Generator

The two calculations a yarn's stiffness admits

The two calculations a yarn's stiffness admits
The two calculations a yarn's stiffness admits. A bundle of 9 fibres bent with the fibres free to slide and with them locked together. Free, the rigidity is the sum of the fibres': 0.00141 N·mm² for a 30 tex cotton yarn. Locked, it is the fourth power of the yarn's own diameter: 0.689. The ratio is the fibre count over the square of the packing factor, 490, and nine fibres are drawn where the yarn has 176. What the drawing cannot show is where a real yarn sits between them, which is a question about friction rather than about fibre.

A bundle of 9 fibres bent with the fibres free to slide and with them locked together. Free, the rigidity is the sum of the fibres': 0.00141 N·mm² for a 30 tex cotton yarn. Locked, it is the fourth power of the yarn's own diameter: 0.689. The ratio is the fibre count over the square of the packing factor, 490, and nine fibres are drawn where the yarn has 176. What the drawing cannot show is where a real yarn sits between them, which is a question about friction rather than about fibre.

9 essays call force-section. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the weave its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

The force at a crossing. One warp end of a sheeting riding over three picks, with the weave angle Peirce's geometry solves for at that construction: 36.8°. An end held at 0.50 N presses each pick it crosses with 0.599 N, which is twice the tension times the sine of the angle and has no material constant in it. What the drawing cannot show is the relaxed case: a cloth with no tension in it still holds its threads together, and what does the holding then is the yarn's own resistance to being bent, which needs an elastica this site does not have. What cloth is

Every crossing is a force

A thread arrives at a crossing at an angle and leaves at its negative, so the two pulls have transverse parts that add. The force pressing one thread onto another is twice the tension times the sine of the weave angle — and for an ordinary sheeting that is more than the tension in the thread itself.

Where a thread stops sliding and starts breaking. A pick of sheeting gripped over a length of cloth, drawn one crossing at a time. The resistance is 0.30 times the 0.599 N each crossing presses with, so it rises with the length held; the breaking load of 3.74 N does not. The two are equal at 7.4 mm. What the drawing cannot show is that μ is a range rather than a constant, so the mark is a band and its position is exactly inversely proportional to the friction. What cloth is

A thread is held one crossing at a time

Grip a thread over a length of cloth and its resistance to being pulled out rises with that length, because it is held at every crossing it makes. Its own breaking load does not rise at all. The two curves cross, and the length at which they cross turns out to be a seam allowance, a frayed edge and a tuft's anchorage — three rules of thumb with one number under them.

The loop that costs nothing to extend. A plain knitted loop at rest and extended by 35 per cent, with the arcs marked. The arcs' radius is the diameter of the yarn the loop wraps, 0.167 mm, and it is set by contact rather than by the fabric's dimensions — so extending the fabric lengthens the legs and bends nothing further. The bending energy is 0.0176 N·mm at both, and the model therefore asks no force at all for an extension a woven cloth would refuse. What the drawing cannot show is what a real knit's first few per cent do cost, which is friction and yarn flattening and is not a bending property. Knits and other structures

A knit is soft because it bends

Ask the same energy question of a woven cloth and a knitted one and the answers are not different by a factor — they are different in kind. A woven cloth's bending energy changes the moment it is extended. A knitted loop's does not change at all, exactly, over the whole of its extension, because its arcs are held to a radius by contact rather than by the fabric's dimensions.

The two calculations a yarn's stiffness admits. A bundle of 9 fibres bent with the fibres free to slide and with them locked together. Free, the rigidity is the sum of the fibres': 0.00141 N·mm² for a 30 tex cotton yarn. Locked, it is the fourth power of the yarn's own diameter: 0.689. The ratio is the fibre count over the square of the packing factor, 490, and nine fibres are drawn where the yarn has 176. What the drawing cannot show is where a real yarn sits between them, which is a question about friction rather than about fibre. Mechanics and drape

A yarn's stiffness is a bracket, not a number

Two calculations are available for how stiff a thread is in bending, and both are exact. One treats the fibres as free to slide and gives the sum of their stiffnesses; the other treats them as locked and gives a solid rod. They differ by the fibre count, which for an ordinary cotton yarn is a factor of five hundred — and no measurement of the fibre narrows it by anything at all.

The energy well, and where the cloth sits in it. The bending energy of a sheeting at every state on its own constant-thread-length locus, plotted against how the crimp divides between the two systems. The minimum is at 1.22 and the value every Peirce solution here is drawn at is 1.00, marked. The well's depth decides how firmly the ratio is settled, which is why an open scrim's measured crimp scatters and a close sheeting's does not. What the plot cannot show is the friction that stops a cloth reaching the bottom, which turns the minimum into a band. Setting and geometry

The crimp ratio is not a measurement

Peirce's geometry is two thread systems, four unknowns and three equations. It cannot say how the crimp divides between warp and weft, so every cloth solved so far has been drawn at a ratio somebody chose. Give the threads a stiffness and the missing equation arrives — and for six of the eight cloths in the table it arrives with no material constant in it at all.

A loop's cell, dry and wetted. One stitch of a 20 tex cotton jersey at a 3.50 mm loop, drawn inside the rectangle of one wale by one course that its own dimensions give. The thread is drawn at its own width, and it already fills 1.129 of the cell dry — more than the whole of it, which is what an opaque jersey looks like from above. Wetting takes it to 1.355. So the reason a knit does not build a swelling pressure is not that it has room; it is that its dimensions are a loop length times a constant with no yarn diameter in them, so there is no closure condition to fail. What the drawing cannot show is the third dimension: the legs lie over one another rather than overlapping in the plane, which is exactly why an occupancy above one is possible. Knits and other structures

A loop has no closure condition

A woven cloth can run out of room: its two systems must supply its whole thickness between them, and past a certain swelling they cannot. A knit has no such equation, so no critical swelling and no pressure. The obvious explanation — that a knit is open and has somewhere to put the swelling — is false, and the arithmetic refuses it.

The beat-up, at the fell. The last picks of a sheeting at 26 picks per centimetre, with the beat-up zone shaded. Driving the fell forward makes the warp take more crimp and more crimp takes more thread, which the warp can only supply by stretching — so the force is the warp tension times the crimp's elasticity with respect to the pick spacing, 0.182 here. That is 0.205 N per end and 573 N per metre of reed. What the drawing cannot show is that the shaded band's width cancels out of the derivation exactly; it is drawn because a reader needs to see what is being compressed, not because the answer depends on it. Setting and geometry

The blow that sets the pick

The take-up gear decides how far the cloth moves between picks and says nothing about the blow that puts each pick where it goes. That blow is a force, and a virtual-work argument gives it in one line — with the length of the beat-up zone cancelling out of the answer exactly, which is the part worth having.

The resting band, not the resting point. The bending energy of a sheeting along its own constant-thread-length locus, with the band in which friction can hold it shaded. The minimum is a single state; the band is 10.9 per cent of length wide, because the cloth stops sliding as soon as the energy it can release falls below the 0.0756 N friction takes to move a crossing. What the drawing cannot show is which end of the band a given piece of cloth stops at, which depends on the direction it arrived from and is what makes relaxation hysteretic. After the loom

A cloth relaxes until its threads stop pushing

The finishing field treats the relaxed state as a place a cloth arrives at. With an energy along its own locus and a friction at its crossings it is not a place but a band — and which point of the band a piece of cloth stops at depends on which side it came from, which is why washing it twice gives two answers.

Selectable against reachable. How far up the take-up gear's catalogue a beat-up force reaches, on a sheeting. The catalogue holds 4,825 distinct pick densities between 8 and 40 per centimetre, which is the previous rung's count of what the machine can select. At 200 N per metre only 548 of them can be woven; at 2,000 it is 4,256. The fineness of the choice is untouched by the ceiling and the top of the range is cut off entirely, so the weft direction's advantage is resolution rather than reach. What the chart cannot show is the loom's own force, which depends on the beat-up mechanism and is not a property of the cloth. Setting and geometry

A pick density is a force budget

The take-up ladder counted what a change-wheel take-up can select: 4,825 distinct pick densities between eight and forty threads per centimetre, against forty-nine warp setts a reed catalogue offers over the same range. That count assumed every setting is available. A beat-up force says otherwise, and cuts the top off the range without touching the fineness of the choice.

The whole library · All essays