Concept

Spirality — where it appears

The lean a knitted fabric acquires when its wales run at an angle to its own edge, caused by residual torque in a yarn that was never allowed to untwist. It is a torsional problem rather than a geometric one, so it is worst in singles yarns that have been neither balanced by folding nor relieved by setting.

Named by 7 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Which knitted structures spiral, at a twist factor of 4.0. A yarn leaves the spinning frame with a torque it has not been allowed to release, and a loop knitted from it leans. The lean per unit of twist factor above balance is measured; what is counted here is the structure. A loop on the front bed and one on the back are mirror images, so their torques have opposite signs, and a fabric that knits equally on both beds nets to zero whatever the yarn is doing — which is why 1x1-rib, 2x2-rib, interlock do not spiral and plain, half-cardigan, tubular do. The count has to be made per fabric and not per structure: an interlock and a tube both knit equally on the two beds, and they are opposite cases, because an interlock's two components each straddle the beds while a tube's are each wholly on one. The integrity criterion, which asks what nothing holds together, is what tells them apart. What the bars cannot show is the tube's second face, which leans the other way.

A jersey leans because its yarn still turns

A single-jersey T-shirt comes back from the wash with its side seam spiralling round the body, and a rib does not. The difference is not the yarn: it is a count. Loops on opposite beds are mirror images, so their torques oppose, and a fabric that knits equally on both nets to zero whatever the yarn is doing.

knits · Spirality
Two courses of a knitted tube, and the number between them. The solved course of a 20 tex cotton jersey at a 3.5 mm loop, wrapped onto a tube 12 wales round, drawn with the course below it. Each is a closed curve, which is what a linking number needs. The Gauss integral over the pair returns 0.0000 — zero, to four places. In a knitted fabric the answer is 12: every needle loop of one course is drawn through the loop below it. The model puts the interlacing at a point where two centre lines pass one yarn diameter apart, and two curves that pass beside one another are not linked however close they come.

A jersey's course has no writhe

The mechanism everybody quotes for why a hard-twisted jersey leans is that the fabric relieves the yarn's twist by writhing. This collection's own solved course has a writhe of minus six parts in a million, and it is not small — it is exactly zero, by a symmetry, and the symmetry is a statement about what the model left out.

knits · Topology
Where a loop's bending actually is. Half a stitch — from the crown of a needle loop's head to the bottom of the next sinker loop — with the curvature at every station drawn as a spine standing off the curve, in units of one over the yarn diameter. The centre line is drawn as a line rather than at the yarn's own width here, because the subject of this figure is the curvature and a yarn drawn at true width covers its own spines. The peak is 1.14, at 28% of the way along, and the curvature varies smoothly from one end to the other with no jump anywhere. That smoothness is the whole point: Peirce's construction joins an arc of constant curvature to a straight line of none, so its bending moment steps at the join, and a step in moment is a point force no thread can carry. An elastica has no steps in it, which is why its forces exist at all and his do not.

What a loop model still cannot say

A planar rod with a natural curvature and point contacts gets a knit's forces, its modulus and its extension. It does not get torsion, it does not get the third dimension the interlacing actually needs, and it does not stop adjacent courses passing through one another — which is why its extension ceiling sits three times beyond any jersey.

mechanics · Elastica
A slack twisted yarn takes a coil of one size. A 20 tex cotton at 800 turns a metre. Its own torque is 1.177 µN·mm at the free bound, and a rod under tension T is stable while its torque stays under 2·√(B·T). Below that tension the straight state stops being a minimum and the thread wraps on itself at a radius of 1.59 mm. That radius is 2B/M, which is 2/(r·ω) once the torque is written out: it depends on the twist and on the ratio of the two stiffnesses, and on neither stiffness itself.

The twist a fabric gives back

A T-shirt that hung straight in the shop has its side seam round the front after three washes. The torque was there all along, the setting had hidden it, and the water gave it back — which makes spirality a finishing failure rather than a knitting one.

finishing · Memory
The course helix of a 30-inch machine with 96 feeders, unrolled. A knitted tube from a 30-inch machine with 96 feeders unrolled flat, one round wide, with its wales drawn straight along it and its courses climbing across it. The machine lays 96 courses in each turn, so each course climbs 96 course spacings — 48 mm of fabric — in one round of 2,262 wales, 162 cm: an angle of 1.70° from the tube's cross-direction. The course drawn heavy is followed round one turn. The vertical scale is exaggerated 6 times. What the drawing cannot show is the hand of the helix, which is set by the direction the cylinder turns.

A circular machine leans its courses whatever the yarn

Spirality is blamed on the yarn, and the yarn is most of it. The rest is the machine's. A circular knitting machine's needles make wales that run straight along the tube, and its feeders lay one course each per turn, so every course climbs its feeder count in every round: on a 96-feeder machine, 48 millimetres round 162 centimetres of tube, an angle of 1.7 degrees. The helix has no machine size in it, its hand is set by the way the cylinder turns, and it survives every remedy aimed at the yarn — a steamed yarn, a plied one, S and Z on alternate feeders, and a rib.

knits · Spirality
Imbalance against the torque a tuck carries, for six named structures. For six named two-bed structures, the imbalance of front-bed loops against back-bed loops in the worst fabric, as the share of a knit loop's torque a tuck carries runs from nought to one: single jersey from 1.000 to 1.000; a one-by-one rib from 0.000 to 0.000; a half-cardigan from 0.333 to 0.000; a full cardigan from 0.000 to 0.000; a rib that both tucks and floats from 0.333 to 0.143; a half-milano from 0.333 to 0.333. Structures without tucks are flat lines; a half-cardigan falls from a third to nought and a rib that tucks and floats from a third to a seventh. What the lines cannot show is where along them a real tuck sits, which is not measured.

A tuck decides whether a third of two-bed fabrics lean

A jersey leans because every loop is on one bed and a rib does not because its loops are mirrored across two, and the count that says so treated a tuck as nothing. A tuck is a loop of the same lively yarn wrapped round a needle of one bed, and nobody here has measured how much of a knit loop's lean it carries. It matters. Of the 1,135 two-bed fabrics a two-needle, two-course frame can make, 135 are balanced whatever a tuck carries and 612 lean whatever it carries — and 388, a third, are balanced under one answer and lean under the other. A half-cardigan leans a third of a jersey if a tuck carries nothing and not at all if it carries a full loop's torque, which makes it the instrument that would settle the question.

knits · Spirality
Two stiffnesses, one bracket, and a ratio that does not move. The bending and torsional rigidities of a cotton yarn against its count, each drawn at both ends of its own bracket, on a logarithmic scale. The four curves are two parallel pairs: the torsional bracket is the bending bracket exactly — the fibre count over the square of the packing factor, 327 at 20 tex — so the vertical gap between the two bounds is the same for both deformations. The consequence is the useful part: the ratio C/B is 0.250 at the top of the bracket and at the bottom and everywhere between, because the polar second moment of a circle is exactly twice its flexural one.

Where a torsion model stops

A second stiffness was added because an earlier ladder named its absence as the first thing to disbelieve. It settled four things, refuted one trade explanation, and left the question it was built for exactly where it found it.

mechanics · Torsion

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

CourseElasticaLoopResidual torqueTwistLinking numberSpecificationTorsional rigidityTwist factorWaleWritheBending energy

All concepts