seven, and the two-by-two patches, 153; census of three-by-three patches, 157. Only the census of three-by-three patches reaches 157. What the bars cannot show is which orbits a measure confuses, which the pair figure draws for the seven measures together.

Weaves

A cloth's derivation class is its census of small patches

The manuals' derivations cut the 426 four-by-four cloths into 157 orbits, and an orbit is found by searching a group of 256 operations. The question left was whether a short list of numbers read off a draft could do the same job. The familiar ones cannot. Marks, interlacings, layers, plane group, float lengths, crossings per thread and distinct ends and picks are all invariant, and all seven together tell 120 of the orbits apart. A census of the two-by-two patches a draft contains tells 127 apart. A census of its three-by-three patches tells all 157 apart — a complete invariant of derivation, computed by counting windows rather than by searching operations.

Mechanics and drape

The one fibre whose answer is known

A table of measured constants is worth what its worst row is worth, and nobody can tell which row that is. This one has a member whose answer was known before anybody measured it, and the ordering of the other nine turns out to say something about how fibres are made.

Two stiffnesses, one bracket, and a ratio that does not move. The bending and torsional rigidities of a cotton yarn against its count, each drawn at both ends of its own bracket, on a logarithmic scale. The four curves are two parallel pairs: the torsional bracket is the bending bracket exactly — the fibre count over the square of the packing factor, 327 at 20 tex — so the vertical gap between the two bounds is the same for both deformations. The consequence is the useful part: the ratio C/B is 0.250 at the top of the bracket and at the bottom and everywhere between, because the polar second moment of a circle is exactly twice its flexural one.

Mechanics and drape

Where a torsion model stops

A second stiffness was added because an earlier ladder named its absence as the first thing to disbelieve. It settled four things, refuted one trade explanation, and left the question it was built for exactly where it found it.

What flattening costs, against what the loop's bending is worth. The energy of squashing a 20 tex cotton to the 78% the fabric's geometry demands, as a multiple of the whole bending energy of one stitch, at three lateral rigidities. The free bound is exactly zero: a bundle of fibres free to slide resists a change of shape at constant area not at all, so flattening is free and the bracket on it has no floor. The coherent bound is 36 times the loop's bending, so a yarn that could not rearrange could not be knitted into this fabric at all. The fabric flattens, so it is reading the free end — which is the fourth ordinary observation on this site to land at that end of the bracket.

Mechanics and drape

Flattening is free and impossible

The fabric demands a flattening and the yarn has to supply it. At one end of this collection's oldest bracket the deformation costs exactly nothing; at the other it costs thirty-six times the whole bending energy of a stitch. The fabric flattens — which is the fourth everyday observation in one phase to land at the same end.

What flattening a section does to the ratio of the two stiffnesses. C/B is 2G/E for a circular section, because a circle's polar second moment is exactly twice its flexural one. A flattened section has two different flexural moments — easy about the long axis, hard about the short one — and the polar moment is still their sum, which is the perpendicular axis theorem and holds for any section whatever. So a flattened thread has three constants rather than two, and the multiplier on C/B depends on which way it is being bent. At the 0.78 a knitted fabric's own geometry demands, the easy direction multiplies the ratio by 1.322 and the hard one by 0.804. A knitted loop bends in the easy direction, so the collection's headline ratio is a lower bound for a yarn in cloth.

Mechanics and drape

The section that changes both stiffnesses

A thread's two rigidities are in the ratio 2G/E, and that is a fact about a circular section: a circle's polar second moment is exactly twice its flexural one. A yarn in cloth is not circular, so a yarn in cloth has three constants rather than two — and the ratio a whole ladder rests on is a lower bound.

Mechanics and drape

A fabric reads its own bracket four ways

A yarn's stiffness is unknown to a factor of three hundred, and no laboratory measurement has closed it. Four unrelated everyday observations — a snarl, a knot, a flattened yarn and a cloth's own thickness — all say the same thing about which end of it a yarn sits at.

All themes