Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
Series

Shine — the series

9 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. A round thread reflects a beam into a fan. A round thread seen end-on, with a beam arriving from straight above. Every point across the thread has its own normal, tilted by the angle it sits at, and mirrors the beam through twice that angle — so a single direction in becomes a whole fan out, spread across the thread and not at all along it. Seen from the front that fan is a highlight lying along the thread, exactly as long as the length of thread that is straight, which is the float. Nothing about this depends on the fibre. A cylinder of any material returns a fan, and the only way to narrow it is to stop the section being a cylinder — which is what a calender does.

    A float reflects into a line

    A cylinder cannot return a beam to a point. Its normals sweep the whole half-turn across it and nothing at all along it, so a straight thread throws light into a fan — seen as a highlight lying along the thread, exactly as long as the length of thread that is straight. The lobe of a satin is twice as narrow along the thread as across it; the lobe of a plain weave is exactly round.

    part 1 · weaves
  2. How much every four-by-four draft can shine. All 22,874 four-by-four drafts in which every end and every pick interlaces, at sheeting's construction and a tolerance of 2°, counted by specular area. The range runs from 0.02% to 0.93%, a factor of 60.0, and the distribution is not smooth — it clusters, because the quantity behind it is a count of whole crossings and takes only certain values. The dullest drafts in the catalogue are the plain weaves, which have no plateau at all and shine only from the crowns of their turns; the brightest carry the most float on the face, with the fewest turns interrupting it. Lustre over the catalogue is a length census, and nothing about the yarn enters it.

    Lustre is a length times a width

    The specular area of a cloth factors exactly: a length of crown line, which the draft supplies, times a width of section within the tolerance, which the yarn and the finish supply. Neither factor knows anything about the other, and over the four-by-four catalogue the first alone spans a factor of sixty.

    part 2 · weaves
  3. A calender multiplies the highlight by 32, and all of it is width. A 2/2 twill in sheeting pressed at increasing force, with the specular area recomputed at each state from the standard compression model. It rises from 0.91% of the plan to 28.9%, a factor of 32, while the cloth thins from 381.6 µm to 186.1 µm. The gain is not in the length of the crowns: that moves by 5 per cent. It is in their width, which moves by 31.8 times, because pressing puts a flat top on the section and a flat top has one normal rather than a fan of them. The finish does not polish the thread. It changes the dimension of the highlight, from a line to a band, and the arithmetic says so by refusing to put any of the gain in the other factor.

    A calender buys the width

    Press a cloth and its lustre multiplies by twenty-four. None of that comes from the length of its crowns, which moves by six per cent; all of it comes from their width, because a flattened section has a plane on top of it and a plane has one normal rather than a fan of them. The arithmetic refuses to put any of the gain in the other factor.

    part 3 · weaves
  4. Turn the cloth and the highlight changes hands. A 2/2 twill in sheeting turned under a light, with the specular area of each system counted separately at each angle. The warp peaks at 0° and the weft at 83°, a quarter turn apart, and neither returns anything worth seeing where the other peaks. The reason needs no dye and no interference: a warp crown's normals all lie in the plane across the warp and have no component along it, so a warp float can only mirror light that arrives from across the warp. A cloth woven with one colour in the warp and another in the weft therefore shows one colour at one angle and the other a quarter turn away, which is the whole of shot silk — a geometric effect that has been sold as a mysterious one for three hundred years.

    Turn the cloth and the shine changes hands

    A warp crown's normals all lie in the plane across the warp and have no component along it, so a warp float can only mirror light that arrives from across the warp. Turn the cloth a quarter turn and the weft takes over. That is the whole of shot silk — a geometric effect with no dye that changes and no interference in it.

    part 4 · weaves
  5. A shot effect needs a fibre with no ends. The peak-to-trough contrast of an eight-end satin in sheeting as the cloth is turned in the light, against how much hair stands on it. Bare, the contrast is 37 to one, because a straight thread's normals lie in the plane across it and the warp and the weft therefore reflect a quarter turn apart. A hair layer does two things and only one of them matters: it blocks, which takes the same factor off the peak and the trough and changes no contrast at all, and it returns light of its own, which is added to both. A hair population points every way at once, so its return has no azimuth in it — and adding a constant to both ends of a ratio of 37 destroys the ratio. On an ordinary spun cotton the contrast is already down to 5.1 to one; singeing recovers it to 29; raising kills it outright at 1.00. The one fibre with no staple length is the one fibre with no fibre ends, and every shot fabric ever woven is made of one.

    A hair layer veils a highlight

    An eight-end satin's shine swings by a large factor as the cloth is turned, because a straight thread's normals lie in the plane across it. Put fibre ends on it and the swing disappears — not because the hairs block the light, which changes no contrast at all, but because they return light of their own that has no direction in it.

    part 5 · weaves
  6. Specular area against the size of the source. The share of a sheeting's face that reflects, for plain, 2/2 twill, 5-end satin, 8-end satin, against the angular half-width of whatever is lighting it. Plain weave's line has twice the slope of the others, because a specular area is a length times a width and both are proportional to the angle for a weave with no float — while a float contributes a crown line that does not shrink with the source at all.

    No cloth shines under a sky

    Every specular figure on this account is drawn at a tolerance of two degrees, which is a stand-in for how wide the source is. Sweeping it says something the account has not: the contrast between a floated weave and a plain one is inversely proportional to the source's angular size, exactly, because a float keeps a crown line as the source narrows and a plain weave has only turns. A satin outshines a plain weave by 177 under the sun's disc, by 22 under a small lamp, and by exactly nothing at sixty degrees.

    part 6 · weaves
  7. A lamp in front of a window: the contrast against the lamp's share of the light. The contrast an eight-end satin shows over a plain weave when a 1° lamp and a 16° window both lie in the direction the cloth reflects to the viewer, against the lamp's share of the light: 0.0% gives 3.01, 0.5% gives 3.22, 1.0% gives 3.43, 2.0% gives 3.85, 5.0% gives 5.11, 10.0% gives 7.21, 20.0% gives 11.39, 30.0% gives 15.57, 50.0% gives 23.88, 70.0% gives 32.16, 100.0% gives 44.48. The points lie on a straight line between the window alone and the lamp alone, to within 0.8 per cent: the room's contrast is its sources' contrasts averaged by power. The dashed curve is a single source as wide as the power-weighted average width, which gives only 3.30 at a tenth of the light where the room gives 7.21.

    A room lights a satin at the harmonic mean of its lamps

    A satin outshines a plain weave by a factor inversely proportional to the width of the light, which is a clean law for one source and says nothing about a room. A room has a lamp and a window at once. Sum each source's highlight and the average falls out by itself: the room behaves as a single source whose width is the harmonic mean of its sources' widths, weighted by the power each supplies. The harmonic mean is ruled by the narrowest source, so a small lamp carrying a tenth of the light more than doubles the contrast a large window gives.

    part 7 · weaves
  8. A satin's contrast as the lamp moves off the mirror. The specular area of an eight-end satin over a plain weave, both as a sheeting, for a source 2° wide moved away from the direction the viewer sees mirrored in the cloth. Moved across the satin's floats, the contrast is 22.4 on the mirror and 21.7 forty degrees off. Moved along them it is 22.4 on the mirror and 0.25 once the source is more than twice its own width away: the satin is darker than plain. A calendered satin falls to 1.83 across its floats as well. What the plot cannot show is shadowing, which a lamp far enough off the mirror brings in.

    A lamp off the mirror lights a satin only across its floats

    Every source in the account of a room was a source the viewer sees mirrored in the cloth. A lamp off to one side lights the cloth too, and which facets it reaches depends on which way it is off. Displaced across a satin's floats it is caught by the float's own curve and adds contrast like any lamp on the mirror; displaced along them by more than twice its own width it reaches only the turns, and the satin comes out a quarter as bright as plain weave.

    part 8 · weaves
  9. Floated weaves against plain under an overcast sky. The sky's radiance each weave's facets mirror into the eye, over the plain weave's, as the viewer's elevation above a sheeting falls from overhead to thirty degrees, under an overcast sky with a ground of albedo 0.2. 2/2 twill: 1.25 overhead and 0.99 at 30°; 5-end satin: 1.30 overhead and 1.01 at 30°; 8-end satin: 1.37 overhead and 1.01 at 30°. What the plot cannot show is the diffuse reflection, the same for every weave of one fibre, which a real cloth's sheen sits on top of.

    A satin mirrors the top of the sky

    A uniform source sixty degrees wide leaves every weave reflecting the same share of its face, and that was read as saying no cloth shines under a sky. A real sky is not uniform. An overcast one is three times as bright overhead as at the horizon, and it stands over a ground darker than itself. Every facet of a cloth mirrors one direction, and a satin's facets mirror the top of the dome while a plain weave's mirror the horizon and the ground — so seen from above, under cloud, an eight-end satin still sends back a third more sky.

    part 9 · weaves

All series