Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
Concept

Pilling — where it appears

The standing population of entangled balls of fibre held to a fabric's surface by a few anchor fibres. It is a generation rate times a lifetime: the first belongs to the fuzz supply and the construction, the second to how much force an anchor takes to break.

Named by 9 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Whether a cloth's hairs can reach one another. n_A λ² for each construction in this site's table — the hairs per square millimetre times the square of their own length, which is the pure number that asks whether a hair can touch its neighbour. It is a count times an area, so it has to be a pure number. Every one of them is under one, which means no ordinary woven cotton cloth has a hair layer at all: it has isolated whiskers on a bare surface. The dashed line is the threshold. The spread across the whole table is only 1.9-fold, because the density goes as the sett times the root of the count and those move in opposite directions as a cloth is made finer — so construction is almost powerless here, and everything that crosses this threshold does so by finishing rather than by weaving.

A knit gives up its fibres more easily

Knitwear pills and shirting does not, and the fibres are often the same fibres. The difference is a count of yarn per unit area and a pressure between threads, and both of them push a knit over a threshold that a woven cloth of the same yarn cannot reach.

knits · Knit A hair layer is a balance, so singeing does not stay done. The hair population of a 20 tex cotton yarn under rubbing, started from a singed cloth and from an unusually fuzzy one. Abrasion does two opposite things: it frees ends that spinning left buried, from a supply of 2.23 per millimetre in the surface shell, and it removes hairs that are long enough to be caught. Where the two meet is a fixed point at 1.43 per millimetre, and the cloth goes there from either side with the same time constant — 248 cycles to halve the distance, whichever direction it is travelling. A singeing is therefore undone in a few hundred rubs, because the flame changed the stock and not the balance. What is predicted here is that a fixed point exists, that it does not remember the starting state, and that one rate serves both directions; where it sits relative to the spun level needs two rates the model does not supply, and it is set to reproduce the one thing everyone has noticed, which is that fabrics get fuzzier as they are worn.

A hair layer is a balance, not a stock

Singeing takes under one per cent of a cloth's mass and changes its lustre, its friction, its printability and its pilling. It also does not stay done, because rubbing frees fibre ends as fast as it breaks them off, and a flame changes the stock while leaving the balance exactly where it was.

finishing · Hairiness How much of an abrasion loss is not damage. The share of a reported abrasion mass loss that is hair rather than cloth, for sheeting as woven and raised 64-fold. The first material off a fabric is its hair layer, which is 0.107% of a bare cloth's mass and 6.84% of a napped one's — and which regenerates, so it keeps coming off. A bare cloth is through it by 5344 cycles and the test then reaches the crowns, where the loss means damage. A napped cloth is not through it by 342000, which is more cycles than any standard test runs, so a Martindale on a fleece never measures the fabric at all. Two cloths taken to the same mass loss have therefore not lost the same thing, and the more heavily napped one may not have been damaged. a-cloth-loses-its-strength-before-its-mass made the same point about a different pair of quantities; this is the same failure one layer further out.

Abrasion takes the hairs first

An abrasion test reports milligrams lost against cycles, and the first milligrams off any fabric are not fabric. On a bare cloth that stage is over in a few thousand cycles. On a napped one it is not over by the end of the test, so a Martindale on a fleece never measures the fleece.

applied · Damage The strong fibre is the one that pills. Standing pills per unit area by fibre, relative to wool, at one and the same fuzz supply — every row is the same cloth raised the same amount, so the only thing varying is how long a pill survives once it exists. A pill is not made, it is kept: rubbing generates it and rubbing breaks the fibres that tie it down, and a tie survives in proportion to how much force it takes to break. So polyester carries 18 times wool's standing population from the same generation rate, and the ordering here is exactly the ordering of tenacity and nothing else. Wool sheds its pills because wool's ties break. No two real fabrics have the same fuzz supply, which is why a wool knit still pills more than a cotton shirting in practice — the comparison drawn here isolates the tie and says nothing about the generation, and reading it as a ranking of fabrics would be wrong.

A pill is anchored, not made

Every account of pilling starts with how a ball of fibre forms and stops there, which explains why fabrics pill and not why some of them stay pilled. A pill is not a thing that happens; it is a standing population, and the number on a fabric at any moment is a generation rate times a lifetime.

applied · Pilling A fifth of a strong fibre buys most of its pilling. How long a pill survives on a wool fabric as nylon is blended into it, relative to the pure wool. A pill is held by several anchor fibres and survives while any of them holds, so its life is set by the strongest anchor it happens to have — and the chance that a pill with 8 anchors has at least one strong one is 1 − (1 − x)^8, which is already 83% at a fifth. The blend therefore gets 83% of the pure strong fibre's pill life while keeping the whole of the weak fibre's fuzz supply, which is the worst of both. Nine tenths of the way arrives by 30%. No average of the two fibres' properties produces this curve: it is a maximum over a small sample, and a maximum is not an average. It is also why a fifteen-per-cent polyamide in a wool knit is notorious, and the arithmetic says the reputation is deserved.

The strong fibre is the one that pills

A pill survives while any one of its anchors holds, which is a maximum over a small sample rather than an average — and a maximum behaves nothing like an average. A fifth of a strong fibre in a blend buys four fifths of the pure strong fibre's pill life while leaving the whole of the weak fibre's fuzz supply in place.

applied · Pilling What a raising machine can catch in a 2/2 twill. The draft with every weft float long enough for a raising wire to lift marked on it. The teeth need an unsupported length of thread on the surface, so a cloth in which every thread is bound at every crossing offers them nothing at all — which is why a napped fabric is always a twill or a satin and never a plain weave.

What holds a nap in a knit

A fibre buried in a woven cloth breaks rather than slides once about thirty-four millimetres of it is held, and a cotton staple buries about fourteen. In a knit the same figure is over a metre — seventy-five times the burial available — so nothing is ever close, and a raised knit sheds for the whole of its life.

finishing · Nap What holds a thread in, as two factors. The two quantities whose product is the grip on a buried thread, for a woven poplin and a jersey of the same yarn. Each contact in the knit is lighter by 8.0 times, and the contacts are further apart by 5.6 — one per half loop length against one per thread spacing. They multiply rather than competing, so the grip per millimetre of buried thread is 31 times weaker in the knit, and the crossover length at which a thread breaks rather than slides moves with it: 11.6 mm in the cloth and 461 in the knit. The two factors are drawn separately because their product is two orders of magnitude and a bar chart of it would put the knit's bar below the width of a line.

The knitted pilling criterion gets its number

Knitwear pills and shirting does not, and the standing explanation here has been that a knit presents more exposed yarn under less pressure between its threads. The second half had no number. It has one now, and it is bigger than the argument needed: the grip on a buried fibre is thirty times weaker in a knit than in a woven cloth of the same yarn.

applied · Pilling The fibre pieces in one cut tuft. A cut-pile tuft 3 mm tall on a 1 mm base, spun from a 25 mm staple, with a seeded sample of its fibre pieces drawn along the yarn: 16 pass under the binding pick and 2 lie wholly in one leg, between a fibre end and the cut tip. Across a whole pile the loose share is 21.9 per cent of the pieces and 7.0 per cent of the fibre. What the drawing cannot show is the twist, which holds the loose pieces by friction and is what they escape from.

A blade leaves loose fibre in every tuft

The account of hair, nap and pile ended on a clean claim: a blade collapses a population's length to one value, so a cut pile has no tail and nothing in it reaches past the rest. The tips are one length. The fibres are not. A tuft cut from staple yarn is a length of yarn with fibre ends scattered along it, and every fibre end that lands in a leg leaves a piece between it and the blade that nothing in the draft holds — a fifth of the pieces in an ordinary wool carpet, none in a filament one.

fancy · Pile Which loose pieces in a cut tuft are free at once. A cut-pile tuft 12 mm tall on a 2 mm base, spun from a 90 mm staple, with a seeded sample of its fibre pieces drawn along the yarn and the tip's untwisted run-out, 5.6 mm, shaded down each leg. 22 pieces pass under the binding pick; of the 9 that lie wholly in one leg, 3 lie wholly inside the run-out, where the twist presses on nothing, and are free at once; the other 6 reach down into twisted yarn and are held until wear opens the twist further. What the drawing cannot show is the run-out's edge, which is a fall in pressure rather than a line.

A cut pile sheds in two stages

Every cut tuft of staple yarn holds loose fibre pieces that nothing anchors but the twist, and at the tip the twist holds nothing: it runs out over a length the grip arithmetic already gives, five and a half millimetres in a wool carpet yarn. A loose piece lying wholly inside that run-out is free the day the carpet is laid; one reaching below it is held until walking opens the tip's twist. So the reservoir drains in two stages, and the pile height decides the split. A velvet sheds everything it will ever shed at once. A twelve-millimetre wool carpet sheds a fifth of its reservoir at once and four fifths later. A shag sheds almost nothing at first and fourteen per cent of its fibre eventually.

fancy · Pile

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Hair layerCanopy criterionHair balanceAbrasionContact forceLoop lengthRaisingSingeingCapstanCrossover lengthEscape fractionFriction

All concepts