Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
Series

Pattern — the series

10 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. A draft is a two-coloured pattern. For each weave, the symmetries that leave warp-up as warp-up and those that exchange the two. Only a balanced weave has any of the second kind, because exchanging warp and weft is only a symmetry when there is as much of one on the face as the other.

    Weaves as plane patterns

    A draft is a periodic pattern with two states, so its symmetry is two-coloured. Some operations leave warp-up as warp-up and others exchange the two, and only a balanced weave has any of the second kind.

    part 1 · pattern
  2. Colour and weave — 2/2 twill. One interlacement, threaded in two colour orders. What a reader sees is the colour of whichever thread is on the face, so the visible pattern can be something the draft gives no hint of.

    Colour and weave

    Thread the same weave with a different order of coloured ends and a pattern appears that is nowhere in the draft. Houndstooth is an ordinary two-and-two twill, and nothing about its interlacement is unusual at all.

    part 2 · pattern
  3. The 2/2 twill. The 2/2 twill on point paper, a filled square meaning the warp is on the face. Its longest float, its interlacing count and the number of separable cloths it describes were all counted from the matrix that drew it.

    The diagonal is not a thread

    A twill's diagonal is the most looked-at feature in weaving and the most misdescribed. No thread in the cloth runs diagonally. What runs diagonally is a pattern of which thread is on top, which is a different sort of object.

    part 3 · pattern
  4. The twelve groups a draft can have. Every four-by-four draft in which each thread interlaces, classified by its plane symmetry group. Twelve of the seventeen groups occur; the five that do not are the ones needing a three-fold rotation, which no grid of warp and weft admits at any size.

    The seventeen groups a draft can have

    Twelve of them, in fact. The five missing ones all need a three-fold rotation, and no grid of warp and weft admits one at any size — which makes it a theorem rather than an artefact of the census.

    part 4 · pattern
  5. Three different weaves, one cloth. Drafts drawn from one collision class, with the blind intersections marked, and the single surface all of them produce. Where the two crossing threads are the same colour the weave leaves no trace, so the cloth cannot report what it is.

    Colour and weave as a two-colour problem

    Where the two threads crossing are the same colour, the intersection looks identical whichever is on top. Half of them are, so 22,874 drafts collapse onto 256 surfaces — eighty-nine weaves apiece, and no way to tell them apart.

    part 5 · pattern
  6. How many four-by-four weaves there are. The same census counted four ways. A draft is a notation; shifting the repeat's origin, turning the cloth over and turning it end for end all change the matrix and not the fabric. Each bar is the number of distinct objects left once those identifications are made, counted by canonical form and checked against Burnside's lemma.

    How many cloths are there

    Twenty-two thousand eight hundred and seventy-four four-by-four drafts. Four hundred and twenty-six four-by-four cloths. And the site's own separation rate — the fraction of drafts that look like fabric and are not — more than doubles when fabrics are counted instead of notations, which is the opposite of what was expected.

    part 6 · pattern
  7. A 40-by-40 motif on a poplin, drawn and finished. A motif 40 ends wide and 40 picks tall, at the setts the reed and the take-up were set to, and the same motif measured on the finished cloth. Point paper has one cell per end and per pick, so a motif's proportions are the ratio of the two setts — and both setts move in the finishing, in opposite directions. On the poplin the aspect changes by a factor of 0.8429, so a circle drawn as a circle at the loom's numbers comes back 15.7% out of round and a designer who wants a circle must draw an ellipse of 1.1863. What the drawing cannot show is that the correction is not a property of the design: it belongs to the cloth, so the same card woven on a different construction is a different shape.

    A motif is drawn at the wrong shape on purpose

    Point paper has one cell per end and per pick, so a design's proportions on the cloth are the ratio of the two setts. Both setts move in the finishing and they move in opposite directions, so a circle drawn as a circle comes back out of round — by three per cent on a balanced cloth and by sixteen on a warp-dense one.

    part 7 · pattern
  8. What a pair of colour orders does to the catalogue. Dark ends in the warp across against dark ends in the weft down, for the sixteen two-colour orders at four ends. Each cell gives the blind intersections of sixteen and the number of distinct surfaces the 22874 drafts collapse onto. Every cell stands for between one and thirty-six colour orders and they all behave identically, so the arrangement of the colours does not matter and only their counts do. The corner at four against nought is blind nowhere and separates every draft.

    The colour order that hides least

    A caption on this account's top essay left a question: whether a warp of long runs against a weft of short ones hides less than either would against itself, and called it a lever nobody uses. Sweeping all sixteen orders against all sixteen says the lever is real and the caption named the wrong variable. Run length has nothing to do with it — the blind count, the separation and the largest confused class all depend on the two orders' colour counts and on nothing else, and what a mixed pair saves is exactly the square of the difference between them.

    part 8 · pattern
  9. Every way to make 4 intersections blind. The number of distinct surfaces the 22874 four-by-four drafts collapse onto, for every shape a set of 4 blind intersections can take, in however many colours it needs. 1×1 + 1×1 + 1×1 + 1×1: 3,632 surfaces, touching 8 threads, 4 colours needed; 1×1 + 1×1 + 1×2: 3,352 surfaces, touching 7 threads, 4 colours needed; 1×2 + 1×2: 3,102 surfaces, touching 6 threads, 3 colours needed; 1×2 + 2×1: 3,100 surfaces, touching 6 threads, 4 colours needed; 1×1 + 1×3: 3,038 surfaces, touching 6 threads, 3 colours needed; 1×4: 2,744 surfaces, touching 5 threads, 2 colours needed; 2×2: 2,402 surfaces, touching 4 threads, 3 colours needed. The same number of blind intersections keeps more of the catalogue apart the more threads it is spread over. What the chart cannot show is whether an eye can tell the surfaces apart.

    A blind set hides less the thinner it is spread

    Two colours showed that where a cloth's threads match in colour the draft underneath is invisible, and that how many intersections match is not what decides how much is hidden. More colours say what does. A third colour lets the blind count take every value from nought to ten; a fourth lets the blind intersections sit one to a thread. At a fixed count, the catalogue keeps more of its cloths apart the more threads the blind set is spread across — 3,632 surfaces for four scattered blind cells, 2,402 for the same four in a square.

    part 9 · pattern
  10. The advantage of spreading a blind set, against the repeat. The number of distinct surfaces a blind set keeps when its cells are spread one to a thread, over the number it keeps when they are gathered into a block, against the size of the repeat: 4 blind, 1.512 at 4, 1.254 at 5, 1.129 at 6, 1.064 at 7, 1.032 at 8, 1.008 at 10, 1.002 at 12; 8 blind, 1.080 at 8, 1.020 at 10, 1.005 at 12. Sampled from forty thousand surfaces at each point. The dashed curves are the closed form — each thread the set misses must interlace on its own, which fails once in 2^(n−1) — and the sampled points sit on them from six threads up; at four and five the form overstates, because a thread the set does touch can still fail there. At four by four spreading keeps half as much again; at eight, a few per cent; at twelve, nothing to speak of. What the chart cannot show is whether an eye can tell the surfaces apart.

    A blind cell costs half the cloths at any real repeat

    At four by four, spreading a blind set over more threads kept half as many cloths apart again as gathering it. At eight by eight the same rule holds, and it is almost nothing: three per cent for four blind cells, eight for eight. The reason is one factor. A blind set's surfaces are the count's bound, 2^(n² − b), times the chance that every thread it misses interlaces on its own, and at eight threads a thread lies all on one face once in 128 tries. So shapes that touch the same number of threads tie exactly, whatever their rectangles; every blind cell costs very nearly half the catalogue; and by twelve threads the arrangement is free.

    part 10 · pattern

All series