Textile Structure
how cloth is put together
Generator

Three different weaves, one cloth

Three different weaves, one cloth
Three different weaves, one cloth. Drafts drawn from one collision class, with the blind intersections marked, and the single surface all of them produce. Where the two crossing threads are the same colour the weave leaves no trace, so the cloth cannot report what it is.

Drafts drawn from one collision class, with the blind intersections marked, and the single surface all of them produce. Where the two crossing threads are the same colour the weave leaves no trace, so the cloth cannot report what it is.

5 essays call colour-collisions. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the weave its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Every figure listed here is drawn from this one rule.

Three different weaves, one cloth. Drafts drawn from one collision class, with the blind intersections marked, and the single surface all of them produce. Where the two crossing threads are the same colour the weave leaves no trace, so the cloth cannot report what it is. Pattern and colour

Colour and weave as a two-colour problem

Where the two threads crossing are the same colour, the intersection looks identical whichever is on top. Half of them are, so 22,874 drafts collapse onto 256 surfaces — eighty-nine weaves apiece, and no way to tell them apart.

 A tartan sett in 2/2 twill. A pivoted sett of 70 threads used in both systems, which is what makes a tartan a tartan rather than a check. On the left, the cloth at block scale: the squares on the diagonal have one colour in both systems and the rest are mixtures. On the right, one mixture rectangle at thread scale, where the weave decides. In 2/2 twill the reflection survives on 50.0 per cent of a mixture's intersections, against a ceiling of 75 per cent that no weave can reach. The three tints stand for the three colours of the sett and carry no other meaning here. Pattern and colour

A check is two stripes and a tartan is one

A tartan is quoted as one sett of thread counts because the warp and the weft carry the same order. That is said to make it symmetric about its diagonal, and the arithmetic says it cannot be — the ceiling is three quarters, and a 2/2 twill reaches one half.

 What a pair of colour orders does to the catalogue. Dark ends in the warp across against dark ends in the weft down, for the sixteen two-colour orders at four ends. Each cell gives the blind intersections of sixteen and the number of distinct surfaces the 22874 drafts collapse onto. Every cell stands for between one and thirty-six colour orders and they all behave identically, so the arrangement of the colours does not matter and only their counts do. The corner at four against nought is blind nowhere and separates every draft. Pattern and colour

The colour order that hides least

A caption on this account's top essay left a question: whether a warp of long runs against a weft of short ones hides less than either would against itself, and called it a lever nobody uses. Sweeping all sixteen orders against all sixteen says the lever is real and the caption named the wrong variable. Run length has nothing to do with it — the blind count, the separation and the largest confused class all depend on the two orders' colour counts and on nothing else, and what a mixed pair saves is exactly the square of the difference between them.

 Every way to make 4 intersections blind. The number of distinct surfaces the 22874 four-by-four drafts collapse onto, for every shape a set of 4 blind intersections can take, in however many colours it needs. 1×1 + 1×1 + 1×1 + 1×1: 3,632 surfaces, touching 8 threads, 4 colours needed; 1×1 + 1×1 + 1×2: 3,352 surfaces, touching 7 threads, 4 colours needed; 1×2 + 1×2: 3,102 surfaces, touching 6 threads, 3 colours needed; 1×2 + 2×1: 3,100 surfaces, touching 6 threads, 4 colours needed; 1×1 + 1×3: 3,038 surfaces, touching 6 threads, 3 colours needed; 1×4: 2,744 surfaces, touching 5 threads, 2 colours needed; 2×2: 2,402 surfaces, touching 4 threads, 3 colours needed. The same number of blind intersections keeps more of the catalogue apart the more threads it is spread over. What the chart cannot show is whether an eye can tell the surfaces apart. Pattern and colour

A blind set hides less the thinner it is spread

Two colours showed that where a cloth's threads match in colour the draft underneath is invisible, and that how many intersections match is not what decides how much is hidden. More colours say what does. A third colour lets the blind count take every value from nought to ten; a fourth lets the blind intersections sit one to a thread. At a fixed count, the catalogue keeps more of its cloths apart the more threads the blind set is spread across — 3,632 surfaces for four scattered blind cells, 2,402 for the same four in a square.

 The advantage of spreading a blind set, against the repeat. The number of distinct surfaces a blind set keeps when its cells are spread one to a thread, over the number it keeps when they are gathered into a block, against the size of the repeat: 4 blind, 1.512 at 4, 1.254 at 5, 1.129 at 6, 1.064 at 7, 1.032 at 8, 1.008 at 10, 1.002 at 12; 8 blind, 1.080 at 8, 1.020 at 10, 1.005 at 12. Sampled from forty thousand surfaces at each point. The dashed curves are the closed form — each thread the set misses must interlace on its own, which fails once in 2^(n−1) — and the sampled points sit on them from six threads up; at four and five the form overstates, because a thread the set does touch can still fail there. At four by four spreading keeps half as much again; at eight, a few per cent; at twelve, nothing to speak of. What the chart cannot show is whether an eye can tell the surfaces apart. Pattern and colour

A blind cell costs half the cloths at any real repeat

At four by four, spreading a blind set over more threads kept half as many cloths apart again as gathering it. At eight by eight the same rule holds, and it is almost nothing: three per cent for four blind cells, eight for eight. The reason is one factor. A blind set's surfaces are the count's bound, 2^(n² − b), times the chance that every thread it misses interlaces on its own, and at eight threads a thread lies all on one face once in 128 tries. So shapes that touch the same number of threads tie exactly, whatever their rectangles; every blind cell costs very nearly half the catalogue; and by twelve threads the arrangement is free.

The whole library · All essays