Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
Series

Count — the series

5 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Six ways of saying how fine a yarn is. The same four yarns written in six count systems, all placed on one axis of tex. A direct system states mass per unit length and rises as the yarn coarsens; an indirect one states length per unit mass and falls. Both kinds are in daily use and neither says which it is.

    The yarn count systems, and why there are several

    Half the ways of saying how fine a yarn is get bigger as it gets finer and half get smaller. That is not carelessness — and one of the constants buried in the oldest rule of thumb turns out to be a measurement nobody wrote down.

    part 1 · setting
  2. The flattening a knitted fabric asks for, against its own tightness. Every point is a solved fabric — 18 of them, over five loop lengths, three relaxation states and three counts — and the vertical axis is the closest its adjacent courses come, in diameters. The values run from 0.707 to 0.839 and they fall on one curve against the tightness factor, which is the model's only dimensionless group. That is what makes this a structural requirement rather than an arithmetical accident of one example: a tighter fabric demands a flatter yarn, by an amount its own tightness decides, and nothing about the fibre or the count enters except through that group.

    The count that decides how flat

    A knitted fabric's demanded flattening is a function of its tightness factor, and a tightness factor is the square root of a count over a loop length. So a coarser yarn at the same loop is flatter — which is a prediction about a spinner's choice that nobody has framed as one.

    part 2 · setting
  3. What a 2-fold yarn weighs against the sum of its singles. The count of a 2-fold cotton yarn against the sum of its singles' counts, as the folding twist runs from three tenths to nine tenths of the singles' twist, at twist factors of 3000, 3800, 4500 (turns a metre times the root of the tex). Below a ratio near two thirds the fold is lighter than the sum, above it heavier; the curves cross the sum at 0.661 at 3000, 0.658 at 3800, 0.654 at 4500, and in the small-angle limit at exactly 0.6667. The trade's folding band, 0.6 to 0.75, is shaded, and across it the fold is within −0.6% and +1.3% of its notation. What the curves cannot show is a real fibre's migration between the core and the surface of each single, which the ideal helix leaves out and which shortens the path both lengths are computed from.

    Two thirds is where a fold weighs its singles

    A folded yarn's count is written as its singles' count divided by the number folded, as though folding changed no length. It changes two. The fold's helix wraps each single round the yarn's axis, which puts more single into every metre, and the untwisting straightens each single's fibres, which puts less fibre into every metre of single. Each is three to seven per cent at a weaving twist. They cancel at a folding ratio that is exactly two thirds in the small-angle limit — the folder's own number — and six elevenths for three singles and two fifths for four.

    part 3 · setting
  4. What a 2×2 cable weighs as its cable twist rises. A cotton cable of 2 folds, each of 2 singles, with the folds set at 0.707 of the singles' twist and the cable twisted the singles' way at ratios from nought to 0.60, at twist factors of 3000, 3800, 4500. A little cable twist makes the cable lighter, because it takes twist out of folds set above their own crossing; then the cable's own helix wins and the count climbs. It crosses the singles' sum at 0.260 at 3000, 0.250 at 3800, 0.239 at 4500. At the rule as quoted, a cable twist of 0.500, the cable is +2.21%, +3.54%, +4.95% heavy; at the rule read in the finished thread, 0.293, it is +0.16%, +0.32%, +0.54%. What the curves cannot show is a real cable's folds pressed out of round, which shortens the cable's helix and moves every crossing right.

    A cable weighs its singles at the twists the finished thread keeps

    Cabling untwists every fold and hands that twist back to the singles inside it, so beneath its own helix a cable is a fold folded at the difference of two twists — and the cable's helix is a length nothing below it can pay for. Twisted where the cabling rule is quoted, a two-by-two weighs three and a half per cent over its notation. Read in the finished thread, with every level's surface at one angle, the same rule sets the folding frame exactly where a plain fold's is and the cable at 0.293, and the cable comes back to within half a per cent.

    part 4 · setting
  5. What a thread of twos weighs as its levels of twist are added. A two-fold, a cable of two two-folds, a cord of two such cables and a cord of two cords, all of 20 tex cotton singles, each twisted so that every level's surface sits at one angle in the finished thread, at twist factors of 3000, 3800, 4500. At 3,800 they weigh fold −1.35%, cable +0.32%, cord +2.02%, cord of cords +3.75% against the sum of their singles: a fold light, a cable on its notation, and every level after it one helix heavier than the last. Dashed, the same four twisted to the rule as quoted on the frames, +0.46%, +3.54%, +4.54%, +6.98%. What the chart cannot show is the folds' and cables' real shape, which is taken round.

    The singles pay once and every level adds a helix

    A cable twisted so that every level's surface sits at one angle weighs its notation, and it is tempting to read that as a law: equal angles, honest count. It is not one. With every surface at one angle the singles keep the same twist however many levels sit above them, so their saving is paid once, while every level adds a helix of the same length. A two-fold comes out light, a cable on its notation, and a cord of two such cables two per cent heavy — the cable's agreement is the walk passing through zero. For a cord to weigh its notation, everything above its singles has to sit at about half their angle.

    part 5 · setting

All series