Theme

The thread: Measured, not claimed — page 2

Page 2 of 6 of the essays on this thread.

Where a bias cut's waste actually is. A bolt of cloth with panels placed at a stated angle, the ones that fit drawn and the rest of the cloth left shaded. Identical panels at a single angle tile the plane exactly, so the interior of the bolt loses nothing at all and the whole of the waste is at the two selvedges. The inset is the single-panel bounding box, which is the picture the usual account of bias cutting draws.

The bias cut and the selvedge

A bias-cut square costs exactly twice its own area, and every other shape costs more. That is an exact result about one panel — and it is not where a cutting room's waste comes from, because identical panels at one angle tile the plane. The loss is at the two selvedges, so it falls as the cloth gets wider, which no account in terms of the diagonal can explain.

Z twist at 800 turns per metre. A 20 tex cotton yarn, 0.167 mm across, with its surface fibres drawn as the helices they are. The angle between a surface fibre and the yarn's axis is 22.8°, and it is the only quantity in this family: the yarn is 4.1% shorter than the fibre in it and carries 85% of the strength the same fibre would give lying straight.

Setting and geometry

Twist is one angle

Every model on this site treats a yarn as a cylinder with a diameter. It is a bundle of loose fibres, and what makes it behave like a cylinder is twist — which is a helix, so the whole subject is one angle, and the trade's twist factor turns out to be the only combination of count and turns that decides anything.

A ratio that will not hold still. The exchange rate between the two directions for 4 cloths, against how far each has been extended along the warp. Every curve is above one half everywhere it is drawn, and every curve rises — so a single number for a cloth's ratio has to name the state it was read at, which a material's ratio does not.

Mechanics and drape

A cloth's Poisson ratio is not a material's

The ratio of a cloth's contraction to its extension has a name everywhere else in mechanics, and it breaks every rule the name comes with — above one half on all eight cloths measured, doubling across a four per cent span, and not reciprocal between the two directions.

rib-float in section. A two-bed structure seen in section across the wales, over 3 repeats of course 1. The front bed's loops sit on the upper line and the back bed's on the lower one, offset by 0.5 of a needle pitch because the gating is rib. Of the 2 floats in the repeat, 2 lie in the gap between the beds and 0 on a surface. The upper panel is the fabric at the machine and the lower one is the same course with the beds closed up, which is what happens when the fabric is cast off — and neither panel is a relaxed fabric, because the loops are drawn as arches of one size and a real one settles wherever the yarn's bending leaves it.

Knits and other structures

A second bed changes what a float is

Every float so far has been on a surface, because every knit so far has had one needle bed. Put a bed behind it and the yarn runs in the gap between them — and over the whole enumeration of two-bed structures, 1,248 floats of 1,272 lie inside the cloth, on no surface at all.

Swelling, at the same count. The same yarn before and after mercerisation, drawn to one scale. Its linear density has not changed — the same grams per kilometre go into the cloth — but the fibre occupies more volume, which is a lower packing factor and a larger diameter. Every consequence in this field follows from that single number.

After the loom

Mercerising is a packing factor

Cotton held in caustic soda swells, and everything the treatment is famous for follows from one number in this site's diameter calculation. The lustre it is actually sold for does not, and saying which consequences are computed and which are not is the whole of the discipline here.

Z twill, Z twist. A square of cloth with two directions on it. The broad lines are the twill, whose angle 45.0° from the warp comes from the setts alone — 24 ends and 24 picks per centimetre. The fine lines are the surface fibres of the warp ends, at 25.3° from the warp because the yarn is twisted 900 turns per metre. Between them is 19.7°, and that is the whole of the rule.

Setting and geometry

Twist and the twill line

The oldest rule of thumb in weaving says to weave a Z twill from S-twist warp for a bold line and from Z-twist warp for a subdued one. Both halves of it are geometry: the twill's angle comes from the two setts, the fibres' angle comes from the twist factor, and the rule is their difference.

Every cloth at 150 grams. The counts and setts that all weigh 150 g/m² at a crimp of 7 per cent and a balance of 1. Hollow marks are past the jam — arithmetic rather than cloth. Among the 10 that can be woven the cover factor runs from 0.28 to 0.77, a factor of 2.77, and every one of them is the fabric the specification asked for.

Setting and geometry

What a fabric weighs

Every fabric is sold by its weight in grams per square metre, and the number is a sum of four products in which no term appears alone. One equation, four unknowns: a hundred and fifty grams describes an open coarse cloth and a close fine one, and the cover factors differ by a factor of nearly three.

Compound and figured cloths

What holds a pick in

A plain weave grips its weft by the crimp, and the crimp's wrap angle falls towards nothing as the cloth opens out. A leno crossing is half a turn whatever the sett. So the comparison has an exact answer that does not depend on the friction coefficient at all — and no plain weave can ever reach a leno's grip.

Cloth doing a job

What holds a thread in a seam

A seam fails in two quite different ways, and the one the trade worries about is not the stitches breaking. It is the cloth's own threads sliding out of the weave beside the seam — and what resists that is friction at the crossings, accumulating multiplicatively, so a satin gives a seam a thousandth of the grip a plain weave gives it.

A thread withdrawn from a plain weave and from a satin. One pick of a sheeting being pulled from 1.60 mm of cloth, in a plain weave and in a five-end satin, at a friction coefficient of 0.30. The drawn width of each thread is the tension in it at that point, to a common scale; the faint rules are where the thread actually turns, which is at its interlacings and nowhere else. A plain weave turns 2.80 times per millimetre and a satin 1.12, so the plain weave's tension compounds 2.78-fold over this length against the satin's 1.46. What the drawing cannot show is that the wrap angle is taken from a plain-weave geometry in both panels: a satin's crimp is genuinely smaller, so its real turns are gentler than these and its grip weaker still.

What cloth is

A thread is gripped where it turns

The usual arithmetic for fraying, seam slippage and tuft anchorage counts every crossing a thread makes as a grip and adds them up. A thread lying flat on the surface of a satin presses on nothing at all, and a thread that is gripped is gripped by a friction that compounds along its length rather than adding. Both corrections were recorded as missing and both are here.

The draft for 2/2 twill, as a loom holds it. The 2/2 twill written the way a weaver writes it: the threading above, saying which shaft each end hangs on; the lifting plan to the right, saying which shafts rise on each pick; and the cloth below, which is not copied from the weave but produced by running those two against one another and then checked against it.

Weaves

How many shafts a draft needs

Every quantity counted so far is a property of the cloth. This one is a property of the loom — the number of distinct columns in the matrix — and it is very probably the strongest single predictor of which of the twenty-two thousand four-by-four drafts anybody ever wove.

What a raising machine can catch in a 3/1 twill. The draft with every weft float long enough for a raising wire to lift marked on it. The teeth need an unsupported length of thread on the surface, so a cloth in which every thread is bound at every crossing offers them nothing at all — which is why a napped fabric is always a twill or a satin and never a plain weave.

After the loom

Raising spends the cloth's strength

Fibre standing up on the surface is fibre no longer in the load path. A nap is warmth bought with tensile strength, and the exchange rate runs along the same axis as everything else the float decides — which means a fabric cannot be optimised for both ends of it.

A leno and the open plain weave it is not. Two warp ends and the picks they hold. On the left the doup end passes under its partner between picks and comes up the other side; on the right it never crosses, which is an open plain weave at the same sett. The layer count under each panel is computed by the same criterion that decides every other draft, and it returns the same verdict for both.

Compound and figured cloths

The criterion cannot see friction

This site's central check is exact, decidable in linear time, and structurally incapable of distinguishing a carpet from a fabric that sheds. That is not a defect to be repaired — a separation exists or it does not, and there is no margin in it — and the fancy weaves are precisely the constructions that live in the gap.

The sett moves the flux and not the height. A 20 tex cotton yarn woven at every sett from 8 to 34 threads per centimetre. Above: the hole between the threads lifts from 27 to 234 mm as the cloth closes, while the space between the fibres lifts 6.37 m at every one of them — so the cloth's maximum is the flat line, and the sett does not touch it. Below: the permeability of those holes falls by a factor of 292 over the same range. Both curves are monotone, so there is no optimum — only an interval, ending at the jam at 34.6 threads per centimetre.

Setting and geometry

The sett decides how much, not how high

Every essay on wicking so far has found the sett deciding something. This one finds it deciding nothing at all: a cloth's maximum rise is 6.37 m at eight threads per centimetre and 6.37 m at thirty-four, because the sett cannot reach inside a yarn.

The stitch density that makes the strongest seam. Seam strength against stitch density, as the two limits that decide it: the sewing thread crossing the seam, which rises with the stitches, and the fabric the needle perforates, which falls. The seam is the lower of the two, so the optimum is where they cross — and whether the fabric line falls at all is decided by the clear gap between threads against the width of the needle.

Cloth doing a job

The stitch that weakens the seam

More stitches per centimetre put more sewing thread across a seam and more holes through the cloth beside it, so seam strength rises, crosses and falls. Whether the fabric line falls at all is decided by the clear gap between two threads against the width of the needle — the same arithmetic a filter cloth is specified by, doing a different job.

Stick, slip, and the ratio between the two coefficients. The force in a thread as a cloth is agitated, with a static coefficient of 0.300 and a kinetic one of 0.225 — a ratio of 0.75, which is what fibre on fibre measures. The force climbs until it reaches the static limit, the contact breaks away, and while it is sliding it resists only at the kinetic limit. So a cloth that is being shaken can be left anywhere in the narrower band, and a cloth at rest anywhere in the wider one. What the trace cannot show is how much this buys: the band does not narrow in the ratio of the coefficients, because the restoring force stiffens away from the minimum, and the real narrowing is nearer 0.87 than 0.75.

What cloth is

Two coefficients, not one

Every friction on this site is a single number, and the account of why a cloth relaxes better when it is agitated depends entirely on there being two. Separating static from kinetic changes what a resting state is: a cloth at rest is held by one coefficient and a cloth being shaken by the other, and the band it can be left in narrows — by less than the ratio, because a cloth's restoring force is not linear in its extension.

Cloth doing a job

A cloth does not mind a hole

A hole in a film costs it two thirds of its strength whatever the hole's size, because a continuum concentrates stress at an edge. A cloth's threads carry their own load and hand almost nothing to their neighbours, so a hole costs exactly the threads it removes — a loss that is linear in the hole, independent of the sett, and zero for a slit along the load.

Float lengths in a honeycomb. The same draft twice. On the left, filled where the warp is on the face — which is all point paper says. On the right, every intersection shaded by the length of the float it belongs to, from one at the palest to 6 at the strongest. The gradient on the right is the whole mechanism of a relief weave and it is invisible on the left.

Weaves

A honeycomb gets its cells in the wash

The obvious mechanism is take-up on the loom, and the arithmetic says it is wrong: every end of a diamond passes through the long floats and the tight ones alike. What is left is finishing, and a cell is a region that wanted to shrink less than the cloth around it.

After the loom

A knit's dimensions come from its loop

A relaxed plain knit's courses, wales and stitch density depend on the loop length and on nothing else — not the yarn count, not the fibre, not the machine gauge. The constants are measured rather than derived, and the interesting thing about the published set is that it does not quite satisfy its own arithmetic.

Setting and geometry

The reed is not the sett

A reed holds the warp at a pitch, and the cloth that leaves it is narrower — by exactly the weft's crimp, with nothing fitted and nothing approximated. On a close balanced sheeting that is 12.75 per cent, on an open scrim 1.87, and a weaver who allowed one figure for both would be wrong by a factor of nearly seven.

Heddles per shaft: stripe. The threading of a narrow satin stripe on a broad plain ground, over a warp of 1,200 ends. Each bar is one shaft and its length is the heddles on it. The draft needs 10 shafts however they are loaded; the heaviest carries 500 and the lightest 25, a factor of 20.0. Spending 20 shafts instead brings the heaviest down to 100.

Compound and figured cloths

Where the heddles go

A draft says how many shafts it needs and says nothing about how the ends divide between them. On a satin stripe over a plain ground the two ground shafts carry twenty times what the stripe shafts do — and the only cure is to spend shafts, which turns the threading into an allocation problem with an exact answer.

How much a draft agrees with itself. On the left the draft; on the right its correlation at every offset, one cell per offset, with the offset of nothing at the top left. Warp-up counts as plus one and weft-up as minus one, so the number in each cell is agreements minus disagreements out of 64. The correlations away from the origin sum to exactly -64, whatever the draft — structure can be moved about and not removed.

Weaves

A crepe cannot be structureless

A crepe weave is designed to have no line in it anywhere. The correlations of a draft with itself sum to a number fixed by the repeat alone, so structure can be spread and never removed — and on eight ends the floor turns out to be half the repeat, set by a fact about binary words with nothing textile in it.

How much a cloth can give back. Relaxation shrinkage against how much of the warp crimp the loom took out, with the area shrinkage above it and the ceiling drawn across. The ceiling is the crimp itself, read as c/(1+c): it is all the length there is to give, and no tension reaches past it.

After the loom

A dimension without a state

Every essay in this field turned on the same omission, and collecting them produces a result none of them had on its own — the quantities a cloth's geometry determines divide cleanly into those a finishing works can move and those it cannot, and the division is not the one the vocabulary suggests.

A tear breaks threads or pulls them out. The grip a cloth has on a thread at the tip of a tear, against the sett, with the thread's own strength drawn across. Below the line the thread slides and the yarns group, which is the trade's explanation of why a loose weave tears well; above it the thread breaks where it is and grouping never happens. The essay that asked it could not compute this: it needed a friction, and the fancy weaves supplied one.

Cloth doing a job

A tear stops where the grip is

This collection asked whether a loose weave tears better and had to answer that the geometry could not say — it supplies a grip count and a slack, and neither is a force. The fancy weaves brought a friction. With it the question has an answer — a cloth's threads slide up to a computable sett and break above it — and a ripstop grid has a bound with no free parameter in it.

The step between a figure and its ground. Three figures on a plain ground, all in one sheeting's threads at its own setts. A thread presses on the thread it crosses only where it turns, and it turns at its interlacings — so the pressing a region receives per unit area is the contact force at one turn times the turns per unit area, and the second factor is a property of the matrix exactly. A five-end satin turns two fifths as often as a plain weave, is pressed two fifths as hard, flattens less, and stands 55 µm proud of it. What the rows cannot show is that both regions are given a plain weave's weave angle: a satin's crimp is genuinely smaller and its turns genuinely gentler, so the real step is larger than this, by an amount not computed here.

Pattern and colour

A figured cloth has a step in its surface

A damask is one cloth in one set of threads at one sett, and it is not flat. A thread presses on the thread it crosses only where it turns, so a region that turns less often is pressed less often, flattens less and stands thicker — and the step is a ratio of interlacing rates, read off the matrix with no yarn property in it.

Mock leno, 3 threads to a bundle. Threads that interlace identically have no weft passing between them, so nothing holds them apart and they lie touching. The reed still sets the average spacing, so the space they leave collects at the bundle's edge — a hole 0.60 by 0.60 mm, made without one thread crossing another. Drawn to scale on a fixed 9 mm square of cloth at 20 threads per centimetre and a 0.3 mm yarn.

Weaves

A hole with nothing crossing

A real leno holds its holes open by crossing one thread over another, which is a topological arrangement and cannot come undone. A mock leno makes the same holes by grouping threads that nothing separates, and everything about it is friction.

Two pore systems in one cloth — 24 threads per centimetre. A plain weave of 20 tex cotton in section, at 24 threads per centimetre, so the yarn is 167 µm across and the clear hole between two picks is 250 µm. That hole's hydraulic radius is 124.8 µm. Inside the yarn, fibres 14 µm across packed at 0.6 leave spaces of hydraulic radius 2.33 µm — 53 times finer, and by Jurin's law 53 times higher: 6.37 m against 119 mm. The yarn's interior is magnified 6 times and the two discs at the foot are the only part drawn at one scale.

Cloth doing a job

How high a cloth wicks

A woven cloth has two capillary systems and they are a factor of twenty to a hundred apart. The one every diagram draws — the hole between four threads — lifts 119 mm. The one nobody draws, inside the yarn, lifts 6.37 m.

The weight against the constant nobody has measured. Areal weight against the stitch-density constant, for four two-bed structures at 20 tex on a 0.35 cm loop with a tuck taken as 1.15 of one. Every line is exactly straight through the origin, because the weight is tex times yarn per repeat times k_s divided by the area of the repeat and there is no fitted constant anywhere in that division. The three vertical rules are the only measured values this site has — Munden's published k_s for plain single jersey in three relaxation states — and none of them is the right value for any structure drawn here. Where each line should be read is the whole of what is missing.

After the loom

The constants do not compose

The yarn in a knitted structure is a sum of what each element takes, exactly, over structures nobody has measured. The size the structure relaxes to is not a sum of anything — and the whole gap between the two is one number per structure, which would cost forty-five fabrics each to obtain.

A knit's restoring force, and the column that does not move. A plain knit of 20 tex cotton at a loop length of 3.5 mm, over the extension range its own geometry admits. The bending energy stored in one loop is the same number at every extension — the loop's arcs are held to a radius by the thread they wrap rather than by the fabric's dimensions, so extending the fabric does not bend anything more. The frictional resistance at the interlocks is not zero: it is μ times the force pressing there, times 2.34 interlocks per millimetre of width. So a knit's resistance to extension is dissipative rather than elastic, which is why it does not spring back and why its dimensions depend on how much it has been agitated. What the rows cannot show is the interlock force itself, which this site does not have for a knit and which is recorded as missing.

Knits and other structures

What stops a knit extending

A knitted loop's bending energy does not change as the fabric extends — exactly, over the whole range its geometry admits. Something resists, and it is not stiffness. It is friction at the interlocks, which is dissipative rather than elastic, and that single fact accounts for why a knit does not spring back, why a softener changes its dimensions and why the constants its size is quoted with contain no yarn property at all.

Compound and figured cloths

Where a stitch can hide

One reversed intersection turns two cloths into one, and half the intersections in the repeat would do it. Almost none of them may be used — a plain-faced double cloth has nowhere at all to put a stitch, a five-end satin has fifteen places or none depending on which rule is asked, and two satins of the same order differ by a factor of two.

Plain weave, doubled. Plain weave, then the same weave with its picks grouped in 2, its ends grouped in 2, and both — which are a warp rib, a weft rib and a hopsack — and a 2/2 twill beside them for comparison. The rules under the drafts bracket the threads that lift together on every pick and so lie touching. Each doubling multiplies the cloth's own unit by 2: 2, then 4, then 8 intersections. The hopsack and the twill interlace equally often and are drawn from different rules. The setts under each draft are the densest that weave may be set at with a 0.25 mm yarn, and a rib's two are 0.750 apart where every other weave here is square.

Weaves

A cord is a stripe with no colour in it

Warp rib, weft rib and hopsack are plain weave with its threads doubled, in the warp, the weft, or both. Six of the nine measures this site takes off a matrix cannot tell a 2/2 hopsack from a 2/2 twill, and the three that can are not the ones a weaver quotes.

The harness a strain budget buys. How many shafts stay inside a 1.0 per cent warp-strain budget, against the clear shed opening the loom needs at the reed: 12 mm gives 43, 16 mm gives 36, 20 mm gives 28, 24 mm gives 21, 30 mm gives 13, 36 mm gives 7, 44 mm gives 1. The shed's tangent enters the strain squared, so the opening is much the strongest thing a loom builder controls.

Compound and figured cloths

The harness has a depth

Why does a dobby carry sixteen or twenty-four shafts rather than two hundred? The usual answers are about the mechanism — how many jacks a box can drive, how many hooks a dobby has — and they are real limits that are not the binding one. A stated tolerance on warp strain is a stated distance from the fell, and a stated distance is a whole number of shafts. One per cent buys thirteen.

A front on a thread with 8 per cent crimp. Three rows at one scale. The top row is the warp end laid out straight, with the wetted front marked at four equal quarters of its own length — which is where Washburn's law puts it at four times whose square roots are evenly spaced. The middle row is the same thread crimped at 8 per cent, so it covers 92.6 per cent of the paper the straight one did. The bottom row is the cloth, and the four fronts on it are the four above pulled back by 1.08. A coefficient is a length squared over a time, so it comes down by 1.1664 — exactly (1 + c)², with no property of the liquid or the fibre in it. The thread's thickness is not drawn and neither is the liquid: a meniscus in a 2.33 µm pore is finer than any line on this canvas.

Cloth doing a job

Wicking is slower along a crimped thread

A front travelling up a warp end travels the thread's path, which is longer than the cloth by exactly the crimp. So the wicking coefficient measured on the fabric is the yarn's own divided by (1 + c)² — 14.3 per cent lost at eight per cent crimp, whatever the liquid.

The resting band, not the resting point. The bending energy of a sheeting along its own constant-thread-length locus, with the band in which friction can hold it shaded. The minimum is a single state; the band is 10.9 per cent of length wide, because the cloth stops sliding as soon as the energy it can release falls below the 0.0756 N friction takes to move a crossing. What the drawing cannot show is which end of the band a given piece of cloth stops at, which depends on the direction it arrived from and is what makes relaxation hysteretic.

After the loom

A cloth relaxes until its threads stop pushing

The finishing field treats the relaxed state as a place a cloth arrives at. With an energy along its own locus and a friction at its crossings it is not a place but a band — and which point of the band a piece of cloth stops at depends on which side it came from, which is why washing it twice gives two answers.

A crossing before and after it is pressed. One warp end of a sheeting riding over three picks, drawn twice to the same scale. Unpressed, both sections are circles and the cloth is 0.388 mm thick. At 0.40 N per crossing the sections flatten to aspect ratios of 1.75 and 1.84, the cloth thins to 0.263 mm, and the warp runs flat for 0.109 mm over each pick before it begins to curve. What the drawing cannot show is why the cloth does not do this by itself: flattening shrinks the arc radius as well as the crimp height, so it costs bending energy, and a relaxed cloth keeps its threads round.

Mechanics and drape

A flattened thread is a record of a force

A yarn in cloth is not round, and this site has modelled the flattening for as long as this collection has run with the amount of it left as a number somebody chose. Give the section a stiffness and ask what the cloth prefers, and the answer is a circle — at every stiffness, for every balanced cloth in the table. Flattening does not happen by itself; it happens because something pressed.

Weaves

The three basic weaves do not generate the rest

Every weaving manual opens with the same sentence: there are three basic weaves, and everything else is derived from them. The complete catalogue of the smallest interesting repeat is in hand, so the claim can be checked instead of repeated. Starting from plain weave, every twill and every satin, and applying every derivation the manuals name, reaches nine of the 426 cloths that exist there.

Setting and geometry

Peirce and Kemp are one cloth at two moments

This site has run two thread sections side by side since the setting field was built — a circle and a flattened racetrack — and said honestly that they disagree and that the disagreement is the point. They are not rival descriptions of the same fabric. They are descriptions of the same fabric before and after something pressed it, and the difference between them is a pressure that can now be named.

How much too thick a round section is, and what reconciles it. For each cloth in the standard cloth table: the thickness a circular Peirce section predicts, the thickness a cloth of that construction measures, and the force per crossing that makes the flattened model reproduce the measurement. The over-prediction runs from 36% to 81%. The reconciling forces span a factor of 4.6 across a table whose counts span a factor of six, and every one of them is of the order of the contact force the cloth's own warp tension supplies — which is what makes this a model rather than eight fitted parameters. What the rows cannot show is that the thicknesses are trade figures for cloths of these constructions rather than measurements of these particular fabrics, so what is being read is an ordering.

Compound and figured cloths

The criterion gets a force

This site's integrity criterion decides exactly whether a draft describes one cloth, and has one standing limitation: it says a tuft bound under one pick and a tuft bound under three are both attached, and it is right, and one of those is a carpet while the other sheds. What separates them needs a normal force in a fabric that is not under tension — the number the rung that computed it recorded as unavailable, and the one a thickness gauge now supplies.

The bracket that closes and the bracket that does not. A 25 tex cotton yarn at a packing factor of 0.6. Its bending rigidity lies between 0.00117 N·mm² — the sum of its fibres', with them free to slide — and 0.478, a solid rod of its own diameter: a factor of 408, and both ends are derivations. Its resistance to being squashed out of round has an upper bound of the same kind, 369 N/mm² for a solid section, and no lower bound at all, because fibres free to slide resist a change of shape with nothing. That is why the aspect ratio of a flattened yarn has been a free parameter here since the setting field was built: a quantity bounded below by zero cannot be estimated from its bounds, and has to be measured.

Mechanics and drape

The stiffness with no lower bound

A yarn's bending rigidity lies between two derivable ends and the ratio is the fibre count — wide, but closed. Its resistance to being squashed out of round has an upper bound of the same kind and a lower bound of exactly nothing, because fibres free to slide resist a change of shape with nothing at all. That is why nobody could ever compute the aspect ratio of a flattened thread.

The resting band with two coefficients in it. The range of extensions a sheeting can be left in, at rest and while being agitated, at three ratios of kinetic to static friction. The upper bar of each pair is the stuck band, held by the static coefficient; the lower is the band a cloth being shaken can be left in, held by the kinetic one. Agitation narrows the band but by less than the ratio of the coefficients: at 0.75 the narrowing is 0.868. The restoring force is not linear in the extension, so cutting the friction by a quarter does not move the band's edges by a quarter of the way in. What the bars cannot show is where a given piece of cloth actually stops inside its band, which depends on which side it came from.

After the loom

Why agitation helps a cloth relax

Every standard relaxation procedure agitates: tumble it, wash it, steam it, work it. The explanation given is that agitation lets the fabric find its own dimensions, which is true and is not a mechanism. The mechanism is that a sliding contact resists less than a stuck one — and putting a number on it shows the effect is real, is smaller than the obvious arithmetic suggests, and does not account for what a relaxation procedure achieves.

From a calender's line load to a force at one crossing. A sheeting through a nip loaded at 30 N per millimetre of bowl width, with the cloth in contact over 5.0 mm. The pressure is the first divided by the second, 6.00 N/mm², and the force at one crossing is that pressure times the area a crossing owns — the product of the two thread spacings, 0.1374 mm². So the crossing carries 0.824 N, the sections flatten to 2.42 and 2.63, and the cloth thins from 0.388 mm to 0.218 mm. What the drawing cannot show is that two cloths through the same nip are not given the same treatment: the area a crossing owns varies fivefold across the standard cloth table, and it is a factor in the force.

After the loom

A calender spends the compression for good

Calendering was described here as moving a cloth from one thread-section model to another, which was right and had no number in it because the amount of the move was a free parameter. It is a pressure now — and the same nip setting turns out to give two cloths quite different treatments, because the force at a crossing is the pressure times the area a crossing owns.

The size of the capstan correction. The ratio of the capstan crossover to the crossover a sum of independent contacts gives, for every cloth in the table at a friction coefficient of 0.30. It is exactly ln(1 + z)/z, where z is the thread's breaking load times the wrap angle, over the contact force — a quantity with no friction coefficient in it at all. That is why the earlier result that μ·L* is exactly constant survives this correction to twelve figures: μ was only ever in the factor outside the logarithm. The correction is largest for the duck, whose coarse strong yarn makes z large, and smallest for the batiste. What the rows cannot show is that a real cut edge frays at a friction nobody measured on that particular cloth.

Cloth doing a job

How far a cut edge frays

A seam allowance, a fray width and a tuft's bound length are the same number wearing three hats, and the earlier estimate of it was four times too long. Correcting it moves the whole table across the boundary an ordinary allowance sits on — from four cloths holding and four slipping, to all eight holding — and turns a specification argument into a different one.

The crimp ratios a dense shirting can have. Poplins in 15 tex warp and 20 tex weft at 22 picks, from 32 ends per centimetre to 52. Each bar is the interval of warp-to-weft crimp ratios the construction admits at all: the warp must supply at least the thickness the weft cannot reach, and at most what it can reach itself. The rule at one is this site's standing default. It sits inside the interval up to 44.18 ends per centimetre and outside it beyond — so for a dense shirting an equal division of the crimp is not merely the wrong assumption but a geometric impossibility. The 44-end poplin the standard cloth table called impossible for a long time sits a fifth of an end below that limit, which is why the solver failed on it: its feasible interval was real and narrow, and a bisection on the whole range walked away from it.

Setting and geometry

The cloth that was called impossible

This site's own table of fabrics carries a note saying a real 44-end poplin has no solution in its geometry at all, and that the poplin row was therefore set at 32 ends. The cloth solves. What had no solution was the search — a bisection that treated a state it could not reach as evidence of having gone too far, and walked away from the answer every time.

Mechanics and drape

The relaxed cloth's contact force

How hard two threads press on each other in a cloth that is not being pulled is the number this site's own integrity criterion has needed since its first essays, and the route to it was an elastica nobody had. A thickness gauge supplies it instead — because a cloth's thickness is a record of how flat its threads are, and how flat they are is a record of how hard they are pressed.

Weaves

A float presses on nothing

The rung below expected the float correction to change how a satin's hold compares with a plain weave's, by something like the ratio of their interlacing rates. It does not change the comparison at all — the interlacing rate leaves the answer outside the logarithm and divides straight out of any ratio. What it changes is the absolute answer, by a factor of four, for every weave alike.

The two halves of a beat-up force. The force the reed must apply per metre, for a sheeting, against the number of picks that are still sliding against the warp. The elastic half — the warp tension times the crimp's elasticity with respect to the pick spacing — is 573 N/m and does not depend on the zone at all; that cancellation is exact and is the result the rung below established. The frictional half is 1133 N/m per sliding pick and is nothing but zone. Against a reported 400–1500 N/m, that leaves room for at most 0.82 picks sliding — so the fell region a weaver can see, ten to fifty picks deep, is not the same quantity as the picks that are still moving. What the rows cannot show is that this is a static friction throughout, and a beat-up is a blow.

Setting and geometry

The half of the beat-up that is all zone

The elastic half of the beat-up force is exact and the length of the beat-up zone cancels out of it, which is this site's own result and disagrees with every practical account of weaving. The frictional half is nothing but zone — and requiring the total to match the force a loom is actually built to apply puts the number of picks still sliding at about one.

$The two diameters of a 20 tex yarn. The pressure inside a twisted yarn is zero at its surface, so the outermost fibres are held by nothing but their own buried ends and some of them stand off as loops and ends. A yarn therefore has two diameters: a mass diameter of 167.1 µm, which is a volume divided by a length and is the one every other calculation on this site uses, and a contact diameter of 217.1 µm, which is what a neighbouring thread, a finger or an air stream meets. The gap is a hair layer of 25.0 µm on each side and it is measured, not computed — nothing here predicts hairiness. What is computed is the consequence, and it is 29.9% of the diameter every cover factor on this site was built from.$ What cloth is

The hairs are what touch

The pressure inside a twisted yarn falls to exactly zero at its surface, so the outermost fibres are held by nothing and some of them stand off. A yarn therefore has two diameters — the one its mass gives and the one a neighbour meets — and only the first is in the arithmetic.

The crown line of every four-by-four draft there is. All 22,874 four-by-four drafts in which every end and every pick interlaces at least once, at sheeting's construction, counted by how much horizontal crown line each carries per square millimetre. The bar at zero holds 2 of them — the two plain weaves, and nothing else in the catalogue. Every other draft has a float somewhere, and a float is a plateau, and a plateau is a line of constant height. So the whole catalogue divides into two drafts that touch at points and 22,872 that touch along lines, with no intermediate case, because a float is either present or it is not.

What cloth is

Two drafts of twenty-two thousand

Every four-by-four draft there is, measured by how much horizontal crown line its surface carries. Two of them carry none — the plain weave and its translation, and nothing else in the catalogue — and the quantity turns out to be smallest for the most balanced cloths and largest for the most one-sided, which is the opposite of what a float count suggests.

A damask's figure and ground trade places when the cloth is turned. A satin 8 figure on a sateen 8 ground in sheeting — one cloth, one set of threads, one sett, and the ground is the figure's own complement. Their total specular areas are within a few per cent of one another, so neither is intrinsically the brighter. What differs is the direction: the figure's crowns run with the warp and the ground's with the weft. So the contrast between them is 2.0-to-one with the light coming from 8° and 0.47-to-one from 90° — it reverses, exactly, a quarter turn apart. That is what makes a damask visible in one colour, and it is not the step in its surface: the step is fifty micrometres and returns no light at all under a diffuse illumination, while this contrast is a factor of 2.0 and is present whenever there is a direction in the light.

Pattern and colour

A figure shows by its shine, not its step

A damask is one cloth in one colour and its pattern is plainly visible. This collection attributed that to the step in its surface — fifty micrometres of relief, computed from the interlacing rates. The step is real and returns almost no light. What makes the figure visible is that its crowns run at right angles to the ground's, so the two trade places when the cloth is turned.

single jersey, as loops. Three courses of the same structure drawn as yarn. A knitted needle takes a new loop through the one below; a tuck takes the yarn into the loop below and leaves it on the needle, so that loop is held for another course; a miss floats straight past. Six needles is as many as a loop diagram can carry, which is why the array beside it exists.

Knits and other structures

A jersey has two surfaces

The face of a plain knit shows the legs of its loops, which run along the wale; the back shows the heads and feet, which run across it. So the two faces carry their crowns at right angles — the same situation as a damask's figure and its ground, in a fabric with no warp, no weft and no float.

$What it costs to touch a cloth. The pressure needed to bring a stated fraction of the plan into contact, for plain, 2/2 twill, satin 8 in sheeting. Reaching two per cent of the plan takes 2.83 kPa on a plain and 0.05 on a satin 8, a factor of 55. The stiffness in this figure is fitted and is labelled as such. A yarn's resistance to being squashed out of round has no lower bound at all — a bundle of fibres free to slide is a fluid in cross-section — so no bracket exists to compute this from, and what is used is the value this collection fitted to measured fabric thickness. Every curve moves together across its published range, which is why the ratio between weaves survives and the absolute values are quoted with the fit named.$ What cloth is

How much of a cloth is touching

Press a fabric against a flat plate with the weight of a hand and ask what fraction of it is actually in contact. The bearing curve answers, and the answer is about four per cent — of which the great majority is not the cloth's surface at all, but the hairs standing off it, which nothing in this arithmetic can see.

$A yarn's diameter is a contour, not a length. The fraction of the space beside a 20 tex cotton yarn that is occupied by hair, against height, grossed up from the modelled population by the measured split between the long and short populations. At the yarn's own surface it is 8.9% — the layer is almost entirely gap — and it falls away exponentially from there. Every instrument that reports a yarn diameter is picking a contour of this curve, and the contours are far apart: a threshold that needs half the space filled is never met at all, one that needs a twentieth is met at 355 µm, and a hair counter triggers out at 2353 µm. The earlier model gave the layer a single thickness of 25 µm, which is a fair description of where most of the material is and wrong about its extent by more than a decade. What the curve cannot say is which contour any particular instrument uses, which is a fact about the instrument.$ Pattern and colour

A cloth is more opaque than it is closed

Opacity is not cover — this collection established that already and left the discrepancy attributed to the thickness of the threads. Part of it is not in the threads at all. A hair standing in a hole blocks light exactly as well as a thread does and costs nothing in air.

Whether a cloth's hairs can reach one another. n_A λ² for each construction in this site's table — the hairs per square millimetre times the square of their own length, which is the pure number that asks whether a hair can touch its neighbour. It is a count times an area, so it has to be a pure number. Every one of them is under one, which means no ordinary woven cotton cloth has a hair layer at all: it has isolated whiskers on a bare surface. The dashed line is the threshold. The spread across the whole table is only 1.9-fold, because the density goes as the sett times the root of the count and those move in opposite directions as a cloth is made finer — so construction is almost powerless here, and everything that crosses this threshold does so by finishing rather than by weaving.

Knits and other structures

A knit gives up its fibres more easily

Knitwear pills and shirting does not, and the fibres are often the same fibres. The difference is a count of yarn per unit area and a pressure between threads, and both of them push a knit over a threshold that a woven cloth of the same yarn cannot reach.

$The presser foot sinks 1.8 µm into a 2/2 twill. A thickness gauge presses a flat foot onto the cloth at 1 kPa and reads the gap. It does not read the geometric thickness. The foot sinks until the area it is touching can carry the load, and that is 2.57% of the plan at a depth of 1.8 µm — so a 2/2 twill in sheeting whose outside stands 381.6 µm apart measures 379.8 µm. How far the foot sinks is a property of the draft, because the bearing area near the top is, and a weave with plateaux stops the foot in a fraction of the distance a plain weave lets it travel. The transverse stiffness used here is fitted to measured fabric thickness rather than predicted: across its published range the reading moves between 377.0 µm and 380.6 µm.$ What cloth is

A thickness gauge reads the draft

A presser foot does not stop at the top of a cloth. It sinks until the area it is touching can carry the load, and how far that is depends on the shape of the bearing curve near the top — which is a property of the weave. So there is a weave term inside a measurement nobody thinks of as a weave measurement, and it is worth about one per cent.

A slack twisted yarn takes a coil of one size. A 20 tex cotton at 1400 turns a metre. Its own torque is 2.060 µN·mm at the free bound, and a rod under tension T is stable while its torque stays under 2·√(B·T). Below that tension the straight state stops being a minimum and the thread wraps on itself at a radius of 0.91 mm. That radius is 2B/M, which is 2/(r·ω) once the torque is written out: it depends on the twist and on the ratio of the two stiffnesses, and on neither stiffness itself.

Pattern and colour

A crepe is a yarn that will not lie still

A crepe cloth's pebbled surface is the yarn's own torque acting on a cloth that cannot resist it. The instability that makes a slack yarn snarl says how large the pebbles should be, and the answer is a millimetre — which is what a crepe looks like.

$A 20 tex cotton yarn and the fibre standing off it. 6 mm of a 20 tex ring-spun cotton yarn with the hair population this site computes from the yarn's own count and staple — 0.89 hairs per millimetre, every one of them drawn. The two axes are at different scales and have to be — the yarn is 167 µm across and its hairs reach past a millimetre, so a picture at one scale is either a bare line or a black rectangle. Along the yarn is 99 pixels to the millimetre and off it is 74, a 1-fold exaggeration of the vertical. Lengths are drawn from the exponential the model predicts, mean 621 µm; the rules mark one, two and three millimetres with the count a hair-counting instrument reports at each, and the hairs crossing each rule in the drawing are the ones those counts are about. At the yarn's own surface the long hairs cover 1.1% of the space beside it, which is why the picture is mostly gap. Nothing here is the short population, which carries most of the protruding length and none of the reach; and a hair reaching past the room the canvas has is drawn to the edge of it, so the very longest few are shortened in the drawing and not in the arithmetic.$ What cloth is

A yarn's surface is a distribution

This collection has computed where a cloth stops, and every one of those numbers is a statement about yarn. What a finger, a plate, a droplet or a ray of light actually meets first is a population of fibre ends standing off the yarn — and it is a population, with a count and a length, rather than a layer with a thickness.

Everything a plain knit can be, at one loop length. Bending energy over the two spacings a plain knit has to choose, for a 20 tex cotton yarn at a 3.5 mm loop, as a multiple of the energy the fully relaxed fabric holds. Darker is more. The solid edge is where the straight line between two interlacings reaches the yarn between them — the geometry's own limit, with nothing elastic in it — and there is no state beyond it at any force. Munden's three relaxation states are marked, and the thing to see is that they are not in a hollow: they lie along a slope, in order, with the most completely relaxed of them the highest. An unset yarn would slide down and to the right until it met the edge. Real fabrics sit where they were left.

Knits and other structures

The relaxed knit is not at a minimum

Differentiate a loop's bending energy along the fabric instead of across it and the answer should be zero, because a relaxed fabric is one nothing is pulling. It is not zero. It is tens of newtons a metre, downhill in both directions at once — and the three relaxation states everybody measures run the wrong way up the slope.

Twist is not torsion: a straight rod, twisted. A rod drawn with a cross painted along it, and the cross turned through 2 full turns from one end to the other. The rod is straight, so it has no Frenet frame at all — a straight line has no osculating plane to turn. The two discs above are the rod's ends seen down its own axis, which is where the twist is an angle rather than a foreshortened wiggle. The twist is the rotation of the painted cross about the rod's own tangent, and it is 2 turns whatever the centre line does. That is the quantity a torsional rigidity resists, and it is why a collection that solved a plane curve had not thereby dealt with torsion.

Pattern and colour

A shadow stripe is two twists

A cloth striped in one colour, where the stripe is visible only because alternate bands are spun the other way round. The pattern is carried entirely by which way the fibres lie on the yarn's surface, and it disappears when the light moves.

A yarn has a diameter for every instrument

Conservation of volume gives a yarn one diameter and every other route gives a different one. The disagreement is not experimental scatter: a yarn's outside is a coverage that falls away exponentially, and each instrument stops at whatever contour of it will trigger the instrument.

The surface of an 8-end shading. The height of the cloth's own surface at each tone of an 8-end shading, for the two chains, on a sheeting at 0.50 N in the end. A thread presses on the thread it crosses only where it turns, so a region that turns more often is pressed more often and finishes thinner — and firmness rises towards the midtone of a shading. The spread chain therefore sinks 84 µm between its ends and its midtone and the consecutive chain 43 µm, with 2 of its steps at exactly one thickness against the spread chain's 0. The tone scale is level by construction and the surface under it is not. What the plot cannot show is the light: a step in the surface reads as a line under a raking beam whatever the tone is doing, which is why a relief nobody specified is visible at all.

Pattern and colour

A tone ramp is a valley, and the satin digs it

A shading's tone is exact and its lustre is measured; its thickness is neither, and nobody specifies it. A firmer weave is pressed harder at every crossing and finishes thinner, so an eight-end shading sinks eighty-four micrometres between its ends and its midtone — about a third of the cloth's whole thickness, on every cloth tried. Build the same chain on a twill instead of a satin and the sag is exactly nothing.

All themes